This invention relates to rotor blades and specifically to the mechanical damping of vibratory energy in the blades of rotor assemblies during operation. Rotor assemblies are used in a variety of turbo-machines, such as turbines and compressors. During operation, fluid forces induce vibratory stresses on the blades, resulting in high cycle fatigue and potential failure of the blades. Dampers, commonly frictional dampers, are utilized to reduce the magnitude of these dynamic stresses, thereby increasing operational life of the blades.
Typically the most effective frictional dampers are located on the turbine blade shroud. The shroud is located at the radial tip of the rotor blade adjacent the stationary housing. During operation, centrifugal forces urge the damper into frictional contact with its adjacent blade shroud. This contact reduces the relative motion between the adjacent blades, thereby reducing the vibratory stresses on the blades during operation. Frictional damping is effective so long as relative motion exists between the damper and the blade. When the rotor speed becomes high, typical flat plate shroud dampers become too heavy and the frictional damper sticks to the shroud due to friction thereby reducing its effectiveness. Typical lighter weight damper designs consist of loss fitting rivets. These rivets are hard to form due to the many tight tolerance features required and they are exposed to the main gas flow.
Other efforts to reduce vibrational damage not only are structurally deficient in affecting the clearances of the shroud, they are subject to fatigue that further reduces their effectiveness.
Conventional shrouds typically include one or more sealing rails that extend radially outward from the shroud in close proximity to the stationary housing and typically extend continuously across the top surface of the shroud between first and second circumferential sides. Typical previous shroud frictional dampers are retained by extra features added to the shroud. These added features are located on the shroud at the furthest distance from blade which increases the shroud overhung weight. These added features increase the centrifugal induced bending stress in the shroud which may result in potential failure of the rotor assembly due to high cycle fatigue. To counteract this, the shroud thickness must be increased. This increase in shroud thickness also results in higher centrifugal stress in the blade at the blade's two critical locations, the blade shank and firtree.
What is needed is a way to place any damper out of the main gas flow of turbo-machines without adversely affecting the function of the shroud.
The present invention relates to a damper arrangement on the sealing rail of turbo-machine shrouds where the damper in the rail is outside of the main gas flow. This invention uses the existing rail and requires no modification to the shroud to retain the damper. The rail damper comprises a shim stock having its ends oriented to function with specific shroud rail configurations. The present invention does not require any special retainment features. Retainment features add weight to the shroud and result in lower shroud and blade safety factors.
a is a perspective view of the embodiment in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
a perspective view of another embodiment of this invention in a shroud rail.
b is an enlarged perspective view of the damper used in
c is an enlarged perspective view of the slot in the shroud and rail in
d is an end view of the damper in the slot of
Damper element 21 may be any shape that provides a fit on the rail, with a generally “U” shape being shown. The sides of the “U” shape may extend radially up or down, depending on the configuration of upstream rails 19a and 19b. The use of the “U” shape allows for simple manufacture and installation. Damper 21 may be any material, such as steel or other metals, ceramics and other materials. Damper 21 material should be selected to have a light weight when possible.
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of the relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of an alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of another alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of another alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of another alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of another alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
a is an enlarged perspective view showing the details of another alternative relationship between shrouds 17a and 17b and upstream rails 19a and 19b. Damper 21 is seen in
In all of the embodiments shown herein, the damper is designed to engage the sealing rail of a shroud facing inward from the rail outer surface to maintain the damper element out of the flow of gas and at the most effective radial location on the blade. Damping is affected without any lessening of the functionality of the rails or the shroud. Similar dampers may also be placed on downstream rails since alteration of the shroud is not needed.
The invention has been shown in association with a firtree bladed rotor. The invention is also suitable for use with other rotor configurations such as an integrally bladed rotor, for example.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2610823 | Knowlton, Jr. | Sep 1952 | A |
3752599 | Pace | Aug 1973 | A |
3986792 | Warner | Oct 1976 | A |
4111603 | Stahl | Sep 1978 | A |
4177011 | Eskesen et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4767273 | Partington | Aug 1988 | A |
4897021 | Chaplin et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4936749 | Arrao et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5083903 | Erdmann | Jan 1992 | A |
5423659 | Thompson | Jun 1995 | A |
5730584 | Dodd | Mar 1998 | A |
6343912 | Manteiga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371727 | Stangeland et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
20050135936 | Cherolis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080050236 | Allen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20130170994 | Jones | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130101395 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |