This invention relates to mechanisms and methods for attachment of turbine airfoils to shroud platforms, and particularly to bi-casting of shroud platforms onto turbine airfoils.
Bi-casting is a two-step process whereby one section of a component is cast, and then a second section is cast onto the first section in a second casting operation. Bi-casting has been utilized in gas turbine engine fabrication of vane rings and blades. Complex shapes can be designed for bi-casting that would exceed limits of castability in a single casting, and each section can have specialized material properties. Costly materials and processes such as single crystals can be selectively used where needed, reducing total cost.
A vane ring is a circular array of radially oriented stationary vane airfoils mounted between radially inner and outer shroud rings. The vane airfoils may be cast first, and then placed in a mold in which the inner and outer shroud rings are bi-cast onto the inner and outer ends of the airfoils respectively. The vane rings may be fabricated in segments. One or multiple vanes may be cast into an inner and/or an outer shroud segment to form a vane ring segment. A shroud segment on an end of a vane is called a platform.
A metallurgical bond may not form between the vane airfoils and the platforms. An oxide layer develops on the surface of the airfoil that prevents the molten metal of the platform from bonding to it. This may be overcome in order to form a bond. However, interlocking geometry without bonding has been used in the vane/platform interface to form a mechanical interconnection only.
In large gas turbines, differential thermal expansion (DTE) creates stresses between the vanes airfoils and shrouds. Providing clearance to accommodate DTE can result in lack of connection stability, stress concentrations, hot gas ingestion, and leakage of cooling air into the working gas flow from plenums and channels in the shrouds and vanes.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present invention provides a joint between a vane and a bi-cast platform that accommodates differential thermal expansion while maximizing connection stability and minimizing stress concentrations and coolant leakage.
A tab 48 may extend from the pressure and/or suction sides of the end portion 42 to function in cooperation with an associated vane platform to define an origin for differential expansion and contraction of the platform in the chordwise dimension. Tab 48 may be located for example at a mid-chord position or at a maximum airfoil thickness position as shown in
The taper angle 44 may vary around the airfoil to accommodate varying amounts of differential contraction of the platform 50 and collar 52 at different points around the curvature of the airfoil. The taper angle on the pressure side 36 may be less than on the suction side in order to equalize pressure on the various contact surfaces. In an exemplary engineering model, a taper angle of 3-5 degrees on the pressure side and 50% greater than the pressure side taper angle on the suction side was found to be advantageous—for example, 4 degrees on the pressure side and 6 degrees on the suction side. The optimum angles depend on the airfoil shape.
Referring again to
Optionally, the spray 76A, 76B may be collimated as shown, which can produce a desired coating profile with or without moving the spray nozzle(s). Collimation may be achieved by any means known in the art, and is therefore not detailed here. An example is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,682.
After coating, the platform 50 is bi-cast onto the airfoil end portion 42, and then the airfoil end portion 42 and the platform 50 are cooled to a common temperature. This causes differential process shrinkage in which the platform cools from a solidification temperature that is higher than the bi-casting temperature of the airfoil end portion. The fugitive material 56 may be crushed in some embodiments as the residual stress in the component increases, thereby relieving some of the stress. Further, the fugitive material may be dissolved or otherwise removed, also relieving at least a portion of the residual stress. The thickness profile of the fugitive coating 56 is engineered and controlled during deposition so that it is effective, after removal, to provide an interface between the platform 50 and the airfoil end portion 42 with a predetermined percentage of opposed surfaces in contact, or a predetermined distribution of compressive preload at the common temperature. For example, the maximum preload may be within 130% of the minimum preload over the leading edge 32, the trailing edge 36, and the suction side 38 of the airfoil end portion 42 at a common temperature of the airfoil and platform or within a range of operating temperatures, such as 1,000 to 1,500 C.°. It will be appreciated that for a bi-cast joint between an airfoil and a shroud, it may be desired that no gap remains between the airfoil and shroud at the common temperature and operating temperatures in order to prevent the passage of a working fluid there between during use of the component in a gas turbine engine. However, some gap may be desired in order to accommodate differential shrinkage without excessive mechanical loads. Accordingly, in some embodiments the opposed adjoining surfaces of the airfoil and the shroud may be in less than 100% contact but greater than 50% in contact. While some contact and residual stress may be desired between the airfoil and the shroud, the present invention allows for that stress to be reduced and controlled to a desired value.
Alumina or aluminosilicate-based materials are examples of types of materials for the fugitive coating. Such materials are chemically compatible with typical metal alloy materials used for gas turbine components and thus are not harmful to the finished product even if a small amount of the fugitive material remains trapped in the airfoil/shroud joint. The spray process may be performed by known thermal spray technology such as air or low-pressure plasma spray, high velocity oxy-fuel spray, chemical vapor deposition, or physical vapor deposition, and may be controlled to a thickness of ±50 microns of a desired thickness profile in one embodiment. Porosity of the fugitive material 56 may be controlled to a desired value or range in order to facilitate crushing of the material as the component cools after bi-casting. A non-spray process such as ceramic slurry coating or molding may be alternately used. A directional spray process is preferred in some embodiments in order to form the coating thickness profile via spray direction. The resulting joint may have a mechanical interlock as described herein without a metallurgical bond.
The use of bi-casting enables less costly repair should the platform become damaged in service. The platform can be cut off, saving the high-value airfoil, and then a new replacement platform can be bi-cast onto the airfoil. Bi-casting allows parts to be designed beyond the practical limits of integral castability; improves casting yield; allows the airfoil and platform to be formed with respectively different specialized properties; and allows costly materials and processes, such as single-crystal fabrication, to be selectively used.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/752,460 filed 1 Apr. 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,714,920 and claims the benefit of the filing date thereof.
Development for this invention was supported in part by Contract No. DE-FC26-05NT42644 awarded by the United States Department of Energy. Accordingly, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3669177 | Ingalls et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3732031 | Bowling et al. | May 1973 | A |
3878880 | Jones | Apr 1975 | A |
4008052 | Vishnevsky et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4195683 | Blazek | Apr 1980 | A |
4417854 | Cain et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4489469 | Hall | Dec 1984 | A |
4494287 | Cruzen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4538331 | Egan et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4592120 | Egan et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4728258 | Blazek et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4869645 | Verpoort | Sep 1989 | A |
4955423 | Blazek | Sep 1990 | A |
4961459 | Blazek | Oct 1990 | A |
4987944 | Parks | Jan 1991 | A |
5069265 | Blazek | Dec 1991 | A |
5181550 | Blazek et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5241737 | Colvin | Sep 1993 | A |
5241738 | Colvin | Sep 1993 | A |
5263530 | Colvin | Nov 1993 | A |
5290143 | Kington et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5332022 | Colvin | Jul 1994 | A |
5332360 | Correia et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5377742 | Jarry | Jan 1995 | A |
5573682 | Beason, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5678298 | Colvin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5797725 | Rhodes | Aug 1998 | A |
5981083 | Colvin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6409473 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6648597 | Widrig et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7045220 | Ishiduka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7284590 | Liimatainen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20060239825 | Rice et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090196761 | James | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110243724 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110297344 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12752460 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13195959 | US |