The present disclosure relates generally to gas turbine engine load bearing cases. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to methods for designing systems for protecting load bearing structural frames from heat exposure.
Turbine Exhaust Cases (TEC) typically comprise structural frames that support the very aft end of a gas turbine engine. In aircraft applications, the TEC can be utilized to mount the engine to the aircraft airframe. In industrial gas turbine applications, the TEC can be utilized to couple the gas turbine engine to an electrical generator. A typical TEC comprises an outer ring that couples to the outer diameter case of the low pressure turbine, an inner ring that surrounds the engine centerline so as to support shafting in the engine, and a plurality of struts connecting the inner and outer rings. As such, the TEC is typically subject to various types of loading, thereby requiring the TEC to be structurally strong and rigid. Due to the placement of the TEC within the hot gas stream exhausted from a combustor of the gas turbine engine, it is typically desirable to shield the TEC structural frame with a fairing that is able to withstand direct impingement of the hot gases for a prolonged period of time. The fairing additionally takes on a ring-strut-ring configuration wherein the struts are hollow to surround the frame struts. Such a fairing is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,993,918 to Myers et al., which is assigned to United Technologies Corporation. Due to increased engine efficiencies achieved at higher engine operating temperatures, it is desirable to have the TEC capable of withstanding elevated temperatures. It is also, however, desirable to minimize expense of the TEC without sacrificing performance.
The present disclosure is directed to a structural case assembly, such as a turbine exhaust case. The turbine exhaust case comprises a frame, a fairing and a heat shield. The frame is fabricated from a material having a temperature limit below an operating point of a gas turbine engine. The frame comprises an outer ring, an inner ring and a plurality of struts joining the outer ring and the inner ring to define a load path between the outer ring and the inner ring. The fairing is fabricated from a material having a temperature limit above the operating point of the gas turbine engine. The fairing comprises a ring-strut-ring structure that lines the flow path. The heat shield is disposed between the frame and the fairing to inhibit radiant heat transfer between the frame and the fairing. In one embodiment, the heat shield blocks all line-of-sight between the fairing and the frame. In another embodiment, the frame is produced from CA-6NM alloy.
In another embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method for designing a case structure including a heat shield that is disposed between a frame and a fairing. The method comprises determining a temperature element of an engine operating point for a gas turbine engine. The frame material is selected to be not capable of withstanding the temperature element. The fairing material is selected to be capable of withstanding the temperature element. A temperature gradient is determined between the fairing and the frame. A heat shield material is selected having a shield temperature limit capable of withstanding the temperature gradient.
As is well known in the art of gas turbines, incoming ambient air 30 becomes pressurized air 32 in the low and high pressure compressor sections 16 and 18. Fuel mixes with pressurized air 32 in combustor section 20, where it is burned. Once burned, combustion gases 34 expand through high and low pressure turbine sections 22 and 24 and through power turbine section 26. High and low pressure turbine sections 22 and 24 drive high and low pressure rotor shafts 36 and 38 respectively, which rotate in response to flow of combustion gases 34 and thus rotate the attached high and low pressure compressor sections 18 and 16. Power turbine section 26 may, for example, drive an electrical generator, pump, or gearbox (not shown).
Low Pressure Turbine Exhaust Case (LPTEC) 40 is positioned between low pressure turbine section 24 and power turbine section 26. LPTEC 40 defines a flow path for gas exhausted from low pressure turbine section 24 that is conveyed to power turbine 26. LPTEC 40 also provides structural support for gas turbine engine 10 so as to provide a coupling point for power turbine section 26. LPTEC 40 is therefore rigid and structurally strong. The present disclosure relates generally to placement of heat shields between a fairing and a frame within LPTEC 40.
It is understood that
Frame 42 comprises a ring-strut-ring structure that defines a load path between outer ring 48 and inner ring 50. Fairing 46 comprises a ring-strut-ring structure that is mounted within frame 42 to define a gas path and protect frame 42 from high temperature exposure. In one embodiment, fairing 46 can be built around frame 42, and in another embodiment, frame 42 is built within fairing 46.
Frame 42 comprises a stator component of gas turbine engine 10 (
Fairing 46 is adapted to be disposed within frame 42 between outer ring 48 and inner ring 50 to form the annular flow path. Outer ring 54 and inner ring 56 of fairing 46 have generally conical shapes, and are connected to each other by vanes 58, which act as struts to join rings 54 and 56. Outer ring 54, inner ring 56, and vanes 58, form the gas flow path through frame 42. Specifically, vanes 58 encase struts 52, while outer ring 54 and inner ring 56 line the inward facing (toward centerline axis 12 of
In one embodiment, annular mount 44 is interposed between frame 42 and fairing 46 and is configured to prevent circumferential rotation of fairing 46 within frame 42. In one embodiment, annular mount 44 comprises a crenellated, full circumferential stop ring, that is adapted to be affixed to an axial end of outer ring 48. Fairing 46 engages annular mount 44 when installed within frame 42. Fairing 46 and annular mount 44 have mating anti-deflection features, such as slots 62 and lugs 68, that engage each other to prevent circumferential movement of fairing 46 relative to the frame 42. Specifically, lugs 68 extend axially into slots 62 to prevent circumferential rotation of fairing 46, while permitting radial and axial movement of fairing 46 relative to frame 42.
As will be discussed in greater detail with reference to
Frame 42 comprises a structural, ring-strut-ring body wherein strut 52 is connected to outer ring 48 and inner ring 50. Frame 42 also includes other features, such as flange 77, to permit frame 42 to be mounted to components of gas turbine engine 10 (
Mount ring 74 extends from inner ring 56 of fairing 46 and engages an axial end of inner ring 50 of frame 42. Mount ring 74 is connected via second fasteners 72 (only one is shown in
Fairing 46 is designed to prevent exposure of frame 42 to heat from combustion gases 34 (
Outer heat shield segment 80A comprises a conical sheet positioned between outer ring 54 of fairing 46 and outer ring 48 of frame 42. Outer heat shield segment 80A includes openings to permit struts 52 to pass through. Outer heat shield segment 80A is joined to frame 42 using fastener 70. Fastener 70 passes through a bore within heat shield 80 and into a threaded bore within outer ring 48 at the juncture where annular mount 44 is joined to frame 42. Thus, heat outer heat shield segment 80A is fixed radially, axially and circumferentially via fastener 70. Outer heat shield segment 80A may also be fixed to fairing 46 at boss 86 using a threaded fastener as opposed to fastener 70.
Aft heat shield segment 80C is joined to outer heat shield segment 80A at joint 88. Aft heat shield segment 80C is also joined to inner heat shield segment 80E at joint 90. Aft heat shield segment 80C comprises a sheet metal body that is arcuate in the circumferential direction (e.g. “U” shaped) to partially wrap around strut 52. Joints 88 and 90 may comprise mechanical, welded or brazed joints. In other embodiments, aft heat shield segment 80C may be integrally formed with outer heat shield segment 80A and inner heat shield segment 80E. In another embodiment, forward and aft heat shields are affixed to vanes and are free from outer and inner heat shields.
Inner heat shield segment 80D comprises an annular sheet positioned between inner ring 56 of fairing 46 and inner ring 50 of frame 42. Inner heat shield segment 80D includes arcuate openings along its perimeter to permit struts 52 to pass through. Specifically, inner heat shield segment 80D includes a U-shaped cut-out along its trailing edge. Inner heat shield segment 80D is joined to frame 42 using fastener 72 and flange 92, which is joined to and extends radially inward from inner heat shield segment 80D. Fastener 72 passes through a bore within heat shield 80 and into a threaded bore within inner ring 50. Thus, inner heat shield segment 80D is fixed radially, axially and circumferentially via fastener 72 at one end and cantilevered at the opposite end.
Forward heat shield segment 80B is joined to inner heat shield segment 80D at joint 94. Forward heat shield segment 80B comprises a sheet metal body that is arcuate in the circumferential direction (e.g. “U” shaped) to partially wrap around strut 52. As such, forward heat shield segment 80B is configured to mate or overlap with aft heat shield segment 80C to fully enshroud strut 52. Forward heat shield segment 80B extends from joint 94 so as to be cantilevered within vane 58 of fairing 46 alongside strut 52. Forward heat shield segment 80B may, however, be joined to outer heat shield segment 80A. Joint 94 may comprise a mechanical, welded or brazed joint. In other embodiments, forward heat shield segment 80B may be integrally formed with inner heat shield segment 80D.
Inner heat shield segment 80E comprises a conical sheet positioned between inner ring 56 of fairing 46 and inner ring 50 of frame 42. Inner heat shield segment 80E includes arcuate openings along its perimeter to permit struts 52 to pass through. Specifically, inner heat shield segment 80E includes a U-shaped cut-out along its leading edge. Inner heat shield segment 80E extends between supported end 96A and unsupported end 96B. It thus becomes desirable to anchor heat shield 80 at additional locations other than those provided by fasteners 70 and 72 at frame 42. Slip joint 82 and fixed joint 84 provide mechanical linkages that couple heat shield 80 to fairing 46. Slip joint 82 includes anchor 98, which provides unsupported end 96B a limited degree of movement. Fixed joint 84 is rigidly secured to fairing 46 at pad 100 using fastener 102 to limit all degrees of movement of supported end 96A. In other embodiments, unsupported end of inner heat shield segment 80E may be joined to or integral with inner heat shield segment 80D.
In the disclosed embodiment, heat shield 80 is divided into a plurality of segments to facilitate assembly into LPTEC 40. Forward heat shield segment 80B is separated from outer heat shield segment 80A, and inner heat shield segments 80D and 80E are separated from each other. In other embodiments, inner heat shield segments 80D and 80E are joined together. Various examples of the construction of heat shield 80 are found in U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/747,237 to M. Budnick and U.S. provision patent application No. 61/747,239 to M. Budnick et al., both of which are assigned to United Technologies Corporation and are incorporated herein by reference. In other embodiments, heat shield 80 is a fully welded body such that there are no unsupported ends or separate segments of heat shield 80.
In any embodiment, heat shield 80 forms an obstruction between fairing 46 and frame 42. Radiant heat emanating from fairing 46 is inhibited from reaching frame 42. The radiant heat is either directly blocked or forced to travel a lengthier or more circuitous path than if heat shield 80 were not present. In one embodiment, heat shield 80 blocks all line-of-sight between frame 42 and heat shield 46 such that all radiant heat is inhibited in passing from fairing 46 to frame 42. That is, from any vantage point on frame 42, visibility of fairing 46 is obstructed by heat shield 80 in all directions. The presence of heat shield 80 allows for more flexibility in the design of LPTEC 40. Specifically, frame 42 may be fabricated, produced or made from a material having low temperature limitations, which generally provides for less expensive materials.
At block 240, a material is deliberately selected that cannot withstand the operating element of engine 10 in order to reduce the expense associated with frame 42. Generally, the cost of materials used in gas turbine engines, such as known super alloys, increases disproportionately with the maximum temperature the material is able to survive. Thus, it is desirable to have less expensive materials. If a material can withstand the engine operating parameters of block 200, a different, less expensive material that cannot withstand the engine operating parameters is selected at block 230. If the selected material cannot meet the engine operating temperatures, it is a candidate for use with frame 42. In one embodiment, frame 42 is produced from CA-6NM alloy, which is commercially available from Kubota Metal Corporation.
At block 250, the material for fairing 46 is selected. As discussed, it is desirable for fairing 46 to survive direct impingement of gases from gas turbine engine 10. Thus, fairing 46 is selected to have a temperature limit above the operating parameters determined at block 200. In one embodiment, fairing 46 is produced from Inconel® 625 alloy, which is commercially available from Special Metals Corporation.
At block 260, an expected temperature gradient between frame 42 and fairing 46 is determined, given the operating parameters determined at block 200. The temperature gradient provides an indication of the temperatures that frame 42 will be exposed to during operation of engine 10 when installed between frame 42 and fairing 46. Thus, at block 270, it is determined whether or not frame 42 can withstand the temperature gradient. It is an indication that frame 42 can be made from a cheaper material if frame 42 can survive the temperature gradient.
It is not feasible to simply provide frame 42 with a coating that, while still saving cost over a more expensive frame alloy, increases the temperature limitations of frame 42. Specifically, the application of known thermal barrier coatings can require temperatures that exceed the temperature limits of cost-effective base materials for frame 42. Additionally, it is not practical to provide overcooling to frame 42 by flowing increased amounts of cooling air, such as from low pressure compressor section 16 (
If frame 42 cannot withstand the temperature gradient at block 270, a material for a heat shield is selected at block 280. The temperature gradient determined at block 260 provides an indication of the temperatures that heat shield 80 will be exposed to when installed between frame 42 and fairing 46. The material for heat shield 80 is selected to withstand the temperature gradient at block 280. In one embodiment, heat shield 80 is produced from Inconel® 625 alloy, which is commercially available from Special Metals Corporation.
At step 290, heat shield 80 is designed to block all line-of-sight between frame 42 and fairing 46 to interrupt all radiant heat transfer and reduce the thermal exposure of frame 42. At step 300, the material of frame 42 is checked to determine if it can survive the temperature gradient between frame 42 and fairing 46 given the presence of heat shield 80. If frame 42 cannot withstand the temperature gradient, a new frame material must be selected at step 220 using higher temperature limits. If frame 42 can withstand the temperature gradient, the lifetime cost of frame 42 is determined at block 320.
At block 320, using input from block 330, the material selected for frame 42 is checked to verify that the long-term repair costs of frame 42 do not outweigh the short-term cost savings of the material selected at block 220. For example, given the determined operating parameters at block 200, the expected overall life of frame 42 for the selected material is determined. The overall life of frame 42 includes the total number of repair or refurbishment processes frame 42 is expected to undergo during its life, and the cost of each process.
At block 340, the overall life of frame 42 with the selected, less expensive material is compared to the overall life of frame 42 if produced from a more expensive material having a temperature limit that can withstand the operating element selected at block 200. If the total number of frames 42 made from the less expensive material, including all repair and refurbishment processes, is less expensive than the cost of a single frame of more expensive material, then the material can be used to build frame 42 at block 350. If the material for frame 42 selected at block 220 does not provide a long term cost savings, a different, less expensive material is selected at block 220.
LPTEC 40 designed according to the method of the present disclosure provides significant cost savings over the use of more expensive super alloys for frame 42. As discussed above, the initial material cost of frame 42 and the associated repair costs is less than the cost of a hypothetical frame capable of withstanding temperatures of engine 10 without the use of a heat shield. The use of heat shield 80 allows engine 10 to realize other performance benefits. For example, less cooling air can be provided between fairing 46 and frame 42, as opposed to LPTEC designs not having a heat shield.
The following are non-exclusive descriptions of possible embodiments of the present invention:
A turbine exhaust case comprising: a frame fabricated from a material having a temperature limit below an operating point of a gas turbine engine, the frame comprising: an outer ring; an inner ring; and a plurality of struts joining the outer ring and the inner ring; a fairing fabricated from a material having a temperature limit above the operating point of the gas turbine engine, the fairing comprising a ring-strut-ring structure that lines the flow path; and a heat shield disposed between the frame and the fairing to inhibit radiant heat transfer between the frame and the fairing.
The turbine exhaust case of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A heat shield that blocks all line-of-sight between the fairing and the frame.
A heat shield that comprises a ring-strut-ring structure.
A heat shield that is fabricated from a material having a temperature limit higher than that of the frame.
A frame that is fabricated from CA-6NM alloy.
A heat shield that is fabricated from Inconel 625 alloy.
A fairing that is fabricated from Inconel 625 alloy.
A turbine structural case comprises: a frame produced from CA-6NM alloy, the frame comprising: an outer ring; an inner ring; and a plurality of struts joining the outer ring and the inner ring to define a load path between the outer ring and the inner ring.
The turbine structural case of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, configurations and/or additional components:
A fairing comprising a ring-strut-ring structure that defines a flow path within the load path.
A heat shield disposed between the frame and the fairing to inhibit heat transfer between the frame and the fairing.
A heat shield and fairing that are fabricated from materials having higher temperature limits than CA-6NM alloy.
A heat shield that blocks all line-of-sight between the fairing and the frame.
A heat shield that forms a barrier to all radiant heat capable of emanating from the frame toward the fairing.
A method for designing a case structure including a heat shield that is disposed between a frame and a fairing, the method comprising: determining a temperature element of an engine operating point for a gas turbine engine; selecting a frame material not capable of withstanding the temperature element; selecting a fairing material capable of withstanding the temperature element; determining a temperature gradient between the fairing and the frame at the operating point; and selecting a heat shield material having a shield temperature limit capable of withstanding the temperature gradient.
The method of the preceding paragraph can optionally include, additionally and/or alternatively, any one or more of the following features, steps, configurations and/or additional components:
A frame material that is selected for being less expensive than a material capable of withstanding the temperature element.
Repair costs of the frame over a service life of the frame are less expensive than initial cost of a frame produced from a material capable of withstanding the temperature element.
A frame material is CA-6NM alloy.
A temperature element that is a function of maximum operating temperature of the gas turbine engine and time.
Developing a heat shield that blocks all line-of-sight between the frame and the fairing.
A heat shield that forms a barrier to all radiant heat that emanates from the frame toward the fairing.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/074278 | 12/11/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/105425 | 7/3/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2214108 | Grece | Jul 1938 | A |
2869941 | Shoup, Jr. | Jan 1959 | A |
2928648 | Haines | Mar 1960 | A |
3576328 | Vose | Apr 1971 | A |
3802046 | Wachtell et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3970319 | Carroll et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4009569 | Kozlin | Mar 1977 | A |
4044555 | McLoughlin et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4088422 | Martin | May 1978 | A |
4114248 | Smith et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4305697 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4321007 | Dennison et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4369016 | Dennison | Jan 1983 | A |
4478551 | Honeycutt, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4544420 | Montgomery | Oct 1985 | A |
4645217 | Honeycutt, Jr. et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4678113 | Bridges et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4738453 | Ide | Apr 1988 | A |
4756536 | Belcher | Jul 1988 | A |
4793770 | Schonewald et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4920742 | Nash et al. | May 1990 | A |
4987736 | Ciokajlo et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4989406 | Vdoviak et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4993918 | Myers et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5031922 | Heydrich | Jul 1991 | A |
5042823 | Mackay et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5071138 | Mackay et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076049 | VonBenken et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5100158 | Gardner | Mar 1992 | A |
5108116 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5169159 | Pope et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174584 | Lahrman | Dec 1992 | A |
5188507 | Sweeney | Feb 1993 | A |
5211541 | Fledderjohn et al. | May 1993 | A |
5236302 | Weisgerber et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246295 | Ide | Sep 1993 | A |
5265807 | Steckbeck et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269057 | Mendham | Dec 1993 | A |
5272869 | Dawson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273397 | Czachor et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5292227 | Czachor et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312227 | Grateau et al. | May 1994 | A |
5338154 | Meade et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5357744 | Czachor et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370402 | Gardner et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385409 | Ide | Jan 1995 | A |
5401036 | Basu | Mar 1995 | A |
5438756 | Halchak et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474305 | Flower | Dec 1995 | A |
5483792 | Czachor et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5558341 | McNickle et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5597286 | Dawson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605438 | Burdgick et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609467 | Lenhart et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632493 | Gardner | May 1997 | A |
5634767 | Dawson | Jun 1997 | A |
5691279 | Tauber et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5755445 | Arora | May 1998 | A |
5851105 | Fric et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5911400 | Niethammer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6163959 | Arraitz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6196550 | Arora et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227800 | Spring et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6337751 | Kimizuka | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343912 | Mangeiga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358001 | Bosel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364316 | Arora | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6439841 | Bosel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6511284 | Darnell et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6578363 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6601853 | Inoue | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612807 | Czachor | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619030 | Seda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638013 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652229 | Lu | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672833 | MacLean et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6719524 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736401 | Chung et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6792758 | Dowman | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796765 | Kosel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805356 | Inoue | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811154 | Proctor et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6935631 | Inoue | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969826 | Trewiler et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983608 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7055305 | Baxter et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7094026 | Coign et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100358 | Gekht et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7200933 | Lundgren et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7229249 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238008 | Bobo et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7367567 | Farah et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7371044 | Nereim | May 2008 | B2 |
7389583 | Lundgren | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7614150 | Lundgren | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631879 | Diantonio | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7673461 | Cameriano et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677047 | Somanath et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7735833 | Braun et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798768 | Strain et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815417 | Somanath et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824152 | Morrison | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7891165 | Bader et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7909573 | Cameriano et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955446 | Dierberger | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959409 | Guo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7988799 | Dierberger | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8069648 | Snyder et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083465 | Herbst | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083471 | Black | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091371 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8092161 | Cai et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8152451 | Manteiga et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162593 | Guimbard et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172526 | Lescure et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8177488 | Manteiga et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8221071 | Wojno et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8245399 | Anantharaman et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245518 | Durocher et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266914 | Hawie et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282342 | Tonks et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8371127 | Durocher et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371812 | Manteiga et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8500392 | Durocher | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8616835 | Hashimoto | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9212567 | Rauch | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9316153 | Patat | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20030025274 | Allan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030042682 | Inoue | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062684 | Inoue | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030062685 | Inoue | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050046113 | Inoue | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060010852 | Gekht et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080216300 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100132371 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132374 | Manteiga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132377 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100202872 | Weidmann | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236244 | Longardner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100275572 | Durocher et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100275614 | Fontaine et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100307165 | Wong et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000223 | Russberg | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005234 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020116 | Hashimoto | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110061767 | Vontell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081237 | Durocher | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081239 | Durocher | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081240 | Durocher et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085895 | Durocher et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110214433 | Feindel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262277 | Sjoqvist et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302929 | Bruhwiler | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120111023 | Sjoqvist et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120156020 | Kottilingam et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186254 | Ito et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120204569 | Schubert | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130011242 | Beeck et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130055725 | Rauch | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140205447 | Patat | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140286763 | Munshi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 03020469 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006007686 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2009157817 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010002295 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2012158070 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion, dated Mar. 25, 2014, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150345338 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61747271 | Dec 2012 | US | |
61776393 | Mar 2013 | US |