The invention relates to the field of turbomachines and more specifically relates to turbomachines of open rotor type.
Turbomachines of open rotor type belong to a class of architectures with the aim of maximizing power efficiency while having the ability to be integrated correctly (geometrically and aerodynamically) with the aircraft.
Several solutions in response to this situation are known.
A first solution is a counter-rotating open rotor (CROR) turbomachine as described for example in document FR 2 941 492. Such a turbomachine comprises an air inlet and a circulation path of a stream delimited by an outer casing and an inner hub. The path traverses a gas generator, here with a twin spool which powers a turbine driving two counter-rotating propellers. In this document, these two counter-rotating propellers rotate as a single part with a turbine of the gas generator. The turbomachine of this document has the particular benefit of combining an excellent propulsive efficiency linked to a generation of thrust via propellers with a very low pressure ratio, and outer dimensions less than those of a single-propeller turbomachine with the same thrust, facilitating its physical integration onto the aircraft. This architecture based on twin counter-rotating propellers does however have a certain number of limitations, particularly due to the complexity of the sub-systems required for its implementation (dual system for setting the pitch of the propellers, rotating casings under each propeller rotor etc.).
Another solution, in a variant of the twin counter-rotating propeller architecture is the USF (Unducted Single Fan) architecture, comprising a propeller rotor, and a variable-setting stator in its wake, intended to rectify the residual yaw of the propeller rotor. This variant can be seen as an architecture of CROR type in which the rotation of the downstream propeller is stopped. If it has a greater architectural simplicity, this solution does however suffer from a low-pressure module efficiency that is less good than the CROR solution, and requires larger diameters to maintain a rotor load equivalent to that of the CROR solution (this rotor load determining at the first order the perceived noise levels).
Finally, both the architectural solutions described above have the following drawbacks:
An aim of the invention is to propose a turbomachine architecture with two open-rotor propellers which does not have the aforementioned drawbacks.
For this purpose, the invention proposes, according to a first aspect, a turbomachine of an aircraft comprising an outer casing delimiting with an inner hub, a flow path of a gas stream in which is disposed a low-pressure turbine configured to rotationally drive a low-pressure shaft; said turbomachine comprising, in the direction of flow of the gas stream, a first propeller; and a second propeller downstream of the first propeller, the first propeller being rotationally driven by said low-pressure shaft and the second propeller being rotationally driven by an electric motor, the second propeller being further disposed at a distance between 1.5 and 4 cord lengths from the first propeller defined between the respective axes of shimming of each of the first and second propellers.
The invention according to the first aspect is advantageously completed by the following features, taken alone or in any of their technically possible combinations:
The propulsive system comprises or is linked to a power storage unit connected to the first and/or second electric motor/generator, the power storage unit having, preferably, a capacity between 200 and 500 kWh.
The first and the second propellers are disposed in front of the inlet of the flow path of the gas stream.
The first and the second propellers are disposed downstream of the path and outside the flow path of the gas stream.
The turbomachine comprises a gas generator, a unit for controlling the second electric motor/generator, a unit for controlling the angle of shimming of the second propeller, said controlling units being configured to control the second motor and the angle of shimming of the second propeller according to one of the following operating modes:
In the third operating mode the angle of shimming of the second propeller can be controlled in such a way as to obtain an angle of incidence of the blades less than 0°, in order to rotationally drive the second propeller, in a direction of rotation opposite to the direction of rotation of the first propeller. It is also possible to control the second propeller in such a way as to obtain an angle of incidence of the blades greater than 0°, in order to rotationally drive the second propeller, in a direction of rotation identical to the direction of rotation of the first propeller.
Owing to this configuration of variable interactions between the two propellers, the performance of the turbomachine is increased.
Furthermore, it is possible to control the first and the second propeller in different ways according to the operating modes of the turbomachine.
Other features, aims and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description, which is purely illustrative and non-limiting, and which must be read with reference to the appended drawings wherein:
In all the figures similar elements bear identical reference numbers.
In relation with
The gas stream flow path 1 may comprise from upstream to downstream, in the direction of flow of the gas stream (along the axis AA′ and represented by the arrow F), a low-pressure compressor 11, a high-pressure compressor 12, a combustion chamber 13, a high-pressure turbine 14 and a low-pressure turbine 15.
The low-pressure turbine 15 is configured to rotationally drive a low-pressure shaft 25 while the high-pressure turbine 14 is configured to rotationally drive a high-pressure shaft 24.
The turbomachine comprises, in the direction of flow of the gas, a first propeller 31 and a second propeller 32 downstream of the first propeller 31. The first and the second propellers are unducted (architecture of open rotor type).
The first and the second propellers 31, 32 extend from the inner hub 3 and comprise several blades extending from this inner hub 3.
Hereinafter is a description of the two configurations, a first configuration in relation to
According to the first configuration, the first and the second propellers 31, 32 are disposed in front of the inlet of the gas stream flow path 1.
Alternatively, according to the second configuration the first and the second propellers 31, 32 are disposed at the outlet of the gas stream flow path. In particular, the first and the second propellers 31, 32 are disposed downstream and externally behind and above the gas stream flow path 1.
The two configurations differ from one another by the position of the first and the second propellers with respect to the inlet and the outlet of the gas stream flow path 1, (the inlet and the outlet being defined in the direction of flow of the gas stream).
Advantageously according to one or the other of the two configurations described above, the second propeller 32 is disposed at a distance between 1.5 and 4 cord lengths from the first propeller defined between respective axes of shimming of each of the first and second propellers 31, 32 as described hereinafter in relation to
Such a spacing between the two propellers 31, 32 makes it possible to have an aerodynamic coupling that can effectively contribute to the propulsion of the turbomachine.
Also, this spacing results from the aeroacoustic trade-off between:
In addition, this spacing takes into account the need to integrate the pitch change mechanisms of each propeller, mechanisms requiring a certain axial volume.
The second propeller 32 has, advantageously, the following geometrical features:
Advantageously, the first propeller 31 is rotationally driven by the low-pressure turbine 15, by way of the low-pressure shaft 25 and a first reduction gear 50 only, or else by the combination of a first electric motor/generator 60 and the low-pressure turbine 15, and this by way of the first same reduction gear 50. In this way the first electric motor/generator 60 makes it possible to occasionally palliate the deficiencies of the low-pressure shaft 25.
In this variant, in the event of failure of the contribution of the low-pressure turbine contributing to the power supply of the first propeller 31, the electric motor/generator 60 provides part of the power supply required for the first propeller 31.
This configuration illustrated in
The second propeller 32, meanwhile, is driven only rotationally driven by a second electric motor/generator 70 by way of a second reduction gear 80.
The first reduction gear 50 and the second reduction gear 80 are advantageously:
The turbomachine may comprise according to the configurations a first electric motor/generator 60 and a second electric motor/generator 70 that can operate as a “motor” but also as an “electricity generator”.
The propulsive system comprises, in this regard, a power storage unit 90 connected to the first and/or the second electric motor/generator, the power storage unit having, preferably, a capacity between 200 and 500 kWh.
When the electric motor/generator 60, 70 operates as a motor, the storage unit 90 is a source of power supply for the electric motor/generator 60, 70 whereas when the propellers 31, 32 are not driven by the electric motor/generator 60, 70, the electric motor/generator makes it possible to recharge the storage unit 90.
Specifically, the electric motor/generator 60, 70 can enlist the contribution of the operating modes during which it is not used as a “motor” to recharge the storage unit 90.
Whatever the configuration, the turbomachine may comprise, associated with each propeller, a unit for controlling the angle of shimming of the propeller (units UC1 and UC'1 in the figures) which is characterized by:
Here the terminology “propeller shimming” is used to refer to the shimming of each blade of the propeller.
The second propeller 32 is advantageously used in different ways according to several operating methods of the propulsive system of the aircraft. As will be described (in relation to
Thus, the turbomachine comprises a unit UC2 for controlling the second motor/generator associated with the second propeller 32, the unit UC2 for controlling the second motor/generator 70 making it possible to continuously drive the supply of electrical power for this second motor/generator between the extreme cases of zero supply and a supply corresponding to the maximum power of dimensioning of the second motor/generator 70.
A first operating mode M1 corresponds to the take-off/climb of the aircraft, a mode during which the turbomachine needs a strong propulsive power, known as the given propulsive power:
During this first operating mode M1, the setting of the first propeller 32 to rotate makes it possible to reduce the power level required on the first propeller 31 to ensure the global thrust required by the propulsive system, which makes it possible to dimension the diameter of the first propeller 31 on a lower value than that which the prior art would demand if no thrust boost is supplied via the propeller 32. Such a reduction in the diameter makes it possible to have a first propeller 31 which can be easily integrated while maintaining a high power efficiency of the overall propulsive system.
Furthermore, the power level required on the low-pressure shaft is reduced, in the same way as that required by the gas generator which has the consequence of dimensioning the annular gas flow space to a lower value adapted to this reduced level of required power. There is a benefit in terms of the mass of the turbomachine with improved performance as well as a reduction in unwanted sound due to the gas exhaust at the outlet of the gas generator.
A second operating mode M2 corresponds to the cruise phase of the aircraft, a mode during which the turbomachine needs intermediate propulsive power:
During this second operating mode M2, the propulsive efficiency of the first propeller 31 is maximized by re-use of its residual yaw. The yaw of the flow (set to rotate undesirably since the rotation does not contribute to the increase in flow speed along the propulsive axis) coming from the first propeller is recovered by the interaction with the blades of the second propeller (here virtually immobile), and re-used in the form of speed vector of the flow oriented along the main propulsion axis.
A third operating mode M3 corresponds to an idle descend of the aircraft, during which the turbomachine needs low power;
During this third operating mode M3, the power uncoupling of the propulsion requirement and of the operating point of the gas generator and of the first propeller 31 makes it possible to position these latters on output zones that are much more favorable than those achieved with a classic configuration in idle. This also makes it possible to stay out of critical compressor operability zones by way of the positioning of the gas generator on medium/high power levels for which the operability is less critical than under idle conditions.
This operating mode M3 may be obtained according to two embodiments:
A fourth operating mode M4 corresponding to the braking of the aircraft:
During this fourth operating mode M4, there is a reversal of thrust on the first propeller 31 and the second propeller 32 has a shimming chosen in such a way as to allow the reversal of the air stream powering the first propeller 31.
A fifth operating mode corresponds to a malfunction of the first propeller 31 or a malfunction of the gas generator:
During this fifth operating mode M5, a minimum overall thrust level is maintained during a certain time period (by way of the powering of the second propeller 32 in order to maintain a pull capacity, the thrust is then exclusively generated by the second rotor 32), a time period determined by the capacity of the second electric motor/generator 70 and the power available in the storage unit 90 associated with it. This fifth operating mode thus makes it possible to minimize the impact of a loss of thrust of the first propeller 31 or a loss of a primary power supply coming from the gas generator.
A sixth operating mode M6 also corresponds to a malfunction but this time of the second propeller 32:
Such a sixth operating mode M6 makes it possible to have a turbomachine architecture which is robust in the event of failure of the second propeller.
As already described, the first electric motor/generator 60 associated with the first propeller 31 can serve supplement the rotation by the low-pressure turbine 15 (see
This configuration allows:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1859925 | Oct 2018 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2019/052557 | 10/25/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/084271 | 4/30/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100186418 | Beutin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100206982 | Moore et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20160023773 | Himmelmann | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20180118363 | Keller | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2855442 | Dec 2015 | CA |
2941492 | Sep 2011 | FR |
2994707 | Feb 2014 | FR |
Entry |
---|
M. Hepperle, “Electric flight—Potential and limitations,” in Proc. Work-shop on Energy Efficient Technologies and Concepts of Operation, Lisbon, Portugal, Oct. 22-24, 2012, pp. 1-30. (Year: 2012). |
Machine translation of FR2994707A1. Downloaded Mar. 17, 2023. (Year: 2014). |
Philip R. Gliebe and Bangalore A. Janardan, “Ultra-High Bypass Engine Aeroacoustic Study,” NASA/CR-2003-212525, Oct. 2003 (Year: 2003). |
Robert Cameron Bolam, Yuriy Vagapov,Alecksey Anuchin, “Review of Electrically Powered Propulsion for Aircraft,” Conference Paper ⋅ Sep. 2018, 978-1-5386-2910-9/18 © 2018 IEEE (Year: 2018). |
Chao Xu, “CFD Investigation into Propeller Spacing and Pitch Angle for a Ducted Twin Counter Rotating Propeller System,” School of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering College of Science Engineering and Health RMIT University, Australia, 2015. (Year: 2015). |
A. Filippone, “Historical development of the coaxial contra-rotating propeller,” School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Revised: Sep. 30, 2022; Accepted: Oct. 12, 2022, The Aeronautical Journal ( 2023), 127, pp. 699-736. (Year: 2022). |
French Search Report for French Application No. 1859925, dated Jul. 4, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/FR2019/052557, dated Feb. 7, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210403169 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |