This application claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1759111, filed Sep. 29, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the field of gas turbine engines for aircraft, such as turbojet engines, and relates more specifically to the arrangement of a spark plug in the combustion chamber of this type of engine.
In such an engine, the combustion chamber receives air from the compressor, a portion of which is mixed with the fuel and burned in the primary combustion zone. Ignition is provided by at least one spark plug arranged downstream from the carburetor system. Another portion of the air bypasses the primary combustion zone and mixes with the primary combustion gases. Next, all the hot gases are directed towards the turbine.
WO 2011/061143 discloses a combustion chamber of a gas turbine engine for aircraft which comprises:
Combustion chambers are designed to comply with mandatory specifications such as reigniting during flight, the shape of the temperature profile, gas emissions as well as both the thermal and mechanical resistance of the components. In particular, the ignition system must provide reignition during flight in the event of the combustion chamber accidentally switching off, including under windmilling conditions (blades or vanes turning freely), while withstanding the thermal constraints to which they are exposed under the usual operating conditions of the chamber. Remember that windmilling occurs when the engine stops and the blades of the fan and compressor of the turbine engine continue to turn due to the speed of the air that passes through same (without needing combustion).
The invention discloses a solution that makes it possible to reconcile two constraints at once:
The solution of WO 2011/061143 does not contemplate or even particularly allow this.
The invention also suggests, parallel to the axis of the duct, for the openings passing through the duct to be staggered in a plurality of rows, at least some of said openings individually having a diameter of 0.2 mm to 0.6 mm.
These staggered through-openings preferably number 50 to 500.
Regardless, the invention proposes a solution that includes the equivalent of a variable geometry, while not including any moving mechanical parts, in order to ensure a satisfying service life for the system.
A favorable reduction of the flow rate coefficient is obtained in the openings in question when the pressure drops.
In order to further promote this effect, it is proposed for at least some of said openings passing through the duct to be individually angled relative to a perpendicular to the axis of the duct.
By angling the openings individually in an azimuthal direction, the length of these openings is increased compared with the solutions used in existing engines. Thus, the aforementioned effect of reducing the flow rate coefficient while the pressure drops will be increased.
In this regard, it is also advisable for said (at least some) openings, individually angled relative to a perpendicular to the axis of the duct, to extend individually in a direction belonging to a plane perpendicular to the axis of the duct.
Also in this regard, it is advisable for said (at least some) openings, individually angled relative to a perpendicular to the axis of the duct, to be straight.
Thus, the air will be added by rows, or levels, and the openings will be easier to produce.
In order to achieve the same type of sought effect, it is furthermore also advised:
In principle, the production of the ducts and, in particular, the boring thereof is facilitated, and a homogeneous distribution of the cooling air near the spark plug is also promoted.
The invention, which also applies to a gas turbine engine for aircraft comprising the combustion chamber having all or part of the preceding features, will eventually be understood more completely below, and other aims, details, features and advantages of same may appear with greater detail in reference to the following description, wherein the embodiment(s) of the invention are given as merely illustrative, non-exhaustive examples in reference to the appended schematic drawings.
The following figures relate to embodiments according to the invention, as follows:
In
Such an assembly makes it possible to track the relative movements resulting from thermal fluctuations and others between the chamber and the casing, the plug guide 75 being capable of moving along the bearing surface 73 inside the wall 73′.
However, it is observed that the duct is permeable at all operating pressures of the engine and the chamber: there are typically 12 to 25 openings 72b with an individual diameter of 0.6 mm to 1 mm, which are not staggered (all placed in one row in a plane perpendicular to the axis X3 of the duct 72). Openings 72b allow the passage of air during any phase of flight, even for pressures lower than 0.5×105 Pa. It is specified that the height H of the duct 72 is defined, parallel to the axis X3, between the base 12a thereof that limits same on the side of the shroud (the outer wall 7 in the example) and the opposite end thereof, in this case the plane 12b that is coplanar with the upper bearing surface 73 (on which the plug guide 75 rests).
It follows that the permeability of the shroud varies little when the pressure drops. Thus, the percentage of air passing into the plug guide under high pressure is almost identical to that passing under low pressure. This is unfavorable for ignition, since the flow rate for cooling the spark plug 13, under low pressure (typically 0.1×105 to 0.5×105 Pa), tends to separate the kerosene from the spark plug 13 and to extinguish the ignition cores, 0.3×105 Pa being a typical low-pressure condition during reignition at altitude.
Conversely, in the invention (see
Thus, the multi-perforated duct 720 or 722 will be almost impermeable to air at the aforementioned low pressures.
The various rows (e.g. 74a to 74d) of openings 720b or 722b will obviously extend between the inner face 723 and the outer face 725 of the duct similarly to openings 72b in duct 72 of
The number of openings 720b, 722b will be adapted as a function of the size of the duct and the sought flow rate.
In practice, as a preferred example, it is possible to provide such a duct 720 or 722 having openings, 720b, 722b, respectively, which can number between 120 and 160, with an individual diameter of the order of 0.25 mm-0.45 mm.
Indeed, with identical duct structures (in particular the same heights H, same thicknesses, same duct diameters, same materials), we can estimate that it is necessary:
In fact, it is noted that the smaller the individual diameter of the openings 720b or 722b, the greater the number required. The limit on the number of openings is at least set by the ability to bore same in the duct, as well as by the minimum distance between two openings necessary for the mechanical strength of the part.
Moreover, the air permeability of these openings is characterised by the flow coefficients (Cd) thereof. The flow rate coefficient of an opening is the ratio between the actual air flow passing through same and the theoretical maximum air flow that can pass through same. This is lower than 1 due to the presence of the boundary layer.
And yet, the greater the thickness of the boundary layer compared with the diameter of the opening, the less flow can pass and the closer the flow rate coefficient is to 0. Conversely, the lower the boundary layer is compared with the diameter of the opening, the closer the flow rate coefficient is to its maximum value, 1.
The order of magnitude of the thickness of the boundary layer at the end of a length of 1 mm (thickness of the wall forming the duct) is 0.035 mm-0.045 mm, at 30×105 Pa and around +570° C. The thickness increases to 0.07 mm at around 105 Pa, 27/29° C., and ends up at 0.10 mm at 0.210.4×105 Pa, at −25° C. (typical condition for reignition at altitude, around 10,000 m); see
When the pressure drops, the size of the boundary layer increases, since the Reynolds number drops. The flow rate coefficient of the openings with small diameters tends towards 0. Conversely, for openings with a diameter of around 1 mm, the coefficient remains close to 1 across a very broad range of pressures (from windmilling conditions to full-throttle engine conditions). An estimation of the variation in the flow rate coefficient of openings 720b or 722b for cooling a plug guide as a function of the intake pressure air is presented in
However, to reinforce the effect of a reduction of the flow rate coefficient in the openings in question, when the pressure drops, it is also proposed in
Thus, at least some of the (in the example, all of the) openings 720b passing through the duct 72 as shown in
And likewise, in the preferred solution in terms of cooling equilibrium and quality via said openings and ease of production, it is proposed for at least some of the (in the example, all of the) openings 720b, 722b:
The openings 720b or 722b of the same row (e.g. 74a to 74d) will be favorably oriented in directions belonging to the same plane (individual plane P4) perpendicular to the axis X3.
The openings 720b of the same row (e.g. 74a to 74d) will then be angled in directions (individual angles A;
This arrangement will favour production as well as homogeneous air distribution. This will also allow for improved cooling of the spark plug in question, in line with the overall objective.
Thus, in reference to the solution of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1759111 | Sep 2017 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8479490 | Zupanc | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20070051110 | Holland et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20100212324 | Bronson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110113748 | Lains | May 2011 | A1 |
20150013571 | Gerendás | May 2015 | A1 |
20160025342 | Erbas-Sen | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160377289 | Kostka, Jr. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2871419 | May 2015 | EP |
2958373 | Oct 2011 | FR |
S5774521 | May 1982 | JP |
WO 2011061143 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
French Application No. 1759111, Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 25, 2018, 8 pgs. (in French, relevance found in citations). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190101290 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |