TUNABLE TRANSCONDUCTANCE-CAPACITANCE FILTER WITH COEFFICIENTS INDEPENDENT OF VARIATIONS IN PROCESS CORNER, TEMPERATURE, AND INPUT SUPPLY VOLTAGE

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20130162338
  • Publication Number
    20130162338
  • Date Filed
    February 20, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 27, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
A transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filter of arbitrary order is provided that is biased by a bias circuit such that the Gm-C filter is robust to variations in process corner and temperature as well as input supply noise. The bias circuit includes a biased transistor that has a width-to-length ratio that is a factor X times larger than a corresponding transistor in the Gm-C filter. The biased transistor couples to ground through a switched capacitor circuit.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to filters, and more particularly to tunable transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filters.


BACKGROUND

Transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filters offer attractive performance characteristics. Thus, the use of Gm-C filters is widespread and pervasive in radio communications and signal processing. Analog Gm-C filters are constructed using operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs). OTAs operate to translate a voltage input signal into a current output signal. An example balanced (differential output) OTA is shown in FIG. 1a. The transconductance Gm for the OTA determines the I+ and Icurrents based upon the input voltages V+ and Vaccording to the following equations:






I
+
=G
m(V+−V)






I−G
m(V−V+)


Various approaches are known to construct OTAs such as using cascodes or differential architectures. A simple analog transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filter may be constructed using a single-ended OTA as shown in FIG. 1b. If a time constant τ is defined as C1/Gm, then it can be shown that Vin for this filter equals Vout+τ d(Vout(t)/dt. The cutoff frequency for the resulting Gm-C filter will thus rely on both Gm and C1. But process corner variations will typically be in the range of 20% for a desired capacitance whereas a desired transconductance will have process corner variations in the range of 10%. It follows that the resulting time constant τ for such a filter will be accurate to just 30% across all the process corner variations. Moreover, transconductance values will vary significantly with temperature and the supply voltage level. In addition, input noise will introduce variations in the filter coefficients. Accordingly, it is conventional to provide some sort of tuning circuitry on Gm-C filters. In this fashion, a tunable Gm-C filter has its time constant set to some desired value with some isolation from variations in the power supply voltage, process corner, and temperature.


Although such independence is desirable, conventional tunable Gm-C filters are still sensitive to power supply variations and suffer from non-idealities. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for improved tunable Gm-C filters that are more robust to variations in process corner, power supply, and temperature.


SUMMARY

In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filter is provided that includes: a plurality of operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs), wherein a first one of the OTAs has a first transconductance and the remaining ones of the OTAs have transconductances that are proportional to the first transconductance, and a bias circuit for biasing the first transconductance to a desired value responsive to a clock frequency, the bias circuit including a switched capacitor circuit generating a resistance inversely proportional to the clock frequency, wherein the desired transconductance value is proportional to the clock frequency.


In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filter is provided that includes: a plurality of operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs), wherein each OTA includes a differential pair of transistors providing a tail current to a third transistor having a transconductance gm, and a bias circuit for biasing a gate of a given one of the third transistors with a control voltage, the bias circuit including a switched capacitor circuit such that a transfer function for the Gm-C filter is proportional to a ratio of capacitances and is independent of process corner variations.


In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a bias circuit to bias the transconductance gm of a first transistor within a Gm-C filter is provided that includes: a second transistor having a width-to-length ratio that is a factor X larger than a width-to-length ratio of the first transistor, the second transistor coupling to ground through a switched capacitor circuit such that gm is proportional to (1−1/X1/2).


The scope of the invention is defined by the claims, which are incorporated into this section by reference. A more complete understanding of embodiments of the present invention will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages thereof, by a consideration of the following detailed description of one or more embodiments. Reference will be made to the appended sheets of drawings that will first be described briefly.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1
a is a schematic diagram of an operational transconductance amplifier (OTA).



FIG. 1
b is a schematic diagram of a conventional transconductance-capacitance (Gm-C) filter.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a biquad Gm-C filter tuned using a switched-capacitor bias circuit.



FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a differential amplifier within an OTA in the filter of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4
a is a circuit diagram illustrating the equivalence of a switched capacitor circuit to a resistor.



FIG. 4
b is a circuit diagram of a switched capacitor circuit adapted for greater robustness to parasitic effects.



FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram for a bias circuit to provide the control voltage applied in the circuit of FIG. 3.





Embodiments of the present invention and their advantages are best understood by referring to the detailed description that follows. It should be appreciated that like reference numerals are used to identify like elements illustrated in one or more of the figures.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to one or more embodiments of the invention. While the invention will be described with respect to these embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular embodiment. On the contrary, the invention includes alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may come within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. The invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and principles of operation have not been described in detail to avoid obscuring the invention.


To provide a tunable Gm-C filter that self-compensates with regard to process corner variations, power supply variations, and temperature variations, a switched capacitor circuit is used to tune the transconductance Gm of one of more of the OTAs included within the Gm-C filter. In that regard, a biquad second order Gm-C filter such as filter 100 shown in FIG. 2 includes five different OTAs, each having their own independent transconductance (denoted as gm1 through gm5). In addition, filter 100 includes 3 classes of capacitors (having corresponding capacitances C1 through C3). The transfer function H(s) for filter 100 thus depends on the various transconductances and capacitances as given by the following equation:















H


(
s
)


=






s
2



[


?



?

+

C
2



]


+


?



[


?



C
2

+

C
2



]


+

[



G

m





2




G

m





4





C
1



(


?

+

C
2


)



]




s
2

+

s


[


?



C
2

+

C
2



]


+

[



G

m





1




G

m





2





C
1

+

(


C
2

+

C
2


)



]



.





?




indicates text missing or illegible when filed







(
1
)







This relatively complex behavior can be simplified as follows. Although transconductances have large variations in their absolute values, relative transconductance values can be set quite accurately by the ratio of the OTA transistor widths (provided the same channel lengths are used for all devices). Thus, an arbitrary OTA such as OTA 105 having a transconductance gm1 may be used to define the transconductance of the remaining OTAs. For example, the transconductance gm2 for OTA 110 may be defined as Km2gm1, the transconductance gm3 for OTA 115 may be defined as Km3gm1, and so on. In general, the ith transconductance can be expressed in terms of the first OTA as






G
mi
=K
mi
G
mi  (2)


Similarly, the sum of the capacitances C3 and C2 can be defined in terms of C1 using a constant K as






C
3
+C
2
=KC
1  (3)


Using equations (2) and (3), equation (1) can be simplified as follows















H


(
s
)


=






s
2



[


?



?

+

C
2



]


+


s


(


?

K

)




(


G

m





1



C
1


)


+


(



K

m





2




K

m





4



K

)




(


G

m





1



C
1


)

2





s
2

+


s


(


?

K

)




(


G

m





1



C
1


)


+


(



K

m





1




K

m





2



K

)




(


G

m





1



C
1


)

2




.





?




indicates text missing or illegible when filed







(
4
)







From equation (4), it can be seen that if just the ratio of Gm1/C1 is tuned to be self-compensating with regard to variations in power supply, process corner, and temperature, then the remaining transconductance/capacitance ratios need no tuning since these ratios can be conventionally manufactured to an accuracy of approximately one percent.


Although the above simplification was described with regard to the biquad filter 100 of FIG. 1, it can be shown that any order (nth order) of Gm-C filters can be tuned in this fashion. In other words, a single one of the OTAs may be self-compensated as discussed further herein yet the entire Gm-C filter will be self-compensated. This self-compensation may be better understood with reference to the transistor differential pair within each OTA. An example differential pair of matched transistors M1 and M2 is shown in FIG. 3. The tail current from transistor M1 and M3 is biased by a control voltage Vcntl driving the gate of a transistor M3. Matched transistors M1 and M2 each have a transconductance of Gn, whereas M3 is sized to have a transconductance of AGm.


The following discussion will show how to generate the bias voltage Vcnt1 such that the ratio of Gm/CL for the OTA is self-compensating. This self compensation will rely on the use of a switched capacitor circuit to produce a desired resistance. As known from Ohm's law, a voltage potential VA−VB applied across a resistor of resistance R will produce a current I equaling (VA−VB)/R. However, as seen in FIG. 4a, the same amount of charge can be moved between these voltage potentials using a switched capacitor circuit 400 that couples voltage VA to a capacitor having a capacitance Cck through a switch S1. Similarly, the capacitor couples to voltage VB through a switch S2. If switched S1 is driven on and off by a clock of frequency fck while switch S2 is driven by the complement of this clock, it can be shown that a current I flowing through the capacitor will equal fckCck(VA−VB). Thus, the switched capacitor circuit functions as a resistor having a resistance Rm of






R
m=1/fckCck.  (5)


The equivalence of a switched capacitor circuit to provide a desired resistance is made more precise by using the additional switches S3 and S4 as shown in FIG. 4b for a switched capacitor circuit 405 in that the additional switches make the circuit parasitic insensitive. S1 and S4 are driven by the clock whereas S2 and S3 are driven by the complement of the clock.


The incorporation of a switched capacitor circuit into a bias circuit 500 as shown in FIG. 5 for the generation of the control voltage Vcnt1 will now be discussed. A pair of PMOS transistors P1 and P2 form a current mirror. Thus, if P1 and P2 are matched (same width W and length L and thus the same W/L ratio), they will each source the same current I. Thus, a current I flows through an NMOS transistor M4 and an NMOS transistor M5. M4 is diode connected between the drain of a PMOS transistor P1 and ground so as to be in saturation mode. Transistor M4 is matched to M3 of FIG. 3. The gate of M4 is tied to the gate of transistor M5, where M5 is larger than M4. If M5 has the same length L as does M4, then the width of M5 is a factor X times larger than a width W for M4. The sources of both P1 and P2 are driven by a power supply voltage node VCC. The source of M5 couples to ground through a switched capacitor circuit 505 that functions to provide a resistance of Rm. It can be shown that the transconductance gm4 for M4 can be expressed as






g
m=2/Rm(1−1/Sqrt(X))  (6)


Substitution of equation (5) into equation (6) allows the transconductance to be expressed as






g
m4=2(1−1/Sqrt(X))fckCck  (7)


It will be appreciated that the switched capacitor circuit 505 may be made more robust as discussed with regard to FIG. 4b. Examination of equation (7) shows that the transconductance dependence on the width X is such that by making X sufficiently large, the necessary clock frequency for driving the switched capacitor circuit is reduced. This is a substantial advantage over other techniques used to make Gm-C filters more robust to variations in power supply voltage (input noise), process corners, and temperature.


Referring back to FIG. 3, one can see that if the transconductance of M3 is controlled by the control voltage Vcnt1 generated as discussed with regard to FIG. 5, the ratio of Gm/CL for the OTA/capacitor combination including such a differential pair can be expressed as






G
m
/C
L=2A(1−1/Sqrt(X))fckCck/CL  (8)


Referring again to FIG. 2, suppose that the OTAs were all matched in the sense of having matched differential pairs of transistors as discussed with regard to FIG. 3. It has already been shown with regard to equation (4) that if just one of the transconductances is tuned, then the overall Gm-C for the filter is established. As seen by equation (8), the filter coefficients will depend only on the ratio of device parameters and capacitances. This is quite advantageous as the resulting filter coefficients will be independent of process and temperature variations as well as power supply noise. For example, a fast process corner will affect Cck equally as it does affect CL. Thus, the ratio of capacitances cancels out process corner variations. The same argument applies to temperature and power supply noise. Moreover, although this self compensation of a Gm-C filter has been discussed with regard to the biquad filter 100 of FIG. 2, the same self-compensation can be applied to any nth order Gm-C filter.


It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. The appended claims encompass all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. A bias circuit to bias the transconductance gm of a first transistor within a Gm-C filter, comprising: a second transistor having a width-to-length ratio that is a factor X larger than a width-to-length ratio for the first transistor, the second transistor coupling to ground through a switched capacitor circuit such that gm is proportional to (1−1/X1/2).
  • 2. The bias circuit of claim 1, wherein a gate of the first transistor is biased by a control voltage that equals a gate voltage for the second transistor.
  • 3. The bias circuit of claim 2, wherein the switched capacitor circuit is driven by a clock and a complement clock of frequency fck and has a capacitor of capacitance Cck, whereby the switched capacitor circuit provides a resistance of 1/fckCck.
  • 4. The bias circuit of claim 3, wherein the control voltage drives a gate of a third transistor that matches the first transistor.
  • 5. The bias circuit of claim 4, wherein the third transistor is diode connected.
  • 6. The bias circuit of claim 5, wherein a drain of the first transistor couples to a source of a diode-connected fourth transistor, a drain of the fourth transistor coupling to a power supply voltage node.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/848,006, filed on Jul. 30, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12848006 Jul 2010 US
Child 13771515 US