Patent Application
20140230528
The present technology relates generally to a mixing device for combining at least two fluids in a chromatography system. More specifically, the present technology relates to a turbulent flow mixing device resulting in improved chromatography results, e.g. peak separation, sample focusing.
Liquid-based high efficiency chromatography (“LC”) can be used in various applications as a separation tool for identification and purification of crude chemical mixtures. The chromatography process involves passing a mixture dissolved in a mobile phase through a stationary phase, which separates the analyte to be measured from other molecules in the mixture based on differential kinetics between the mobile and stationary phases. Subtle differences in a compounds ability to interact with the mobile versus stationary phase results in differential retention on the stationary phase. These subtle differences lead to the separation of the compounds.
Chromatography can be preparative or analytical in terms of process capacity. Liquid-based chromatography can have various formats based on the characteristics of the components it utilizes in the process. For example, high performance liquid chromatography (“HPLC”) uses pure organic solvents as mobile phases, while tubes filled with solid particles (e.g., columns) are used as stationary phases. Supercritical fluid chromatography (“SFC”), is another format that uses the same type of columns used in HPLC, but employs carbon dioxide or other compressible fluids at conditions above the supercritical point as mobile phases, along with co-solvents in some cases, to perform the same type of separation and purification as performed in HPLC systems.
A compressible fluid is one in which the fluid density changes significantly when it is subjected to high pressure. The key difference, in the context of SFC or HPLC, between compressible and incompressible fluids is the way the different fluids behave when pressure is applied to them. In the case of incompressible fluids, e.g. water or methanol, application of a pressure at one point immediately creates identical pressure at all other points in the system.
In the case of a compressible fluid, e.g. supercritical CO2, the imposition of a force at one point within a system does not result in an immediate increase in pressure elsewhere the system. Instead, the fluid compresses near where the force was applied; that is, its density increases locally in response to the force. This compressed fluid subsequently expands against neighboring fluid particles causing the neighboring fluid itself to compress. In many cases, the net result is the generation of pressure waves as the locally dense fluid moves throughout the system.
The performance of liquid or supercritical fluid based chromatography systems can depend upon fluidic dynamics between mobile and stationary phases, in addition to the nature of the molecules to be separated. Fluidic dynamics of the mobile and stationary phases are in continuous states of equilibrium during the chromatography process. Because of the differences in kinetics upon which the chromatography system is based (e.g., interactions of molecules with both stationary and mobile phases can be very subtle), these equilibrium of states (“EOS”) are not constant and are highly susceptible to all kinds of disturbances, such as environmental factors. These disturbances can be, for example, pulsations from imperfect pumping of mobile phase solvents, fluctuations of system pressure, or gradient disturbance from heterogeneous diluents.
It is, therefore, a well accepted doctrine that in LC most operational factors are kept as consistent as possible with the optimized conditions in order to obtain the best result possible. For example, once the chromatographic method parameters are developed, such as the gradient combinations of the mobile phases, it is preferable to have effective mixing of all the individual solvents before they are pumped onto the separation column and mixed with samples. In addition, it is also preferable to prepare all the samples in the diluents with the same composition as it is in mobile phase. This way the injection and loading of samples onto the system will give minimum disturbance to the main flow stream from changes to the mobile phase solvent strength that can impact the separation.
These guidelines are, however, not always followed in practice for many reasons. First, in most LC cases, the normally laminar flow based design of the mixing chamber for solvents can depend on the actual operational parameters to determine whether mixing will be effective. For example, if the two solvents possess different physical properties such as density, viscosity and/or miscibility, it can be difficult to get a thorough mixing. In addition, the pressure from the chromatography system can have a profound impact on the effectiveness of mixing. Second, the diversified nature of analyte molecules can make it difficult to prepare the analyte/sample with the exact same composition diluents as mobile phases, simply based on the solubility factor. As a result, the sample injected onto the system can have a different solvent strength than the mobile phase. This can disrupt the equilibrium of states, and diminish the process efficiency. Third, in the case of SFC, since the major component of mobile phase are compressible fluids, such as supercritical carbon dioxide, it is practically impossible to prepare the samples in the same composition of diluents as in mobile phase because the samples are in ambient atmospheres prior to being injected onto the system and not under pressurized conditions like the compressible fluids.
The present technology features a mixing device for combining at least two fluids in a chromatography system. The device can be used to thoroughly mix two or more mobile phases that may have such different physical properties (e.g. density, viscosity, and polarity) that thorough mixing via laminar flow may otherwise be inefficient.
The technology further enables thorough mixing between two different components of a mobile phase in SFC. For example, it enables mixing a compressible fluid such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and a modifier solvent, i.e. an incompressible fluid, for the mobile phase such as methanol. The present technology also enables thorough dissolution of the analyte within the combined mobile phase. Thus, upon exiting the mixing device of the current technology, the analyte and mobile phase exist as a homogenous mixture prior to entering the separation column.
The technology further enables thorough mixing between two different components of a mobile phase in HPLC. Often, the components of an HPLC mobile phase will have different densities, viscosities, and polarities. For example, a mobile phase might comprise a nonpolar component and a polar component in addition to the sample. Because of their different physical properties, these components may mix slowly under laminar flow despite being miscible. The current technology enables thorough mixing of all components of the mobile phase along with the analyte, giving rise to a homogenous mixture prior to entering the separation column.
In one aspect, the technology features a turbulent flow mixing device for combining at least two fluids in a chromatography system. The device includes an exterior housing having a first end and a second end and a hydraulic flow connector at the first end of the exterior housing. A cartridge including a chamber is enclosed within the exterior housing. The chamber has at least one wall defining an interior volume having a shape, and the chamber also contains a packing material wherein the packing material within the chamber creates a turbulent flow condition to mix at least two fluids and provide flow through the cartridge during operation of the chromatography system.
In one embodiment of the technology, the interior volume of the chamber has a shape, and the combination of the shape of the interior volume together with the packing material create the turbulent flow conditions to mix the at least two fluids and provide flow through the cartridge during operation of the chromatography system.
In one embodiment of the technology, the shape of the interior volume of the chamber is cylindrical, conical, or concave. In one embodiment, the packing material comprises a plurality of particles. In one embodiment, the plurality of particles have a size between about 1 micron to about 10,000 microns. In one embodiment, the surface of the plurality of particles is chemically inert. In one embodiment, the plurality of particles comprise an inorganic material, a metal oxide, a polymer, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the exterior housing of the device comprises stainless steel.
In one embodiment, the technology is used in combination with a high-performance liquid chromatography system or a supercritical fluid chromatography system. In one embodiment, the plurality of particles are hollow. In one embodiment, the packing material is a porous monolith. In one embodiment, the porous monolith is a silica gel monolith. In one embodiment, the packing material is non-retentive to the mobile phase, but somewhat retentive to the analyte of interest, such that a sample is retained for a longer period of time than a mobile phase in order to ensure a more narrow bolus of the analyte of interest. In one embodiment, the technology comprises an inlet at the first end of the exterior housing and an outlet at the second end of the exterior housing. In one embodiment, the inlet and outlet are asymmetrically oriented about an axis from the first end to the second end of the exterior housing.
In another aspect, the technology features a chromatography system including a first pump and a second pump. The first pump can pump a first flow stream comprising first fluid and the second pump can pump a second flow stream comprising a second fluid. The second pump is in parallel with the first pump. A turbulent flow mixing device containing a cartridge is located after the first and second flow streams are combined. In some embodiments, the mixing device is located after an injection point of a sample. The turbulent flow mixing device is configured to create a turbulent flow condition to mix at least the first flow stream and the second flow stream and to provide flow through the mixing device during operation of the chromatography system. A column is located downstream of the cartridge and a detector is located downstream of the column.
In one embodiment of the chromatography system, a heater is located downstream of the mixing device. In another embodiment, an injector for injecting a sample into the second flow stream is located upstream of the mixing device. In one embodiment, the mixing device is configured to retain the sample for a longer period of time than the first and second fluids. In one embodiment, the first fluid is a compressible fluid and the second fluid is an incompressible fluid.
In one embodiment of the chromatography system, the mixing device includes an exterior housing having a first and second end, and a hydraulic flow connector is located at the first end of the exterior housing. In one embodiment, a cartridge including a chamber is enclosed within the exterior housing, and the chamber has at least one wall defining an interior volume. In one embodiment, a packing material is disposed within the interior volume of the chamber, and the packing material creates the turbulent flow condition to mix at least the first flow stream and the second flow stream and provide flow through the cartridge during operation of the chromatography system.
In one embodiment of the chromatography system, the interior volume of the chamber has a shape and the packing material in combination with the shape of the interior volume create the turbulent flow condition to mix at least the first flow stream and the second flow stream and provide flow through the cartridge during the operation of the chromatography system. In one embodiment, the chamber is cylindrical, conical, or concave. In one embodiment, packing material comprises an inorganic material, a metal oxide, a polymer, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the packing material comprises a plurality of particles. In one embodiment, the plurality of particles are hollow. In one embodiment, the packing material is a porous monolith. In one embodiment, the porous monolith is a silica gel monolith. In one embodiment, the packing material is non-retentive to the mobile phase but somewhat retentive to the sample of interest, such that a sample is retained for a longer period of time than the mobile phase. In some embodiments, the mixing device comprises an inlet at the first end of the exterior housing and an outlet at the second end of the exterior housing. In some embodiments, the inlet and outlet of the device are asymmetrically oriented about an axis from the first end to the second end of the housing.
In another aspect, the technology features a method. The method is directed to enhancing peak signal in HPLC or SFC. The method includes pumping a first flow stream comprising a first fluid and pumping a second flow stream comprising second fluid. The method also includes injecting a sample into the second flow stream or the combined flow stream. The first and second flow streams along with the injected sample are turbulated in a cartridge. The method also includes flowing the turbulated flow stream through a chromatography column and detecting at least a portion of the sample.
In some embodiments of the method, the first and second flow streams are combined prior to turbulating. In some embodiments, the first and second flow streams are combined in the cartridge. In some embodiments, the sample is retained within the cartridge for a longer period of time before entering the column. By retaining the sample for a longer period of time, sample focusing is achieved.
The exemplary devices and methods of the present disclosure provide numerous advantages. For example, the technology significantly improves the reliability of chromatography, for example SFC, by ensuring that conditions are kept more constant across different runs, i.e. compensating for operational factors by improving mixing through turbulating flow. This increased reliability makes chromatography, for example SFC, a more robust process for separating complex mixtures overall. Additionally, the technology helps focus the sample prior to its entering the chromatography column by helping retain the sample for a longer period of time than the mobile phase. The sample focusing helps ensure that a more narrow bolus of sample enters the column. By ensuring that conditions are more constant across runs and ensuring a narrow bolus of sample enters the chromatography column, the technology allows for greater peak separation. Greater peak separation provides improved results and more rapid analysis.
The advantages of the technology described above, together with further advantages, may be better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the technology.
Devices and designs for effective solvent mixing can improve the chromatographic process. The processes can consist of flow-through designs that are based on turbulence-flow fluidic dynamics theories which can have higher effectiveness on solvent mixing, compared to laminar-flow based design mixing chambers that are commonly used in many LC applications. The improvement to chromatography systems, in terms of peak shape, loading capacity, and sensitivity by using a turbulent flow mixing device in the chromatography system can improve the gradient profile of the mobile phase composition of the system, e.g. provide improved results through peak separation.
A flow-through type mixing device has been developed and demonstrated to significantly improve chromatography (e.g., HPLC and/or SFC) system performance. The mobile phase/gradient profile can be optimized to minimize the disadvantages of low-strength nature of supercritical carbon dioxide in the flow stream. The peak shape, peak symmetry, and resolution can be improved significantly with the use of the mixing device, and the column loading capacity can be increased by about 3 to 5 times. In embodiments, the mixing device employs elements which focus the bolus of sample and provide multiple turbulent flow paths for greater mixing to achieve improved results.
In SFC, while the use of carbon dioxide as the supercritical fluid can show the most advantages of using this technique, it has also long been noted that the peak performance and the loading capacity may not be as good as than in HPLC, even when the same type of LC column is used in SFC. Various studies have demonstrated that this is mostly due to the inherent non-polar and low-strength nature of carbon dioxide. A new type of mixer has been designed in terms of chromatographic and geometric improvisions to the flow profiling.
The use of the turbulent flow mixing device, or peak enhancer, can significantly improve the mobile phase profile and reduce the solvent shock due to stronger sample injections. The peak shapes, symmetry, and resolution can be improved by using the mixing device. In addition, the sample loading capacity can be increased by about 3-5 folds, e.g., to the same level as in traditional HPLC systems. These improvements can be due, at least in part, to the improved mixing of the samples, solvents and/or mobile phase. More specifically, the internal geometry of the chamber by itself, or in some embodiments, together with the particles, is designed to provide turbulent flow conditions through at least a portion of the chamber such that the mobile phase and solvents are thoroughly mixed.
In some embodiments, the mixing device includes a chamber that can have various geometries, including, for example, a straight cylinder type chamber similar to chambers used in chromatography columns. The chamber can have other types of geometries or shapes that can promote a desired functionality, for example, cone-shaped, concave shaped, or concave end shaped. The chamber can have multiple flow paths.
The chamber can be filled or at least partially filled with particles or a porous monolith to create effective turbulence flow condition for maximum mixing performance. The sizes of particles or voids can range from a few micron to tens of thousands microns. In addition, the surface properties of the particles or monoliths can range from total inertness in chemical terms, to different degrees of affinity, adsorption, lipophilicity and steric factors. The materials of the particles or monoliths can range from inorganic based materials, e.g., silica gels, metal oxides like zirconium, or titanium oxide, to polymer based materials, e.g., polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PSDVB). The chamber can be enclosed in a high pressure rated stainless steel vessel, for example, the cartridge holder of
A similar method for HPLC is possible. Techniques can be implemented with HPLC solvents which do not include the BPR 260 or the gas liquid separator 261.
To test the effectiveness of the turbulent flow mixing device when used in a chromatography system, tests were performed on a PrepSFC-80 system, with either 5 or 10% of methanol (“MeOH”) as the modifier total flow running at 60 mg/min and 100 bar of back pressure holding. The column was a 5 μm 19×150 mm of Waters Viridis SFC 2-EP with temperature maintained at 35° C. during the separation process. Compounds (e.g., trans-stilbene-oxide, caffeine, amcinonide, 3,3-diphenylpropionic acid, 3-aminobenzoic acid, and sulfamethazine) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (“DMSO”) and MeOH. The detecting wavelength was 270 nm for the early eluters (e.g., trans-stilbene-oxide and caffeine) and 254 nm for the mid to late eluters (e.g., amcinonide, 3,3-diphenylpropionic acid, 3-aminobenzoic acid, and sulfamethazine).
Similar results were obtained when the mixed stream injection method was used in the chromatography system. Referring
Similar results were obtained when the mixed stream injection method was used in the chromatography system. Referring
The above results show a drastic reduction in peak width, which in turn improves the analysis and results of the chromatogram. For example, in embodiments of the present technology, peak width reductions over conventional methods not employing the device realize peak width reductions of 30% or more. For example, reduction of 30-50%, 30-75%, 30-100%).
The use of the turbulent flow mixing device, or peak enhancer, can significantly improve the mobile phase profile and reduce the solvent shock due to stronger sample injections. The peak shapes, symmetry, and resolution can be improved by using the mixing device. In addition, the sample loading capacity can be increased by about 3-5 folds, e.g., to the same level as in traditional HPLC systems.
The mixing device can utilize advantageous geometric optimization for the mixing chamber to achieve a more homogeneous distribution profile of all solvents inside the mixing chamber. The trajectory and dimensions of the chamber can enable a more consistent and thorough mixing of solvents and can result in a less parabolic flow profile, which is commonly seen in most current LC designs. A non-limiting list of examples of internal geometry include cylindrical, conical (see, e.g.,
The shape of the flow chamber is important for the mixing of the two or more flow streams that enter the mixing device. Importantly, the flow chamber within the mixing device does not give rise to a laminar flow of fluid. Such a laminar flow would prevent effective mixing between two separate flow streams, because laminar flow implies parallel movement of different streams. Instead, the shape of the flow chamber in connection with its packing material is designed to give turbulent flow to facilitate mixing. It does so by leveraging a number of possible geometries that force fluids to change trajectory along the flow path, thus creating more turbulence.
For example,
In another embodiment,
In another embodiment,
The packing material in combination with the internal geometry of the mixing device creates and enhances turbulence in fluids to ensure effective mixing within the chamber. In one embodiment, the packing material is in the form of particles. In another embodiment, the packing material is a porous monolith. In any embodiment, multiple pathways through the chamber are created to generate turbulent flow conditions. In some embodiments, the particles of the packing material can be made from various compositions and dimensions, such as silica and polymeric materials, and the dimensions vary from several microns to a few thousands microns in its diameter. In some embodiments, the porous monolith forming the packing material is a silica gel. In some embodiments, the plurality of the particles is chemically inert. In some embodiments, the plurality of particles comprise an inorganic material, a metal oxide, a polymer, or a combination thereof. These characteristics of the filled particles can effectively create a turbulent environmental setting that ensures a high efficient mixing.
In some embodiments, the packing material filling or partially filling the mixing device to enhance turbulent flow can be chemically inert to the fluids passing therethrough. For example, the packing material is chemically inert to the mobile phase, modifier, and sample. In some embodiments, the packing material is chemically tailored to retain one or more of the mobile phase, modifier, or sample. For example, the packing material can be treated with a coating of a material which is more retentive to the sample than the mobile phase and modifier. As a result, the sample is retained for a longer period of time than the mobile phase or modifier, and this leads to a more narrow bolus of the sample of interest prior to entering the chromatography column. The chemical material may be deposited directly on the packing material (e.g. particles are infiltrated into the void space of the monolith). In some embodiments, the packing material itself is treated, (e.g. covalently capping the siloxy groups of the silica monolith) to create different properties.
A chromatography system that includes the mixing device can optimize the performance of the chromatography system. The chromatography system with the mixing device can create unique characteristics that demonstrate multiple types of affinity to analytes based on their diverse physical properties such as hydrophobicity, adsorption and mass transfer coefficient. The molecular nature of the chemistry includes, but is not limited to, C18, C8 C4, C2, C1, silica, cyano, pyridine, diol, amino groups, titanium oxide, zirconium, polymeric styrene and vinyl. The chromatographic mechanism for these chemistries include, but are not limited to, hydrophobicity, adsorption, size-exclusion, ion-pairing, partition and affinity, among other properties.
The mixing device can also be used in a SFC system to address the inherent solvent mismatch problem when supercritical carbon dioxide is used as the mobile phase by injection of a sample plug with a different solvent strength than the mobile phase. The mass transfer characteristics from supercritical fluids are used to enable an instantaneous and effective turbulence section at the location in the SFC system where the sample is introduced. This can result in significantly improved chromatographic performance in SFC systems, especially in terms of loading capacity, resolutions, sensitivity, peak shape, and peak symmetry.
The technology described herein can be effectively used for sample treatment in common LC techniques such as reverse-phase LC (RPLC) and normal phase LC (NPLC) by customized designs based on their unique prevailing and complementing separation mechanisms. For example, in RPLC the mechanism can be optimized mainly based on hydrophobicity, while in NPLC the mechanism can be optimized on partition and adsorption, in addition to other available mechanisms.
The mixing device is applicable to chromatography instruments at both analytical and preparative scales. Various dimension and capacity designs can be adapted to fit to chromatography instruments based on processing capacities. Overall improvements in chromatography can be achieved from all these designs
Although various aspects of the disclosed apparatus and method have been shown and described, modifications may occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. The present application includes such modifications.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/498,459, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US12/42729 | 6/15/2012 | WO | 00 | 5/2/2014 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61498459 | Jun 2011 | US |
