This invention relates to building technology and in particular to welded wire lath which may be used to reinforce coatings, such as stucco. Specifically, this invention relates to an improved structure for a self furred welded wire lath in order to provide superior attachment points, and the ability to package the product in rolls.
Some building construction techniques involve the application of a coating, such as stucco, to a surface. This coating is the cladding or the finish for such surfaces. In the following disclosure, the term “stucco” is used generally to apply to cementitious plasters or gypsum plasters, including stuccos as defined in applicable building codes.
When applying a coating of stucco, it is generally desirable to provide a lath on the surface. The lath provides reinforcement for the stucco and attaches the stucco to the vertical building surface.
The framing for buildings is typically constructed with wood or steel studs. In some situations, sheathing may be applied over the framing. This sheathing may be in the form of wood boards, plywood, oriented strand board (OSB), gypsum wall board, EPS foam or other types of sheathing material. In other situations, the framing is left open. Typically, a water resistant membrane, such as building paper or building wrap, is applied over the open framing or over the sheathing. The lath is then applied over the water resistant membrane.
The lath is attached to wood and metal framing by various fasteners, generally including nails, staples, self-tapping screws or other mechanical fastening means. Fastening is normally spaced every 6 inches in the vertical direction with framing 16 inches on center or every 4 inches in the vertical direction with framing 24 inches on center. With open frame structures, the lath must be attached to the frame elements. In the case of structures with sheathing, for structural purposes, it is still desirable to attach the lath to the frame elements. In these situations the fasteners must pass through the sheathing material first.
There are a number of different metal lath types being used for stucco coatings. One common type is expanded metal lath. Another group of stucco laths are wire fabric laths. Within this group there are woven wire laths and welded wire laths. This invention is specifically related to the welded wire lath group.
In the prior art, welded wire lath is provided in a variety of configurations, but it is comprised typically of a wire mesh of intersecting horizontal and vertical wires that are welded together at the intersections, defining a plurality of square or rectangular openings. Typically, mesh openings are 2 inches by 2 inches, 1½ inches by 1½ inches, or 1 inch by 1 inch.
Another requirement for stucco surfaces is that the lath be spaced away from the framing or sheathing to allow the stucco, when applied, to surround the lath and obtain sufficient keying and bonding. This spacing is achieved with the use of furring or spacing devices, such as furring nails, or with the application of self-furring laths. In the prior art as disclosed by Frank in U.S. Pat. No. 3,342,003, the mesh reinforcement has bent portions for spacing the mesh away from a substrate. However, one major disadvantage with the prior art as disclosed by Frank is that the bent portions are bent to form a ‘dovetail’ shape and the bent portions “are in contact with each other and rigidly secured together”. This requires a separate process which is difficult and costly to incorporate into a manufacturing process.
In the past, the most common construction practice has been wood framing with the lath attached by staples. The advantage of using staples is that the two legs of a staple can surround both sides of a horizontal wire and physically trap the lath to the structure. It would not be necessary to try and attach at an intersection of the lath.
However, the use of staples is now being discouraged for several reasons. First, each staple produces two holes in the moisture barrier membrane, whereas a nail or screw only produces one hole at each location. With the increasing problems of moisture entry into structures and the resulting material deterioration and mold concerns, there is a desire to reduce the number of penetrations through the moisture barrier membrane.
Secondly, steel framing is becoming more popular as wood framing becomes more expensive. Steel framing has typically been used in non load bearing commercial or high rise applications but, more recently, it is now being used to a greater extent in load bearing residential applications. Staples cannot be used with steel framing and self-tapping screws must be substituted. The screws must have a large head and must be applied at an intersection of the horizontal and vertical wires. This method of attachment for the lath is a problem because the lath is not securely attached to the structure. In some cases, the intersection of the lath does not coincide with the framing member. Furthermore, the lath is only being pinched under a part of the screw and it is not trapped, which may cause it to disengage with structural movement.
Thirdly, it was found that staples sheared off of structures in the Northridge earthquake in California in 1993 and that stucco claddings fell off of buildings. In those cases, stucco was also providing shear value to the structure and when the stucco came loose, the buildings suffered serious damage and collapse. As a result, various jurisdictions had banned the use of staples for attaching lath in seismic zones. Further, with prior art lath, it was found that there was inadequate embedment of the lath in the stucco and, as a result, there was delamination of the lath and stucco during the Northridge earthquake in Northridge Calif.
Rutherford in U.S. Pat. No. 3,991,536 discloses an improved welded wire fabric lath, which includes double strands of wire located at predetermined spaced intervals. The wires of the double strand are spaced slightly apart to provide a slot for receiving fasteners that are used to hold the lath in place on wood and metal framing. Rutherford states “that screw fasteners or nails can now be used, thus eliminating the use of other mechanical fasteners to attach the lathing and eliminating the perforations through the waterproof backing.”
In Rutherford's invention, the double strands are located at the furring location. As he clearly shows in his figures, the double strands are not in the same plane as the body of the lath. This results in two problems. First, as a result of this configuration, the lath cannot be rolled up and can only be produced in sheets. Secondly, the double strands are not furred away from the building frame and are not embedded by the stucco when it is applied.
A problem of economic importance is the method for packaging the lath; more specifically the ability of the lath to be rolled up for easy handling and shipping. Clancy in U.S. Pat. No. 617,458 and Jaenson in U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,023 describe wire mesh lathing material in which strands are welded at the furring location and therefore not in the plane of the lath. Consequently, this structure makes their laths impossible to be rolled up for any practical purposes.
Another invention described by Kreikemeier in U.S. Pat. No. 5,287,673 consists of a lath cast in plastic with furring consisting of bars. This structure makes it impossible for his lath to be rolled up in the direction of the bars.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,305,432 Sacks describes a lath with flattened wires along one particular direction. This design which allows the lath to be rolled along that direction and therefore compactly packaged, can save significant costs in shipping and handling. Sacks' design however, does not have the slots structure as described by Rutherford.
Hence, there is a need for an improved welded stucco lath that provides positive attachment with nails or screws. The welded lath should also be manufactured in rolls, it should be self furring, and all the horizontal wires should be in the proper plane.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a self-furring lath equipped with slots comprising closely spaced parallel strands welded to the lath, wide enough to allow the insertion of fastener's shafts, yet narrow enough to hold the fastener's heads and to further provide a lath with these closely spaced parallel strands which are furred away from the building frame.
It is a further object of this invention to describe a lath with closely spaced parallel strands, that can be compactly rolled for easy and economical handling and shipment.
The present invention relates to an improved welded wire lathing material. The improved lathing comprises a plurality of spaced apart, parallel intersecting vertical and horizontal strands, secured together at the points of intersection such that the strands define a screen of predetermined mesh dimensions. In lathing material of this improved type, an additional strand is located adjacent to and spaced a small distance from certain horizontal strands such that pairs of closely spaced strands define a plurality of parallel slots extending across the lathing material. This lath also has a plurality of furring legs formed on the vertical strands in between a pair of horizontal strands.
The advantages of the improved lathing of the present invention relative to the prior art are significant and numerous. Because all of the longitudinal strands are in the same plane, including the spaced apart strands, the improved lathing can be packaged in rolls. This is an advantage in manufacturing, shipping and installation. Lath material that is packaged in rolls can be installed quicker which results in a time savings for installers. Furthermore, the number of vertical joints is minimized with this improved lath, which is important because joints are always a source of weak points and they can potentially develop cracks. Minimizing the vertical joints is also important because at every joint an overlapping of lath material is required, resulting in wasted material. This waste can range from a few inches up to 15-16 inches depending on where the next stud falls in relation to the sheet length.
The second major benefit of this improved lath is that all of the longitudinal strands are furred away from the structure. This provides improved keying and reinforcement of the stucco. This is important in order to minimize cracking of the stucco and to prevent disengagement of the stucco from the lath.
In one aspect of the invention, the horizontal and vertical strands could be of a generally circular profile. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the closely spaced horizontal strands could be shaped, such as a flattened or oval profile. The benefit of such a mesh is that the surface area of the strands in contact with the vapor resistant membrane is increased, resulting in less pressure and less tendency to cut the membrane as the fastener is tightened.
In another embodiment of the invention, the closely spaced horizontal strands could be of a different size than the nominal size of the other horizontal strands. These strands could each be as little as one third of the cross-sectional area of the nominal horizontal strands. Since there are two strands in these locations and if these strands are of shaped wires, the combination of the double wires and the increase in tensile strength through cold working this lath could still provide the same strength as a conventional lath with standard horizontal wire spacing. This embodiment would provide the advantages of the double wires without an increase in the amount of material per square area and hence without added material cost.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, all of the horizontal strands could be of a shaped profile, either of similar cross-section areas or dissimilar areas.
Further features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood when considered with respect to the following detailed description claims and accompanying drawings.
A preferred embodiment of self furring welded wire lath 10 in accordance with the present invention is shown in
Any one of a number of well known materials are used to fabricate welded wire lath 10, such as drawn steel, stainless steel, aluminum, copper, or the like. Seventeen gauge galvanized steel wire is preferred for strands 11, 12 and nineteen gauge for strands 14, 16.
Furring crimps 4 are fashioned at suitable intervals along the length of the vertical wires 12 by a crimping or stamping mechanism (not shown). Sufficient pressure is applied to portions of the vertical strands 12 at spaced apart intervals to form approximately V-shaped indentations. In the preferred embodiment, these furring crimps 4 would have a flat bottom shaped indentation. The flat portions of the furr 4 provide firm support with a relatively large area to reduce the tendency of the furrs to penetrate or dig into the supporting surface. The supporting surface is normally covered with a vapor resistant membrane and it is important not to penetrate or damage this membrane.
Furring crimps 4 are provided along the vertical strands 12 at intervals corresponding to approximately every second or third vertical grid space. The furring crimps are ¼ inch in depth, which is intended to space the bulk of the wire lath 10, a ¼ of an inch away from the framing material.
The furring crimps 4 are positioned between horizontal strands 11. As a result, this construction of the wire lath 10 enables the horizontal strands 11 and the closely spaced strands 14, 16 to remain in the same plane. This has two significant advantages. First, all of the horizontal strands 11 and closely spaced strands 14, 16 are in the same plane. When this wire lath 10 is applied to a wall surface, all of these strands 11, 14, 16 will be evenly positioned ¼ inch away from the framing material and stucco plaster when applied will be able to completely surround and embed around all of the strands 11, 14, 16. This is very important to achieve full keying and embedment of the wire lath 10, which results in an improved wall with less cracking, superior shear strength for seismic events, and that will not delaminate off the stucco.
The second advantage of this preferred embodiment of all horizontal strands 11, 14, 16 being positioned in the same plane is to allow the self furred lath 10 to be easily rolled lengthwise into a roll. The strands 11, 14, 16 are flexible and since they are in the same plane, the lath 10 can be rolled tightly into a roll without distorting or damaging the wire lath 10. The furring crimps 4 pass into spaces between the crossed strands so as not to contact or interfere with other strands in such a way as to hinder the rolling of the fabric. As a result, the wire lath can be packaged in rolls of approximately 150 feet length. This is an advantage in shipping and packaging. It is also an advantage in installation in that it reduces the number of vertical joints which results in faster installation, less cracking caused by joints, and reduced wastage of material at overlaps.
Further, the rows of furrs 4 on the transverse strands 12 coincide linearly with furrs 4 from the previous revolution. The majority of the furrs 4 will be staggered from the furr 4 directly below in the previous revolution and will not interfere. However, approximately 7% of the furrs 4 will overlay totally or partially a furr 4 in the previous revolution. In the preferred embodiment, the angles of the side walls of furrs 4 are between approximately 20 and 50 degrees and preferably at 45 degrees or less, from the plane of the lath 10. This ensures that the furrs 4 are self stacking and that there is no interference with furrs 4 on each revolution regardless of where they align in relation to underlying furrs 4.
Therefore, this improved lath 10 can be packaged very densely, which is an advantage for warehousing, shipping and material handling. This advantage reduces shipping costs and packaging costs, and reduces potential to damage of the lath 10 during material handling.
With the furrs 4 facing outwards, the roll of lathing with closely spaced strands can be placed against a wall surface during application. The leading edge can be attached with staples, nails or the like, at locations between longitudinal strands 14 and 16. The lathing 10 can be unrolled for considerable distance of some 80 to 100 feet, or more if required, without joints or overlaps. The lath 10 can then be pulled tight, attached at the opposite end, and remainder of the roll cut off. The installer can then attach the lath 10 at each framing member in accordance with building codes and specifications.
Therefore, there are additional advantages for the installer at the job site in relation to the prior art. The dense rolls are much easier to handle and move on ladders and scaffolds. The improved lathing 10 in rolls with furrs facing outwards eliminates double handling of the lath, and increases productivity of the installer. The dense package enables a single installer to conveniently and safely apply lath to large areas without overlaps and joints. This reduces material waste, reduces potential for cracks at joints, and overall reduces labor and material costs.
The improved wire lath 10 is then applied and attached either to the framing elements 22, 24 or in some cases to the sheathing 20. In the case of steel framing, self tapping screws 23 may be used for attaching the lath, and in the case of wood framing, nails 25 may be used for attaching the lath. In each case, the fasteners are applied between each pair of closely spaced longitudinal strands 14, 16. Stucco plaster 27 is then applied, usually in two coats, first coat being a scratch coat and the second being the brown coat. A finish coat is usually applied, or sometimes the stucco is painted. The stucco can be applied by hand trowel or by hose from a pump.
As can be seen in
This is a significant improvement and advantage over the prior art. As can be seen in
As shown in partial front elevation
For example the lathing material may include vertical (i.e., transverse) strands having cross-sections from 0.032 inches to 0.063 inches in diameter and grid spacing from 1 inch to 2 inches.
In another example the lathing material may include vertical (i.e., transverse) and horizontal (i.e., longitudinal) strands having nominal cross section from 0.0475 inches to 0.054 inches and grid spacing from 1.4 inches to 1.6 inches.
In yet another example the lathing material may include strands forming pairs of horizontal (i.e., longitudinal) strands ranging from 0.035 inches to 0.055 inches in nominal cross section.
In yet a further example, the horizontal (i.e., longitudinal) strands may have a flattened cross-section profile equivalent to a circular cross section of 0.035 inches to 0.055 inches and the strands forming pairs of horizontal (i.e. longitudinal) strands may have a flattened cross-section profile with a minor axis ranging from 0.015 inches to 0.025 inches and a major axis ranging from 0.050 inches to 0.070 inches.
The terms “horizontal” and “vertical” have been used above to indicate in a simple fashion the mutually perpendicular relationship of the intersecting strands. This nomenclature, however, is not meant to restrict how the lath can be oriented with respect to a building frame. To express this concept, a more general nomenclature can be adopted, in which the term “horizontal” is replaced by “longitudinal” and the term “vertical,” by “transverse.” Consequently, and in accordance with this new nomenclature, the lath as described in the above embodiments is most likely to be applied with its longitudinal direction along the horizontal axis.
While the above description contains many specificities, the reader should not construe these as limitations on the scope of the invention, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments thereof. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations within its scope. Accordingly, the reader is requested to determine the scope of the invention by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, and not by the examples which have been given.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
553306 | Fordyce | Jan 1896 | A |
617458 | Clancy | Jan 1899 | A |
659416 | Perry | Oct 1900 | A |
749714 | Barnes et al. | Jan 1904 | A |
1986172 | Wilson | Jan 1935 | A |
2565292 | Athur | Aug 1951 | A |
3299785 | James | Jan 1967 | A |
3342003 | Frank | Sep 1967 | A |
3475876 | Oroschakoff | Nov 1969 | A |
3522668 | Oroschakoff | Aug 1970 | A |
3672022 | York | Jun 1972 | A |
3991536 | Rutherford | Nov 1976 | A |
4003178 | Douthwaite | Jan 1977 | A |
4245926 | Asszonyi et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4693048 | Guetersloh | Sep 1987 | A |
5287673 | Kreikemeier | Feb 1994 | A |
5540023 | Jaenson | Jul 1996 | A |
6305432 | Sacks et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6820387 | Sacks et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20030029129 | Walters | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040134158 | Farrell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050055949 | Sacks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055953 | Sacks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050055949 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |