The invention relates to wall thickness control during investment casting of hollow parts having film cooling passages.
Investment casting may be used to produce hollow parts having internal cooling passages. During the investment casting process, wax is injected into a wax cavity to form a wax pattern between a core and a wax die. The wax die is removed, and the core and wax pattern are dipped into the ceramic slurry to form a ceramic shell around the wax pattern. The wax pattern is thermally removed, leaving a mold cavity. Molten metal is cast between the ceramic core and the ceramic shell, which are then removed to reveal the finished part.
Any movement between the ceramic core and the wax die may result in a distorted wax pattern. Since the ceramic shell forms around the wax pattern, and the ceramic shell forms the mold cavity for the final part, this relative movement may result in an unacceptable part. Likewise, any movement between the ceramic core and the ceramic shell when casting the airfoil itself may result in an unacceptable part. Specifically, cooling channels formed into a wall of the finished part require that the wall, which is formed by the mold cavity, meet tight manufacturing tolerances. As gas turbine engine technology progresses, so does the need for more complex cooling schemes. These complex cooling schemes may produce passages that range in size from relatively small to relatively large, and hence manufacturing tolerances are becoming more prominent in the design of components.
The nature of the investment casting process, where two discrete parts must be held in a single positional relationship during handling and multiple casting operations, makes holding the tolerances difficult. In addition, the ceramic core itself is relatively long and thin when compared to the wax die and ceramic shell. As a result, when heated, the ceramic core may distort from its originally intended shape. Likewise, the ceramic core may not expand in all dimensions in exactly the same manner as the wax die and/or the ceramic shell. This relative movement may also change the mold cavity and render the final part unacceptable.
In order to overcome this relative shifting, U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,308 to Caccavale et al. describes a ceramic core having bumpers on the ceramic core that touch, or almost touch, the wax die during the wax pattern pour. This controls a gap between the ceramic core and the wax die, and likewise controls a gap between the ceramic core and the ceramic shell. Controlling the gap minimizes shifting between the ceramic core and the ceramic shell, and this improves control of the wall thickness of the airfoil. The bumpers are positioned at key stress regions to counteract distortions. The final part may have a hole where the bumpers were located, between an internal cooling passage and a surface of the airfoil, which allows cooling fluid to leak from the internal cooling passage.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present inventors have devised an innovative ceramic core that will enable wall thickness control without the unwanted cooling air leakage associated with the prior art. Specifically, the core disclosed herein forms the typical serpentine cooling passages in the conventional manner, but further includes film hole protrusions that extend from the conventional core. The film hole protrusions are configured to abut an inner surface of a wax die, and then an inner surface of a ceramic shell, in a manner that holds the ceramic core in a fixed positional relationship with the wax die and the ceramic shell. Each film hole protrusion will generate a respective hole in a subsequently cast airfoil. However, unlike the prior art, where the associated holes are minimized, or avoided altogether, to minimize cooling air leakage, the holes associated with the film hole protrusions disclosed here are instead sized and shaped to become film cooling holes, and positioned to be part, if not all, of a pattern of film cooling holes within a film cooling arrangement. By sizing, shaping, and positioning the film hole protrusions in this way there is no unwanted loss of cooling fluid. Instead, the resulting hole and associated cooling fluid flowing there through are innovatively used as part of a film cooling arrangement.
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
During handling and casting operations the wax die imparts frictional and normal forces to the end face 72. Due to the cantilevered nature of the arrangement, this creates a bending moment around where the body 70 and the core 50 meet. This cantilevered arrangement renders the body 70 less able to resist forces imparted to it by an inner surface 80 of the wax die. For this reason, care must be taken to prevent damage to the film hole protrusion 64. This tradeoff is, however, considered acceptable in order to create film cooling holes 34 that are oriented to direct cooling fluid so they travel with the hot gases, or alternately, counter current with the hot gases.
In order to resist this bending moment, while still maintaining a positional relationship between the core 50 and the wax die 68, (and subsequently between the core 50 and the ceramic shell), the body 70 and the core 50 must not only be strong enough resist breaking, but must also be configured to permit a desired amount of flex, and yet mitigate any unwanted flex. In an exemplary embodiment where some flex is permitted, the positional relationship maintained by the film hole projections 64 is essentially a single, fixed positional relationship with a permissible tolerance. In an exemplary embodiment, it may be preferable to reduce and/or eliminate any flex. In an exemplary embodiment where no flex is permitted, the positional relationship maintained by the film hole projections 64 is essentially a single, fixed positional relationship without a permissible tolerance.
It can also be seen that the body 70 may include a first geometry 82 (defining the axis 76 of elongation) and a second geometry 84 of a larger and/or increasing cross sectional area. The second geometry 84 may define a diffuser portion of the subsequently formed film cooling hole 34. Thus, the film hole protrusion 64, which is defined by the first geometry 82 and the second geometry 84 (i.e. the portions of the body 70 exterior to the core surface 74), may actually increase in cross sectional area the further it gets from the core surface 74. In addition,
Alternately, the body 70 with the third geometry 86 may be joined to a completed core by, for example, inserting the third geometry 86 into recesses and bonding the body 70 to the core 50. This bonding may be accomplished by means known to those in the art, such as by using adhesives, or soldering, brazing, or welding etc. For example, a quartz body 70 may be inserted to a recess in the pressure side 62 and/or the suction side 66. If discrete bodies 70 are assembled into the core, the discrete bodies 70 may optionally be configured to form a cooling hole 34 that is different than other cooling holes machined into the casting. For example, the discrete bodies 70 may be larger to ease handling/assembly. The relatively larger film cooling hole resulting from the enlarged discrete bodies 70 may simply be larger than the other machined cooling holes, or alternately, they may serve an additional function, such as being sized to permit dust to be ejected from the internal cooling passage of the component.
While
In
In
One advantage of forming the pattern using a combination of cast cooling holes and subsequently machined cooling holes is that more than one pattern and associated film cooling arrangement 30 can be fabricated from a single casting configuration. For example, should it be determined that the subsequently machined cooling holes should have a decreased or increased diameter, that change can be accommodated using the same core 50. Increased cooling may be desired when, for example, a given gas turbine engine is upgraded to operate at a higher temperature to increase efficiency. In this instance, the blade remains the same, but more cooling is necessary. The greater cooling needed with the finished upgraded blades can be accomplished by machining different, or more, film cooling holes in the same casting that can be used to make finished blades for the engine before it was upgraded. Further, should it be determined that fewer machined film cooling holes are necessary, the unwanted holes would simply not be drilled. Consequently, the arrangement and method disclosed herein provide increased flexibility.
From the foregoing it can be seen that the inventors have devised a unique and innovative positioning arrangement that improves dimensional control of the mold cavity while not creating a structure that leaks air from the cooling passage of the resulting airfoil. The result is improved dimensional control of the wall thickness of the airfoil, and less subsequent machining needed to form film cooling holes. Consequently, this represents an improvement in the art.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/042900 | 6/18/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/195110 | 12/23/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3596703 | Bishop et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3659645 | Rose | May 1972 | A |
4068702 | Herold | Jan 1978 | A |
4078598 | Kelso et al. | May 1978 | A |
4811778 | Allen et al. | May 1989 | A |
5296308 | Caccavale et al. | May 1994 | A |
5609779 | Crow | Mar 1997 | A |
6329015 | Fehrenbach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6530416 | Tiemann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7237595 | Beck | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7448433 | Ortiz | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20110113627 | Alquier et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132562 | Merrill et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130333855 | Merrill et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140271129 | Mueller | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160151829 | Propheter-Hinckley | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1493513 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1529580 | May 2005 | EP |
2006026742 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007061912 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2008138675 | Jun 2008 | JP |
WO-2014113184 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2015 corresponding to PCT Application PCT/US2014/042900 filed Jun. 18, 2014. (09 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170087630 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |