The present invention relates to a turbulence sensor and blade condition sensor system, and in particular to a turbulence sensor and sensor system for installation in a wind turbine to detect accumulated matter such as dirt and ice on wind turbine components.
Wind turbines are often located in areas where conditions are harsh, such as offshore, coastal, or elevated areas, and during operation unwanted matter, such as ice and dirt, can often accumulate on the surface of the wind turbine components. Ice in particular can accumulate very rapidly as a result of sudden changes in climate conditions.
Accumulation of such matter is undesirable as it can reduce the lifetime of a component, either by corrosion, increased wear, or increased mechanical stress resulting from the extra weight of the matter. In the worst case, such matter can result in a premature and complete failure of a turbine component.
Due to the often inaccessible location of wind turbines, the applicants have appreciated that a way of detecting the build up of undesirable matter on wind turbine components is desirable, so that maintenance of wind turbine components can be carried out more efficiently, and the lifetime of the components improved.
Additionally, in most wind turbines, such as those operating using pitch or stall control the pitch of the rotor blades relative to the wind direction is carefully controlled to extract the optimal power from the wind, and to avoid dangerous overloads at the generator. An accumulation of matter on the blades can make them less efficient in extracting power from the wind, and can additionally make it more difficult to accurately control their pitch for power regulation and safety. A way of detection the accumulation of unwanted matter on wind turbine blades is therefore particularly desirable.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a turbulence sensor for a wind turbine component having a cavity is provided. The turbulence sensor comprises: a sensor membrane, for detecting the turbulence of air flow past a surface of the wind turbine component, wherein the sensor membrane is integral to the surface, and covers at least part of the cavity; a light source located in the sensor cavity for illuminating the surface of the sensor membrane inside the cavity; a light detector located in the cavity for detecting light reflected from the surface of the membrane, and for providing an output to a processor, the processor determining from the output a turbulence value for the air flow across the sensor membrane.
The invention provides a sensitive sensor system due to the fact that small displacements of the sensor membrane can be detected using the light source and detector. Further, the sensor is relatively easy to install and can be situated in the wind turbine blade for protection, and to ensure that the presence of the sensor does not interfere with the measurement. As there are few moving parts, the sensor is resistant to extreme changes of temperature.
In one embodiment, the light source and light detector in the cavity are optical fibres connected to an opto-electrical light source. This allows the use of electrical components in the sensor to be avoided, and means that the sensor will be resistant to lighting strikes. These are especially common for wind turbine blades. Any electrical components for the sensor can be housed in part of the wind turbine that is electrically shielded.
Preferably, the sensor comprises an adder for adding light reflected from the surface of the membrane to a reference light signal to give an interference pattern that indicates displacement of the membrane. Use of an interference pattern provides the most accurate way of interpreting the displacement of the membrane, as small displacements of the membrane can be used to give large variations in intensity. For larger displacements, a sinusoidal intensity pattern is produced, meaning that information about the speed at which the displacement is occurring as well as the direction of displacement can be obtained from analysis of the sinusoidal frequency and rate of occurrence.
In one embodiment, the adder comprises a partial mirror located in the sensor cavity to reflect a portion of the light from the light source to the light detector and provide the reference light signal. Thus, all of the components of the sensor are provided locally inside the sensor cavity for ease of replacement and maintenance.
In a further embodiment, the sensor cavity is sealed. This allows the cavity environment to be maintained at levels of humidity and temperature that ensure good operation of the sensor membrane. Furthermore, the cavity may be filled with a gas other than air, such as an inert gas.
In one embodiment, the sensor membrane may be formed of a different material to that from which the surface of the wind turbine component is formed. This allows it to be tailored more precisely to its function as a sensor, in terms of tension and responsiveness. Depending on installation, the sensor membrane may alternatively be formed by the blade surface itself.
In an embodiment, the turbulence sensor comprises a processor for analysing the sinusoidal variations in the interference pattern over a predetermined period of time to determine whether the air flow is turbulent. The processor may analyse the pattern using pattern recognition or statistical techniques and give a determination with an associated level of confidence. Analysis for a longer period of time may give a higher degree of confidence in the sensor outcome.
In a further aspect of the invention, a sensor system for detecting the surface condition of a wind turbine blade is provided. The sensor system comprises: one or more turbulence sensors according to the first aspect above, for giving an output indicating turbulent air flow across a surface of the wind turbine blade; a memory; and a processor; wherein the processor determines a condition of the blade surface from the output received from the one or more turbulence sensors. Changes in the blade condition, such as deterioration of the blade surface or accumulation of matter such as dirt or ice, will greatly affect the flow of air across the blade surface. The turbulence sensors described provide a reliable and inexpensive way of detecting changes in blade condition.
Preferably, the memory records the outputs received from the one or more turbulence sensors over a period of time, and the processor determines a condition of the blade surface based on a change in the outputs compared with past outputs. This allows the past outputs of the turbulence sensor to act as a reference for comparison with the instantaneous or current readings being taken. Accumulation of dirt for example, may manifest itself as a gradual increase in the turbulence detected. Ice accumulation on the other hand may occur quickly over a number of hours. Thus, the nature of the matter can also be deduced. Preferably, the sensor system comprises a plurality of sensors on the windward and leeward sides of the blade, so that a complete sensor view is obtained.
In a further embodiment, the processor compares the outputs from the turbulence sensors of one wind turbine blade with those of another. This allows the processor to give an indication of whether the blades are mounted and operating correctly, and provides additional data for comparison of blade condition. Preferably, the sensor system detects the accumulation of matter on the blade surface.
Preferably, the processor determines a condition of the blade surface, in which matter is taken to have accumulated on the blade surface, when a predetermined number of the turbulence sensors indicate turbulence.
The invention also provides a wind turbine comprising a turbulence sensor or a blade condition sensor system as described above.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example, and with reference to the drawings in which:
The sensor 10 comprises a sensor housing 11, having side walls 12 that define a cavity 13. In the cavity 13, sensor apparatus, denoted generally by reference number 14, is situated. One surface of the sensor housing 11 is provided with a sensor membrane 15. In practice, the sensor 10 is mounted in the blade 5 such that the sensor membrane 15 separates the cavity 13 from the outside air, and such that the membrane 15 is in contact with the air flow across the surface of the blade. The cavity is entirely sealed off from the external environment by the side walls 12 and the membrane 15, so that movement of the membrane surface can be considered wholly attributable to variations in the air flow across the blade surface 5. Sealing the cavity also acts to keep the internal surface of the membrane clean, and allows the internal environment of the cavity to be regulated to avoid build up of moisture that could affect the sensor membrane 15 and apparatus 14. The cavity 13 may for example be filled with a gas other than air, such as an inert gas, that gives a better operating environment for the membrane.
Preferably, the blade surface 5 and the membrane 15 are arranged so that they form a smoothly continuous blade surface. It is undesirable both for the aerodynamic properties of the blade and for the sensitivity of the sensor if the connection between the membrane 15 and the blade surface is not continuous as this may introduce obstructions or impediments into the air flow.
The membrane 15 is arranged such that it is susceptible to changes in air flow at the surface of the wind turbine component. It is therefore relatively thin, in some embodiments between 0.5 and 2 mm, and is tensioned so that turbulent airflow will result in only a small movement of the membrane surface. An interference pattern is produced by shining light on to the membrane in order to measure the displacement of the membrane. In practice, therefore, a range of movement of the membrane of the order of several pm has been found advantageous, owing to the wavelength of the light used. The choice of the membrane material is critical to ensure it is suitable for measurement. A material that is too light and flexible will be too sensitive to changes in air flow even in laminar conditions will not be suitable for distinguishing turbulent and laminar flow. Preferably, the material is therefore strong and stiff enough to ensure that only strong vibrations (in the range of 10 to 100 Hz, say) from turbulent air flow give a sufficient interference signal.
It is possible to use the outside surface of the rotor blade itself as the membrane 15. In this case, the sensor apparatus 14 can be installed in the rotor blade 5 under the outer surface, with or without the sensor housing 11 creating a sealed cavity for the apparatus. If the sensor 10 is installed into the rotor blade 5 or other wind turbine component, as a separate unit, then a hole of diameter 30 to 100 mm has been found adequate to accommodate the sensor housing 11 and apparatus 14.
The internal construction of the sensor apparatus 14 will now be explained in more detail. Sensor apparatus 14 comprises a light source 16 aimed at the membrane 15. Where possible, it is advantageous to avoid the use of electrical components in rotor blades as they are more susceptible to damage from lighting strikes. Thus, the light source 16 preferably comprises an optical fibre 17 connected to an opto-electronic light source, such as a photo-diode or laser, located remotely in the rotor blade hub. In this embodiment the light source 16 constitutes the exposed end of the optical fibre 17 and a suitable mount to support the fibre in the sensor cavity and ensure that it is securely aimed at the membrane 15.
In
The apparatus 14 may also comprise a partially reflecting mirror 20, located between the membrane and the optical fibre 17. In this way, the optical fibre will receive light reflected back from both the plane of the mirror 20 and also from the plane of the membrane 15. If one or more lenses 18 are installed, the partially reflecting mirror 20 may be advantageously located between the membrane 15 and the one or more lenses 18. The apparatus 14 may be secured inside cavity 13 by suitable connections to housing walls 12.
It will be appreciated that some internal reflection of the light in the optical fibre 17 will occur at the fibre to air interface in the fibre 17. As a result, even without the partial mirror 20, an interference pattern can be produced using solely the optical fibre 17 and the membrane surface 15. However, the amount of light subject to internal reflection is only around 4% of the total. While this is sufficient to produce a useful reference signal to interfere with the sensor signal from the membrane 15, in some embodiments it is useful to provide a stronger unreflected reference signal. As reflection from the partial mirror is around 40 to 50%, and the reflection from the membrane 15 a similar order of magnitude, the partial mirror provides a reference and sensor signal of similar magnitude. It also allows light sources that are not especially powerful to be used, thereby making the sensor cheaper to produce. In this case, the most significant interference occurs at the partial mirror, although as before, interference will still occur at the fibre to air interface.
Locating the partially reflecting mirror 20 in the sensor cavity 13 is advantageous, as it means that all of the components likely to require installation and maintenance are located together in same location of the component. Alternatively, the partially reflecting mirror may be omitted from cavity and located instead in the path of the optical fibre 17, as will be described below. This can be useful if it is desired to save space in the sensor cavity 13.
In the sensor described above with reference to
An alternative embodiment will now be described with reference to
Other suitable arrangements of sensor could be implemented and will occur to the skilled person.
The turbulence sensors shown in
Optical fibres 43 are connected between the one or more optical mixers 42 and respective turbulence sensors 44. The turbulence sensors 44 may for example be those illustrated in
As shown in
The optical mixer 42 is coupled to light sensing device 45. For each turbulence sensor, the light sensing device 45 receives at least two light signals, the first being a light signal that has been reflected from the membrane 15, and the second being a reference signal. As noted above, the reference signal may have been reflected, not by the membrane 15, but by the partially reflecting mirror 20, or the fibre to air interface in the sensor cavity 13. Alternatively, the reference signal may be light received directly or indirectly from light source 41 either at the light sensing device 45, optical mixer 42, or other optical mixer in the light path. Optical mixer 42 is preferable as a portion of the light from the light source can then simply be diverted directly to the light sensor 45.
The light sensor 45 is in turn connected to an Analogue to Digital Converter (ADC) 46 which is connected to a processor 47 for processing the results. Processor 47 preferably has access to a timer unit 48 and a memory 49.
Many wind turbines, especially those installed in wind parks, are monitored and controlled by sophisticated control systems, such as the SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system. It will therefore be appreciated that in practice, processor 47 will typically be connected to a larger control system, and may have access to data or information gathered at the wind turbine other than that received from the turbulence sensor. This need not always be the case however, such as where turbines are installed as stand-alone individual units.
Preferably the light source 41, the light sensor 45, the ADC 46 and processor 47 are housed separately from the rotor blade, either in the rotor blade hub, or in the nacelle, where they may be protected from lighting strikes by a suitable arrangement of lighting conductors or electrical shielding.
It will be appreciated that the phase of the reference signal, even in the arrangements where the partially reflecting mirror is used in the cavity, will be solely determined by the phase of the light source 41. In general, differences in lengths of optical fibres (unless these are made deliberately long) can be ignored. The phase of the signal that has been reflected by the membrane will however vary according to the optical path length between the emitting and receiving optical fibres 17, 23 or 24 in the sensor cavity 13. In turn, this path length is affected by movement or vibration of the membrane 15 caused by the air flow past outer surface of the blade 5. Thus by allowing the two signals to interfere with one another and sensing changes in phase of the two signals, information can be generated about the quality of the air flow.
In ideal operating conditions, the air flow across the surface of the rotor blade will be laminar, resulting in little or no disturbance of the membrane 15. Turbulent air flow caused by the accumulation of matter on the surface of the rotor blade or by the pitch of the blade inducing stall like conditions will result in sudden and unpredictable movement of the membrane 15 and associated changed in phase of the light reflected back from the membrane relative to the reference phase.
If the membrane moves further, then the phase between the reference signal and the sensor signal will change and result in further changes in intensity. If the magnitude of the movement of the membrane is sufficiently large, a sinusoidal variation in the intensity of the light will be seen as the phase difference increases through complete phase oscillations. The sinusoidal variation will continue for the period in which the membrane is moving, and will reverse direction as the direction of movement of the membrane reverses. The time taken for the intensity to vary from peak to peak additionally indicates the time taken for the membrane to move half of the distance indicated by the wavelength of the light signal.
The intensity graph of
Laminar air flow or non-turbulent background conditions, on the other hand, will result in little or less movement of the membrane. The intensity graph would therefore be characterised by more and longer periods of flat lines, gentle variations, or periods in which although a sinusoidal variation is seen, it has a long wavelength indicating that it is occurring relatively slowly.
The flat line regions of the graph representing no movement of the membrane may or may not always indicate the same intensity of light. In practice, although the rest position of the membrane may be largely determined at least in part by the membrane tension and the material of which the membrane is made, the instantaneous force exerted by the air flow will ultimately determine the instantaneous position.
The processor 47 analyses the intensity of the light signals received at ADC 46, to determine the present quality of air flow across the blade. It may do this using any suitable mathematical processing techniques to determine the amount of variation in the light interference signal, such as that shown in
As well as identifying whether the results from an individual sensor 44 indicate turbulence, the processor 47 has the further function of assessing the current operating performance of the wind turbine blades based on the results collected from the plurality of sensors 44 over time. It will be appreciated that a separate processor could be provided for this purpose, but that for the sake of simplicity in the present description, processor 47 will be assumed to perform both roles.
The processor preferably takes continuous or periodic readings from the turbulence sensors 44 to develop a time-log of changes in the air flow over the blade. In either case, in order to accurately determine the quality of air flow an intensity pattern such as that shown in
To detect the accumulation of unwanted matter on the wind turbine components, periodic measurements may for example only be required a limited number of times per day. In which case, the light sensors are activated for discrete periods of time, and subsequently deactivated when not required to be in use. Where the sensors are continuously activated, the processor divides the continuous readings into discrete time windows for each sensor.
The processor 47 receives the light intensity signal from each sensor for the measurement period, and stores this in memory 49 with an indication of the time period. Each signal is then analysed to determine whether or not it is characteristic of turbulent or laminar air flow, and the result of the determination logged. It will be appreciated that the result may be a discrete value, either a positive or a negative indication of turbulence, or may be a continuous value indicating the degree to which the air flow is turbulent.
At the start of operation of a wind turbine, the blades and other wind turbine components will be largely free of dirt, but depending on the time of year, and climate conditions, ice may or may not have accumulated. At installation therefore, and assuming the blades are not pitched to cause stall-like air flow, the readings from the sensors 44 should largely indicate laminar flow. Nevertheless, particular sensors at particular times may indicate turbulent air flow, as a result of instantaneous and unpredictable variations in the air flow. Such indications would be sporadic and without pattern.
The results from the sensors are logged and monitored by the processor to determine larger scale changes that are indicative of problems with the component. For example, if in normal operation three sensors on a blade surface component occasionally and sporadically indicate turbulent air flow but largely give a reading consistent with laminar air flow, then a change in the system to a persistent reading of turbulence from two or more sensors might indicate that the air flow across the blade has been affected by the build up of matter, and that action needs to be taken. Such a condition is illustrated in
The first four columns show an occasional turbulence detection from a sensor, but do not indicate any large scale trend. The columns after point A however show a permanent change to turbulent indications from the majority of sensors and are indicative of a problem with the blade condition. The processor may therefore detect such problems simply by counting the number of turbulence indications over a predetermined time period or window, say four or more. If a threshold count is passed, the processor issues an alarm indicating that attention is needed.
Preferably, the alarm function operates on a continuous basis such that if the turbulent conditions are no longer detected the alarm is cancelled. At point B for example, it is possible that the turbulence sensors on the leeward side of the blade will return to largely indicating a normal condition. As noted above turbulence can be a result of the blade pitch and not necessarily accumulation of unwanted matter. Thus, if turbulence is detected for an extended period of time, the processor can be configured to test the determination by reducing the blade pitch and reducing the likelihood that the turbulence is due solely to the blade angle. If doing so results in a cancellation of the alarm signal, the blades may be pitched into the wind as before to resume operation.
Increasing accumulation of matter on the blades is likely to lead to a reduced stall angle of the blades. Testing the blades by varying the pitch angle once a turbulent condition has been detected therefore provides an additional test of the extent to which matter has accumulated on the blades. If the stall angle of the blades is severely reduced by accumulated matter, then attention may be needed from a maintenance engineer.
In one embodiment, in addition to comparing the indications of individual sensors on a blade, the processor 47 compares the results from one blade to those of another. Sub-optimal turbulence performance of one blade in comparison with the other blades may indicate that the mounting of the blade on the rotor hub needs adjustment, or that the blade is not performing as well, due to stress or other factors. The processor may, if persistent sub-optimal performance is detected, issue an alarm to draw attention to the blade condition.
The sensor described above is relatively inexpensive to produce and is easy to mount. Thus, sensor systems comprising a large number of sensors can be installed relatively easily into both new and existing turbines. Furthermore, the membrane may be painted the same colour as the surrounding component surface to ensure that the visual appearance of the wind turbine is not impaired. Painting the area after mounting the sensor also has the effect that no moisture can enter the blade along the side of the sensor cavity 12 and 13 and blade 5.
The above description is intended only to be illustrative of the invention defined by the claims. Alternative techniques for implementing the invention will occur to the skilled person in the art. In one alternative embodiment, the ADC 46 and the turbulence detection part of the processor may be replaced by an analogue filter that passes the high frequencies associated with rapid deflection of the membrane 15, and a circuit that activates an output if the amount of signal within these frequencies exceeds a certain limit or rate of occurrence.
As rotor blades are susceptible to lightning strikes, the preferred device employs optical fibres as both light source and light detector in the sensor housing. In alternative embodiments however, opto-electronic devices such as light emitting diodes and photo detectors may be used directly inside the sensor housing, with appropriate electrical and signaling connections to a controller and power source. In certain embodiments it may of course be appropriate to install the control electronics and power systems locally or in the sensor itself.
Additionally, although the discussion has largely considered use of the sensors on wind turbine blades, the sensors could be installed on any wind turbine component. Further, although the sensor system is intended to indicate whether unwanted matter, such as dirt or ice has accumulated on the blade, it will be appreciated that the sensor system can be used to indicate the general condition of the blade surface.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0822930.4 | Dec 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/008934 | 12/14/2009 | WO | 00 | 6/13/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/069534 | 6/24/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4387993 | Adrian | Jun 1983 | A |
4671659 | Rempt et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681025 | Carty | Jul 1987 | A |
4912530 | Bessho | Mar 1990 | A |
4996419 | Morey | Feb 1991 | A |
5009505 | Malvern | Apr 1991 | A |
5094527 | Martin | Mar 1992 | A |
5160976 | Carr et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5201015 | von Bieren et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5250802 | Runner | Oct 1993 | A |
5308973 | Odoni | May 1994 | A |
5488475 | Friebele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5633748 | Perez et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649035 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5726744 | Ferdinand et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5973317 | Hay | Oct 1999 | A |
6125216 | Haran et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6301968 | Maruyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6586722 | Kenny et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612810 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640647 | Hong et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6850821 | Weitkamp | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6940185 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940186 | Weitkamp | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7059822 | LeMieux et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086834 | LeMieux | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7476985 | Llorente Gonzalez | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7703331 | Magne et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726943 | Stommel | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7908923 | Bosselmann et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8002523 | Borden | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8123480 | Enevoldsen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8322206 | Hucker et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8408871 | Herr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463085 | Cribbs | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020057436 | Skinner et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030066356 | Kanellopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030127587 | Udd et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040057828 | Bosche | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040114850 | Dewyntermarty et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040252290 | Ferguson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050088660 | Ronnekleiv | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050276696 | LeMieux | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000269 | LeMieux et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060146337 | Hartog | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060285813 | Ferguson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070223004 | Baillon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070280582 | Sanders | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070284112 | Magne et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013879 | Mossman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080317598 | Barbu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090097976 | Driver et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100011862 | Kuhlmeier | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 06 624 | Sep 1982 | DE |
31 48 867 | Jun 1983 | DE |
195 24 036 | Jul 1996 | DE |
253 669 | Jan 1998 | DE |
199 23 087 | Dec 2000 | DE |
199 27 015 | Dec 2000 | DE |
202 06 704 | Aug 2002 | DE |
101 60 522 | Jun 2003 | DE |
103 15 676 | Nov 2004 | DE |
0 640 824 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 857 291 | May 1997 | EP |
0 984 243 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 148 324 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 249 692 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 359 321 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 466 827 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 586 854 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1 770 278 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1 780 523 | May 2007 | EP |
1 873 395 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 911 968 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2 025 929 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2 075 462 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2 707 754 | Jan 1995 | FR |
2 105 846 | Mar 1983 | GB |
2 284 256 | May 1995 | GB |
2 326 471 | Dec 1998 | GB |
2 398 841 | Sep 2004 | GB |
2 409 517 | Jun 2005 | GB |
2 421 075 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2 428 748 | Feb 2007 | GB |
2 440 953 | Feb 2008 | GB |
2 440 954 | Feb 2008 | GB |
2 440 955 | Feb 2008 | GB |
2466433 | Jun 2010 | GB |
55-69006 | May 1980 | JP |
58-153107 | Sep 1983 | JP |
60-100707 | Jun 1985 | JP |
10-69922 | Mar 1989 | JP |
6-117914 | Apr 1994 | JP |
2000-111319 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2003-302536 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2007-114072 | May 2007 | JP |
11378 | Aug 1996 | LV |
11389 | Aug 1996 | LV |
780 654 | Mar 1996 | RU |
577398 | Oct 1977 | SU |
9715805 | May 1997 | WO |
0023764 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0028294 | May 2000 | WO |
0039548 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0133075 | May 2001 | WO |
02053910 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03076887 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2005024349 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005071382 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005071383 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006021751 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006063990 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007099290 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007104306 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008101496 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009046717 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
David Biloen; International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/IB2009/007018; Mar. 7, 2011; 9 pages; European Patent Office. |
Jonathan Charles Teixeira Moffat; Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/119,871; Jun. 30, 2011; 23 pages; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. |
Jonathan Charles Teixeira Moffat; Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/119,871; Dec. 13, 2011; 18 pages; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. |
Gareth John; Search Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0812037.0; Sep. 16, 2008; 4 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
P. Ganci; International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/GB96/02606; Jan. 28, 1997; 2 pages; European Patent Office. |
Robert MacDonald; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0812258.2; Nov. 7, 2008; 6 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Christopher Smith; Search Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0814651.6; Dec. 4, 2008; 1 page; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Tony Oldershaw; Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0814651.6; May 1, 2009; 2 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Tony Oldershaw; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0817341.1; Jan. 12, 2009; 4 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
David Biloen; International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/IB2009/007018; Oct. 7, 2010; 6 pages; European Patent Office. |
Lars Jakobsson; International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/NO03/00087; Jun. 10, 2003; 3 pages; European Patent Office. |
James Paddock; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB0913739.9; Nov. 30, 2009; 4 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Daniel Jones; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB1004162.2; Sep. 13, 2010; 8 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Mike Walker; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in Great Britain Application No. GB1001855.4; Mar. 22, 2010; 7 pages; Great Britain Intellectual Property Office. |
Tony Oldershaw; Combined Search and Examination Report issued in priority Great Britain Application No. GB0822930.4; Mar. 26, 2009; 6 pages; Intellectual Property Office. |
Christoph Felicetti; International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in priority International Application No. PCT/EP2009/008934; Apr. 27, 2010; 11 pages; European Patent Office. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110246094 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61122974 | Dec 2008 | US |