The present inventions relate generally to turbines, and more particularly, to a system for controlling a valve therein.
Electrical power plants employ large steam turbines to generate electricity. In a steam turbine, fast control of the valves may be particularly useful.
The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
One aspect of the preferred embodiments involves valve control multicasting. Turbine control systems require increasingly fast response times from their electronic governors in order to provide tight, responsive and safe turbine operation. The response time of the electronic governor is typically defined as the time delay from the moment the system reads the physical turbine speed signal to the moment the physical servo output signal is adjusted in direct response to the change in the speed input signal. As shown in
Some prior systems used the controller to perform all the functions involving valve control. This included critical and non-critical tasks in addition to other functions the controller is required to perform. However, the preferred embodiments split the functions such that the critical functions are executed in a fast task or down at the I/O module level to greatly reduce execution time to a few milliseconds. Furthermore, less critical functions are executed in a slower task reducing the stress on the controller.
The principal applications for the preferred embodiments are generally large steam turbines at electrical power plants. The use of this application provides much faster control of multiple steam valves than traditional controls used in the past. The expected improvement is of the order of 10:1. Additionally, other applications that require faster control of valves could benefit from the preferred embodiments.
The biggest contributor to delays in the governor response time is the execution of the control logic inside the main DCS controller, which can vary from a few milliseconds to hundreds of milliseconds. The DCS controller executes governor functions such as speed control, load control, protection, fuel control, and communication interfaces to I/O modules. The last element, communication interfaces to I/O modules, can be a very significant burden on the DCS controller in systems with a large number of I/Os and more specifically a large number of valve positioner I/O modules. The communication interfaces to the valve positioner I/O modules can take several milliseconds for each instance, resulting in slow controller execution times and slow governor response times for turbine applications with a lot of fuel valves, which are representative of many steam and gas turbines.
One advantage of the preferred embodiments is greatly reduced execution time in a DCS controller. Another advantage is a reduced amount of logic required in the controller. Another advantage is discrimination between critical and non-critical functions inside the valve position I/O module.
The inventions as described herein may have one or more of the following features in addition to any of the features described above. Referring to the figures, the following features are shown.
A turbine control system including a speed probe 20 detecting a speed of a turbine 26; a turbine valve 24 controlling a flow of a fluid or a gas to or from the turbine 26; a controller 14 in communication with the speed probe 20 and the turbine valve 24, the controller 14 receiving a speed signal from the speed probe 20, and the controller 14 sending a first signal 32 and a second signal 34 to the turbine valve 24, the first signal 32 comprising a valve position command 40 to change a position of the turbine valve 24 in response to the speed signal and the second signal 34 comprising a support function 42 that does not command a change in position of the turbine valve 24 in response to the speed signal, wherein the controller 14 outputs the first signal 32 at a faster rate than the second signal 34.
The turbine control further comprising a speed wheel 22 attached to and rotatable with the turbine 26, the speed probe 20 identifying teeth of the speed wheel 22 as the teeth pass by the speed probe 20.
The turbine control further comprising a speed monitoring module 10, the speed monitoring module 10 being in communication with the speed probe 20, and the speed monitoring module 10 being in communication with the controller 14 through an I/O bus 12.
The turbine control system wherein the support function 42 comprises a diagnostic function, a feedback function, a calibration function or a test function and data 44 associated therewith.
The turbine control system wherein the controller 14 processes tasks in a fast cycle 28 and a slow cycle 30, the first signal 32 being processed in the fast cycle 28, and the second signal 34 being processed in the slow cycle 30.
The turbine control system further comprising a valve positioning module 18, the valve positioning module 18 being in communication with the turbine valve 24, and the valve positioning module 18 being in communication with the controller 14 through an I/O bus 16.
The turbine control system further comprising a plurality of the valve positioning module 18 and a plurality of the turbine valve 24, each of the valve positioning modules 18 being in communication with a separate one of the turbine valve 24, and the controller 14 separately communicates with each of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18 to send the second signal 34 comprising the support function 42, each of the support functions 42 thereby corresponding to a particular one of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18.
The turbine control system wherein each of the plurality of the turbine valve 24 comprises a fuel valve, a bypass valves, a stop valve or a governor valve.
The turbine control system wherein each of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18 comprises a separate circuit board and processor therein.
The turbine control system wherein the controller 14 communicates with the plurality of the valve positioning module 18 with packets 32, 34, each packet 32, 34 containing at least one address 38 associated with one of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18.
The turbine control system wherein the first signal 32 comprises a first type of packet 32 containing multiple addresses 38 associated with more than one of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18, the first type of packet 32 further containing one of the valve position command 40 for each of the multiple addresses 38.
The turbine control system wherein the first type of packet 32 contains a multicast flag 36 indicating that all of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18 must read the packet 32.
The turbine control system wherein the second signal 34 comprises a second type of packet 34 containing only one address 38 associated with only one of the plurality of the valve positioning module 18.
The turbine control system wherein the plurality of the valve positioning module 18 ignore the second type of packet 34 if the packet 34 does not contain the address 38 associated with the respective valve positioning module 18.
It is understood that the preferred embodiments described herein may be implemented as computerized methods in a non-transitory computer readable medium if desired.
While preferred embodiments of the inventions have been described, it should be understood that the inventions are not so limited, and modifications may be made without departing from the inventions herein. While each embodiment described herein may refer only to certain features and may not specifically refer to every feature described with respect to other embodiments, it should be recognized that the features described herein are interchangeable unless described otherwise, even where no reference is made to a specific feature. It should also be understood that the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages of the inventions, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of the inventions. The scope of the inventions is defined by the appended claims, and all devices and methods that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2827020 | Cook | Mar 1958 | A |
3597653 | Moore et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
4020685 | Van Millingen et al. | May 1977 | A |
4099237 | Zitelli | Jul 1978 | A |
4183242 | Brown | Jan 1980 | A |
4345191 | Takats et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4356447 | Hönig et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4434470 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4485452 | Cording et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4494207 | Chang et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4506339 | Kühnlein | Mar 1985 | A |
4554788 | Hwang et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4602515 | Eichenlaub | Jul 1986 | A |
4635209 | Hwang et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4712372 | Dickey et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4715009 | Böhmler et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4746862 | Ueki | May 1988 | A |
4774845 | Barbe et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4788647 | McManus et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4887214 | Takats et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4955269 | Kendig et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4972332 | Luebbering et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975845 | Mehta | Dec 1990 | A |
5165271 | Stepper et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5371460 | Coffman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5508609 | Parkinson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5537322 | Denz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559705 | McClish et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5789658 | Henn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5933005 | Pugh | Aug 1999 | A |
6131547 | Weber et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6292717 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6445995 | Mollmann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6727686 | Beckmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6804600 | Uluyol et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
8100000 | Rankin | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8174268 | Bose et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8222760 | Menke | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8352149 | Meacham | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8428784 | Krueger | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464598 | Cazaux et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8753067 | Shindo | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9140718 | O'Neil et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9438026 | Franks et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9708926 | Curlier et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10371072 | Gouzenne Coutier | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10392962 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10487683 | Gerez et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10989063 | Xiong et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20030007861 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040050178 | Parkinson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20080110283 | Shaver et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100088003 | Meacham | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324799 | Davison | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130098042 | Frealle et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130289933 | Hess et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140070794 | Cosby et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140241850 | Duge | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140260249 | Shapiro et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150096371 | O'Neil et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150211380 | Curlier et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160090918 | Certain | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160291052 | Riolo et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170343575 | Brown et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170356300 | Domnick et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180003073 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180031594 | Joseph et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180050789 | Marone et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180050816 | Yakobov et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1678913 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1191190 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2273649 | Jan 2011 | EP |
3757355 | Dec 2020 | EP |
49-41706 | Apr 1974 | JP |
52-170233 | Dec 1977 | JP |
53-125502 | Nov 1978 | JP |
58-202308 | Nov 1983 | JP |
60-156909 | Aug 1985 | JP |
61-55303 | Mar 1986 | JP |
61-269615 | Nov 1986 | JP |
61-276036 | Dec 1986 | JP |
61-286504 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62-225704 | Oct 1987 | JP |
8-227317 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2000-249629 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2003-148108 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-336503 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-159496 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2007-224918 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-302090 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-157663 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2012-90422 | May 2012 | JP |
WO 2012064592 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2014147832 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 19800872.4, 8 pp. (dated Feb. 11, 2022). |
Japan Patent Office, Office Action in Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-563458, 11 pp. (dated Jan. 5, 2022). |
Japan Patent Office, Second Office Action in Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-563458, 11 pp. (dated Aug. 16, 2022). |
Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US19/31445, 5 pgs, dated Jul. 25, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210054789 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62669070 | May 2018 | US | |
62669063 | May 2018 | US | |
62669057 | May 2018 | US | |
62669042 | May 2018 | US | |
62669048 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2019/031445 | May 2019 | US |
Child | 17092525 | US |