This invention relates generally to gas turbine engine airfoils, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for cooling hollow turbine airfoils.
A typical gas turbine engine includes a turbomachinery core having a high pressure compressor, a combustor, and a high pressure turbine in serial flow relationship. The core is operable in a known manner to generate a primary gas flow. The high pressure turbine (or “HPT”) includes one or more stages which extract energy from the primary gas flow. Each stage comprises row of stationary vanes or nozzles that direct gas flow into a downstream row of blades or buckets carried by a rotating disk. These components operate in an extremely high temperature environment. To ensure adequate service life, the vanes and blades are hollow and are provided with a flow of coolant, such as air extracted (bled) from the compressor. This coolant flow is circulated through the hollow airfoil's internal coolant path and is then exhausted through a plurality of cooling holes.
One type of cooling hole that has been found effective is a shaped or diffuser hole that includes a circular metering portion and a flared portion that acts as a diffuser. The shaped diffuser holes can be oriented axially or parallel to the gas stream (indicated by the arrow “G” in
Accordingly, there is a need for a turbine airfoil with diffuser holes that perform effectively without excessive weight increase.
This need is addressed by the present invention, which provides a turbine airfoil having diffuser holes. The wall thickness of the airfoil is locally increased at the location of the diffuser holes.
According to one aspect of the invention, a turbine airfoil for a gas turbine engine includes: an outer peripheral wall having an external surface, the outer peripheral wall enclosing an interior space and including a concave pressure sidewall and a convex suction sidewall joined together at a leading edge and at a trailing edge; wherein the outer peripheral wall has a varying wall thickness which incorporates a locally-thickened wall portion; and a film cooling hole having a shaped diffuser exit passing through the outer peripheral wall within the locally-thickened wall portion.
According to another aspect of the invention, a turbine blade for a gas turbine engine includes: an airfoil having a root and a tip, the airfoil defined by an outer peripheral wall having an external surface, the outer peripheral wall enclosing an interior space and including a concave pressure sidewall and a convex suction sidewall joined together at a leading edge and at a trailing edge; wherein the outer peripheral wall tapers in thickness from a maximum value at the root to a minimum value at the tip; wherein the outer peripheral wall includes a first locally-thickened portion at the root and a second locally-thickened portion at the tip, the first and second locally-thickened portions having equal thickness; and first and second film cooling holes each having a shaped diffuser exit, the first film cooling hole passing through the outer peripheral wall within the first locally-thickened portion and the second film cooling hole passing through the outer peripheral wall within the second locally-thickened portion.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
In the illustrated example, the engine is a turbofan engine and a low pressure turbine would be located downstream of the high pressure turbine 10 and coupled to a fan. However, the principles described herein are equally applicable to turboprop, turbojet, and turboshaft engines, as well as turbine engines used for other vehicles or in stationary applications.
The high pressure turbine 10 includes a first stage nozzle 12 which comprises a plurality of circumferentially spaced airfoil-shaped hollow first stage vanes 14 that are supported between an arcuate, segmented first stage outer band 16 and an arcuate, segmented first stage inner band 18. The first stage vanes 14, first stage outer band 16 and first stage inner band 18 are arranged into a plurality of circumferentially adjoining nozzle segments that collectively form a complete 360° assembly. The first stage outer and inner bands 16 and 18 define the outer and inner radial flowpath boundaries, respectively, for the hot gas stream flowing through the first stage nozzle 12. The first stage vanes 14 are configured so as to optimally direct the combustion gases to a first stage rotor 20.
The first stage rotor 20 includes an array of airfoil-shaped first stage turbine blades 22 extending outwardly from a first stage disk 24 that rotates about the centerline axis of the engine. A segmented, arcuate first stage shroud 26 is arranged so as to closely surround the first stage turbine blades 22 and thereby define the outer radial flowpath boundary for the hot gas stream flowing through the first stage rotor 20.
A second stage nozzle 28 is positioned downstream of the first stage rotor 20, and comprises a plurality of circumferentially spaced airfoil-shaped hollow second stage vanes 30 that are supported between an arcuate, segmented second stage outer band 32 and an arcuate, segmented second stage inner band 34. The second stage vanes 30, second stage outer band 32 and second stage inner band 34 are arranged into a plurality of circumferentially adjoining nozzle segments that collectively form a complete 360° assembly. The second stage outer and inner bands 32 and 34 define the outer and inner radial flowpath boundaries, respectively, for the hot gas stream flowing through the second stage turbine nozzle 34. The second stage vanes 30 are configured so as to optimally direct the combustion gases to a second stage rotor 38.
The second stage rotor 38 includes a radial array of airfoil-shaped second stage turbine blades 40 extending radially outwardly from a second stage disk 42 that rotates about the centerline axis of the engine. A segmented arcuate second stage shroud 44 is arranged so as to closely surround the second stage turbine blades 40 and thereby define the outer radial flowpath boundary for the hot gas stream flowing through the second stage rotor 38.
A cross-sectional view of one of the second stage vanes 30 is illustrated in
Other manufacturing methods are known, such as disposable core die casting and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) or direct metal laser melting (DMLM), which may be used to create the vane 30. Such methods may permit additional flexibility in creating closer component when implementing the selective thickening, as compared to convention casting. An example of a disposable core die casting process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,487,819 to Wang et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. DMLS is a known manufacturing process that fabricates metal components using three-dimensional information, for example a three-dimensional computer model, of the component. The three-dimensional information is converted into a plurality of slices, each slice defining a cross section of the component for a predetermined height of the slice. The component is then “built-up” slice by slice, or layer by layer, until finished. Each layer of the component is formed by fusing a metallic powder using a laser.
The vane 30 has an internal cooling configuration that includes, from the leading edge 54 to the trailing edge 56, first, second, third, and fourth radially extending cavities 60, 62, 64, and 66, respectively. The first and second cavities 60 and 62 are separated by a first rib 68 extending between the pressure an suction sidewalls 50 and 52, the third cavity 64 is separated from the second cavity 62 by a second rib 70 extending between the pressure an suction sidewalls 50 and 52, and the fourth cavity 66 is separated from the third cavity 64 by a third rib 72 extending between the pressure an suction sidewalls 50 and 52. The vane's internal cooling configuration, as described thus far, is used merely as an example. The principles of the present invention are applicable to a wide variety of cooling configurations.
In operation, the cavities 60, 62, 64, and 66 receive a coolant (usually a portion of the relatively cool compressed air bled from the compressor) through an inlet passage (not shown). The coolant may enter each cavity 60, 62, 64, and 66 in series or all of them in parallel. The coolant travels through the cavities 60, 62, 64, and 66 to provide convection and/or impingement cooling of the vane 30. The coolant then exits the vane 30, through one or more film cooling holes 74. As is well known in the art, the film cooling holes 74 may be arranged in various rows or arrays as needed for a particular application. Coolant ejection angle is typically 15 to 35 degrees off the local tangency of the airfoil external surface 58.
In particular, film cooling hole configuration 74 comprises shaped diffuser exits. One of these holes 74 is shown in detail in
Several parameters are relevant to the performance of the cooling hole 74. One such parameter is the “blowing ratio”, which is a ratio of local flowpath to coolant gas parameters.
Another critical parameter is the ratio L′/D, or the “hooded” diffuser length “L′” divided by the diameter “D” of the circular or metering section of the film hole 76 In addition, proper metering length “L” must be maintained to provide directionality for coolant exiting the film hole. The metering length also serves to assure proper levels of coolant are utilized, thereby sustaining engine performance. For optimum cooling hole effectiveness, it is desirable to tailor the L′/D ratio to the specific conditions of the coolant flow and the free stream flow, which both tend to vary by location on the airfoil. Given a fixed hole diameter D, the only parameter which is variable is the distance L′.
This distance can be affected by changing the wall thickness “T”. A locally thicker wall will enable the diffuser portion to be manufactured deeper into the wall from the external gas-side surface. This permits sufficient hooded length without comprising metering length, L. In prior art airfoils, the thickness “T” of the walls (e.g. sidewalls 50 and 52, see
In the present invention, the local wall thickness is selected to be adequate for optimum performance of the cooling hole 74. The thickness is locally and selectively increased as required, resulting in a significantly smaller weight increase. As seen in
Smaller regions of the airfoil may incorporate selective thickening. An example of this is seen on the convex or suction side of the airfoil in zone Z1. Here a local wall thickening only on the suction side of the first cavity 60 is implemented. This results in less weight increase over thickening the entire convex or suction side.
Another method of selective thickening includes providing one or more discrete elements protruding from the inner surface of the outer peripheral wall, such as local embossments, bosses, or bumps on the coolant side of the airfoil as seen in zone Z2 (labeled 61 in
Local chordwise tapering may also be used to smoothly transition the airfoil wall from the increased thickness T′ down to the nominal thickness T (seen in
As noted above, the principles of the present invention may also be applied to rotating airfoils as well. For example, a cross-sectional view of one of the first stage turbine blades 22 is illustrated in
The turbine blade 22 includes one or more diffuser-type film cooling holes 174 identical to the cooling holes 74 described above, each including an upstream metering portion and a divergent downstream portion.
The turbine blade 22 rotates in operation and is therefore subject to centrifugal loads as well as aerodynamic and thermal loads. In order to reduce these loads it is known to reduce the mass of the radially outer portion of the blade 22 by tapering the outer peripheral wall from the root 100 to the tip 102. In other words, the nominal wall thickness “TR” near the root 100, seen in
For example, as seen in
The local or selective thickness increase is maintained throughout the radial span of the turbine blade 22, independent of the radial tapering. For example, as shown in
In other words, the locally-thickened wall portion surrounding each cooling hole 174 may be much thicker than the nominal thickness at the tip 102, but only slightly thicker than (or possibly equal to) the nominal thickness at the root 100. As with the vane 30, the locally-increased wall thickness may be provided through a combination of discrete protruding elements, chordwise-tapered walls, and/or thickening of specific wall portions.
The present invention locally increases airfoil wall thickness such that a minimum wall condition under expected casting variation will still allow for proper diffuser hole geometry L′ while maintaining metering length. A wall thickness properly sized to optimize the L′/D criteria while maintaining proper metering length results in a cooling hole with a maximum cooling effectiveness. This concept provides for required thickness while minimizing weight increase for the entire airfoil.
The foregoing has described a turbine airfoil for a gas turbine engine. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/037753 | 4/23/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/163150 | 10/31/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2928749 | Watts | Mar 1960 | A |
3090691 | Weyer | May 1963 | A |
3197432 | Lamoreaux | Jul 1965 | A |
3197433 | Lamoreaux | Jul 1965 | A |
3220972 | Lamoreaux | Nov 1965 | A |
3313773 | Lamoreaux | Apr 1967 | A |
3423358 | Oliver | Jan 1969 | A |
3438936 | Harry | Apr 1969 | A |
3516946 | Frank | Jun 1970 | A |
3692086 | Michelon | Sep 1972 | A |
3715334 | Karstedt | Feb 1973 | A |
3775452 | Karstedt | Nov 1973 | A |
3870529 | Okumoto et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3957715 | Lirones et al. | May 1976 | A |
4086311 | Huseby et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4097292 | Huseby et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4108672 | Klug et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4108676 | Huseby et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4164424 | Klug et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4184885 | Klug et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4190450 | Burd et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4191582 | Magee | Mar 1980 | A |
4221903 | Elfert et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4222983 | August et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4247333 | Ledder et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256870 | Eckberg | Mar 1981 | A |
4269753 | Mine et al. | May 1981 | A |
4288345 | Ashby et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4323756 | Brown et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4421903 | Ashby | Dec 1983 | A |
4724299 | Hammeke | Feb 1988 | A |
4730093 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4888376 | Atwell et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4894194 | Janney | Jan 1990 | A |
4901450 | Chemello et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906424 | Hughes et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4998581 | Lane et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5014763 | Frank | May 1991 | A |
5028362 | Janney et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038014 | Pratt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043548 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5126082 | Frank | Jun 1992 | A |
5162480 | Schilling et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5337568 | Lee et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5397215 | Spear et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5419039 | Auxier | May 1995 | A |
5433261 | Hinton et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5635250 | Blum et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5688104 | Beabout | Nov 1997 | A |
5824250 | Whalen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5927379 | Yasrebi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931638 | Krause et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978221 | Sawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000457 | Vandermeer | Dec 1999 | A |
6017186 | Hoeger et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037397 | Satoh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066279 | Walls et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087024 | Whinnery et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6152211 | Klug et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6228299 | Janney et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254334 | LaFleur | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269540 | Islam et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273682 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283713 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302185 | Lee et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338609 | Decker et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345633 | Tartakovsky et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345663 | Klug et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350404 | Li et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365082 | Walls et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368060 | Fehrenbach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368525 | Klug et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375880 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379528 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402464 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419446 | Kvasnak et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429402 | Dixon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467534 | Klug et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481490 | Vihtelic et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485553 | Guinn | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502622 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6504127 | McGregor et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511294 | Mielke et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546730 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561761 | Decker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6599953 | Ratke et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626230 | Woodrum et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648645 | MacDougald et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6669445 | Staubach et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6805535 | Tiemann | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6860714 | McNulty et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6974308 | Halfmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981840 | Lee | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7121802 | Athans et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134842 | Tam et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7487819 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503749 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594529 | Jones | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7622539 | Fukui et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20010024000 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020047229 | Yanagisawa et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020119045 | Starkweather | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030015308 | Fosaaen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078334 | Doles et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050006047 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023710 | Brodkin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070651 | McNulty et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050156361 | Holowczak et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199366 | Vandermeer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205232 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060065383 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060153681 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060233641 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060275112 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003416 | Bewlay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089849 | McNulty et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080027163 | McNulty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080135202 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135718 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135721 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080314445 | McNulty et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314446 | McNulty et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1840859 | Oct 2006 | CN |
0964981 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1015736 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1016639 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1079071 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1495820 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1526250 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1552913 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1614488 | Mar 2014 | EP |
1034368 | Jun 1966 | GB |
1409794 | Oct 1975 | GB |
1409795 | Oct 1975 | GB |
2040292 | Aug 1980 | GB |
2040295 | Aug 1980 | GB |
2174458 | Nov 1986 | GB |
4895317 | Dec 1973 | JP |
52107230 | Sep 1977 | JP |
5431995 | Mar 1979 | JP |
5445314 | Apr 1979 | JP |
5964135 | Apr 1984 | JP |
61152702 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62121734 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63242439 | Oct 1988 | JP |
02188460 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02303651 | Dec 1990 | JP |
0488140 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05262558 | Oct 1993 | JP |
061605 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06321624 | Nov 1994 | JP |
08143613 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08509665 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09285839 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2000071057 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000301289 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001511864 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001286980 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001516834 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001316185 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002127261 | May 2002 | JP |
2002514996 | May 2002 | JP |
2003053480 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004508201 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005028455 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006029329 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006051542 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006504530 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006169411 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006257323 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008155A4 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008183566 | Aug 2008 | JP |
9817418 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9837310 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201380021404.2 dated May 5, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 30, 2013 which was issued in connection with PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US13/37753 which was filed on Apr. 23, 2013. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2015507258 dated Nov. 4, 2015. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 10/675,374, filed Jan. 20, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 10/675,374, filed Jun. 7, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 10/675,374, filed Nov. 17, 2006. |
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07101040.9 dated Jul. 26, 2007. |
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07101040.9 dated May 8, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Jul. 25, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07121580.0 dated May 16, 2008. |
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07121789.7 dated Apr. 3, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Dec. 10, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Jan. 9, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/609,117, filed May 5, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Apr. 15, 2009. |
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07121789.7 dated Aug. 26, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,409, filed Nov. 19, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,926, filed Jul. 28, 2009. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,926, filed Feb. 18, 2010. |
Bruck S. et al., “RF-Aerogels: A New Binding Material for Foundry Application”, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2003. |
F. Jorge Lino et al., “Ceramic Components for Foundry Industry,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 142, pp. 628-633, 2003. |
Harvey et al., “Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part 1 Three-Dimensional Linear Design System”, ASME Paper 99-GT-337; Presented at the International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 8 pages, 1999. |
J. C. Ferreira, “Manufacturing Core-Boxes for Foundry with Rapid Tooling Technology,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 155-156, pp. 1118-1123, 2004. |
Krauss et al., “Rheological Properties of Alumina Injection Feedstocks”, Materials Research, vol. 8, pp. 187-189, 2005. |
Lorenz Ratke et al., “Mechanical Properties of Aerogel Composites for casting Purposes”, Journal of Material Science, vol. 41, pp. 1019-1024, 2006. |
Mueller B. et al., Laminated Object Manufacturing for Rapid Tooling and Pattermaking in Foundry Industry, vol. 39, pp. 47-53, 1999. |
Product Information sheet for Dow Corning SE 1885 Kit. |
Shih et al., “Controlling Secondary-Flow Structure by Leading-Edge Airfoil Fillet and Inlet Swirl to Reduce Aerodynamic Loss and Surface Heat Transfer”, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 125, pp. 48-56, 2003. |
Sieverding; “Secondary Flows in Straight and Annular Turbine Cascades”, Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics of Turbomachinery, vol. II, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 621-664, 1985. |
Takeishi et al., “An Experimental Study of the Heat Transfer and Film Cooling on Low Aspect Ratio Turbine Nozzles”, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Presented at the Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, 9 pages, 1989. |
Theiler et al., “Deposition of Graded Metal Matrix Composites by Laser Beam Cladding”, BIAS Bremen Institute of Applied Beam Technology, Germany, 10 pages, 2005. |
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with Related CN Application No. 200710307197.3 dated Mar. 12, 2012. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-016456 dated Oct. 25, 2011. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-311888 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-311888 dated Jan. 8, 2014. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-311888 dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-317839 dated Aug. 14, 2012. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-317839 dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with Related JP Application No. 2007-317839 dated Jun. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11 /240,837, filed Sep. 30, 2006, “Methods for Making Ceramic Casting Cores and Related Articles and Processes”, H.P. Wang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,823, filed Oct. 24, 2005, “Ceramic-Based Molds for Industrial Gas Turbine Metal Castings Using Gelcasting”, Huang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,741, filed Sep. 29, 2006, “Turbine Angel Wing Sealing Using Surface Depression Treatment”, Bunker, Ronald Scott. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,409, filed Dec. 6, 2006, “Casting Compositions for Manufacturing Metal Castings and Methods of Manufacturing Thereof”, Hsin-Pang Wang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,443, filed Dec. 6, 2006, “Disposable Insert, and Use Thereof in a Method for Manufacturing an Airfoil”, Ching-Pang Lee, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,477, filed Dec. 6, 2006, “Composite Core Die, Methods of Manufacture Thereof and Articles Manufactured Therefrom”, Ching-Pang Lee et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,521, filed Dec. 6, 2006, “Ceramic Cores, Methods of Manufacture Thereof and Articles Manufactured From the Same”, Ching-Pang Lee. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/609,150, filed Dec. 11, 2006, “Method of Modifying the End Wall Contour in a Turbine Using Laser Consolidation and the Turbines Derived Therefrom”, Ching-Pang Lee et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,749, filed Dec. 7, 2006, “Processes for the Formation of Positive Features on Shroud Components, and Related Articles”, Ching-Pang Lee. |
Japanese Search Report issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2007-016456 dated Oct. 20, 2011. |
Japanese Search Report issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2007-311888 dated Aug. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150152734 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61636908 | Apr 2012 | US |