None.
The present invention relates generally to a twin-tube hydraulic damper, in particular to a damper having a rebound valve assembly with improved noise reduction especially at low vehicle speeds.
Twin-tube hydraulic damper assemblies in motor vehicle suspension environments are subject to many different types of stress and highly variable amplitudes and frequencies of compression and rebound. High frequency vibrations of the piston rod inside a typical twin-tube assembly can result in rattling, rambling, and knocking noises and when the damper is a part of a vehicle suspension system, these vibrations may be audible even inside the passenger compartment. The rattling noise intensity and occurrence depends on the particular vehicle suspension setup and the acoustic performance of the vehicle chassis. Nevertheless, these noises occur mainly at low amplitude, high frequency damper stroke reversals which occur, for example, while driving over a road paved with setts, also called Belgian blocks, with relatively low speeds of around 12 to 25 miles per hour (20-40 km/h). The most irritating rattling noise occurs at a piston rod vibration frequency within the range of 300-600 Hz. Poor isolation parameters of the vehicle chassis and a top mount at the end of the piston rod, as well as a low level of a background noise related to the low vehicle speeds at which this rattling noise occurs additionally makes it hard for vehicle drivers and passengers to ignore
The present inventors have discovered that these vibrations are generated by a deflective disc of a rebound base valve assembly due to pressure fluctuations occurring, in particular, during rapid changes of the stroke direction of the piston.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a twin-tube hydraulic damper in which these vibrations would be significantly suppressed and consequently the rattling noise they produce would be significantly decreased. It is also desirable to accomplish this object in a cost efficient and simple to manufacture method.
The prior art discloses other solutions providing improvements of acoustic performance of hydraulic dampers. Publication US2012292147, for example, discloses a twin tube damping mechanism having a piston body provided with a base valve assembly having an additional deflective disc named a velocity sensitive valve separated by a spacer from the main deflective disc. This velocity sensitive valve disc defines a plurality of slots or apertures which allow the flow of fluid when the velocity sensitive valve disc is in its closed position. Various kinds of other noise and vibration suppressing arrangements provided on damper piston assemblies are disclosed, for example, in publications U.S. Pat. No. 5,813,500, DE2727407, GB2347728, US2015247545, DE102008042251 and JPH10220515.
The present invention relates to a twin-tube hydraulic damper, in particular, a motor vehicle suspension damper comprising a tube filled with a working liquid and a piston assembly disposed slidably inside the tube, thereby dividing the tube into a rebound chamber and a compression chamber, with the piston assembly attached to a piston rod which is led outside the damper through a sealed piston rod guide. A compensation chamber is located outside of the tube, and a base valve assembly is located at an end of the compression chamber, wherein the base valve assembly comprises a rebound valve assembly and a compression valve assembly to control a flow of the working liquid between the compensation chamber and the compression chamber respectively during rebound and compression strokes of the damper. The rebound valve assembly is provided with a main deflective disc cooperating with a seat of a base valve body, which is provided with an annular protrusion distanced from the inner surface of the tube, and normally covering the flow channels of the base valve body. The rebound valve assembly is also provided with an additional deflective disc disposed over the main deflective disc and separated from the main deflective disc by an axial annular gap having a thickness that is equal to or less than the thickness of the main deflective disc. Preferably, the thickness of the annular gap is equal to or greater than 40% of the thickness of the main deflective disc. Most preferably, the thickness of the annular gap is within the range of from 0.18 to 0.4 millimeters (mm) in thickness. Preferably the additional deflective disc has a radius that is equal to a radius of the main deflective disc. Preferably the thickness of the additional deflective disc is greater than or equal to the thickness of the main deflective disc. Most preferably, the additional deflective disc has the same thickness as the thickness of said main deflective disc. Preferably, the rebound valve assembly is provided with a spacer separating the main deflective disc from the additional deflective disc and defining the annular gap. Preferably, the additional deflective disc is provided with a number of axial through openings. A thin film of the working liquid in the axial annular gap between the main deflective disc and the additional deflective disc introduces a stiction force, thereby dissipating energy of the rebound valve assembly oscillations which muffles the irritating rattling noise. As known to those of skill in the art, the term “stiction” is a portmanteau of “static friction”. The efficiency of the dissipation is proportional to the relative axial velocity between the main and additional deflective discs and therefore to the stiffness of the additional deflective disc, as more energy is dissipated by the radial flow of the working liquid. The choice of the stiffness and dimensions of the additional deflective disc, as well as the gap width between the main deflective disc and additional deflective disc provide tuning parameters that may be used to reduce the amplitude and frequency of the rebound valve assembly oscillations. It is also beneficial that no substantial modifications of the damper are required to implement the present invention.
The invention shall be described and explained below in connection with the attached drawings on which:
Illustrated in
The piston assembly 4 is provided with a compression valve assembly 42 and a rebound valve assembly 41 to control a flow of the working liquid passing through the piston assembly 4 between the rebound chamber 11 and the compression chamber 12 while the piston assembly 4 is in motion. The base valve assembly 7 is also provided with a rebound valve assembly 71 and a compression valve assembly 72 to control a flow of working liquid passing through the base valve assembly 7 between the compensation chamber 13 and the compression chamber 12, respectively during rebound and compression strokes of the damper 1.
As shown in
At the outlets of the rebound flow channels 712 an annular recessed seat 713 is formed in the body 73 enabling for a fluid communication of the outlets of these channels 712 while covered by the disc 711 and equalizing the pressure of the working liquid acting on the disc 711 during the rebound stroke. The seat 713 is surrounded at its radially external side by an annular protrusion 714 and at its radially internal side by a second annular protrusion 715.
In order to dissipate the energy of the rebound valve assembly 7 oscillations during damper 1 operation, the base valve assembly 7 further comprises an additional deflective disc 716 that is located above the main deflective disc 711 and separated from it by a spacer 717 which defines an annular damping gap 8 between the discs 711 and 716.
Radially internal areas of the discs 711, 716 and 721, as well as the spacer 717 are clamped together by a bolt 75 passing through a central opening of the body 73 and secured in the compression chamber 12 by a threaded shoulder nut 74 screwed on an external thread of the bolt 75.
In this embodiment, the radii R1 and R2 of the discs 711 and 716 are the same and are about 14.5 mm. Furthermore both discs 711 and 716 have the same thicknesses T1 and T2 of about 0.4 mm. Preferably, the additional deflective disc 716 has a thickness that is equal to or greater than that of the thickness of the main deflective disc 711. The thickness of the spacer 717 and thus also the thickness G of the annular damping gap 8 amounts about 0.2 mm. The internal radius R3 of the damper tube 3 is about 16.01 mm. Preferably the thickness, G, of the annular gap 8 is greater than or equal to 40% of the thickness of the main deflective disc 711. Most preferably, the thickness of G is from 0.18 to 0.4 mm in thickness.
In order to provide an inflow of the working liquid to the compression flow channels 722 to deflect the compression discs 721 during a compression stroke of the damper 1, the main deflective disc 711 of the rebound valve assembly 71 is provided with a plurality of, preferably two, kidney-shaped through openings 7111 in the area of the compression flow channels 722. Similarly the additional deflective disc 716 is provided with a plurality of, preferably two, kidney-shaped through openings 7161 in the area of the compression flow channels 722 rotated by 90° (degrees) with respect to the openings 7111 of the main deflective disc 711 so that the openings 7111 and 7161 partially overlap.
Obviously the gap 8 shape and size provide tuning parameters that may be used to reduce the amplitude and frequency of the disc 711 oscillations.
The damper 1 according to the present invention has been examined in tests involving measuring the acceleration of the piston rod 5 undergoing sinusoidal excitation as shown in
The tests, as shown in
In
The above embodiments of the present invention are merely exemplary. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and some features may be exaggerated or minimized. These and other factors however should not be considered as limiting the spirit of the invention, the intended scope of protection of which is indicated in appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/449,640 filed on Jan. 24, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3003594 | Bourcie De Carbon | Oct 1961 | A |
3756357 | Graff et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
5042624 | Furuya et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5529154 | Tanaka | Jun 1996 | A |
6155391 | Kashiwagi | Dec 2000 | A |
20080121478 | Maniowski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20110031077 | Slusarczyk et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110186393 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120292147 | Bombrys et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150167774 | Kiyonaga | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150247545 | Anderson | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260253 | Slusarczyk et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150316117 | Kim | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20428297 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105308350 | Feb 2016 | CN |
1282391 | Nov 1968 | DE |
2727407 | Jan 1979 | DE |
4139746 | Jun 1993 | DE |
4139746 | Jun 1993 | DE |
10318018 | Dec 2003 | DE |
102008042251 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102012214713 | Feb 2014 | DE |
1172580 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1686284 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1906046 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1906046 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2661726 | Nov 1991 | FR |
2866688 | Aug 2005 | FR |
2347728 | May 2000 | GB |
5442570 | Apr 1979 | JP |
54042570 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S55-102440 | Jul 1980 | JP |
5824632 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58024632 | Feb 1983 | JP |
6078127 | May 1985 | JP |
04185929 | Jul 1992 | JP |
10220515 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2005045277 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2018 for counterpart European Patent Application No. EP18151183.3, Eight Pages. |
First Office Action and search report dated Mar. 20, 2019 for counterpart Chinese patent application No. 201711455541.3, along with machine EN translation downloaded from EPO. |
Second Office Action and Search Report dated Sep. 16, 2019 for counterpart Chinese patent application No. 201711455541.3, along with machine EN translation downloaded from EPO. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180209506 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62449640 | Jan 2017 | US |