Patent Grant
11515776
This application derives priority from New Zealand patent application number 627633 incorporated herein by reference.
Described herein is a device comprising members in a kinematic relationship, the kinematic relationship at least partially governed by at least one magnetic flux interaction that, in effect, may provide a tunable resistance to movement, changing the rate of relative movement between the members.
Eddy current formation may be used in a variety of ways to adjust the rate of movement of a member. Various apparatus exist, for example in abseiling, to control the descent of a climber or for example, in personal protective equipment scenarios to prevent an injury causing fall. Other applications that use eddy current generation are in controlling pay-out of line in trains, cable cars, zip line devices and roller coasters.
One art device is published as US2012/0055740. This device utilizes a rotor assembly with arms that move relative to the rotor. The arms themselves may be conductive or magnetic or may have conductive or magnetic members attached thereto. When a rotational force is applied to the rotor, the arms move outwards from a central axis via centrifugal force and into a magnetic (or conductive) field. As the arms move through the field, eddy currents are generated, the strength of which is dependent on the speed of rotation. As the speed of rotation reduces, the arms are drawn back towards the axis of rotation via springs and/or a reduced centrifugal force acting on the arms. This device is widely used and provides an excellent means of changing the relative speed of parts.
One aspect of the above apparatus is that control on the speed of activation of the braking effect caused by movement of the arms into the magnetic field can only be tuned by adjusting a few variables including bias strength, arm weight (and hence inertia) and pivot axis placement—influenced by either the degree of offset from a center of mass of the arm and/or the degree of offset of the pivot axis from the rotor axis.
Tuning movement of the arms once movement commences via an additional input may also be useful depending on the end application of the device or at least it provides the public with a choice.
Further aspects and advantages of the device will become apparent from the ensuing description that is given by way of example only.
Described herein is a device comprising members in a kinematic relationship, the kinematic relationship at least partially governed by at least one magnetic flux interaction that, in effect, may provide a tunable resistance to movement, changing the rate of relative movement between the members.
In a first aspect, there is provided a device comprising:
at least one first member in a kinematic relationship with at least one further member to form a system, the system moving within a limited range of motion and wherein the system interacts when an external energizing force is imposed on the system causing the members to respond due to their kinematic and dynamic characteristics and thereby creating relative motion between the members;
at least one trigger member coupled to the at least the first member that moves in response to a pre-determined system movement and, when the at least one trigger member moves, the at least one trigger member or a part thereof imposes a braking action on the system or a member or members thereof; and,
wherein the speed and/or intensity of the braking action imposed by the at least one trigger member on the system or a member or members thereof is controlled by the at least one trigger member rate of movement and this rate of movement is in turn governed by a magnetic flux interaction between the at least one trigger member or a part thereof and the at least one first member or a part thereof causing formation of a magnetically induced eddy current force between the at least one trigger member or a part thereof and the at least one first member or a part thereof.
In a second aspect, there is provided a line dispensing device incorporating at least one device substantially as described above.
In a third aspect, there is provided a passenger seat restraint incorporating at least one device substantially as described above.
In a fourth aspect, there is provided a transmission drive incorporating at least one device to engage a rotational drive substantially as described above.
In a fifth aspect, there is provided a linear guided lifeline incorporating at least one device substantially as described above.
Numerous other applications of the device may also be possible as further outlined in the description below.
One advantage of the above device includes the ability to control the rate of movement prescribed by the kinematic relationship. In addition, a further advantage of the device is to also influence the kinematic relationship once movement commences. The magnitude of the resistance to movement may be varied in a consistent manner as the members move or in a stepped or otherwise varied manner. Tuning in this way may have the effect of avoiding unwanted activation or slowing the speed of activation of, for example, a brake engagement.
Further aspects of the device will become apparent from the following description that is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
As noted above, described herein is a device comprising members in a kinematic relationship, the kinematic relationship at least partially governed by at least one magnetic flux interaction that, in effect, may provide a tunable resistance to movement, changing the rate of relative movement between the members.
For the purposes of this specification, the term ‘about’ or ‘approximately’ and grammatical variations thereof mean a quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length that varies by as much as 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1% to a reference quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length.
The term ‘substantially’ or grammatical variations thereof refers to at least about 50%, for example 75%, 85%, 95% or 98%.
The term ‘comprise’ and grammatical variations thereof shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e., that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements.
The term ‘energizing force’ and grammatical variations thereof refers to a force that acts to impose a rate of movement on an object.
The term ‘dynamic’ and grammatical variations thereof in the context of device or device part movement refers to forces induced by mechanical means.
In a first aspect, there is provided a device comprising:
at least one first member in a kinematic relationship with at least one further member to form a system, the system moving within a limited range of motion and wherein the system interacts when an external energizing force is imposed on the system causing the members to respond due to their kinematic and dynamic characteristics and thereby creating relative motion between the members;
at least one trigger member coupled to the at least the first member that moves in response to a pre-determined system movement and, when the at least one trigger member moves, the at least one trigger member or a part thereof imposes a braking action on the system or a member or members thereof; and,
wherein the speed and/or intensity of the braking action imposed by the at least one trigger member on the system or a member or members thereof is controlled by the at least one trigger member rate of movement and this rate of movement is in turn governed by a magnetic flux interaction between the at least one trigger member or a part thereof and the at least one first member or a part thereof causing formation of a magnetically induced eddy current force between the at least one trigger member or a part thereof and the at least one first member or a part thereof.
In one embodiment, the at least one trigger member may comprise a magnetic part or parts that interact with a conductor part or parts on the at least one first member. Alternatively, the at least one trigger member may comprise a conductor part or parts that interact with a magnetic part or parts on the at least one first member.
The kinematic relationship between the system movement and the at least one trigger movement may be a non-linear response. The rate of movement of the at least one trigger member relative to the first member may slow as relative motion occurs. Alternatively, the rate of movement of the at least one trigger member relative to the first member may speed up as relative motion occurs. Further, the rate of movement of the at least one trigger member relative to the first member may cycle at least once between slower and faster relative motion. In one embodiment, a comparatively rapid change in rate of movement of the members may occur when the at least one trigger member and at least one first member move sufficiently far apart to cause a reduction in magnetic flux interaction between the members. For example, when the magnetic flux terminates the trigger and first members are able to move freely with no eddy current induced resistance. The transition from resistance to no resistance may be abrupt leading to a rapid change in rate of movement as noted above.
The device action may be further characterized by a variable and pre-determined rate of motion of the trigger member relative to the first member, the rate being determined by tuning the magnetic flux between the members. By way of example, the comparative rate of movement between the members may vary from fast, to slow, to moderately fast, before the members move apart and the eddy current induced force dissipates altogether.
Relative movement between the system and the at least one trigger member may be delayed until the pre-determined system movement occurs.
The system braking action imposed by the at least one trigger member or a part thereof may be caused by: latching, friction force, magnetic force interactions, and combinations thereof.
The rate at which the at least one trigger member moves relative to the at least one first member may be tuned by varying the resulting eddy current force between the at least one trigger member and the at least one first member.
The magnetically induced eddy current force may be tuned by varying at least one of:
(a) the magnetic element surface area on or within the at least one trigger member or at least one first member;
(b) the conductive region on or within the at least one trigger member or at least one first member;
(c) the proximity of at least one magnetic element and at least one conductive region on the at least one trigger member and at least one first member;
(d) the geometry and/or magnetic properties of the at least one magnetic element on or within the at least one trigger member or at least one first member;
(e) the geometry and/or electrical properties of the at least one conductive element on or within the at least one trigger member or at least one first member;
(f) and combinations thereof.
For example, the trigger member may include a magnetic element, the magnetic strength varying along the direction of travel. As the trigger member moves relative to the first member, the magnetic flux varies and therefore the eddy current induced force varies along the prescribed path of movement of the members.
As should be appreciated from the above, the members may take various shapes or weights, factors that influence the activation and/or rate of motion of the member or members during movement. The interaction may for example be continuous across a trigger and/or first member length or spaced apart or of varying dimensions to thereby adjust the flux occurring. The interacting portion of the trigger or other members may be the whole member or only a portion thereof. Where only a portion of the member interacts, the location of the interacting portion either on the exterior, interior or part of the member, can be altered.
The at least one trigger member and at least one first member may be positioned so that an immediate magnetically induced eddy current force induction occurs as soon as relative movement occurs between the members. In effect this means that when in an at rest position, the at least one trigger member and at least one first member are at least in part in a magnetic relationship together. As noted above however, the eddy current induced force may be tuned and, for example, the magnetic flux interaction may only commence after a degree of movement of the members and the above example should not be seen as limiting.
Movement of the trigger member described above may be direct—that is the trigger member moves directly due to the energizing force. The trigger member may instead move indirectly or by proxy at least in part due to the energizing force causing at least one additional mechanical part or force dynamic to move or interact with the trigger member and thereby subsequently causing motion of the trigger member. Indirect means may be a dynamic force transfer via another part such as a coupling or gear or a centrifugal force being imposed on the trigger member by direct force on another part. Indirect or proxy force transfer may have the advantage of being able to amplify the energizing force.
Static or dynamic positional and/or strength adjustment of the point of action of the eddy current induced force may also be completed by:
(a) adjusting the position of the magnetic element or conductive region on the trigger member as the trigger member or first member moves; and/or,
(b) adjusting the position of the magnetic element or conductive region on the first member as the trigger member or first member moves.
By way of example, the trigger member may comprise a slot and a portion of the trigger member comprising the magnetic element or conductive region moves within the slot as the trigger member as a whole moves on application of the energizing force. This additional means of adjusting movement may be useful to further alter the force dynamics and hence the way the parts interact. For example, in a rotary movement embodiment where the trigger member induces an eddy current drag force on overall system movement, positional adjustment may affect both the eddy current drag force and position which in turn may alter the resisting torque on the trigger member. In a linear movement embodiment, positional adjustment might affect the eddy current force generated.
Relative movement between the trigger member and additional member or members may be frictionless. Magnetic forces such as the induced force noted above and any subsequent forces acting on the trigger member may avoid friction contact. This may be useful to minimize mechanical wearing on the parts.
In one embodiment, movement between the parts may be predominantly governed by dynamic forces. The device may be free of liquid fluid with all movement between the parts due to dynamic forces. Alternatively, the device may have some liquid fluid present but the predominant energizing force on the device members may be dynamic force. Liquid based systems utilizing magnetics to alter kinematic relationships exist but these devices differ to that described herein in that that are often bi-stable—that is, the parts are only stable in two positions. In addition, movement predominantly or wholly relies on a force or pressure build up from the liquid fluid as opposed to dynamic forces. Liquid based devices also have inherent difficulties associated with sealing the liquid and more regular maintenance being required to ensure reliable running.
As may be appreciated from the above, the at least one trigger member and at least one first member have a magnetic flux interaction leading to magnetically induced eddy current forces. The magnetic flux interaction may be provided by use of at least one magnetic element located on or within the at least one trigger member interacting with an electrically conductive region either on or within the at least one first member. Alternatively, the at least one magnetic flux interaction may be provided by use of at least one magnetic element located on or within the at least one first member interacting with a conductive region either on or within the trigger member. As should be appreciated, a wide variety of configurations may be undertaken to achieve the above relationships which assists with making the device very flexible as to exact design. In one embodiment, the whole trigger member may be magnetic or conductive and similarly, the whole first member may be magnetic or conductive. Alternatively, parts or regions of either member may be magnetic or conductive. Designs of member may also integrate the ability to remove and replace magnetic elements and/or conductive elements. Additionally, it should be appreciated that the term ‘conductive’ in the context of the above described magnet relationships refers to a material that a magnet interacts with that is electrically conductive. Further, the material may be ferromagnetic, or the material may be paramagnetic. The term ‘conductive’ should not be seen as limiting in terms of magnetic characteristics.
In one alternative embodiment, the device may include at least one second member independent to the at least one first member, the second member magnetically interacting with the at least one trigger member about at least a part of the at least one trigger member outside an area overlapping the at least one first member. This second member may be a series of magnets or conductive members and, when the trigger member moves into a region complementary to the second member, an eddy current induced force occurs between the trigger and second members. In one example, the second member may be stationary. Alternatively, the second member may move at a different relative speed to the at least one trigger member either in the same direction as the trigger member (but different speed) or, in an opposing direction.
In one variation on the above embodiment, the at least one first member may be fixed and the at least one trigger member moves on application of the energizing force, the movement of the at least one trigger member being urged by at least partial magnetic interaction with the at least one second member and, wherein movement of the at least one trigger member then induces a magnetic flux interaction between the at least one trigger member and at least one first member. The kinematic relationship in this variation may be prescribed by the at least one trigger member moving pivotally relative to the at least one first member. Alternatively, the kinematic relationship in this variation may be prescribed by the at least one trigger member moving via an independent translational path relative to the at least one first member.
In a further alternative, the at least one trigger member may engage with a further latching member or members upon relative movement of the at least one trigger member and at least one first member. Engagement of the trigger member and latching member may result in no further relative motion between the first member and the latching member. This latching member may be useful to constrain movement of the kinematic relationship. The engagement may be releasable so as to re-set the device for further movement.
The at least one trigger member and the at least one first member or parts thereof may be approximately adjacent to each other.
The magnetic flux interaction may be at least partially orthogonal to the direction of relative motion between the at least one trigger member and at least one first member. In one embodiment, the members lie in the same plane adjacent each other and, when an energizing force is applied, the members move past each other but remain in the same plane relative to each other. A magnetic field or fields may extend at right angles to the member movement. As may be appreciated, whilst fully orthogonal placement may be optimal, other planar angles may also achieve the same or similar outcomes.
The trigger member may be an arm shaped member that rotates about an axis when the pre-determined system movement occurs. The kinematic relationship may be at least in part prescribed by the at least one trigger member being pivotally attached to the at least one first member about an axis of rotation. The axis of rotation may be positioned so that movement of the first member causes rotational movement of the at least one trigger member about the axis of rotation. Movement of the at least one trigger member about the axis of rotation may rotate at least part of the at least one trigger member outside the area bound by the at least one first member. This kinematic relationship minimizes the number of parts needed yet confers a useful movement path. The pivot attachment may be by use of a mechanical fastener or fasteners, bearings or other known components. Movement of the member or members may be constrained within a predetermined range by use of a stop or other means to limit movement.
In one specific embodiment, movement of the at least one first member on application of the energizing force may be rotational movement. In this embodiment:
The above embodiment may be useful to minimize the overall size of a device particularly where space does not allow for a linear track. The above device and mechanism may be integrated into a device similar to that described in US2012/0055740.
The at least one trigger member may alternatively be a rod shaped member that moves in a linear direction when the pre-determined system movement occurs. As noted, the kinematic relationship may be at least in part prescribed by the at least one trigger member moving via an independent translational path relative to the at least one first member. Movement of the at least one first member in this embodiment may be rotational about an axis of rotation such as where a rotor is used. Alternatively, movement of the at least one first member on application of an energizing force may be linear movement as in the example of using a carriage as the second member(s).
In a further alternative embodiment, movement of the at least one first member on application of the energizing force may be linear movement. In this embodiment:
Linear embodiments of this nature may be useful where the first member or members move along a track such as in applications using long guidelines, e.g., a train carriage or a gondola and the above described device acts to help brake the rate of movement of the carriage or gondola.
In a second aspect, there is provided a line dispensing device incorporating at least one device substantially as described above. Line dispensing devices such as auto belay devices are widely used to prevent falls in both recreational and industrial applications. In some cases, magnetically attracted relationships may be useful to tune the auto belay device characteristics. The at least one further member in the case of a line dispensing device may be a spool of line coupled directly or indirectly to the at least one first member. The external energizing force imposed on the system in this embodiment may be caused by line being extended from or retracted onto the spool.
In a third aspect, there is provided a passenger seat restraint incorporating webbing for extending and retracting, the webbing operatively coupled to at least one device substantially as described above. One example of a passenger seat restraint may be a seat belt used in a vehicle such as a car. Seat belts are a critical safety feature and the above described device may provide a useful alternative to existing designs particularly given the ability to tune the response in the wide variety of ways noted.
In a fourth aspect, there is provided a transmission drive incorporating at least one device to engage a rotational drive substantially as described above.
In a fifth aspect, there is provided a linear guided lifeline incorporating at least one device substantially as described above.
The above examples should not be seen as limiting since the devices described may be used for a wide variety of other applications, non-limiting examples including control of:
As noted above, one advantage of the above device includes the ability to control the rate of movement prescribed by the kinematic relationship. In addition, a further advantage of the device is to also influence the kinematic relationship once movement commences. The magnitude of the resistance to movement may be varied in a consistent manner as the members move or in a stepped or otherwise varied manner. Tuning in this way may have the effect of avoiding unwanted activation or slowing the speed of activation of, for example, a brake engagement.
The embodiments described above may also be said to broadly consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, and any or all combinations of any two or more said parts, elements or features, and where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which the embodiments relates, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as of individually set forth,
Where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which this invention relates, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as if individually set forth.
The above described device is now described by reference to specific examples.
For ease of description in the examples, only a single trigger member and single first member are shown although it should be appreciated that multiple trigger and first members may be used.
Where described, a second member magnetic field through which the trigger member(s) move and a latching member are generally shown for prolixity as continuous regions. The second member, (if present at all) may for example be a series of discrete magnets or even just one magnet. Similarly, the latching member (if present) may take on various shapes or surface contours.
As shown in
In the Example, the trigger member 1 is a pawl or arm that is pivotally linked to a first member 2 drawn as a rotor with part of the rotor area removed for clarity. The pivoting link provides a pivot axis of rotation 3 around which the trigger member 1 can rotate relative to the first member 2 or vice versa. In this Example, the first member 2 rotates in direction X about rotor axis 4 when an energizing force is applied. On application of the energizing force that rotates the rotor in direction X, the trigger member 1 will, through combination of centrifugal forces and inertial forces, be urged to pivot about the pivot axis 3 so that a part of the trigger member 1 moves. The solid line image of the trigger member 1 shows the pawl in a resting or trigger position while the dotted line shows the pawl in a second position post movement 5 showing the trigger member 1 rotating about the pivot axis 3 in direction Y.
As shown, the trigger member 1 and first member 2 are approximately adjacent each other and in a constrained kinematic relationship relative to each other.
The trigger member 1 and first member 2 are in a magnetic relationship. As shown in
The magnetic element may be the whole trigger member 1 or may have differing shapes to that shown in
In action, as the varying rate of motion occurs, at least one magnetically induced flux results between the trigger member 1 and first member 2 thereby forming a magnetically induced eddy current force between the members 1, 2 or a part thereof.
The magnetically induced eddy current force may act to resist relative movement between the members 1, 2 and the at least one first member 2. The magnetic flux may be tuned by varying a number of characteristics of the arrangement including altering the magnetic element 6 and/or conductive region 7 size and positioning; altering the proximity of the trigger and first members thereby altering the proximity of the magnetic element 6 and conductive region 7; and finally altering the geometry and/or magnetic/conductive properties of the magnetic element(s) 6/conductive region(s) 7.
As shown in the Figures, the direction of the magnetically induced flux is in a direction substantially orthogonal to the direction of motion between the trigger member 1 and the first member 2 and the members 1, 2 lie in the same plane adjacent each other both at rest and during movement.
The embodiment described above may be integrated into a device similar to that described in US2012/0055740.
Referring to
The trigger member 1 may be a pawl or arm shaped member or members (one pawl shown for clarity) that are mechanically linked to a first member 2 that, in this example, is a carriage which translates linearly in direction AA on application of the energizing force along a surface or track 8.
In
Linear embodiments of this nature may be useful where the first member 2 or members move along a track 8 such as in applications use long guidelines, e.g., a train carriage or a gondola and the above described device acts to help brake the rate of movement of the carriage or gondola.
The device may include at least one second member 10 (drawn for ease of description as a shaded region) independent to the at least one first member 2, the second member 10 magnetically interacting with the trigger member 1 when the trigger member 1 moves away from the first member 2. This second member 10 may be a series of magnets or conductive regions and, when the trigger member 1 moves into a space complementary to the second member 10, an eddy current induced force occurs between the trigger 1 and second member 10.
The second member 10 may be stationary. Alternatively, the second member 10 may move at a different relative speed to the trigger member 1 either in the same direction as the trigger member 1 (but different speed) or, in an opposing direction. The second member 10 may for example be a series of magnets (not shown) outside and around the circumference of the first member 2.
As shown in
As shown in the Figures, the second member 10 is independent to the first member 2. The second member 10 magnetically interacts with the trigger member 1 about part of the trigger member 1 that extends partly beyond the overlapping region between the trigger member 1 and first member 2. The second member 10 may be a series of magnets or conductive members complementary to the trigger member 1 so as to cause a magnetic flux interaction to occur when the second member 10 moves relative to the trigger member 1.
With the trigger member 1 in a region complementary to the second member 10, an energizing force on the second member 10 causes a magnetically induced eddy current force to occur between the trigger 1 and second members 10 that encourages movement of the trigger member 1 relative to the first member 2.
The first member 2 may be stationary and the trigger member 1 moves on application of the energizing force, the movement of the trigger member 1 then induces a magnetic flux interaction between the trigger member 1 and the first member 2.
As shown in
Aspects of the device have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the claims herein.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 627633 | Aug 2014 | NZ | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2058024 | Logan, Jr. | Oct 1936 | A |
| 2122312 | Cassion | Jun 1938 | A |
| 2122315 | Fosty et al. | Jun 1938 | A |
| 2272509 | Cavallo | Feb 1942 | A |
| 2409009 | Bakke | Oct 1946 | A |
| 2428104 | Winther | Sep 1947 | A |
| 2437871 | Wood | Mar 1948 | A |
| 2492776 | Winther | Dec 1949 | A |
| 2771171 | Schultz | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2807734 | Lehde | Sep 1957 | A |
| 3364795 | De Coye De Castelet | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3447006 | Bair | May 1969 | A |
| 3721394 | Reiser | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3868005 | McMillan | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3934446 | Avitzur | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3962595 | Eddens | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3967794 | Fohl | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4078719 | Durland et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4093186 | Golden | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4224545 | Powell | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4271944 | Hanson | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4306688 | Hechler, IV | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4416430 | Totten | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4434971 | Cordrey | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4544111 | Nakajima | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4561605 | Nakajima | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4567963 | Sugimoto | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4612469 | Muramatsu | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4676452 | Nakajima | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4690066 | Morishita et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4729525 | Rumpf | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4826150 | Minoura | May 1989 | A |
| 4846313 | Sharp | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4895317 | Rumpf et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4938435 | Varner et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4957644 | Price et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4974706 | Maji et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5054587 | Matsui et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064029 | Araki et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5084640 | Morris et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5205386 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5248133 | Okamoto | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5272938 | Hsu et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5342000 | Berges et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5392881 | Cho et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5441137 | Organek et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5465815 | Ikegami | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5477093 | Lamb | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483849 | Orii et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5495131 | Goldie et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5636804 | Jeung | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5692693 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5711404 | Lee | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5712520 | Lamb | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5722612 | Feathers | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742986 | Corrion et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5779178 | McCarty | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791584 | Kuroiwa | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822874 | Nemes | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5862891 | Kröger et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5928300 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6041897 | Saumweber et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042517 | Gunther et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6051897 | Wissler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6062350 | Spieldiener | May 2000 | A |
| 6086005 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6209688 | Kuwahara | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6220403 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6279682 | Feathers | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293376 | Pribonic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6412611 | Pribonic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6460828 | Gersemsky | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466119 | Drew | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6523650 | Pribonic et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6533083 | Pribonic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6557673 | Desta et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561451 | Steinich | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6659237 | Pribonic | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6756870 | Kuwahara | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6793203 | Heinrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6810997 | Schreiber et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6918469 | Pribonic et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6962235 | Leon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973999 | Ikuta et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7011607 | Kolda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014026 | Drussel et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018324 | Lin | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7279055 | Schuler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7281612 | Hsieh | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7281620 | Wolner et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7513334 | Calver | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528514 | Cruz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7984796 | Pribonic | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8037978 | Boren | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8272476 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8424460 | Lerner et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8490751 | Allington et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8511434 | Blomberg | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8556234 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8567561 | Strasser et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8601951 | Lerner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8851235 | Allington et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9016435 | Allington et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9199103 | Hetrich et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9242128 | Macy | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 10020720 | Diehl et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10110089 | Diehl | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10498210 | Diehl | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10518115 | Allington | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10774887 | Allington | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10873242 | Diehl | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10971988 | Diehl | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 20020162477 | Palumbo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179372 | Schreiber et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030116391 | Desta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168911 | Anwar | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211914 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040055836 | Pribonic et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073346 | Roelleke | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040168855 | Leon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191401 | Bytnar et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050051659 | Wolner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050082410 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117258 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189830 | Corbin, III et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050263356 | Marzano et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060219498 | Organek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060278478 | Pribonic et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000741 | Pribonic et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070001048 | Wooster et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135561 | Rath et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228202 | Scharf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228713 | Takemura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256906 | Jin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080059028 | Willerton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074223 | Pribonic | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087510 | Pribonic | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080105503 | Pribonic | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080106420 | Rohlf | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080135579 | Bertram et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090026303 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032785 | Jones | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084883 | Casebolt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090114892 | Lesko | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090166459 | Niitsuma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178887 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090211846 | Taylor | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319212 | Cech et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100032255 | Conti et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100065373 | Stone et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112224 | Lott | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100116922 | Choate et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211239 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110084158 | Meillet et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110114907 | Hartman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110147125 | Blomberg | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166744 | Lu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110174914 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175473 | Kitabatake et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110240403 | Meillet | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110297778 | Meillet et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120055740 | Allington | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120118670 | Olson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120312540 | Lefebvre | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130048422 | Hartman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130087433 | Sejourne | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130118842 | Lerner | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130186721 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140048639 | Allington et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110947 | Mongeau | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140224597 | Takezawa et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140346909 | Vogler et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140375158 | Allington et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150196820 | Allington et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150266454 | McGowan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150352380 | Huang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160052401 | McGowan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160317936 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160360738 | Richardson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170237313 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170244313 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170274261 | Allington et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170328424 | Allington et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170338728 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180245658 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180264296 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180269767 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180269768 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180269769 | Allington et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180370484 | Diehl et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1783674 | Jun 2006 | CN |
| 101820952 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 202203305 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 102497085 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| 102627063 | Aug 2012 | CN |
| 102652029 | Aug 2012 | CN |
| 103244577 | Aug 2013 | CN |
| 103326538 | Sep 2013 | CN |
| 93 00 966 | Mar 1993 | DE |
| 10 2005 032 694 | Jan 2007 | DE |
| 0 247 818 | Dec 1987 | EP |
| 0 460 494 | Dec 1991 | EP |
| 0 909 684 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 1 094 240 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1 401 087 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1 432 101 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1 480 320 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 564 868 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1 244 565 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 721748 | Jan 1955 | GB |
| 908128 | Oct 1962 | GB |
| 2 340 461 | Feb 2000 | GB |
| 2 352 644 | Feb 2001 | GB |
| 2 352 645 | Feb 2001 | GB |
| 2 352 784 | Feb 2001 | GB |
| 2 357 563 | Jun 2001 | GB |
| S4712243 | Oct 1972 | JP |
| 49-097163 | Sep 1974 | JP |
| S53-113528 | Sep 1978 | JP |
| 56-107092 | Aug 1981 | JP |
| 58-25152 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 60-259278 | Dec 1985 | JP |
| 63-64542 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| 5-72684 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5-296287 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| H05-84347 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| 8-252025 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 10-98868 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 10-140536 | May 1998 | JP |
| H10-178717 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 10-304799 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 11-119680 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 11-189701 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 11-315662 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2000-189530 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000-316272 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2001-17041 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2005-353123 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2012-152316 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 106 462 | Jul 2011 | RU |
| 9516496 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| 9617149 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| 9847215 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| 0138123 | May 2001 | WO |
| 03055560 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2007060053 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2008139127 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009013479 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009047469 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009108040 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009127142 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2010104405 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011079266 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report, dated Apr. 6, 2018, for European Application No. 15864540.8-1201, 26 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 11, 2017, for European Application No. 14872681.3-1809, 10 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Mar. 29, 2018, for European Application No. 15834380,6-1201, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 1, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050206, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 13, 2009, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087863, 15 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 23, 2011, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2010/000011, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 24, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050207, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050208, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2014/000245, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 18, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050209, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050205, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050114, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 18, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050113, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 26, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050115, 10 pages. |
| MSA Safety Incorporated, Auto Belay Stop Use Notice, Oct. 15, 2009, URL=http://verticalendeavors.com/minneapolis/auto-belay-stop-us-notice/, download date Apr. 6, 2017, 2 pages. |
| North Safety Products Europe B.V., “Climbing Wall Descender: FP2/5 GDD,” Climbing Wall Descent Controllers Instruction Manual v3, Aug. 18, 2008, 20 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 21, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 11 pages. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 22, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 5 pages. |
| Office Action, dated Feb. 20, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages. |
| Office Action, dated Jan. 17, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,111, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages. |
| Office Action, dated Jan. 9, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 9 pages. |
| Office Action, dated Jul. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages. |
| Park et al., “Torque analysis and measurements of a permanent magnet type Eddy current brake with a Halbach magnet array based on analytical magnetic field calculations,” Journal of Applied Physics 115(17):17E707, 2014, (3 pages). |
| TRUBLUE Auto Belays, Model TB150-12C Operator Manual, Jun. 20, 2013, 37 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200036277 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15504636 | US | |
| Child | 16592688 | US |
