Patent Application
20250179338
The present invention relates to the field of adhesives, in particular two-component polyurethane adhesives.
The use of aluminium alloy in the building blocks for car body design is growing due to the continuous drive for weight reduction. In particular for electrical vehicles (EV), where the battery brings extra weight to the entire vehicle. The battery itself uses a lot aluminium alloy for the various structures and components. For example the housing of the battery pack is typically made from aluminium, and the side and edge panels of battery modules are made of aluminium alloy as well. The joining of aluminium alloy to other components for the battery becomes critical. Adhesive bonding is the current popular joining method for aluminium in the automotive industry together with other joining methods such as welding, and riveting. The typical bonding strength needed for bonding structural components should be higher than 5 MPa, or preferably higher than 10 MPa.
The most commonly used adhesive to bond aluminium alloy is based on epoxy and acrylic chemistry. However, epoxy adhesives have a relatively slow curing speed, and they can be brittle in the cured state. This hinders the application of epoxy adhesives for structural bonding of aluminium alloy inside battery pack applications. Acrylic based adhesives often have an unpleasant smell, making them not very user friendly.
Polyurethane (PU) adhesives are typically used for bonding painted substrates and plastic components in automotive applications. However, PU adhesives do not typically provide strong, durable bonding to aluminium alloy, in particular, adhesion to aluminium decreases significantly when exposed to harsh weathering conditions such as high temperature and high humidity. In addition, for battery applications, the adhesive used inside of battery pack should be fire- or flame-resistant. Flame retardant additives typically used in polyurethane industry are halogen-containing or phosphorus-based.
Unfortunately, these additives often lead to a dramatic reduction of adhesion or bonding performance of the adhesive, thereby detracting from the structural properties of the bonding system.
In a first aspect, the invention provides a two-component thermally conductive polyurethane adhesive formulation comprising:
A method for adhering two or more substrates, comprising the steps:
An adhered assembly, comprising:
The inventors have found that flame-retardant adhesives can be formulated with polyurethanes to offer i) lap shear strengths on aluminium of >8 MPa, ii) flame-retardancy ratings of V0, and iii) good retention of lap shear strength after prolonged exposure to harsh conditions.
Equivalent and molecular weights are measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with a Malvern Viscothek GPC max equipment. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was used as an eluent, PL GEL MIXED D (Agilent, 300*7.5 mm, 5 μm) was used as a column, and MALVERN Viscotek TDA (integrated refractive index viscometer and light scattering) was used as a detector.
The adhesive of the invention is a two-component polyurethane adhesive, comprising an A Part and B Part. The A Part and the B Part may be packaged together as a kit. The A Part and the B Part are mixed together at an appropriate ratio, preferably 1:1 by volume, prior to use and then applied as soon as practicable to the substrate or substrates.
The A Part and the B Part will now be disclosed in more particular detail.
Part A comprises a polyurethane prepolymer made from at least one polyol, at least one polyisocyanate and an aminosilane, wherein the prepolymer is partially terminated with silane moieties and has reactive NCO moieties.
The polyisocyanate used to make the prepolymer may be aliphatic, aromatic, or a mixture, with aromatic polyisocyanates being preferred. Examples of aromatic polyisocyanates include methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), polycarbodiimide-modified MDI, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), p-phenylene diisocyanate (PPDI), and naphthalene diisocyanate (NDI). MDI is particularly preferred and/or polycarbodiimide-modified MDI. In some embodiments, a mixture of MDI and polycarbodiimide-modified MDI is used.
The polyisocyanate used to make the prepolymer is preferably used at 35-65 wt %, more preferably 40-60 wt %, particularly preferably 45-55 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the prepolymer is made using MDI and/or polycarbodiimide-modified MDI at 35-65 wt %, more preferably 40-60 wt %, particularly preferably 45-55 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
The polyol used to make the prepolymer is preferably a polyether polyol. The polyol may have two or more OH groups. Examples of polyether polyols include poly(alkylene oxide)diols, wherein the alkylene group is C2-C6, particularly preferably the alkylene group is C2-C4. Examples of suitable polyols include poly(ethylene oxide)polyols, poly(propylene oxide)polyols, poly(tetramethylene oxide)polyols. Particularly preferred are poly(propylene oxide)polyols, particularly poly(propylene glycol). In a preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol is a polyether polyol based on propylene glycol. In a particularly preferred embodiment, it is a polyether polyol based on propylene glycol with ethylene oxide capping, having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 Da, a functionality of 2.
The polyether polyol used to make the prepolymer is preferably used at 5 to 20 wt %, more preferably 8 to 15 wt %, particularly preferably at 9 to 12 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyol used to make the prepolymer is a polyether polyol based on propylene glycol, used at 5 to 20 wt %, more preferably 8 to 15 wt %, particularly preferably at 9 to 12 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
The polyisocyanate is used in excess to the polyether polyol such that the prepolymer is terminated with isocyanate groups. The final prepolymer preferably has an NCO wt % in the range of 5-30 wt %, more preferably in the range of 10-25 wt %.
The aminosilane in Component A is preferably of general Formula I or Formula II:
where R1 is independently selected from C1-C6 alkyl, and R2 is independently selected from C2-C6 alkylene.
In a preferred embodiment, the aminosilane in Component A is of general Formula I, R1 is C1-C2 alkyl, and R2 is C2-C4 alkylene. In a more preferred embodiment, the aminosilane is of general Formula I, R1 is methyl, and R2 is propylene.
In another preferred embodiment, the aminosilane in Component A is of general Formula II, R1 is C1-C2 alkyl, and R2 is C2-C4 alkylene. In a more preferred embodiment, the aminosilane is of general Formula II, R1 is methyl, and R2 is propylene.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the aminosilane in Component A is bis-(trimethoxysilylpropyl)amine.
The aminosilane in Component A is preferably used at 0.5-4 wt %, more preferably 1-3 wt %, particularly preferably 1.5-2.5 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In a preferred embodiment, the amino silane in Component A is bis-(trimethoxysilylpropyl)amine, used at 0.5-4 wt %, more preferably 1-3 wt %, particularly preferably 1.5-2.5 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In a preferred embodiment, the prepolymer in Component A is made using:
In a more preferred embodiment, the prepolymer in Component A is made using:
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the prepolymer in Component A is made using:
The prepolymer is made by mixing the components, preferably under dry and/or inert atmosphere, for a period of time sufficient to result in reaction of substantially all of the polyol OH groups and the aminosilane amino groups with the polyisocyanate. In a preferred embodiment, mixing is carried out for 1 to 2 hours. The proportions are chosen so that the prepolymer is terminated with isocyanate groups and partially silane groups.
Part B (polyol)
Part B comprises:
The polyol used in Component B is a polyether polyol. The polyol may have two or more OH groups. Examples of polyether polyols include poly(alkylene oxide)diols, wherein the alkylene group is C2-C6, particularly preferably the alkylene group is C2-C4. Examples of suitable polyols include poly(ethylene oxide)polyols, poly(propylene oxide)polyols, poly(tetramethylene oxide)polyols. Particularly preferred are poly(propylene oxide)polyols.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture of polyols having functionalities of 2-6. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture of at least one diol, at least one triol and at least one polyol of functionality >3.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture comprising or consisting of a diol, a triol, and a polyol having nominal functionality of 5-6.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture of poly(propylene oxide) polyols having functionalities of 2-6. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture comprising or consisting of at least one poly(propylene oxide) diol, at least one poly(propylene oxide) triol and at least one poly(propylene oxide) polyol of functionality >3.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B is a mixture comprising or consisting of a poly(propylene oxide) diol, a poly(propylene oxide) triol and a poly(propylene oxide) polyol having nominal functionality of 5-6.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B comprises 46-83 wt % of a polyether triol, 19-46 wt % of a polyether polyol having functionality >3, 4-15 wt % of a polyether diol, based on the total weight of polyether polyol in Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B comprises 55-65 wt % of a polyether triol, 25-35 wt % of a polyether polyol having functionality >3, 5-8 wt % of a polyether diol, based on the total weight of polyether polyol in Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B comprises 46-83 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) triol, 19-46 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) polyol having functionality >3, 4-15 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) diol, based on the total weight of polyether polyol in Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyether polyol of Component B comprises 55-65 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) triol, 25-35 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) polyol having functionality >3, 5-8 wt % of a poly(propylene oxide) diol, based on the total weight of polyether polyol in Component B.
The total polyether polyol in Component B is preferably present at 35 to 70 wt %, more preferably 40 to 60 wt %, particularly preferably 50 to 57 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In a preferred embodiment, Component B comprises 35 to 70 wt %, more preferably 40 to 60 wt %, particularly preferably 50 to 57 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B, of a mixture of polyether polyols comprising or consisting of:
Component B may optionally comprise a diol of molecular weight <200 Da, more preferably <150 Da. Examples include propylene glycol and butane diol, with butane diol (e.g. 1,4-butane diol) being particularly preferred.
If present, the diol of molecular weight <200 Da is preferably used at 5 to 12 wt %, more preferably 6-10 wt %, particularly preferably 8-9 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In a preferred embodiment, Component B comprises butane diol (e.g. 1,4-butane diol) at 5 to 12 wt %, more preferably 6-10 wt %, particularly preferably 8-9 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
Component B comprises one or more catalysts capable of promoting the reaction of the NCO moieties of the prepolymer of Component A with the one or more polyether polyols of Component B.
The catalyst is preferably selected from Lewis bases and Lewis acids.
Preferred are tertiary amines, including diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, tris-2,4,6-((dimethylamino)methyl)phenol, DMDEE (2,2′-Dimorpholinodiethylether), imidazoles, such as 4-methylimidazole), triethanolamine, polyethyleneimine, with diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane being particularly preferred.
Also suitable are organotin compounds, such as dioctyltindineodecanoate, dibutyltin di(acetate), and di-n-octyltin bis(isooctyl mercaptoacetate). With dibutyltin di(acetate) being particularly preferred.
In a preferred embodiment, the catalyst comprises diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane and dibutyltin di(acetate).
The catalyst is preferably used at 0.05-0.5 wt %, more preferably 0.1-0.3 wt %, particularly preferably 0.2 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In a preferred embodiment, the catalyst is a mixture of diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane and dibutyltin di(acetate), used at 0.05-0.5 wt %, more preferably 0.1-0.3 wt %, particularly preferably 0.2 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
Part A and/or Part B comprise aluminium hydroxide having a D50 of less than 5 microns, and melamine polyphosphate, such that when Part A and Part B are mixed together to form an adhesive mixture (preferably in a 1:1 volumetric ratio), the aluminium hydroxide concentration is at least 20 wt %, and the melamine polyphosphate concentration is at least 7 wt %, both based on the total weight of the mixture. Particle sizes and distributions being measured by light scattering using acetone as suspending medium.
Preferably the aluminium hydroxide concentration in the adhesive mixture is 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of the mixture.
In a preferred embodiment, the aluminium hydroxide is present in Component A at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In another preferred embodiment, the aluminium hydroxide is present in Component B at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In a preferred embodiment, the aluminium hydroxide is present in both Component A and Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, the aluminium hydroxide is present in both Component A and Component B at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of the respective Component.
In a preferred embodiment, the aluminium hydroxide has a D50 of less than 3 microns, more preferably about 1 micron.
Preferably the adhesive mixture resulting from mixing Components A and B (preferably in a 1:1 volumetric ratio) comprises aluminium hydroxide having a D50 of less than 3 microns, more preferably about 1 micron, at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of the mixture.
In a preferred embodiment, Component A comprises aluminium hydroxide having a D50 of less than 3 microns, more preferably about 1 micron, at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In another preferred embodiment, Component B comprises aluminium hydroxide having a D50 of less than 3 microns, more preferably about 1 micron, at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, both Component A and Component B comprise aluminium hydroxide having a D50 of less than 3 microns, more preferably about 1 micron, at 20-35 wt %, more preferably at 22-26 wt %, based on the total weight of the respective Component.
Preferably the melamine polyphosphate concentration in the adhesive mixture is 7-15 wt %, more preferably 8-12 wt %, particularly preferably 9-11 wt %, based on the total weight of the mixture.
In a preferred embodiment, melamine polyphosphate is present in Component A at 7-15 wt %, more preferably at 8-12 wt %, based on the total weight of Component A.
In another preferred embodiment, melamine polyphosphate is present in Component B at 7-15 wt %, more preferably at 8-12 wt %, based on the total weight of Component B.
In a preferred embodiment, melamine polyphosphate is present in both Component A and Component B.
In another preferred embodiment, melamine polyphosphate is present in both Component A and Component B at 7-15 wt %, more preferably at 8-12 wt %, based on the total weight of the respective Component.
Components A and/or B may additionally comprise other ingredients, for example, talc, molecular sieves, silica (particularly amorphous silica), carbon black.
Parts (A) and (B) are mixed and can be applied to a substrate using known methods, such as a manual application system or in an automated way with a pump system using 20 I pails or 200 I drums or any other preferred container.
Preferred substrates include aluminium, e-coated aluminium, e-coated steel, laser treated aluminium, or passivated aluminium.
The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B preferably has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after curing and resting for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 9 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 10 MPa or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples.
The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B preferably has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after curing and resting for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, followed by 7 days of Cataplasma treatment of 6 MPa or greater, more preferably 9 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 10 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples.
The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B preferably has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after curing and resting for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, followed by 168 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 10 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 11 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples.
The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B preferably has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after curing and resting for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, followed by 1,000 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 10 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 11 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples.
The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B preferably has a UL94 rating of V0, after curing for 7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity.
In a preferred embodiment, The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B (7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity) has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after curing and resting for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 9 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 10 MPa or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples, and a UL94 rating of V0, after curing for 7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity.
In another preferred embodiment, the cured adhesive (7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity) has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after 7 days of Cataplasma treatment of 6 MPa or greater, more preferably 9 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 10 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples, and a UL94 rating of V0, after curing for 7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity.
In another preferred embodiment, the cured adhesive (7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity) has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after 168 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity, of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 10 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 11 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples, and a UL94 rating of V0, after curing for 7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity.
In another preferred embodiment, The cured adhesive composition resulting from mixing Components A and B (7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity) has a lap shear strength, on aluminium substrates, after 1,000 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity of 8 MPa or greater, more preferably 10 MPa or greater, particularly preferably 11 MPA or greater, when measured according to the method given in the Examples, and a UL94 rating of V0, after curing for 7 days at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity.
The following are particularly preferred embodiments of the invention:
MIDI, polyether polyol and aminosilane (Dynasilan 1124) in the amounts listed in Table 2, were first charged into a planetary mixer and mixed at room temperature for 2 hours at mixing speed between 300-1,000 rpm, and then the fillers ATH, MPP, talc, carbon black and amorphous silica were loaded into the mixture. The fillers were pre-dried in an oven at temperatures from 100-200° C. until the moisture level was below 1,000 ppm. The fillers were mixed into the mixture at a mixing speed of 1,000-2,000 rpm for 30-60 minutes. The mixture was then loaded into the cartridge for storage.
The polyols, silane (Dynasilan) and catalyst in amounts indicated in Table 2 were mixed at 500-1,000 rpm for 5-15 min., and then the fillers ATH, MPP, talc, amorphous silica and molecular sieve were loaded into the mixture. The fillers were pre-dried in an oven at temperatures from 100-200° C. until the moisture level was below 1,000 ppm. The fillers were mixed into the mixture at a mixing speed of 1,000-2,000 rpm for 30-60 minutes. The mixture was then loaded into the cartridge for storage.
Parts A and B were mixed in a 1:1 volumetric ratio using a static mixer, and can be dispensed manually or robotically onto the substrates.
Samples of adhesive were produced by mixing Part A and B in a 1:1 volumetric ratio, and allowing the mixture to cure at 23° C. for 7 days at 50% relative humidity. Flammability of the samples was measured according to UL94 flame tests. Samples were assigned a V0 rating if burning stopped within 10 seconds on a vertical specimen; drips of particles allowed as long as they are not inflamed. The results are reported in Table 2.
Lap shear strength was measured according to DIN EN1465, on aluminium alloy 3003. Aluminium substrates (from Novelis, AA6061 T6 1.92 mm MF noPT no lub, 140×25 mm, 1.9 mm thick) were used. The substrates were cleaned with isopropanol before use. The adhesive was produced by mixing Parts A and B in a 1:1 volumetric ratio and applied on one substrate, before the second substrate was joined within 5 minutes. The thickness was adjusted to 1.0 mm, the overlap area was 25 mm×25 mm. The material was cured and rested for 7 days at 23° C., 50% relative humidity before the lap shear tests were performed. The lap shear samples were then mounted in a tensiometer and the lap shear tests were performed, using a pull speed of 10 mm/min. The force deflection curve was monitored and the strength at break was reported as lap shear strength.
Lap shear tests were performed immediately after curing, as well as after 7 days cataplasm exposure (Cataplasma conditions are 7 d @70° C., 100% relative humidity, followed by thermal shock at −30° C. for 24 hours), after 168 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity, and after 1,000 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity. The results are reported in Table 2.
1“No rating” means the sample burned outside the rating scale of the method.
Inventive Examples 1-4 all show a UL94 rating of V0, as well as excellent lap shear strength immediately after cure (≥11 MPa). Comparative Examples 5, 6 and 9 had UL94 ratings that were unacceptable, and also showed lower lap shear strengths immediately after curing (<11 MPa). Comparative Examples 7 and 8 had ratings of V0, however, their lap shear strengths immediately after curing were significantly lower (<9 MPa).
Inventive Examples 2 and 3 show excellent retention of lap shear strength after 7 days Cataplasma treatment as well as after 168 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity. In contrast, Comparative Examples 5 an 6 show unacceptable drops in lap shear strength after 7 days Cataplasma treatment, and Comparative Examples 5 and 8 show unacceptable drops in lap shear strength after 168 hours at 85° C. and 85% relative humidity.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2022/083075 | 3/25/2022 | WO |
