This invention relates generally to turbine drive systems and more particularly to a swimming pool cleaner propelled by a turbine driven by a suction powered water flow.
Many diverse systems use a pump to pull a fluid (e.g., water) through a suction passageway (typically including a nozzle) in order to drive a turbine. In designing such a system, it is desirable that the passageway define a flow area sufficiently small to produce a fluid velocity sufficiently high to efficiently drive the turbine. However, a relatively small flow area constitutes a flow restriction which, potentially, can obstruct objects (e.g., debris) borne by the fluid. To avoid obstructing the passageway, it would, of course, be preferable that the flow area be as large as possible. These competing design requirements, i.e., (1) reducing flow area to increase fluid velocity and (2) increasing flow area to reduce the potential of flow obstructions, are generally compromised in the design process.
Various efforts intended to mitigate the aforementioned competing requirements are discussed in the prior art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,656,683 describes a suction cleaner for swimming pools in which the suction “nozzle is made of silicone rubber so that it can distend to allow large objects to pass through”.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,950 describes an anti-clogging variable throat suction cleaning device intended to overcome the disadvantages and shortcomings of the prior art including aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,656,683. More particularly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,950 describes a suction nozzle including at least one body portion which is moveable relative to another body portion for the purpose of enabling the throat to expand in response to the relative movement of the body portions. The patent asserts that “The resulting expansion of the suction nozzle allows substantially unrestricted passage of large foreign objects through the throat during the operation of the cleaner”.
The present invention is directed to a suction inlet configured to produce a fluid velocity greater than would be produced by a conventional suction nozzle having an equivalent physical cross section area. The suction inlet in accordance with the invention comprises an orifice whose flow characteristic differs from that of a nozzle in that the constricted section of the flow, i.e., the vena contracta, occurs not within the orifice, but downstream from it. A suction inlet in accordance with the invention is particularly suited for use in a swimming pool cleaner in that it can provide a sufficiently large physical flow area to pass debris such as acorns and rocks which would not fit through a nozzle dimensioned to produce the same fluid velocity for driving a turbine.
The present invention is primarily directed to a method and apparatus for enabling a cleaner to travel through a water pool to collect dirt and other debris from the water and/or pool containment wall. The cleaner defines a suction passageway having an inlet open to pool water and an outlet adapted to be coupled via a flexible hose to the suction side of an electrically driven pump. A resulting suction flow, from the inlet to the pump, functions to (1) carry dirt and other debris to a filter and (2) to drive a turbine for propelling the cleaner.
In accordance with the invention, the suction passageway inlet includes an orifice defining a physical flow area A1 and is configured to create an “effective” flow area A2, smaller than A1, downstream from the orifice. The small effective flow area A2 creates a water flow of sufficient velocity to efficiently drive the turbine whereas the larger physical flow area A1 permits debris to pass more readily. The orifice peripheral edge is typically, though not necessarily, circular.
A preferred cleaner embodiment is comprised of a housing including a wall (or “plate”) defining a passageway inlet. The inlet is formed by an orifice extending through the plate which defines an edge peripheral to the orifice. The housing is adapted to be supported in the pool, e.g., on wheels, to place the plate outer surface close to the pool wall surface. This geometry causes water streaming into the orifice to make a sharp directional transition just upstream from the orifice peripheral edge. This transition results in the formation of a vena contracta downstream from the orifice.
The hydrodynamics of an orifice through a plate, resulting in a vena contracta, has been discussed in the literature, primarily with regard to pipeline flow metering (See, e.g., Elementary Fluid Mechanics by John K. Vennard, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1949, at pages 250-262). The flow characteristics of an orifice differ from those of a typical nozzle in that the constricted section of the flow occurs not within the orifice, but downstream from it. The term “vena contracta” refers to the contracted downstream cross section of a jet after passing through the orifice. The formation of the vena contracta occurs as a consequence of water converging on the upstream orifice edge from all directions and continuing to converge downstream from the orifice. Where the orifice upstream edge defines a physical flow area A1 and the vena contracta defines an effective flow area A2, the “coefficient of contraction, CC” is expressed as CC=A2/A1. Various orifice edge geometries, e.g., square-edged, sharp-edged, and Borda, are discussed in the literature, and are generally characterized by different coefficients of contraction.
A cleaner in accordance with the present invention preferably employs an orifice having an upstream cross dimension, i.e., diameter, of between 0.25 and 2.0 inches, and a peripheral edge of the same diameter extending axially less than 5% of that diameter. Various orifice geometries can be used including circular, elliptical, etc. Use of the term “diameter” is not intended to limit the scope of acceptable orifice geometries. The orifice can be formed as a square-edged hole through a thin plate or a sharp-edged hole through a thicker plate. Alternative orifice edge geometries can also be used. Regardless of which geometry is used, the effect must be to produce a vena contracta downstream from the orifice having an effective flow area A2 where A2<80% of the physical flow area A1 defined by the orifice upstream peripheral edge.
A preferred cleaner in accordance with the invention utilizes a plate outer surface which is substantially planar adjacent the upstream orifice edge and has an area surrounding the orifice which is at least four times, and preferably ten times, the physical orifice area A1. The turbine is mounted in the cleaner housing close to the vena contracta, i.e., downstream from the orifice.
Attention is now directed to
More particularly,
The suction applied to outlet 32 by pump 26, via hose 30, draws a water stream 59 into inlet 36. This stream carries water borne debris through the passageway 34 to the pump 26 and filter 41. Additionally the water stream through passageway 34 rotates the turbine rotor 55 to drive the shaft 56 and the propulsion subsystem 58. As previously, noted, the propulsion subsystem 58 can be configured to propel the cleaner 20 in various manners such as by driving wheels 22 and/or by driving a flow generator (not shown) to discharge a water stream into the pool to produce a reaction force.
Attention is now directed to
The cleaner housing 62 is supported on traction means, preferably wheels 86, which engage the pool wall surface 88 and position the plate outer surface 70 close to but spaced from, e.g., 3/16 of an inch, the wall surface 88. The planar outer surface 70 defines an area much larger than the area of orifice 74. For example, if the upstream physical area of orifice 74 is represented by A1, then the planar outer surface 70 surrounding orifice 74 preferably has an area ten times A1. The physical orifice area A1 defines the maximum size debris which can enter the passageway 76. The passageway, as can be seen in the drawings (e.g.,
Attention is now directed to
The vena contracta effect created by the sharp-edged orifice illustrated in
It is recognized that the formation of a vena contracta in a turbine drive system as taught herein can be implemented using a variety of different orifice and orifice edge geometries. It is intended that the claims be interpreted to cover all such geometries which provide for a physical flow area A1 through the orifice and a smaller effective water jet area A2 for driving a turbine where A2/A1<0.8.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/312,748 filed on Dec. 3, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,763 which is a 371 of PCT/US01/14686 filed on May 8, 2001 which claims benefit of U.S. Application 60/213,976 filed on Jun. 24, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1741379 | Slate | Dec 1929 | A |
3229315 | Watson | Jan 1966 | A |
3790979 | Foster | Feb 1974 | A |
4656683 | Raubenheimer | Apr 1987 | A |
4789364 | Chauvier et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4849024 | Supra | Jul 1989 | A |
4939806 | Supra | Jul 1990 | A |
5105496 | Gray, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5293665 | Worwag | Mar 1994 | A |
5604950 | Stern | Feb 1997 | A |
5701633 | Jonischus | Dec 1997 | A |
6070547 | Achord | Jun 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0565226 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0622506 | Nov 1994 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060282962 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60213976 | Jun 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10312748 | US | |
Child | 11509219 | US |