The present invention relates generally to filters in programmable electronic TV signal distribution devices that selectively process TV signals received from antenna or cable and deliver a processed signal which is distributed over a plurality of TV sets.
In TV reception, a selective processing of the received signals is required. The desired signals with known frequencies have to be passed, while the others have to be suppressed. This has been realised by the electronic circuits called filters, in most cases band-pass filters.
An analogue circuit solution of the band-pass filter consists at least of one inductor and one capacitor (frequency tuning circuit), more often different combinations of more inductors and capacitors. The simplest filter of the first generation had both a fixed centre frequency and a fixed bandwidth. A corresponding circuit has also all fixed inductors and capacitors within its structure. Such a solution was very cheap but did not allow simple retuning if needed.
The second filter generation brought circuits with tuneable band-pass centre frequency while the bandwidth was still constant (e.g. GB2272341). Such a solution was sufficient for the late analogue TV transmission characterized by a fixed bandwidth of the TV channels. The filter circuit can be retuned generally by the change of either inductor or capacitor value. The most suitable components for retuning are varicap diodes which can be used as a voltage-controlled capacitor if they are operated reverse-biased. It is why the second filter generation consisted not only of fixed inductors and capacitors but also of varicap diodes. Varicap diodes were employed here as the element which enabled electronically (by the usage of an accompanying digital control part) retuning of the filter.
The newest digital transmission concept brought a requirement to retune in the filters both the band-pass centre frequency and bandwidth. The reason is that the TV channels are broadcasted in groups—clusters of analogue and digital channels. The third filter generation solves this by a bigger complexity of the filter circuits. The varicap diodes are used here not only to retune a centre frequency of the band-pass filters but also to change a coupling between the tuning circuits. An example of such device can be found in the Unitron N.V. product range and has been described in EP1794883.
A crucial parameter in all the three generations of the filters is the selectivity. It defines how much the practical filter differs from the ideal one which has a completely flat pass band and a zero roll-off (all frequencies outside the desired frequency range are completely suppressed). To achieve the best selectivity, the filter circuits have been only equipped with aerial coils which have the highest quality factor for the practical usage.
A disadvantage of using aerial coils is that the shape of all used coils of the frequency tuning circuits must be set. Further, between some of the filter coils one even has to set very accurately the distance (filter coupling factor). As a result, this is typically performed by manually shaping the coils to reach a target characteristic on the measurement equipment (network analyser), which requires highly skilled people. Optionally a programmed robot can be used to do the shaping automatically. In both cases, the process is however time consuming and needs expensive machinery. So even though technology can be used to reach a high quality factor of the coils in the filters, the fabrication process is very complex and leads to a high cost price of the product. Furthermore, increasing the production capacity is not easy since one has to find highly skilled person or invest in expensive machinery.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide a TV signal distribution filter device which can be manufactured at a reduced cost while still obtaining a high quality factor.
This aim is achieved according to the invention with a TV signal distribution filter device showing the technical characteristics of the first claim.
Thereto, the present invention provides a TV signal distribution filter device having at least one tuneable band-pass filter circuit, wherein the inductors are provided as planar inductors instead of the aerial coils used in the prior art. The planar inductors are mechanically fixed and embedded in a dielectric environment. The advantage of planar inductors is that they have a fixed and easily reproducible morphology, so the filter production flow can be made much faster and economical. Especially since there is no longer a need for a manual tuning step.
Another advantage of the use of planar inductors is that they can be easily integrated in a Surface Mount Technology (SMT) production process.
Another advantage is that there is no longer a need to use separated varicap diode voltages for different tuning circuits and separated voltages for coupling varicap diodes between tuning circuits within one filter. With the aerial coils used in the prior art there were big tolerances on the parameters (coil shape and through hole soldering), whereas the planar inductors used according to the invention are highly reproducible.
Another advantage is also that the radiation of the aerial coils is cancelled in the filter device, which had to be carefully eliminated in the prior art by a shielding especially in the case of multiple filters. As the planar inductors which are used according to the invention are embedded in a dielectric environment, the risk of parasitic feedback and signal leakage between neighbour filters is minimised without further shielding.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the planar inductors are provided in a single conductive layer of the dielectric environment, which is in this case preferably a single sided printed circuit board (PCB) substrate. Such a low cost solution enables to integrate planar inductors with other components of the TV signal distribution filter to a common unit, easy to produce and at low cost.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the planar inductors are provided in different conductive layers of the dielectric environment, which is in this case preferably a double-sided or multilayer PCB substrate. Such a solution can significantly improve the selectivity of the filter. Preferably, the first and second inductors overlap each other at least partly (i.e. are located partly above each other seen in a direction perpendicular to the planes of the planar inductors).
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the device comprises a plurality of tuneable band-pass filter circuits connected in a cascade. With two or more band-pass filtering circuits in series, a better selectivity of the total filtering can be achieved. Such a cascaded section can be either provided by a simple joining of the filter circuits or can be also realised with intermediate matching circuits or amplifiers, if necessary.
Preferably, in such a case, the planar inductors of the cascaded tuneable filter circuits have a predetermined morphology, such that synchronised relations exist between the tuning voltage and the respective filtering parameters in each of the cascaded tuneable filter circuits. This means that the morphology (the design of the physical structure) of the planar inductors of the different filter circuits in the cascade is optimised with respect to each other, such that the relation between the tuning voltage and the respective filtering parameter (e.g. centre frequency, cut-off frequency, coupling, . . . ) in a first stage of the cascade is equal to or proportional to the relation between the tuning voltage and the same filtering parameter in a second stage of the cascade. In this way a common voltage can be used for controlling the varicap diodes used in tuning circuits of two or more filters in series.
Depending on the practical tolerance of the dielectric environment, different options are possible. A first being the integration of the complete circuitry on 1 PCB, a second being the implementation of each filter on a separate PCB, a third being the implementation of each inductor or combination of inductors on a separate PCB.
The invention will be further explained by means of the following description and the appended figures.
The present invention will be described with respect to particular embodiments and with reference to certain drawings but the invention is not limited thereto but only by the claims. The drawings described are only schematic and are non-limiting. In the drawings, the size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn on scale for illustrative purposes. The dimensions and the relative dimensions do not necessarily correspond to actual reductions to practice of the invention.
Furthermore, the terms first, second, third and the like in the description and in the claims, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a sequential or chronological order. The terms are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and the embodiments of the invention can operate in other sequences than described or illustrated herein.
Moreover, the terms top, bottom, over, under and the like in the description and the claims are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing relative positions. The terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and the embodiments of the invention described herein can operate in other orientations than described or illustrated herein.
The term “comprising”, used in the claims, should not be interpreted as being restricted to the means listed thereafter; it does not exclude other elements or steps. It needs to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, integers, steps or components as referred to, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps or components, or groups thereof. Thus, the scope of the expression “a device comprising means A and B” should not be limited to devices consisting only of components A and B. It means that with respect to the present invention, the only relevant components of the device are A and B.
The coils 22 and 23 in the typical prior art TV signal distribution band-pass filter have an aerial design. As the varicap diodes have limited minimum and maximum voltage, the fabrication process has to ensure that the coils 22 and 23 in the filter have a shape within some mechanical limits (determines the frequency) and also that their relative distance has only a small tolerance (determines the bandwidth). Such a process can make the device very expensive.
In the embodiment of
The inductors 8 and 10 can also be placed in different conductive layers of a double-sided or even a multilayer PCB substrate 21, as shown in the
It is also possible to use more than one filter circuit in the signal path if the filter selectivity is insufficient. To do so, it could be needed to use an intermediate impedance matching and/or signal level amplification circuits.
Especially in the case of using more filters in series it can be very useful to ensure synchronised controlling of as much as possible frequency voltages and as much as possible bandwidth voltages. This can be achieved by the careful design of morphology of all planar inductors and distances (overlapping) between them. In the best case, for a band-pass filter, the full cascade of the filters can be fully controlled by only two voltages, which according to the embodiment of
In the figures, the planar inductors are shown as circular single winding elements. In alternative embodiments, the planar inductors can also be rectangular, oval or other shapes and can have multiple windings, possibly also on different conductor planes of the dielectric environment.
In the figures and in the description above, varicap diodes have been used as the tuneable capacitive components which are controlled by the tuning voltages for setting the respective filtering parameter (e.g. centre frequency or bandwidth). In alternative embodiments, other tuneable capacitive components can be used as well according to the invention, such as for example voltage controlled switched capacitor banks.
The dielectric environment can be composed of a single dielectric material or different dielectric materials. For example, in the embodiment shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09160840.6 | May 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/056958 | 5/20/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/28/2011 |