In the accompanying drawings:
Referring to
The diffuser 10 is located between the forward 32 and aft 26 annular walls and comprises first 10.1 and second 10.2 annular portions, the former of which is upstream of the latter. The first annular portion 10.1 is concentric with, radially adjacent to, and around, a circumferential discharge boundary 42 of the impeller 14. The second annular portion 10.2 is concentric with, radial adjacent to, and around, a radially outer boundary 44 of the first annular portion 10.1, and a radially outer boundary 46 of the second annular portion 10.2 is concentric with, radial adjacent to, and within the collector 16. Accordingly, compressed gases 18′ from the impeller 14 are first discharged therefrom into the first annular portion 10.1, and after flowing therethough, then flow through the second annular portion 10.2, after which the resulting diffused compressed gases 18″ are discharged therefrom into the collector 16.
The first annular portion 10.1 of the diffuser 10 is vaneless and the second annular portion 10.2 incorporates a plurality of vanes 48, wherein the vaneless first annular portion 10.1 provides for reducing the velocity of the compressed gases 18′ prior to entering the vaned second annular portion 10.2. For example, the radius ratio of the first annular portion 10.1—i.e. the ratio of the radius of the radially outer boundary 44 of the first annular portion 10.1 to the outer radius of the impeller 14—is sufficiently great that the mean velocity of compressed gases 18′ is reduced within the first annular portion 10.1 to Mach 0.7 or less upon entering the second annular portion 10.2. Upon exiting the second annular portion 10.2, the mean velocity of the compressed gases 18′ is reduced to a sufficiently low velocity, for example, less than Mach 0.5, so that the compressed gases 18′ substantially act as an incompressible fluid. For example, in one embodiment, the mean velocity of the compressed gases 18′ is reduced to about Mach 0.45 upon exiting the second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10.
At least one of the forward 32 or aft 26 annular walls abutting the second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10 is sloped so that the axial gap 40′ between the forward 32 and aft 26 annular walls increases with respect to radial distance R from the central axis 38, so as to provide for a meridional divergence of the diffuser 10 within the second annular portion 10.2 thereof, for example, in a range of 1.4 to 2.0, wherein meridional divergence is defined as the ratio of the axial gap 40′ at the exit 10.2″ of the second annular portion 10.2 to the axial gap 40′ at the entrance 10.2′ of the second annular portion 10.2. The axial extent of the vanes 48 within the second annular portion 10.2 also varies with respect to radial distance R from the central axis 38, so as to substantially conform to the axial gap 40′, wherein the vanes 48 provide for substantially preventing wall separation of the compressed gases 18′ flowing therethrough, so that the associated flow of compressed gases 18′ remains attached to the forward 32 and aft 26 annular walls while flowing through the meridionally divergent second annular portion 10.2, so that the meridional divergence provides for further diffusing the compressed gases 18′ flowing therethrough. Referring to
Each of the plurality of vanes 48 of the second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10 is oriented to as to substantially conform to what would be the corresponding direction of the flow field within the second annular portion 10.2 but with the vanes 48 absent. As a result, for each vane 48 of the plurality of vanes 48, an angle of a tangent to a surface of the vane 48 varies with axial position along the vane 48, and the angle of the tangent to the surface of the vane 48 varies with radial position along the vane 48. More particularly, in one set of embodiments, each vane 48 of the plurality of vanes 48 is shaped so a variation of the angle of the tangent of the surface of the vane 48 with respect to axial position along the vane 48 and with respect to radial position along the vane 48 substantially corresponds to simulated directions of flow within regions of the second annular portion 10.2 adjacent to the vane 48 for at least one operating condition when the impeller 14 cooperates with the diffuser 10. Accordingly, each vane 48 is twisted along a length thereof so that the angle of the vane 48 relative to a longitudinal axis thereof varies with position along the vane 48, with the leading-edge (LE) angle of each vane 48 substantially matched to the measured or analytically-or-computationally predicted flow discharge conditions at the exit of the first annular portion 10.1, and with the exit angle of each vane 48 substantially matched to the inlet flow conditions of the collector 16. For example, in one set of embodiments, the shape of the vane 48 is configured to optimize the inlet conditions of the collector 16, for example, so as to safely maximize the loading of the vanes 48 and provide for relatively uniform exit conditions, with the collector 16 similarly designed to match the exit conditions of the vaned second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10.
The second annular portion 10.2 is relatively compact, and the plurality of vanes 48 therein are of relatively high solidity. For example, the second annular portion 10.2 is configured with a radius ratio in the range of 1.08 to 1.20, and the solidity of the plurality of vanes 48 is generally within a range of 1.8 to 4.0, and, in one set of embodiments, within the range of 3.0 to 3.5, wherein solidity is defined as the ratio of the choral length of each vane 48 to the mean circumferential spacing between the vanes 48. Referring to
The orientation and slope of the leading-edge portions 48.1 of the vanes 48 are adapted to match the measured or analytically-or-computationally predicted exit flow conditions of the first annular portion 10.1, and, as described hereinabove, the orientation and slope of the trailing-edge portions 48.2 of the vanes 48 are adapted to match the entrance flow conditions of the collector 16. For example, in one set of embodiments, the trailing-edge portions 48.2 are configured so as to provide for a flow entrance angle 52 of 60 to 80 degrees—relative to the radial direction—with relatively low mean velocities in the range of 0.2 to 0.45 Mach number under substantially all operating conditions of the radial compressor 12. In one set of embodiments, each of the trailing-edge portions 48.2 is oriented at a uniform angle. Alternatively, referring to
Furthermore, referring to
In accordance with a method of diffusing a flow of gases 18 from an impeller 14—provided for as described hereinabove,—the gases 18 are first directed from the impeller 14 into a first annular portion 10.1 of a diffuser 10, wherein the first annular portion 10.1 is bounded by forward 32 and aft 26 annular walls, the first annular portion 10.1 is vaneless, and the first annular portion 10.1 is of sufficient radial extent so that the flow of gases 18 from the impeller 14 is reduced in velocity from a relatively high velocity upon entrance to the first annular portion 10.1 to a mean velocity less than a Mach number threshold upon exiting the first annular portion 10.1, wherein the Mach number threshold is in the range of 0.7 to 0.4. Then, the gases 18 exiting the first annular portion 10.1 are directed into a second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10, wherein the second annular portion 10.2 is bounded by the forward 32 and aft 26 annular walls, and the second annular portion 10.2 is concentric with, radial adjacent to, and around, a radially outer boundary 44 of the first annular portion 10.1. The gases 18 flowing through the second annular portion 10.2 are directed through a plurality of vanes 48 therewithin, wherein a contour of each vane 48 of the plurality of vanes 48 is shaped so as to substantially match a direction of the gas flow adjacent to the vane 48 for at least one operating condition during operation of the diffuser 10; and the gases 18 are also meridionally diverged while flowing through the second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10. The gases flow from the second annular portion 10.2 of the diffuser 10 directly into a collector 16, for example, a plenum 16′ or volute 16″.
The combination of the vaneless first annular portion 10.1 with the twisted vanes 48 or relatively-high solidity within the meridionally-divergent second annular portion 10.2 provides for a relatively-compact diffuser 10, and provides for relatively-improving the efficiency of an associated volute 16″.
In accordance with one embodiment, the radial compressor 12 incorporating the diffuser 10 is incorporated as the compressor of a turbocharger or supercharger (not illustrated), wherein the aft annular wall 26 of the radial compressor 12 is either operatively coupled to or a part of a centerbody 24 of the turbocharger or supercharger, wherein the centerbody 24 incorporates a plurality of bearings that support a rotor shaft that operatively couples the impeller 14 of the radial compressor 12 to a source of shaft power, for example, either an exhaust driven turbine of a turbocharger, a pulley or sprocket of an engine-driven supercharger, or an electric motor of a motor-driven supercharger.
It should be understood that the diffuser 10 is not limited to application either in combination with a radial compressor 12 as illustrated hereinabove, or to diffusing the flow of a gaseous medium. More particularly, it should be understood that the same type of diffuser 10 could also be utilized with either an axial-flow compressor with a significant non-axial—i.e. radial—exit flow region, or a mixed-flow compressor, i.e. wherein the gas flow exits the compressor in a direction other than purely radial or purely axial. Furthermore, it should be understood that the same type of diffuser 10 could also be utilized in cooperation with a pump rather than a compressor, for example, so as to provide for diffusing a flow of a liquid exiting the pump.
The vanes 48 of the diffuser 10 can be manufactured in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, machining—for example, milling, Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) or Electro Chemical Machining (ECM),—casting or additive manufacturing, either integral with the aft 26 or forward 32 annular walls of the diffuser 10, or formed individually in accordance with any of the above methods, or by stamping or forging, followed by insertion of or cooperation of the individually manufactured vanes 48 into or with slots or receptacles in the aft 26 or forward 32 annular walls of the diffuser 10. Referring to
While specific embodiments have been described in detail in the foregoing detailed description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. It should be understood, that any reference herein to the term “or” is intended to mean an “inclusive or” or what is also known as a “logical OR”, wherein when used as a logic statement, the expression “A or B” is true if either A or B is true, or if both A and B are true, and when used as a list of elements, the expression “A, B or C” is intended to include all combinations of the elements recited in the expression, for example, any of the elements selected from the group consisting of A, B, C, (A, B), (A, C), (B, C), and (A, B, C); and so on if additional elements are listed. Furthermore, it should also be understood that the indefinite articles “a” or “an”, and the corresponding associated definite articles “the” or “said”, are each intended to mean one or more unless otherwise stated, implied, or physically impossible. Yet further, it should be understood that the expressions “at least one of A and B, etc.”, “at least one of A or B, etc.”, “selected from A and B, etc.” and “selected from A or B, etc.” are each intended to mean either any recited element individually or any combination of two or more elements, for example, any of the elements from the group consisting of “A”, “B”, and “A AND B together”, etc. Yet further, it should be understood that the expressions “one of A and B, etc.” and “one of A or B, etc.” are each intended to mean any of the recited elements individually alone, for example, either A alone or B alone, etc., but not A AND B together. Furthermore, it should also be understood that unless indicated otherwise or unless physically impossible, that the above-described embodiments and aspects can be used in combination with one another and are not mutually exclusive. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims, and any and all equivalents thereof.
The instant application claims the benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/893,518 filed on 21 Oct. 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/061613 | 10/21/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/061344 | 4/30/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
786384 | Richards | Apr 1905 | A |
1879561 | Smith | Sep 1932 | A |
2283176 | Birmann | May 1942 | A |
2372880 | Browne | Apr 1945 | A |
2681760 | Lundquist | Jun 1954 | A |
2709893 | Birmann | Jun 1955 | A |
2715814 | Barr et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
2819837 | Loeb | Jan 1958 | A |
2836347 | Barr et al. | May 1958 | A |
2898031 | Voigt | Aug 1959 | A |
2945349 | Ritzi | Jul 1960 | A |
2967013 | Dallenbach et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
3132594 | Shiley et al. | May 1964 | A |
3150823 | Adams | Sep 1964 | A |
3369737 | Switzer et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3460748 | Erwin | Aug 1969 | A |
3658437 | Soo | Apr 1972 | A |
3771925 | Friberg et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3860360 | Yu | Jan 1975 | A |
3861826 | Dean, Jr. | Jan 1975 | A |
3868196 | Lown | Feb 1975 | A |
3873232 | Stein et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3904308 | Ribaud | Sep 1975 | A |
3904312 | Exley | Sep 1975 | A |
3936223 | Baghdadi | Feb 1976 | A |
3997281 | Atkinson | Dec 1976 | A |
4012166 | Kaesser et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4099891 | Campell | Jul 1978 | A |
4164845 | Exley et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4181467 | Campbell | Jan 1980 | A |
4302150 | Wieland | Nov 1981 | A |
4428715 | Wiggins | Jan 1984 | A |
4431374 | Benstein et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4737071 | Horn, Jr. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752182 | Zaehring et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4790720 | Rodgers | Dec 1988 | A |
5145317 | Brasz | Sep 1992 | A |
5178516 | Nakagawa | Jan 1993 | A |
5368440 | Japikse et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5529457 | Terasaki | Jun 1996 | A |
5857834 | Nagaoka | Jan 1999 | A |
5927939 | Harada et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5971705 | Nagaoka et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6139266 | Nagaoka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168375 | LaRue | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200094 | Skoch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203275 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6290460 | Nagaoka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312222 | Nagaoka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6364607 | Nagaoka et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6371724 | Nagaoka et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
7146813 | Brasz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7326027 | Skoch et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7581925 | Xu et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7845900 | Roduner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8016557 | Abdelwahab et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8162604 | Kühnel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8511981 | Small et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8596968 | Emmerson | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602728 | Swiatek et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616836 | Blair et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20080170938 | Shinohara | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080276613 | Noelle et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100129204 | Higashimori et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150701 | Simon et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166552 | Emmerson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100215489 | Johnson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110194931 | Swiatek | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120121402 | Brown et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130315741 | Small et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140064953 | Swiatek et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140186173 | Blair et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140271170 | Holbrook | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100374733 | Mar 2008 | CN |
971229 | Dec 1958 | DE |
19502808 | Feb 1997 | DE |
138480 | Apr 1985 | EP |
795688 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1199478 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2650546 | Oct 2013 | EP |
170815 | Oct 1921 | GB |
271074 | Oct 1927 | GB |
305214 | Oct 1929 | GB |
604121 | Jun 1948 | GB |
669357 | Apr 1952 | GB |
701503 | Dec 1953 | GB |
701560 | Dec 1953 | GB |
701561 | Dec 1953 | GB |
710362 | Jun 1954 | GB |
722677 | Jan 1955 | GB |
753231 | Jul 1956 | GB |
783448 | Sep 1957 | GB |
790873 | Feb 1958 | GB |
792122 | Mar 1958 | GB |
864645 | Apr 1961 | GB |
2013280 | Aug 1979 | GB |
2041149 | Sep 1980 | GB |
57126600 | Aug 1982 | JP |
9177698 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2012072735 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2013124624 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2353818 | Apr 2009 | RU |
945499 | Jul 1982 | SU |
9961801 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2009042326 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2012019650 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action in Counterpart Chinese Applicatoin No. 201480057740.7, English Translation + original Chinese language document, Apr. 21, 2017, 13 pages. |
Mohtar, H.; Chesse, P., Chalet, D., Hetet, J.-F; and Yammine, A.; “Effect of Diffuser and Volute on Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor Stability and Performance: Experimental Study”, Oil & Gas Science and Technology—Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, vol. 66 (2011), No. 5, pp. 779-790. |
Xu, Cheng and Amano, Ryoichi S., “Empirical Design Considerations for Industrial Centrifugal Compressors”, International Journal of Rotating Machinery, vol. 2012, Article ID 184061, 15 pp. |
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2014/061613, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2014/061613, dated Jan. 12, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Preliminary Examining Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2014/061613, dated Sep. 15, 2015, 37 pages. |
Boyce, Meherwan P., “Principles of Operation and Performance Estimation of Centrifugal Compressors”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Turbomachinery Symposium, Tutorials, Texas A&M University Turbomachinery Laboratory, pp. 161-177. |
Smith, Pieter E. S., “Theoretical Design of a Centrigugal Compressor for Use in a Miniature Gas Turbine”, Sep. 12, 1997, Internet document downloaded on Jul. 19, 2013, 14 pp. |
Håll, Ulf, “Radial Compressor”, Lecture Notes to CRS, Gas Turbine Theory, Chapter 4, Centrifugal Compressors, Apr. 11, 2002, Internet document downloaded from http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜ulfh/gas_turb_h/crsohbilder/crs4en.pdf on Jul. 19, 2013, 7 pp. |
Tatar, Ozturk; Ozturk, Adnan; and Pinarbasi, Ali; “Flow analysis in centrifugal compressor vaneless diffusers”, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, vol. 67, May 2008, pp. 348-354. |
Miwa, Jyunichi; Dou, Chun Hui; Sawai, Kazuki; Namura, Moriaki; and Toriyama, Toshiyki, “Aerodynamic Consideration on Impeller, Diffuser and Volute for MEMS Centrifugal Compressor”, PowerMEMS 2009, Washington DC, USA, Dec. 1-4 2009, pp. 570-573. |
Ganesh, Ch. Sivaji; Nagpurwala, Q. H.; Dixit, C.S. Bhaskar; “Effect of Leading Edge Sweep on the Performance of a Centrifugal Compressor Impeller”, Sastech Journal, vol. 9, Issue 2, Sep. 2010, pp. 55-62. |
European Patent Office Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC in counterpart European Patent Application No. 14792705.7, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 40 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160281734 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61893518 | Oct 2013 | US |