Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates to the field of industrial lift trucks, and more specifically to systems and methods for improved turning stability control for lift trucks.
Attempts have been made to enhance the turning or cornering stability of a lift truck by using stiff springs in castor wheels set at high pressure in order to make the truck more stable. But, use of stiff springs can also reduce the operator's comfort by allowing the operator to feel more bumps. Other stability enhancement mechanisms lock up the truck suspension in order to enhance truck stability when turning, but with similar results.
For example, referring to
Other varieties of lift truck configurations use spring loaded casters and include a shock absorber 30 for damping. The addition of damping allows for softer springs, which reduces the rate of outward roll, but not the magnitude of the roll. Nevertheless, when the lift truck turns sharply, the damper responds to the high speed motion of the caster by generating a force and may still tilt the truck because the damper force is a function of caster motion, not truck roll. When the damper reacts in this way, it reduces operator comfort and diminishes the advantages of softer springs.
Referring to
At best, all of these previous configurations only improve the tradeoff between soft springs and the truck tilting (rolling or swaying while turning) versus hard springs, and truck dampers that limit the performance of the spring only caster configurations. If the spring tension of the caster could be adjusted during a turn, the truck would then be capable of turning without swaying and maintaining comfort for the operator.
What is needed are systems and methods for enhancing the steering performance by adjusting the caster spring tension in a turn, yet without sacrificing vehicle performance, cornering ability and/or operator comfort.
The present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the previous lift truck systems and methods by providing stability control features to reduce or eliminate swaying of the truck away from a turn or bank into a turn.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system for stabilizing a lift truck is disclosed. The system comprises a rotatable drive unit, the drive unit including a steerable drive tire. A first slide mechanism is coupled to the rotatable drive unit. A caster is mounted to a caster plate, with a second slide mechanism mounted to the caster plate. A steering mechanism is coupled to the rotatable drive unit, such that when the steering mechanism is moved to steer the steerable drive tire, the first slide mechanism interacts with the second slide mechanism to affect a pressure on the caster.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a system for stabilizing a lift truck is disclosed. The system comprises a rotatable drive unit, the drive unit including a steerable drive tire. A left side slide mechanism and a right side slide mechanism are coupled to the rotatable drive unit. A left caster is mounted to a left caster plate, and a right caster is mounted to a right caster plate. A left caster slide mechanism is mounted to the left caster plate, and a right caster slide mechanism is mounted to the right caster plate. A steering mechanism is coupled to the rotatable drive unit, such that when the steering mechanism is moved to turn the lift truck to the left, the right side slide mechanism interacts with the right caster slide mechanism to produce a downward pressure on the right caster.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the invention, a method for stabilizing a lift truck is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of providing a rotatable drive unit, the drive unit including a steerable drive tire; providing a first slide mechanism coupled to the rotatable drive unit; providing a caster mounted to a caster plate; providing a second slide mechanism mounted to the caster plate; providing a steering mechanism coupled to the rotatable drive unit, the steering mechanism for steering the steerable drive tire and causing the first slide mechanism to interact with the second slide mechanism; and affecting a pressure on the caster.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will appear in the detailed description which follows. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments.
The invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims, rather than in the specific description preceding them. All embodiments that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.
The various aspects of the invention will be described in connection with improved turning stability of industrial lift trucks. That is because the features and advantages that arise due to embodiments of the invention are well suited to this purpose. Still, it should be appreciated that the various aspects of the invention can be applied to achieve other objectives as well.
Embodiments of the invention described herein, either alone or in combination, are well suited to provide a stabilized lift truck. The truck achieves improved turning stabilization through one or more individual or combined improvements that are configured to minimize side to side motion caused by vehicle turning. The collective improvements provide a simple mechanical solution, and allow greater productivity by permitting faster travel speeds.
Referring now to the Figures, and more particularly to
The drive unit 60 is coupled to the steering mechanism 54. The steering mechanism 54 is rotatable to the right and left to change the direction of the lift truck 10 (i.e., to turn to the right and left) and may be further movable in an arc between a generally vertical position and a generally horizontal position. In the lift truck configuration shown, a turn of the steering mechanism 54 to the left would cause the lift truck to turn to the left, and a turn of the steering mechanism 54 to the right would cause the lift truck to turn to the right.
It is to be appreciated that lift trucks are designed in a variety of configurations to perform a variety of tasks. Although the lift truck 50 is shown by way of example as a hand/rider truck, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that the present invention is not limited to vehicles of this type, and can also be provided in various other types of material handling and lift vehicle configurations, including for example, pallet trucks, stacker trucks, and fore-aft stance operator configuration lift trucks. The systems and methods are suitable for both driver controlled, pedestrian controlled and remotely controlled lift trucks.
Referring to
Embodiments of the invention increase the downward pressure of the outside castor wheel 70 when the truck 50 goes into a turn. Doing so will prevent/reduce any tendency of the truck to sway or tilt to the outside. Alternatively, or in combination, tension on the inside caster wheel may be reduced. Embodiments of the invention take advantage of rotation of the drive unit 60, or other parts associated with or affected by steering, to directly trigger the pressure changes on one or the other, or both, castors 70.
Referring now to
Each caster plate 86 may have a first slide mechanism, shown as a cam device 100, connected on top surface 102 such that in one embodiment, the cam 100 has a tapered surface 103 tapering upward partially or completely from front 104 to back 106, as best seen in
As can be seen in
In an embodiment shown in
The laterally rotating portion 112 of the truck drive unit 60 may also include a second slide mechanism(s) that make contact with or interact with the first slide mechanism (e.g., cam 100) as the laterally rotating portion 112 is rotated during a turn. In some embodiments, the second slide mechanism comprises a bearing 114 that engages the cam 100, such that the bearing(s) 114 would move about a horizontal axis (see arrow 116 in
Use of a bearing 114 allows for a generally smooth interaction between the cam 100 and the bearing 114 as the laterally rotating portion 112 rotates and the bearing 114 contacts and moves, rolls, and/or slides across the cam surface 103. As the drive unit rotates, the bearing(s) engage the cam 100 on top of the hinged castor wheel, pushing the caster 70 and caster wheel 74 down. This works to prevent the truck from tilting to the outside and keeps the truck more stable. It is to be appreciated that downward pressure on the inside castor may also be reduced in a turn so as to affect movement of one or both the inside and outside caster during a turn.
In an alternative embodiment shown in
In yet an additional alternative embodiment shown in
Other embodiments may use a wide range of systems and methods to adjust the truck stability, and each may be used alone or in combination with other stability controls. For example, some embodiments may use an actuator to adjust the caster spring tension in a turn. In this configuration, the caster spring tension may be monitored and controlled to maximize stability.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. For example, any of the various features described herein can be combined with some or all of the other features described herein according to alternate embodiments. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Finally, it is expressly contemplated that any of the processes or steps described herein may be combined, eliminated, or reordered. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2438571 | Maxon, Jr. | Mar 1948 | A |
2614643 | Quayle | Oct 1952 | A |
2982395 | Rados | May 1961 | A |
3031024 | Ulinski | Apr 1962 | A |
3067839 | Gibson | Dec 1962 | A |
3504889 | Wyrough | Apr 1970 | A |
3672634 | Chaffin | Jun 1972 | A |
3918597 | Lee | Nov 1975 | A |
4037739 | Lee | Jul 1977 | A |
4509127 | Yuki et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4530492 | Bork | Jul 1985 | A |
4534433 | Burbank et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4771531 | Asher | Sep 1988 | A |
5020825 | Lizell | Jun 1991 | A |
5107969 | Klein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5269501 | Liegel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5289902 | Fujita | Mar 1994 | A |
5338015 | Liegel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5480275 | Talbert et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5579859 | Quellhorst et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5628377 | Le Gloan | May 1997 | A |
5647600 | Booras | Jul 1997 | A |
5722504 | Gaetani | Mar 1998 | A |
5781873 | Sasaki | Jul 1998 | A |
5853181 | Booras | Dec 1998 | A |
5878851 | Carlson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5993358 | Gureghian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6226558 | Schneider et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236927 | Sherman | May 2001 | B1 |
6279199 | Plate | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6499184 | Plate | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6517094 | Kincaid | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601825 | Bressner et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6688631 | Andre | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6847874 | Stiller | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7008166 | Grimes | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7017228 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7070028 | Reybrouck et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073643 | Schel | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121372 | Braud | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7243904 | Grimes | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7413062 | Vandewal | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7593797 | Izawa et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7770904 | Passeri | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7823862 | Wakil | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7896358 | Hoff | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905555 | Huntimer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8140228 | McCabe et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20060138733 | Clauson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182578 | Morton | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231312 | Passeri | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070056141 | Armano et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070231113 | McGurn | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006494 | Vandewal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090082925 | Wijffels et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090166989 | Atsushi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090312875 | Lehtonen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100230913 | Peterson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110243699 | Kleeberger et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120101627 | Lert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2889874 | Apr 2007 | CN |
957377 | Jan 1957 | DE |
19641192 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19641192 | Mar 1998 | DE |
102004048519 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102005053264 | May 2007 | DE |
102008020595 | Oct 2009 | DE |
0890462 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0921095 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0931758 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1172277 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1588979 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1588979 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1975114 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1975114 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2022749 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2053013 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2081822 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2379434 | Mar 2003 | GB |
57160708 | Oct 1982 | JP |
S58167214 | Oct 1983 | JP |
06263145 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07315518 | Dec 1995 | JP |
09086610 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9145552 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H11 100200 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11301233 | Nov 1999 | JP |
H11301233 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000 062428 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000 238999 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002370899 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004001941 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004269236 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2008081261 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008081261 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008006928 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Minav, T.A. et al. “Electric energy recovery system efficiency in a hydraulic forklift.” IEEE EUROCON, 2009: pp. 758-765. |
Guang-zhao Cui et al. “A robust autonomous mobile forklift pallet recognition.” 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR). Volume 3, 2010: pp. 28+. |
Keum-Shik Hong et al. “Navigation Function-Based Control of Multiple Wheeled Vehicles.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. vol. 58, Issue 5, 2011: pp. 1896-1906. |
Hoefinghoff, J.F. et al. “Using 3D Field Simulation for Evaluating UHF RFID Systems on Forklift Trucks.” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. vol. 59, Issue 2, 2011: pp. 689-691. |
“Active Sway Control cuts picking times down to size.” http://www.ethiopianreview.com/articles/120808. Dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
“Sway Control.” http://www.hsmsearch.com/stories/articles/-/handling—storing/warehouse—safety/sway—control/. Dated Jun. 1, 2011. |
“Rocla's new innovation brings more intelligence into warehouse trucks and improves user comfort.” http://www.rocla.com/news.asp?Section=4058,Item=5309. Dated 2012. |
Zimmert, Nico et al. “Active Damping Control for Bending Oscillations of a Forklift Mast Using Flatness based Techniques.” Journal Article. Dated Jun. 2010. American Control Conference. pp. 1538-1543. |
Kullaa, Jyrki. “Active Control of a Mast Structure Using Support Excitation.” European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Dated Jul. 2004. pp. 1-14. |
Machine Translated JP 11-100200 A (Komatsu Forklift) Apr. 12, 1999. |
Machine Translated JP 2000-062428 A (Toyota Automatic Loom Works) Feb. 29, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130248787 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |