This application is a §371 national stage entry of International Application No. PCT/FR2008/001166, filed Aug. 4, 2008, which claims priority to French Patent Application 0705875, filed Aug. 17, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a turbojet engine with reduced noise emissions for an aircraft.
It is known that, at the rear of a bypass turbojet engine mounted on an aircraft, the supersonic cold flow, flowing in the downstream direction of said turbojet engine, comes into contact with the exterior aerodynamic airstream of said turbojet engine. Since the speeds of said cold flow and of said airstream differ from one another, this results in inter-penetrating fluidic shear, which generates noise, known in aeronautical parlance as “jet noise”.
In addition, as a result of a discontinuity in static pressure between the external pressure and the pressure at the exit from the jet pipe, this supersonic cold flow gives rise to a series of compression-expansion (speed fluctuation) cells which act as noise amplifiers and produce a noise known in aeronautical parlance as “shock cell noise”, this English-language term “shock cell noise” being widely recognized.
In order to attenuate the noise emitted at the rear of a bypass turbojet engine, the idea of modifying the rear part of the cold flow nozzle has already been actioned. For example, extending said nozzle rearward using “chevrons” (see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,284,170 and 6,360,528) or shaping the rear part of said nozzle in the form of “undulating lobes” (see, for example, GB 2 160 265, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,786,016 and 6,082,635) have already been proposed.
Aside from the fact that these known nozzles demand definitive special shapes which in general increase the cost, mass and drag, it should be pointed out that, although they are effective in attenuating jet noise by creating turbulence that encourages the cold flow and the exterior aerodynamic airstream to mix, they have only a very limited effect in reducing shock cell noise.
Another source, document EP-1 703 114, describes a reduced-noise turbojet engine in which a plurality of bosses are distributed at the periphery of the outlet orifice of the cold flow, projecting into the latter, each of said bosses forming a convergent followed by a divergent connected to the edge of said cold flow outlet orifice.
It is an object of the present invention to improve such bosses to allow not only an attenuation in jet noise but also a reduction in shock cell noise.
To this end, according to the invention, the bypass turbojet engine for an aircraft, comprising, around its longitudinal axis:
By virtue of the present invention, the periphery of said cold flow is subjected, at the exit of the corresponding nozzle, to division into distinct jets with different orientations and different structures according to whether said jets pass over the bosses or through the longitudinal ducts between said bosses. Specifically, the cold flow jets passing along said longitudinal ducts have a direction that extends said outer fan cowl and, at the edge of said cold flow outlet orifice, have an acceleration of magnitude equal to the nominal magnitude for the nozzle. By contrast, the cold flow jets that pass over the bosses are directed outward, extending said divergent face portion, and penetrate the aerodynamic airstream around the turbojet engine. In addition, at the edge of said cold flow outlet orifice, they have an acceleration vastly superior to said nominal acceleration because of the greater expansion caused by said bosses.
Furthermore, because of the presence of said planar lateral faces, a great deal of shear is generated between the cold flow jets passing over the bosses and those running along said longitudinal ducts, thus causing the formation of vortices that encourage mixing between the exterior aerodynamic airstream and said cold flow. The orientation of said planar lateral faces may, for example, be radial with respect to said turbojet engine.
Thus, said bosses according to the present invention:
The bosses according to the present invention therefore are able simultaneously to influence both the turbulence (the source of noise) and the shock cells (which amplify this noise).
For preference, said bosses are uniformly distributed at the periphery of said fan outer cowl. They may also have a peripheral width equal to that of said longitudinal ducts.
Said bosses may be configured with said outer fan cowl in order to form an integral part thereof. However, advantageously, said bosses are components that are added on and attached to said outer fan cowl. Thus it is possible according to the invention to improve not only turbojet engines that are in the process of being manufactured, but also those built earlier.
The figures of the attached drawing will make it easy to understand how the invention may be embodied. In these figures, identical references denote elements that are similar.
The bypass turbojet engine 1 of longitudinal axis L-L and shown in
The nacelle 2 comprises, at the front, an air inlet 4 provided with a leading edge 5 and, at the rear, an air outlet orifice 6 provided with a trailing edge 7.
Positioned inside said nacelle 2 are:
The outer fan cowl 14 forms a nozzle for the cold flow and converges, toward the rear of the turbojet engine 1, toward said outer nacelle cowl 3, in order therewith to form the edge 7 of said orifice 6, which therefore constitutes the cold flow outlet orifice.
In the vicinity of said cold flow 9 outlet orifice 6, the turbojet engine 1 comprises a plurality of bosses (see also
Each boss 20 has a convex face 22 forming, for the cold flow 9, a convergent face portion 22C directed forward followed by a divergent face portion 22D directed rearward. In addition, the rear part of each divergent face portion 22D is connected to the trailing edge 7 of the orifice 6.
As may be seen in
The planar lateral faces 20L may be radial, that is to say then that their planes pass through said longitudinal axis L-L. In addition, the peripheralwidth 120 of the bosses 20 may be equal to the peripheral width l21 of the longitudinal ducts 21.
When the aircraft (not depicted) which bears the turbojet engine 1 moves along, an aerodynamic airstream V flows around the nacelle 2, in contact with the outer nacelle cowl 3 (see
Of course, at the outlet of the trailing edge orifice 6, the jets 9.21 are directed in the continuation of the outer fan cowl 14, whereas the jets 9.20 are directed as a continuation of the divergent face portions 22D of the bosses 20. Thus, jets 9.20 cross the aerodynamic airstream V more rapidly than do the jets 9.21. This results in better penetration of the cold flow 9 in the aerodynamic airstream V, and therefore in better mixing of the latter with said cold flow 9. Jet noise is therefore reduced.
Furthermore, as illustrated by
The difference in acceleration of the jets 9.20 and 9.21 at the outlet from the orifice 6 means that, at least at the periphery, the cold flow 9 is destructured, which means that the noisy shock cells are reduced.
This consequence is illustrated by
This
Curve 23 shown in solid line in
By contrast, curve 24 shown in broken line in
By comparing curves 23 and 24 it may be seen that the present invention provides an approximately 20% reduction in the amplitude of these pressure fluctuations.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07-05875 | Aug 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2008/001166 | 8/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/11/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/053555 | 4/3/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2486019 | Goddard | Oct 1949 | A |
2974744 | Wade | Mar 1961 | A |
3161257 | Young | Dec 1964 | A |
4284170 | Larson et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4786016 | Presz, Jr. et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
6082632 | Clark et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6360528 | Brausch et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7406821 | Hervio | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7735601 | Stieger et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8307659 | Rose et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20030159428 | Hebert | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040074224 | Hebert | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050138915 | Bardagi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060283188 | Webster et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1703114 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2160265 | Dec 1985 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120117939 A1 | May 2012 | US |