The present invention relates to turbine engine arrangements and more particularly to engines used with aircraft to provide propulsion.
Use of turbine engines to provide propulsion for aircraft is well known. The turbine engine provides thrust or movement of the aircraft and traditionally as shown in
The current practice depicted in
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a turbine engine arrangement comprising a nacelle defining an inlet duct and a final mixing nozzle, a turbine engine disposed in a flow path between the inlet duct and the final mixing nozzle, the arrangement secured to an aircraft wing. The engine includes a fan and a core engine that rotate about a principal rotation axis of the engine, and the principal rotation axis is aligned with an upflow of air to the wing to avoid a turning of an inlet flow in the inlet to pass through the engine. The final mixing nozzle and a core exhaust nozzle are angled downwardly relative to the principal rotation axis of the engine to provide a flow of air that has an overall component of lift, the core exhaust nozzle being encompassed within the final mixing nozzle.
Preferably, alignment of the engine rotational axis is inclined towards a plane of the inlet duct.
Preferably, alignment of the engine is with the engine substantially perpendicular to the input duct.
Normally, the nacelle is secured to the wing through a pylon. Typically, the pylon is configured to allow positioning of the nacelle with greater clearance relative to a leading edge of a wing to allow increased fan diameter and/or further displacement of the flow from the engine from the wing.
Typically, the engine has a final mixing nozzle such that the output flow is appropriately directed vectorally for efficient lift operation.
Alternatively, the engine is adjustable mounted within the nacelle via mountings to maintain alignment with the upwash flow to the wing.
Preferably, the alignment of the engine with the upwash flow of air to the wing is parallel to the rotational axis of the engine.
Generally, the angle of upflow relative to a direction of motion of the wing is between 0° and 10°.
Generally, the angle between the final mixing nozzle and the flow through the engine is between 0° and 4°.
Generally, the angle between the core exhaust nozzle and the flow through the engine is between 0° and 4°.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the following:
Referring to
The engine 1 and in particular the turbine machinery are aligned with the inlet flow or upwash 5 created by the wing 4. Thus, air flow at the inlet duct 11 is subjected to no turning such that there is higher recovery and fan 14 stability due to even presentation of the inlet flow 5 to the turbine machinery.
At the core nozzle 7 and the final mixing nozzle 17 of the arrangement 10 as indicated previously a vertical component is provided in the exhaust flow 9. This vertical component is achieved through appropriate vectoring of the bypass duct 8 and core nozzle 7 along with final mixing nozzle 17. This vectoring may vary through displacement of surfaces in the bypass duct 8 or core nozzle 7 to achieve best lift performance.
The vectored nacelle 2 allows increased clearance in a pylon portion 13 in comparison with conventional previous arrangements as depicted in
The bypass duct 8 at an upper portion may be impinged by hot gas flows from the core nozzle 7. Thus, hot gas flows from in particular an upper part 15 of the core nozzle 7 may penetrate the outer bypass duct 8 to provide propulsion. Such an arrangement would allow re-energisation of flow boundary layers created in the pylon 3 and the outer surfaces of nacelle 2.
In summary, the engine arrangement 10 depicted in
The present invention utilises aligning of the engine 1 to the upwash of the wing 4 whilst achieving a vertical component for lift in the outlet flow 9 through appropriate angling vectors for the bypass duct 8/final mixing nozzle 17 in association with the outlet nozzle 7 of the engine 1. The objective is to provide substantial alignment of the inlet duct 11 with the upwash throughout operation. In such circumstances, in normal operation it will be appreciated that fuel load diminishes as fuel is burnt to provide propulsion in the engine 1. In such circumstances, lift requirements are reduced and the angle of attack required by the wing 4 alters and the lift to drag ratios change.
The ultimate thrust vector angle for the exhaust flow 9 may be given by designing the wing in conjunction with the engine installation. Wing lift may be reduced by providing a delta lift from the thrust vector.
It will be noted that an upwash 5 is caused by the presence of a subsonic wing approaching the normally stationary atmosphere. This reduces the pressure field above the wing and induces a vertical component in the atmosphere prior to the wing's arrival. In such circumstances it will be appreciated that the relationships
By providing the core engine 1 in substantial alignment with the uplift flow as indicated above, there is no turning in the inlet flow 5 presented to the fan(s) 4 of the engine 1 as well as in the flow through the engine 1 such that the engine 1 can operate to high efficiency. The present invention utilises an external bypass duct 8 in order to create the necessary optimum thrust vector, that is to say a vertical component in the outflow 9 for lift. The core engine 1 provides, through its core nozzle 7 and final mixing nozzle 17, a gas flow which is controlled and deflected for lift performance. Bypass airflows illustrated as arrowheads 16 created by the fan 14 in
Use may also be made of the vectoring features, both nozzle/duct and adjustable engine mounting features, to actively position the engine/exhaust to minimise noise footprint, especially for take off.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention the nacelle 2 may be shortened or truncated as shown by broken line 2a.
Whilst endeavouring in the foregoing specification to draw attention to those features of the invention believed to be of particular importance it should be understood that the Applicant claims protection in respect of any patentable feature or combination of features hereinbefore referred to and/or shown in the drawings whether or not particular emphasis has been placed thereon.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0401189.6 | Jan 2004 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2969935 | Price | Jan 1961 | A |
3031155 | Kerry | Apr 1962 | A |
3045953 | Eggers et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3064923 | Reiniger | Nov 1962 | A |
3327965 | Bockrath | Jun 1967 | A |
3442471 | Fischer | May 1969 | A |
3451624 | Haberkorn et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3480236 | Nash | Nov 1969 | A |
3542295 | Rosiger et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3640468 | Searle et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3658279 | Robertson | Apr 1972 | A |
3747875 | Stevens | Jul 1973 | A |
3773280 | Buchstaller | Nov 1973 | A |
3806067 | Kutney | Apr 1974 | A |
3809178 | Manca et al. | May 1974 | A |
3863867 | Souslin et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3915415 | Pazmany | Oct 1975 | A |
3940092 | Farris | Feb 1976 | A |
3952973 | James | Apr 1976 | A |
3972490 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4066214 | Johnson | Jan 1978 | A |
4301980 | Bradfield et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4318516 | Cole | Mar 1982 | A |
4449680 | Gratzer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4449681 | Gratzer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4449682 | Gratzer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4449683 | Gratzer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4456204 | Hapke | Jun 1984 | A |
4458863 | Smith | Jul 1984 | A |
4474345 | Musgrove | Oct 1984 | A |
4560122 | Parkinson et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4603821 | White | Aug 1986 | A |
4666104 | Kelber | May 1987 | A |
4691877 | Denning | Sep 1987 | A |
4721271 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722357 | Wynosky | Feb 1988 | A |
4940196 | Lardellier | Jul 1990 | A |
5039031 | Valverde | Aug 1991 | A |
5058617 | Stockman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5131605 | Kress | Jul 1992 | A |
5261227 | Giffin, III | Nov 1993 | A |
5277382 | Seelen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5319922 | Brantley | Jun 1994 | A |
5372337 | Kress et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5746391 | Rodgers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755403 | Marche | May 1998 | A |
5775638 | Duesler | Jul 1998 | A |
6009985 | Ivers | Jan 2000 | A |
6095456 | Powell | Aug 2000 | A |
6138946 | Saiz | Oct 2000 | A |
6247668 | Reysa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6568633 | Dunn | May 2003 | B1 |
6729575 | Bevilaqua | May 2004 | B1 |
20020117581 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020158146 | Lair | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030183723 | Bevilaqua | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004157 | Liotta | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140397 | Dun | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050263643 | Stretton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 115 914 | Jan 1987 | EP |
1 270 538 | Apr 1972 | GB |
2 259 114 | Mar 1993 | GB |
2 275 308 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2 282 353 | Apr 1995 | GB |
WO 9960268 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050211824 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |