The subject of the invention is a turbomachine blade comprising a root with reduced stress concentrations.
Some turbomachine blades, one example of which is represented in
The blade 1 comprises an airfoil 4 passing through the outer flow stream 2, a head end 5 bolted to an outer casing 6 and the other end, a root 7 connected to an inner casing 8 separating the outer flow stream 2 from the inner flow stream 9. The root 7 comprises a platform 10 for which the main extension direction is parallel or almost parallel to the X-X axial direction of the turbomachine, extends over a section of a circle, and it also comprises a flange 11 at one end 34 (in this case a downstream end) of the platform 10 along the X-X direction, that is fixed to the inner case 8 by bolts 12 (the invention would still be applicable if the flange were fitted to the outer case 6). The blade 1 is a single piece, the airfoil 4 being directly connected to the platform 10.
The purpose of the invention is to attenuate these stress concentrations. This is achieved by means of a turbomachine blade comprising an airfoil and a root, the root including a platform and a flange through which bolt holes are formed for bolting to a case of the turbomachine, the airfoil and the flange forming a single piece with the platform and extending along opposite directions from the platform along a radial direction (Y-Y) of the turbomachine, the airfoil comprising an edge connected to the platform, the platform extending from one end along an essentially axial direction (X-X) of the turbomachine, characterised in that the root comprises a groove extending from said end, between the platform and the flange and penetrating in said essentially axial direction towards a bottom beyond a connection point of said edge of the airfoil and the platform and beyond the entire flange; said connection point of the edge of the airfoil and the platform is located along said essentially axial direction (X-X), between said end of the platform and at least one face of the flange facing said end; the flange being connected to the platform by a neck delimited by a face of the groove and extending mainly along said essentially axial direction (X-X) from the flange to the heel, and having a thickness less than the minimum thickness of the flange.
Note that several documents (EP 1 811 131 A2, DE 10 2004004014 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,669,759 A, WO 2008 115390 A1 and WO 2009 115384 A1) disclose blade roots notched at one end, in front of an edge of the airfoil, to reduce stress concentrations; but these devices either do not have a bolting flange, or the connection of the edge to the root is not brought closer to the end than the flange, or the groove does not extend beyond the flange, or the flange is not connected to the root by a thinned neck.
The invention is based on the observation that stress concentrations are explained especially by direct transmission of forces produced by the attachment of blade 1 and that appear in the flange 11. The essential purpose of the groove is to eliminate the direct communication between the zone 15 of the airfoil 4 adjacent to both the edge 13 and to the root 7, and the flange 11. The zone 15, then being close to a much more flexible portion of the blade 1, is relieved; forces that were responsible for the stress concentration are transmitted to other parts of the blade 1, without causing the development of any important stress concentrations.
All the characteristics described above contribute more specifically to making a more sinuous stress path between the end of the airfoil, its connection to the root platform, and bolted attachments of the flange to give better resistance (in this precise configuration with two highly loaded zones 15 and 17) to direct transmission of forces between highly stressed regions of the flange and the connection between the airfoil and the root, and thus reduce stress concentrations; and the flexibility of the neck is such that the flange can deflect more easily and further reduce stress concentrations due to the flexibility obtained.
Some improvements to this basic design can reinforce the flexibility of the arrangement and further reduce stress concentrations to critical zones; this is the case particularly if the platform comprises a heel, corresponding to a thickening of the platform in the radial direction, extending beyond the bottom of the groove along the essentially axial direction, the neck connecting the heel to the flange.
Note that the invention is perfectly applicable to arrangements in which the flange comprises a thinned central portion between two concentric conical portions, the central portion being drilled with bolt holes, the conical bearing surfaces facing the end of the platform.
According to other improvements, also reducing local stress concentrations in this case: the flange is connected to the heel by a rounded surface; or the groove opens up towards said end of the platform and is delimited by two faces converging towards the bottom, and the bottom is formed by a rounded surface joining said faces.
The airfoil edge concerned may be the trailing edge, for example as in
We will now give a complete description of a particular embodiment of the invention, that will be sufficient to clearly understand its different aspects, characteristics and advantages with reference to the following figures:
and
Refer to
Note that unlike usual designs, the edge 31 of the airfoil 4 on the side of the flange 11 is moved towards the end 34 of the platform 10, such that its connection point 32 with the platform 10 extends beyond at least one of the faces of the flange 11 (in this case the face of the thinned central portion 25) that face towards said end 34 along the axial direction X-X.
The flange 11 is mounted flexibly on the platform 10 by the thin neck 23. The corner of the airfoil 4 adjacent to the connection point 32 is also mounted flexibly on the platform 10, the end of which above the groove 18 forms a projection 33 that is also thin on which this corner and therefore the connection point 32 extends. The increased flexibility of the blade 1 at these locations can reduce stress concentrations, by distributing forces towards adjacent areas with lower loads. Therefore it is advantageous if the groove 18 is relatively wide between the faces 19 and 20 to accentuate the flexibility at immediately adjacent locations of the blade 1 (the neck 23 and the projection 33). It is also advantageous if the groove 18 is sufficiently deep to the bottom 21 so that the neck 23 and the projection 33 can be extended with the same effect of increased flexibility, and to make the transmission path of forces between the flange 11 and the corner of the airfoil 4 more sinuous, and thus reduce their magnitude. The heel 22 helps in distributing stresses and therefore reducing their concentration at the end 34 of the airfoil 1; the rounded parts 29 and 30, and the rounded bottom 21, also tend to reduce local stress concentrations.
If the edge 31 of the airfoil 4 is pushed towards the end 34 of the platform 10, its profile from the platform 10 is not critical concerning the reduction of stress concentrations: the layouts in
Unlike the profile of the trailing edge 13 in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16 51386 | Feb 2016 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4171930 | Brisken | Oct 1979 | A |
4480958 | Schlechtweg | Nov 1984 | A |
5669759 | Beabout | Sep 1997 | A |
5988980 | Busbey | Nov 1999 | A |
6761536 | Bash et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6951447 | Cherolis | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7238008 | Bobo | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7632071 | Charbonneau | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8142143 | Kreiselmaier | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147190 | Tsypkaykin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8287241 | Strohl | Oct 2012 | B2 |
10125630 | Bois | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20030068225 | Housley | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20100129228 | Strohl et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110070089 | Kreiselmaier et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2749476 | Feb 2012 | CA |
10 2004 004 014 | Aug 2005 | DE |
0 844 369 | May 1998 | EP |
1 219 778 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 544 410 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 811 131 | Jul 2007 | EP |
646728 | Nov 1950 | GB |
WO 2009115384 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009115390 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
French Preliminary Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2016 in French Application 16 51386 filed on Feb. 19, 2016 (with English Translation of Categories of Cited Documents). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170241292 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |