This application claims priority to PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/039993, filed on Oct. 12, 2006.
This invention relates to a turbofan engine, and more particularly, the invention relates to effectively changing a nozzle exit area of a bypass flow path.
A typical turbofan engine includes a spool supporting a compressor and a turbine. The spool, compressor and turbine are housed within a core nacelle. A turbofan, or “fan,” is coupled to the spool and is arranged upstream from the core nacelle. A fan nacelle surrounds the turbofan and core nacelle. The fan and core nacelles provide a bypass flow path having a nozzle exit area through which bypass flow from the fan exits the engine.
Turbofan engines typical have a fixed nozzle exit area. The flow through the nozzle affects, for example, the operational line of the fan and compressor and the overall performance and efficiency of the engine. Since the nozzle exit area is fixed, the operational lines and other engine operating characteristics must be managed using a more limited number of engine parameters. The engine parameters are varied during engine operation to obtain desired engine operating characteristics, such as fuel efficiency. What is needed is a method and apparatus of managing engine operating characteristics by using the nozzle exit area as an additional variable parameter. What is also needs is an ability to use the nozzle exit area as a variable parameter with minimal cost and weight penalties.
A turbofan engine includes core and fan nacelles that provide a bypass flow path having a nozzle exit area. In one example, the nozzle exit area is fixed providing a physically constant size. The bypass flow path carries a bypass flow circumventing the core nacelle and expelled from the nozzle exit area. A turbofan is arranged within the fan nacelle and upstream from the core nacelle for generating the bypass flow. A flow control device includes a surface in the bypass flow path including an aperture. The flow device is adapted to introduce a fluid into the bypass flow path for altering a boundary layer of the bypass flow that effectively changes the nozzle exit area. In one example, bleed air is introduced through the aperture. In another example, pulses of fluid from a Helmholz resonator flow through the aperture. By decreasing the boundary layer, the nozzle exit area is effectively increased. By increasing the boundary layer, the nozzle exit area is effectively decreased.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
a is a schematic partial side cross-sectional view of a turbofan engine with an example flow control device expelling fluid in a first manner.
b is a schematic partial end view of the turbofan engine shown in
a is a schematic partial side cross-sectional view of a turbofan engine with the example flow control device expelling fluid in a second manner.
b is a schematic partial end view of the turbofan engine shown in
A geared turbofan engine 10 is shown in
In the examples shown, the engine 10:1 is a high bypass turbofan arrangement. In one example, the bypass ratio is greater than 10, and the turbofan diameter is substantially larger than the diameter of the low pressure compressor 16. The low pressure turbine 18 has a pressure ratio that is greater than 5:1, in one example. The gear train 22 is an epicycle gear train, for example, a star gear train, providing a gear reduction ratio of greater than 2.5:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of a contemplated geared turbofan engine. That is, the invention is applicable to other engines including direct drive turbofans.
Airflow enters a fan nacelle 34, which surrounds the core nacelle 12 and turbofan 20. The turbofan 20 directs air into the core nacelle 12, which is used to drive the turbines 18, 28, as is known in the art. Turbine exhaust E exits the core nacelle 12 once it has been expanded in the turbines 18, 28, in a passage provided between the core nacelle and a tail cone 32.
The core nacelle 12 is supported within the fan nacelle 34 by structure 36, which are commonly referred to as upper and lower bifurcations. A generally annular bypass flow path 39 is arranged between the core and fan nacelles 12, 34. The example illustrated in
For the engine 10 shown in
The engine 10 has a flow control device 41 that is used to effectively change the nozzle exit area. In one example, the flow control device 41 provides the fan nozzle exit area 40 for discharging axially the bypass flow B pressurized by the upstream turbofan 20 of the engine 10. A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The turbofan 20 of the engine 10 is designed for a particular flight condition, typically cruise at 0.8 M and 35,000 feet. The turbofan 20 is designed at a particular fixed stagger angle for an efficient cruise condition. The flow control device 41 is operated to vary the nozzle exit area 40 to adjust fan bypass air flow such that the angle of attack or incidence on the fan blade is maintained close to design incidence at other flight conditions, such as landing and takeoff. This enables desired engine operation over a range of flight condition with respect to performance and other operational parameters such as noise levels. In one example, the flow control device 41 defines a nominal converged position for the nozzle exit area 40 at cruise and climb conditions, and radially opens relative thereto to define a diverged position for other flight conditions. The flow control device 41 provides an approximately 20% change in the exit nozzle area 40.
Referring to
In the examples shown in
In one example, a controller 50 commands a valve 55 arranged in a passage 52. The passage 52 fluidly connects the compressor stage 54 to apertures 56 arranged on a surface 57 adjacent to the bypass flow path 39. Three apertures 56 are shown for exemplary purposes. The apertures 56 can be arranged in an array and plumbed in any suitable manner. The valve 55 selectively regulates the bleed air L provided through the apertures 56 in response to commands from the controller 50 to obtain a desired boundary layer thickness. The controller 50 determines when changes in the effective nozzle exit area 40 are desired for a particular engine operating characteristic.
Decreasing the boundary layer at the surface 57 effectively “opens” the nozzle exit area 40. A decrease in boundary layer Q increases the mean velocity of bypass flow B across the nozzle exit area 40. Conversely, decreasing the boundary layer Q at the surface 57 effectively “closes” the nozzle exit area 40. An increase in boundary layer decreases the mean velocity of bypass flow B across the nozzle exit area 40.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In either approach shown in
Another example flow control device 41′ is shown in
Although an example embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/039993 | 10/12/2006 | WO | 00 | 3/20/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/045074 | 4/17/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2355434 | Harter | Aug 1944 | A |
2703477 | Anxionnaz | Mar 1955 | A |
2763984 | Kadosch et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
3000177 | Logerot et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3000178 | Logerot | Sep 1961 | A |
3288373 | Pike | Nov 1966 | A |
3420060 | Ostroff et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3641766 | Uehling | Feb 1972 | A |
3688504 | Hutchinson et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3729934 | Denning et al. | May 1973 | A |
4776163 | Brockmann | Oct 1988 | A |
4804316 | Fleury | Feb 1989 | A |
4973223 | Franklin | Nov 1990 | A |
5269135 | Vermejan et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5568724 | Lindner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5713204 | Kadlicko | Feb 1998 | A |
5806303 | Johnson | Sep 1998 | A |
5896890 | Bourkel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6105616 | Sturman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6179251 | Tindell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203272 | Walsham | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6269642 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308740 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308898 | Dorris et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334753 | Tillman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6390418 | McCormick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6679057 | Arnold | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6776574 | Parker | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7237378 | Lardellier | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7377100 | Bruno et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7422033 | Barber | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7837155 | Meister et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7950218 | Beutin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20030145577 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050022866 | Sakurai et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060983 | Lardellier | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081530 | Bagnall et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060022092 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070266707 | Meister et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080112799 | Winter et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100024415 | Nishiyama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120234017 | Staubach et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2004 024016 | Dec 2005 | DE |
923 996 | Jul 1947 | FR |
2 088 303 | Jan 1972 | FR |
704 669 | Feb 1954 | GB |
795 651 | May 1958 | GB |
795 652 | May 1958 | GB |
1 190 364 | May 1970 | GB |
1 352 206 | May 1974 | GB |
2 014 663 | Aug 1979 | GB |
2 110 762 | Jun 1983 | GB |
2 379 483 | Mar 2003 | GB |
2 407 142 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2008045051 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP Application No. 11186123.3, Apr. 11, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/039993, Jul. 11, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100068039 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |