The invention relates to rotating turbine blade/disc assemblies in gas turbines, and particularly to balancing or stacking the mass of a blade airfoil and platform over an attachment axis or plane of symmetry of the blade root.
Gas turbine blades are mounted on the circumference of a rotating disc in a circular array as shown in
Each blade includes an airfoil section and a platform that forms an inner shroud ring with adjacent platforms. The inner shroud ring separates the combustion working gas from cooling air supplied to channels in the blade via channels in the disc. Each blade is connected to the disc by an attachment device called a root. In order to distribute the centrifugal loads evenly on opposed surfaces of the root, it is common to align the centers of mass of the airfoil, platform, and root along a rotation radius called an attachment or stacking axis. The goal is actually to have the sum of moments about an attachment plane of the blade to be approximately zero during operation of the blade to balance forces on the blade root lobes. The predominant operating load is the centrifugal load, although the airfoil lift load also contributes to the operating loads to a much lesser degree, so the center of mass of the airfoil and/or platform may be offset by a small dimension from the attachment plane in order to offset the airfoil lift moment.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present inventors have now recognized that the prior art approach of aligning the centers of mass of the airfoil, platform, and root along a stacking axis constrains the position of the airfoil on the platform, and it generally places the leading and trailing edges of the airfoil close to the pressure side edge of the platform. This locates the mechanical stress rise associated with the platform-to-airfoil filet weld to be near respective corners of the platform. It also locates the relatively higher pressure airfoil bow-wave over the leading edge of the platform, thereby increasing the possibility of leakage of combustion gas between platforms. The inventors have developed a turbine blade which overcomes these disadvantages.
A combustion gas flow 54 from the turbine combustor aerodynamically drives the airfoils to rotate the disc and shaft. Cooling air 56 is provided to channels or chambers 58 in the platform from the turbine compressor via channels (not shown) in the turbine shaft and disc as known in the art. The cooling air may flow through channels in the blade, and may have a higher pressure than the combustion gas flow 54, which prevents leakage of the combustion gas into the cooling chamber 58. Seals 60 may be provided in grooves 62 in one or both mate-faces 48, 50 to minimize leakage of the coolant air 56 and the combustion gas 54 between the mate-faces of adjacent platforms. These seals 60 commonly take the form of cylinders and/or blades, but may take other forms.
A bow wave 55 forms in the combustion gas flow 54 meeting the leading edge 38. This creates a localized high pressure zone at the intersection of the leading edge and the platform 42 that may be locally higher than a pressure in the cooling chamber 58, thereby potentially causing leakage of the combustion gas between adjacent platforms into the cooling chamber 58. This can contaminate the coolant air, burn the seals, and locally overheat the platform at the high-stress fillet area near the leading edge 38.
For convenience, the distances da and dp are defined herein as the normal distance from each respective center of mass ACM, PCM to the attachment plane 64. Alternate definitions for da and dp may be used that also produce balance across the attachment plane 64, including: 1) The distance between each respective center of mass ACM, PCM, and a common center of mass CCM that is either on the attachment axis 65 or at least in the attachment plane 64; and 2) The perpendicular distance from each respective center of mass ACM, PCM to the attachment axis 65.
Equation 2 below solves for the platform offset dp when the other values are known. A sample substitution of values into equation 2 is shown in equation 3. Thus, an airfoil of 2.00 kg mass (ma) that is offset 1.00 cm (da) from the attachment plane 64, will balance with a platform of 1.00 kg mass (mp) that is offset 2.00 cm (dp) from the attachment plane 64.
ma*da=mp*dp 1)
dp=(ma*da)/mp 2)
dp=(2.00 kg*1.00 cm)/1.00 kg=2.00 cm 3)
Formulas for the center-of-mass and the above formulas provide static balance. Dynamic balance can be achieved by taking into account the uneven radial distribution of the masses ACM, PCM. The reactive centrifugal force CF exerted by a mass m is CF=mrω2 (where ω is angular velocity). The centrifugal forces of the airfoil and platform can be balanced about the attachment plane 64 using equation 5, which treats this problem like balancing a lever. Since ω is the same for both masses, equation 5 simplifies to equation 6, which can be arranged to solve for any single variable in terms of the others. Equation 7 solves for the platform offset dp when the other values are known. A sample substitution of values into equation 7 is shown in equation 8. Thus, an airfoil of 2.00 kg mass (ma) centered at a radius of 50.00 CM (ra), and offset 1.00 cm (da) from the attachment plane 64, will balance with a platform of 1.00 kg mass (mp) centered at a radius of 45.00 cm (rp), and offset 2.22 cm (dr) from the attachment plane 64.
CF=mrω2 (r=radius, m=mass, ω=angular velocity). 4)
marω2da=mprω2dp (CFs of airfoil and platform are balanced) 5)
marada=mprpdp (ω2 cancels, since it is equal on both sides) 6)
dp=marada/mprp 7)
dr=(2.00 kg*50.00 cm*1.00 cm)/(1.00 kg*45.00 cm)=2.22 cm 8)
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the immediately preceding exemplary discussion ignores the moment contribution of the airfoil loads for simplification purposes, but that such loads can be routinely accounted for using known techniques for the various embodiments of the invention. Further, using the static balance technique (locating the two-body center of mass in the attachment plane 64 or on the attachment axis 65), the centrifugal forces will be unbalanced in the correct direction to compensate for such aero forces, i.e. they will be unbalanced toward the suction side of the root. However, it is within the ability of one skilled in the art to calculate the aero torque on the root and to compensate accordingly using the dynamic formula.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4585395 | Nourse et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4682935 | Martin | Jul 1987 | A |
5044885 | Odoul et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5725354 | Wadia et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5785499 | Houston et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6042336 | Bulgrin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6273683 | Zagar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299412 | Wood et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338611 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6786696 | Herman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20070258817 | Allen-Bradley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080101959 | McRae et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080273984 | Liang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090208339 | Cherolis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100158696 | Pandey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120183405 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |