This disclosure relates generally to packaging machines and more particularly to twin layer packaging machines for packing into a carton two layers of upright articles such as beverage cans, one layer overlying the other.
When packaging articles such as soft drink and beer cans into cartons, it sometimes is desirable to group the articles in two layers within the carton, with an upper layer of upright articles overlying a lower layer of upright articles. It is common to separate the layers with a paperboard divider pad on which the upper layer rests. Such a packaging configuration is sometimes referred to as “twin layer packaging.” Packaging machines for obtaining twin layer packaging of articles are known, one such machine being exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,474 of Ziegler, which is commonly owned by the assignee of the present application. Such packaging machines generally comprise an infeed assembly that progressively directs articles in groups into the bays of a synchronously moving conveyor flight. The infeed assembly includes an upstream infeed belt and associated infeed lanes for directing the bottom layer of articles into the bays. A separate downstream infeed belt and associated infeed lanes, which are disposed at an elevated level relative to the upstream infeed belt and lanes, progressively directs the top layer of articles into the bays atop the already loaded bottom layer of articles. The articles thus are staged in two overlying layers in the bays and subsequently are pushed with a pusher assembly into an open carton on an adjacent and synchronized carton flight. The cartons are then closed to complete the packaging process. The use of separate infeed assemblies, one for the bottom layer of articles and one for the top, increases the complexity of these packaging machines and takes up valuable additional space within them.
A need exists for an improved packaging machine for obtaining twin layer packaging of articles such as beverage cans and it is to the provision of such a packaging machine that the present invention is primarily directed.
Referring to the drawing figures,
A continuous conveyor referred to as a selector flight 14 is disposed adjacent to the infeed section and extends further downstream therefrom. In general, the selector flight comprises a selector bed 31 made up of a plurality of side-by-side mutually articulated selector plates that move to the left in
As detailed below, from the lower level of the selector bed, groups of articles are pushed by a lower fixed pusher rail 46 (
As the first groups of cans are swept progressively out of the selector bays and into can bays by fixed pusher rail 46, the emptying selector bays are progressively refilled, each with another or second group of cans, from the exterior group of lanes 23. After being thus refilled, these second groups of cans are conveyed along the selector flight up the ramped section 36 thereof to an elevated position that has been pre-set to be just above the bottom layer of cans and divider pads in the adjacent and synchronously moving can bays 42. Once at this elevated level, the second groups of cans in the selector bays encounter the upper fixed pusher rail 47, which progressively sweeps the groups of cans out of the selector bays and into the adjacent synchronous can bays on top of the bottom layer of cans and divider pad already in the can bays. As a result, the can bays become loaded with a bottom group or layer of cans and a top group or layer of cans separated by a divider pad. The cans are thus staged in the can bays for packaging into cartons in this twin layer configuration. Further downstream, then, pusher rods 49 push the staged twin layered cans from the can bays 42 into open cartons 51 on the adjacent and synchronously moving carton flight 15 in the traditional manner. The cartons then proceed to downstream portions of the packaging machine, where they are closed and sealed and further prepared for distribution.
The just described twin layer packaging machine and methodology represent a distinct improvement over prior art twin layer packaging machines. For instance, both lower and upper layers of articles such as beverage cans are loaded onto the selector flight and into selector bays with a single relatively short infeed section consisting of a single infeed belt and a single array of infeed lanes, all disposed at a single level in the machine. This contrasts with prior art machines, which commonly employ two infeed sections, one for the lower layer of cans and another downstream from and raised relative to the first for the upper layer of cans. This duplication renders the old machines more complex, more expensive to construct and maintain, and more prone to jams and breakdown. Further, the elimination of a second infeed section for the upper layer of cans frees up significant space within the packaging machine, making changeover for different packaging configurations and maintenance significantly simpler and less complicated.
This disclosure has included certain preferred embodiments that represent the best mode known to the inventor of carrying out the invention encompassed herein. However, the invention is not limited, circumscribed, or defined solely by the embodiments disclosed herein, but instead is defined and encompassed only by the claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/245,912, filed Sep. 27, 2011, which application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/487,261, filed Jun. 18, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,074,430, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/073,854, filed Jun. 19, 2008. The entire contents of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/245,912, filed Sep. 27, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/487,261, filed Jun. 18, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/073,854, filed on Jun. 19, 2008, are hereby incorporated by reference as if presented herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
770523 | Haley | Sep 1904 | A |
2936557 | Fay | May 1960 | A |
3323275 | Kingsbury | Jun 1967 | A |
3528566 | Weir | Sep 1970 | A |
3655031 | Cahn | Apr 1972 | A |
3821874 | Jones | Jul 1974 | A |
3881298 | Griner et al. | May 1975 | A |
4875323 | Craighead | Oct 1989 | A |
4936077 | Langen | Jun 1990 | A |
4982556 | Tisma | Jan 1991 | A |
5237795 | Cheney et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5347796 | Ziegler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5388389 | Tisma | Feb 1995 | A |
5437143 | Culpepper et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450708 | Lashyro | Sep 1995 | A |
5456058 | Ziegler | Oct 1995 | A |
5546734 | Moncrief | Aug 1996 | A |
5579895 | Davis, Jr. | Dec 1996 | A |
5727365 | Lashyro et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5758474 | Ziegler | Jun 1998 | A |
5896728 | Domino et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6058679 | Ziegler et al. | May 2000 | A |
6308502 | Olson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
8074430 | Disrud | Dec 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0717702 | Jun 1996 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 09 76 7716 dated Nov. 27, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Mar. 20, 2013. |
Response to Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
Reply to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Aug. 5, 2013. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Transmittal for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,912, dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140215972 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61073854 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13245912 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14246212 | US | |
Parent | 12487261 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13245912 | US |