The present invention relates to a turning behavior control apparatus and a turning behavior control process for a motor vehicle. Aspects of the invention also relate to a vehicle
Japanese published patent application JP 2001-334951 discloses a four wheel steering system arranged to set a geometric target turning center position and to control a rear wheel steer angle on the basis of the set target turning center position in order to adjust the yawing direction of the vehicle body during a turning movement of the vehicle.
The conventional system of the above-mentioned patent document is arranged merely to set the geometric turning center position, and the system is arranged to control the turning path and the direction of the vehicle body geometrically. However, this system takes no account of dynamic characteristics of the vehicle. Therefore, the steer angle control tends to be discontinuous in a transient motion, and the turning behavior may be inconstant.
It is an object of the present invention to address this issue and to improve upon known technology. Embodiments of the invention provide an apparatus and/or process for controlling a turning behavior of a four wheel steer vehicle in consideration of dynamic characteristics of the vehicle. Other aims and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description, claims and drawings.
Aspects of the invention provide an apparatus, a method and a vehicle as claimed in the appended claims.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a turning behavior control apparatus comprises a first section such as steer mechanisms to steer front and rear wheels, respectively and a second section such as a controller configured to set a target vehicle turning behavior and a target vehicle yaw direction individually or separately, to modify the target turning behavior in accordance with the target yaw direction, and to control the first section so as to achieve the modified target turning behavior.
Within the scope of this application it is envisaged that the various aspects, embodiments, examples and alternatives set out in the preceding paragraphs, in the claims and in the following description, may be taken individually or in any combination thereof.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The following is an explanation of embodiments according to the present invention based on the drawings.
Each steer mechanism 3i is arranged to steer the corresponding wheel by transmitting rotation of an electric motor through a hypoid gear having an irreversible characteristic to a rack-and-pinion.
The controller 4 receives, as inputs, a steering angle θ of a steering wheel 6 as sensed by a steering angle sensor 5, a wheel speed of each wheel 2i as sensed by a respective wheel speed sensor 7, and each steer angle as sensed by a respective steer angle sensor 8. Using these inputs, the controller 4 performs a drive control process as illustrated in
In an operation of the steering-by-wire, the controller 4 controls a driving condition of a reaction motor 9 connected in the steering system in order to provide a steering reaction force to the steering wheel 6 in response to a driver's steering operation.
Referring now to
At a first step S1, the controller 4 reads various data items such as the steering angle [theta], the wheel speeds and the steer angles.
At a next step S2, the controller 4 calculates a vehicle speed V from the wheel speeds.
At a next step S3, the controller 4 sets a vehicle transfer function in accordance with vehicle speed V. The controller 4 employs both static and dynamic factors in setting the vehicle transfer function. For example, a static characteristic component includes a steady state gain and a dynamic characteristic component includes natural angular frequency, a damping factor, an advance term and the like.
At a next step S4, the controller 4 sets a target turning behavior in accordance with the transfer function and the steering angle θ. This example employs, as a planar target turning behavior having two degrees of freedom, translational motion in a lateral direction (hereinafter referred to as side motion) and rotational motion in a yawing direction (hereinafter referred to as yaw motion). The controller 4 sets a target side slip angle GS(s) of the vehicle body and a target yaw rate GY(s).
The target side slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s) are used as a desired target value of a traveling direction (the turning trajectory of the center of gravity of the vehicle), and the target side slip angle GS(s) is used as a reference value in the yaw direction (the attitude of the vehicle body). Instead of the target side slip angle and target yaw rate, it is optional to set a target side speed and a target lateral acceleration.
At a next step S5, the controller 4 sets a target yaw direction α in accordance with a running condition such as the steering angle θ and vehicle speed V. The target yaw direction α represents a vehicle body angle (in degrees) to be added to the direction of the vehicle body obtained by the target side slip angle GS(s). Instead of calculating the target yaw direction α per se, the controller 4 may be configured to receive, as an input, the target yaw direction α from an external device that calculates the target yaw direction. Moreover, the target yaw direction α may be calculated in consideration of road geometry data (such as radius of curvature and road gradient) stored in a navigation device (not shown). The target yaw direction α is a value to direct the vehicle body in a direction that is not unnatural to the driver so that the driving operation is easier for the driver in a turning movement of the vehicle along the turning path determined by the target side slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s).
At a next step S6, the controller 4 newly sets a modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ and a modified target yaw rate GY(s)′ by modifying the target slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s) with the target yaw direction α as expressed by the equations below. Namely, the modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ is determined by subtraction of the target yaw direction α from the product obtained by multiplying the target side slip angle GS(s) by the steering angle θ. The modified target yaw rate GY(s)′ is determined by addition of a variation (derivative) sα of the target yaw direction α to the product obtained by multiplying the target yaw rate GY(s) by the steering angle θ. With this calculation, the turning path obtained from the modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ and modified target yaw rate GY(s)′ after the modification is made in agreement with the turning path obtained from the unmodified target side slip angle GS(s) and unmodified target yaw rate GY(s) before the modification.
G
S(s)′=GS(s)·θ−α
G
Y(s)′=GY(s)·θ+sα [Eq. 1]
In this example, the modification is based on the target yaw direction α. However, it is possible to calculate a yaw rate increase γ in advance and perform the modification in accordance with this yaw rate increase γ. In other words, the calculation including subtraction of an integral ∫γdt of the yaw rate increase γ from the product of the target slip angle GS(s) and steering angle θ, and addition of the yaw rate increase γ to the product of the target yaw rate GY(s) and the steering angle θ as expressed below, is equivalent to the modification of [Eq. 1] based on the target yaw direction α.
G
S(s)′=GS(s)·θ−∫γdt
G
Y(s)′=GY(s)·θ+γ
At a next step S7, the controller 4 calculates a target steer angle for each wheel 2i in accordance with the modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ and modified target yaw rate GY(s)′.
At a next step S8, the controller 4 controls the steer mechanisms 3i so as to bring the steer angle to the target steer angle for each wheel 2i, and thereafter returns to a main program.
The turning behavior control system according to the first embodiment is operated as follows.
In the first embodiment, the controller 4 determines the target vehicle turning behavior (the target side slip angle GS(s) and the target yaw rate GY(s)) and the target yaw direction α separately (at S4 and S5), modifies the target turning behavior in accordance with target yaw direction α (at S6) and controls the steer angles of the wheels 2i so as to achieve the modified target behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ by driving and controlling the steer mechanisms 3i (at S7 and S8).
Thus, the control system sets the target yaw direction α at a value taking into consideration the vehicle dynamics by determining the target yaw direction α independently from the target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) and by determining the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ so as to make it possible to achieve the target yaw direction α by modifying the unmodified target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) in accordance with the target yaw direction α.
In this case, by calculating the target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) in accordance with the steering angle (at S4), the control system determines, as a desired target value, the accurate travel direction in accordance with the driver's steering operation.
Moreover, the controller 4 determines the transfer function in accordance with the vehicle speed (at S3) and determines the target side slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s) in accordance with the transfer function and the steering angle (at S4). By so doing, the controller 4 takes into consideration the vehicle dynamics in determining the target values.
Moreover, the controller 4 modifies the target side motion and target yaw motion so as to maintain unchanged the turning path obtained from the target side motion and target yaw motion. In other words, the controller 4 determines the modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ by subtracting the target yaw direction α from the product of the target side slip angle GS(s) and steering angle θ and determines the modified target yaw rate GY(s)′ by adding the variation (derivative) sα of target yaw direction α to the product of the target yaw rate GY(s) and steering angle θ (at S6). With this calculation, the control system achieves the target yaw direction α and at the same time secures the desired target turning path.
In the case of a front wheel steering (2WS) system, the direction of the rear wheels is fixed equal to the direction of the vehicle body, and therefore the vehicle side slip angle varies in accordance with the vehicle speed. For example, during a cornering operation in a front wheel steering system, the vehicle body faces more toward the outer side of the turn as the vehicle speed becomes lower and the vehicle body comes to face toward the inner side of the turn when the vehicle speed becomes higher as shown in
On the other hand, the four wheel steering (4WS) system can make significant improvements to solve such a problem. By steering the rear wheels as well as the front wheels, the four wheel steering system can make the direction of the vehicle body identical to the direction of movement of the vehicle as shown in
The control system according to the first embodiment can set the target yaw direction α to an adequate value in consideration of the vehicle dynamic characteristics by calculating target yaw direction α independently of the target vehicle turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s). Then, by modifying the target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) with target yaw direction α, the control system can determine the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ capable of achieving the target yaw direction α. Therefore, by controlling the steer angles of the front and rear wheels in accordance with the modified target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s), the control system can stabilize the vehicle turning behavior, thereby avoiding discontinuous steer angle control during transient motion as caused by a comparative system that controls the vehicle yaw direction geometrically.
In the example shown in
This practical example, too, can provide the same effects as in the practical example of
Firstly, the control system can set the target yaw direction α in consideration of the vehicle dynamics by calculating the target yaw direction α independently from target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) and can set the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ capable of achieving the target yaw direction α by modifying the unmodified target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) in accordance with the target yaw direction α. Therefore, by controlling the front and rear wheel steer angles in accordance with the modified target turning behavior (GS(s)′ and GY(s)′), the control system can avoid undesired continuity in the steer angle control in a transient state and thereby make the turning behavior stable.
Secondly, since the controller 4 calculates the target vehicle turning behavior in accordance with the steering angle θ, the control system can determine, as a desired target value, an adequate direction of vehicle motion in accordance with the driver's steering operation.
Thirdly, since the controller 4 calculates the target vehicle side motion GS(s) and yaw motion GY(s) in accordance with the transfer function and steering angle θ, the control system according to the first embodiment can determine adequate values in consideration of the vehicle dynamic characteristics.
Fourthly, the controller 4 modifies the target side motion and target yaw motion so as to hold unchanged the turning path obtained from the above-mentioned target side motion and target yaw motion. That is, the controller 4 decreases the side motion GS(s) and increases the target yaw motion GY(s) by an amount corresponding to the yaw motion of the vehicle. By so doing, the control system can achieve the target yaw direction α and at the same time maintain the desired target turning path reliably.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided one or more vehicle models simulating vehicle dynamic characteristics, and steps S4, S6 and S7 are changed as explained below. In the other respects, the second embodiment is identical in construction and process to the first embodiment.
At S4, the controller 4 of the second embodiment sets the target side slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s) according to a linear two-degree-of-freedom model simulating the dynamic characteristics of a front wheel steering (2WS) vehicle as expressed below.
In these equations:
In the equations above, V is a vehicle speed; A is a stability factor of the vehicle; m is a mass of the vehicle; IZ is a yaw moment of inertia of the vehicle; Cf is a front wheel equivalent cornering power; Cr is a rear wheel equivalent cornering power; Lf is a distance between the center of gravity and a front axle; Lr is a distance between the center of gravity and a rear axle of the vehicle; and L is a wheel base.
Moreover, at S6, the controller 4 sets the modified target side slip angle GS(s)′ and the modified target yaw rate GY(s)′ by modifying the target side slip angle GS(s) and the target yaw rate GY(s) with the target yawing direction α, as expressed by the equations below:
At S7, the controller 4 calculates a target front wheel steer angle δf(s) and a target rear wheel steer angle δr(s) according to a linear two-degree-of-freedom model simulating the dynamic characteristics of a vehicle equipped with this control system and controlled by this control system as expressed below.
The controller 4 has a first (2WS) vehicle model simulating the dynamic characteristics of the front wheel steering (2WS) vehicle, and the controller 4 calculates the target side slip angle GS(s) and target yaw rate GY(s) according to this vehicle model (at S4). By so doing, the controller 4 produces a steering feeling of two-wheel steering and restrains unnatural feeling in the driver. It is possible to change the target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) by changing one or more specification data items of the vehicle model. Accordingly, the transfer function of the target turning behavior GS(s) and GY(s) corresponding to steering angle θ is not determined uniformly.
Furthermore, the controller 4 has a second (4WS) vehicle model simulating the dynamic characteristics of its controlled vehicle having the four wheel steering system, and the controller 4 calculates the front wheel and rear wheel steer angles δf(s) and δr(s) according to this vehicle model (at S7). By so doing, the controller 4 controls the steer angles of the front and rear wheels using feed forward control without sensing motion variables such as the yaw rate, lateral acceleration and side slip angle.
In an example shown in
Furthermore, as compared to the 4WS system of the comparative example as shown in
Effects of this second practical embodiment are as follows.
Firstly, the controller 4 uses the first vehicle model representing the dynamics of the front wheel steering vehicle to calculate the target vehicle side motion GS(s) and target vehicle yaw motion GY(s). Therefore, the control system according to the second embodiment can control the course of the vehicle to the turning path of the vehicle model.
Secondly, the controller 4 uses the second vehicle model representing the dynamics of the four wheel steering vehicle to calculate the front and rear wheel steer angles δf(s) and δr(s). Therefore, the control system according to the second embodiment can control the steer angles of the front and rear wheels in a feed-forward manner without the need for means for sensing a motion variable such as the yaw rate, lateral acceleration or side slip angle.
In the other effects and operations, the second embodiment is substantially identical to the first embodiment.
According to a third embodiment of the present invention, the front and rear wheel target steer angles δf(s) and δr(s) are calculated so as to reduce a deviation between the actual vehicle turning behavior and the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′.
As shown in
The control system according to the third embodiment is operated as follows.
Instead of calculating the target steer angles δf(s) and δr(S) of the front and rear wheels merely in accordance with the modified turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′, the controller 4 according to the third embodiment makes further adjustment or correction on the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ in accordance with the deviation between the modified target turning behavior and the actual turning behavior. By so doing, the controller 4 optimizes the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′ and determines the target steer angles δf(s) and δr(s) adequately.
In the illustrated example shown in
Effects of this third practical embodiment are as follows.
The controller 4 is configured to calculate the target steer angles δf(s) and δr(s) of the front and rear wheels in a manner to reduce the deviation between the actual turning behavior and the modified target turning behavior GS(s)′ and GY(s)′. Therefore, the control system according to the third embodiment can control the front and rear wheel steer angles adequately in the manner of feedback control.
In the other effects and operations, the third embodiment is substantially identical to the second embodiment.
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe possible embodiments of the claimed invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to any precise form disclosed. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein but that the invention can widely be adapted to steering systems formed with various layouts and will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-039647, filed 16 Feb. 2006, the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-039647 | Feb 2006 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB07/50502 | 2/15/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2008 |