The object of this disclosure relates to a layer for reducing air resistance of a forward-moving object. In forward-moving objects such as, for instance, a vehicle it is desirable to minimize the air friction, since optimum performance can hereby be obtained in respect of the forward movement of the vehicle. The performance of the moving object, such as a vehicle, is influenced to a great extent by the air resistance. The air resistance depends on the speed and the surface over which flow takes place.
In addition, the so-called CW value is important in the air resistance. The CW value is a characteristic value that is related to the design of the object and how the air flows along this object.
The state in which the air flows along the object is also important for the air resistance. If the air flows along the object in a laminar state, the resistance will be less than if the air flows turbulently along the object. The case occurs in any forward-moving object, wherein the arriving airflow is laminar and somewhere on the surface of the object is transformed into a turbulent airflow. The further to the rear the transition point from laminar to turbulent lies, the lower the air resistance will be.
It is now an object of the disclosure to provide a layer which can be arranged on a forward-moving object and with which the air resistance can be reduced.
This object is achieved with a layer which comprises a pattern of surfaces rising in a first direction, and channels running between the surfaces in a second direction at an angle to the first direction.
The rising surfaces in one form ensure that the air is guided as far as the end of the rising surface and, at the transition to the following rising surface, enters a channel where the air becomes turbulent on a micro-scale. Owing to the rising surfaces a laminar flow is then created on a micro-scale in the channels. This laminar flow ensures that the possible beginning of turbulence in the main flow over the object is damped, whereby the transition point between laminar flow and turbulent flow can be displaced further in flow direction. Due to the channels running at an angle these zones of turbulent flow are distributed uniformly over the surface, thereby creating a uniform damping effect.
In a preferred embodiment the first and second directions form an angle of between 30° and 60°, preferably 45°. In another embodiment each surface comprises at least one groove running in the first direction. During flow some of the air will run through this groove and, when running out into one of the channels between the surfaces, will ensure that the turbulent flow in these channels is blown away, whereby a flow of this turbulent air is generated which also contributes toward the damping effect, and thus displaces the transition point between laminar flow and turbulent flow in the main flow further to the rear as seen in the direction of the flow.
The width of at least one groove preferably lies in the range of 0.1-1 mm.
In another preferred embodiment of the layer according to the invention, the quotient of the pitch distance in the first direction between adjacent surfaces and the desired cruising speed of the object is substantially 20-65 kHz. Due to the alternating changes in height between the different rising surfaces vibrations occur in the air which can possibly cause a sound. The generation of these vibrations likewise causes air resistance, which is undesirable. By now modifying the distance between the surfaces to the desired cruising speed of the object it is possible to select the created vibrations such that a minimum amount of energy is lost herein. It has been found that this energy consumption is minimal at a frequency of around 20-65 kHz.
In yet another embodiment of the layer according to the disclosure, the layer is a foil. The foil preferably comprises a PVC base layer and a Teflon top layer. Through flow of the air along the Teflon top layer the particles in the air brushing along the top layer become electrostatic. The advantage is that this electrostatically charged air layer has a viscosity other than the air lying thereabove, thereby reducing the possible occurrence of friction.
These and other features of the invention are further elucidated with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Layer 1 has a number of separate surfaces 2 which rise in the direction R. Channels 3 are provided between surfaces 2.
Surfaces 2 are further provided with grooves 4.
When layer 1 according to the disclosure is arranged on a vehicle, for instance a car, the pitch distance of the surfaces and the orientation thereof can then be adapted to the airflow over the surface of the car. Various aspects can thus be further optimized in order to obtain the lowest possible air resistance. The power of the engine is hereby utilized better, and this power can be used either to obtain a lower fuel consumption or a higher top speed.
While the present invention is illustrated by description of several embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments are described in detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications within the scope of the appended claims will readily appear to those sufficed in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of applicants' general concept.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1029708 | Aug 2005 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/007950 | 8/8/2006 | WO | 00 | 2/28/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/017290 | 2/15/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
83938 | Drake et al. | Nov 1868 | A |
3741285 | Kuethe | Jun 1973 | A |
4650138 | Grose | Mar 1987 | A |
4750693 | Lobert et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4907765 | Hirschel et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5114099 | Gao et al. | May 1992 | A |
5756217 | Schroder et al. | May 1998 | A |
5848769 | Fronek et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6092766 | Laroche et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6345791 | McClure | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412853 | Richardson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415835 | Heinen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6468629 | Lodder | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
357 637 | Sep 1931 | GB |
2001 050215 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 8001673 | Aug 1980 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100159204 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |