This invention relates generally to an airfoil in a turbine engine, and in particular, to a trailing edge cooling arrangement for a turbine airfoil.
In gas turbine engines, compressed air discharged from a compressor section and fuel introduced from a source of fuel are mixed together and burned in a combustion section, creating combustion products defining a high temperature working gas. The working gas is directed through a hot gas path in a turbine section of the engine, where the working gas expands to provide rotation of a turbine rotor. The turbine rotor may be linked to an axial shaft to power the upstream compressor and an electric generator, wherein the rotation of the turbine rotor can be used to produce electricity in the generator.
In view of high pressure ratios and high engine firing temperatures implemented in modern engines, certain components, such as airfoils, e.g., stationary vanes and rotating blades within the turbine section, must be cooled with cooling fluid, such as air discharged from a compressor in the compressor section, to prevent overheating of the components.
Effective cooling of turbine airfoils requires delivering the relatively cool air to critical regions such as along the trailing edge of a turbine blade or a stationary vane. The associated cooling apertures may, for example, extend between an upstream, relatively high pressure cavity within the airfoil and one of the exterior surfaces of the airfoil. Airfoil cavities typically extend in a radial direction with respect to the rotor and stator of the machine.
Airfoils commonly include internal cooling channels which remove heat from the pressure sidewall and the suction sidewall in order to minimize thermal stresses. Achieving a high cooling efficiency based on the rate of heat transfer is a significant design consideration in order to minimize the volume of coolant air diverted from the compressor for cooling.
Briefly, aspects of the present invention provide an improved trailing edge cooling arrangement for a turbine airfoil.
According to a first aspect of the invention, an airfoil for a turbine engine is provided, which includes an outer wall formed by a pressure side and a suction side extending span-wise along a radial direction and joined at a leading edge and at a trailing edge. An array of features is positioned in an interior portion of the airfoil. Each feature extends from the pressure side to the suction side. The array comprises multiple radial rows of said features with the features in each row being interspaced radially to define coolant passages therebetween. The radial rows are spaced along a forward-to-aft direction toward the trailing edge. The coolant passages of the array are fluidically interconnected to lead a pressurized coolant toward the trailing edge via a serial impingement on to said rows of features. The coolant passages are geometrically configured to bias a coolant flow therethrough toward a first side in relation to a second side of the outer wall, to effect a greater cooling of the first side than the second side.
According to a second aspect of the invention, an airfoil for a turbine engine comprises an outer wall delimiting an airfoil interior and being formed by a pressure side and a suction side extending span-wise along a radial direction and joined at a leading edge and at a trailing edge. A chordal direction may be defined extending from the leading edge to the trailing edge. An array of features is positioned in the airfoil interior. Each feature extends from the pressure side to the suction side. The array comprises multiple radial rows of said features with the features in each row being interspaced radially to define coolant passages therebetween. The radial rows are spaced along the chordal direction. The coolant passages of the array are fluidically interconnected to lead a pressurized coolant from a coolant cavity chordally upstream of said array toward a plurality of exhaust openings at the trailing edge. The coolant passages are geometrically configured such that coolant ejected through the coolant passages has a higher local velocity along the pressure side than along the suction side to effect a greater convective cooling at the pressure side than the suction side.
According to a third aspect of the invention, an airfoil for a turbine engine comprises an outer wall delimiting an airfoil interior and being formed by a pressure side and a suction side extending span-wise along a radial direction and joined at a leading edge and at a trailing edge. A chordal direction may be defined extending from the leading edge to the trailing edge. An array of features is positioned in the airfoil interior. Each feature extends from the pressure side to the suction side. The array comprises multiple radial rows of said features with the features in each row being interspaced radially to define coolant passages therebetween. The radial rows being spaced along the chordal direction. The coolant passages of the array are fluidically interconnected to lead a pressurized coolant from a coolant cavity chordally upstream of said array toward a plurality of exhaust openings at the trailing edge, via a series of impingements on to said rows of features. The features of chordally adjacent rows are staggered in the radial direction such that coolant ejected from a coolant passage in a particular row impinges on an impingement surface of a feature in a chordally adjacent row. The coolant passage has a flow cross-section geometrically configured such that a distribution of coolant jet impinging upon the impingement surface is higher toward the pressure side than the suction side to effect a greater impingement cooling at the pressure side than the suction side.
The invention is shown in more detail by help of figures. The figures show specific configurations and do not limit the scope of the invention.
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation, a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present inventors have recognized certain technical problems in connection with existing trailing edge cooling arrangements. In particular, it has been seen that during operation, there is an uneven heating of the airfoil outer wall exposed to the hot gas path, with the pressure side of the airfoil outer wall often being at a significantly higher temperature than the suction side. A difference in metal temperatures between the two sides of the airfoil outer wall may lead to uneven thermal expansion rates which may induce unnecessary thermal stresses or may even deform the shape of the airfoil during start-up and operation. Embodiments of the present invention illustrated herein attempt to balance the external differences in temperatures in the outer wall by shaping an internal coolant flow so that the coolant flow is biased toward one of the pressure side or suction side depending upon which is at a higher temperature, to effect a greater overall cooling thereof in relation to the other side. A skewed cooling of the outer wall may be thereby achieved without the need to structurally modify the airfoil outer wall (for e.g. by varying the thickness between the pressure side and suction side, etc.). In particular, specific embodiments of the invention may be used for biasing convective and/or impingement cooling toward the pressure side near the trailing edge.
Referring to
As illustrated, the airfoil 10 is a turbine blade for a gas turbine engine. It should however be noted that aspects of the invention could additionally be incorporated into stationary vanes in a gas turbine engine. In the present example, coolant may enter one or more of the radial cavities 41a-e via openings provided in the root of the blade 10. For example, coolant may enter the radial cavity 41e via an opening in the root and travel radially outward to feed into forward and aft cooling branches. In the forward cooling branch, the coolant may traverse a serpentine cooling circuit toward a mid-chord portion of the airfoil 10 (not illustrated in any further detail). In the aft cooling branch, the coolant may traverse axially (forward-to-aft) through an internal arrangement of a trailing edge cooling arrangement 50, positioned aft of the radial cavity 41e, before leaving the airfoil 10 via a plurality of exhaust openings 28 arranged along the trailing edge 20.
As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, each feature 22 is elongated along the radial direction R. That is to say, each feature 22 has a length LR in the radial direction R which is greater than a width Wy in the stream-wise or chordal direction 30. A higher aspect ratio (LR/WY) provides a longer flow path for the coolant in the passages 25, leading to increased cooling surface area and thereby higher convective heat transfer. Furthermore, the array may be geometrically configured for enhancing coolant pressure drop. For example, in one non-limiting embodiment, the length LR of each feature may be greater than a stream-wise pitch or periodicity Pγ of the array. The above features individually and in combination improve cooling efficiency and reduce coolant flow requirement, whereby turbine efficiency may be improved. In the shown embodiment, the features 22 are rectangular in shape, when viewed in a direction from the pressure side 14 to the suction side 16. To reduce stress concentration, the corners of the rectangle may be rounded or filleted. However, the illustrated shape of the features 22 is non limiting and other geometries may be used, including but not limited to a crown shape, a double chevron shape, or an elliptical, oval or circular shape, as viewed in a direction from the pressure side 14 to the suction side 16.
Referring to
In addition to the benefit of biasing convective heat transfer toward one side, the illustrated embodiments may also have an impact on the impingement portion of the heat transfer near the trailing edge. This effect may be illustrated by a comparison of the illustrated embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
It should be noted that various other geometries may be employed based on the principle of biasing of coolant flow toward one side of the airfoil outer wall 12 in relation to the other. For example, in a non-limiting embodiment shown in
By biasing the coolant flow toward the hotter side, which in this case is the pressure side, several benefits may be realized. For example, the metal temperature of the hotter side can be brought down more than on the cooler side leading to a more uniform temperature distribution, which is desirable. Additionally, since less heat is removed from the side that requires less cooling in order to meet life, which in this case is the suction side, the fluid heat up through the trailing edge array may be reduced, which would allow better cooling to be effected toward the end of the array. Managing coolant heat up is especially desirable in low coolant flow designs, such as the illustrated trailing edge array.
While specific embodiments have been described in detail, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternative to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims, and any and all equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/064006 filed on Dec. 4, 2015, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4278400 | Yamarik et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4752186 | Liang | Jun 1988 | A |
6000466 | Aoyagi | Dec 1999 | A |
6227804 | Koga | May 2001 | B1 |
6234754 | Zelesky | May 2001 | B1 |
6607355 | Cunha | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6939107 | Mongillo, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6984102 | Bunker | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7186084 | Bunker | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7484928 | Arness | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7575414 | Lee | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7938624 | Tibbott | May 2011 | B2 |
8714909 | Propheter-Hinckley | May 2014 | B2 |
9957816 | Bunker | May 2018 | B2 |
10247099 | Quach | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10436048 | Brzek | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10557354 | Otero | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20010012484 | Beeck | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20080063524 | Tibbott | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090145581 | Hoffman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100183429 | Liang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110135446 | Dube | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176930 | Ahmad | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130089434 | Simpson | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130280092 | Xu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150345305 | Allen | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180363468 | Beyer | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190271232 | Thorton | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1431514 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1467065 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1548230 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1918522 | May 2008 | EP |
2628901 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2942485 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2013120552 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015088821 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015088821 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2018136042 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2015/064006. |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/064006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180283184 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2015/064006 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 15997287 | US |