1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of deburring and more particularly to a device for deburring two edges of a workpiece.
2. Description of the Related Art
Deburring tools are well known in the industry. When a metal object or workpiece is cut or bored, metal fragments called burrs occur on its edges. These burrs have many associated issues including: they detract from the aesthetic look of the finished product; they form a sharp edge that can cause cuts and scrapes; and, when they eventually break off, they can cause electrical shorts or they can cause other failures to mechanisms such as gears and bearings. Burrs are removed in several ways including from passing a drill bit along one of the edges or filing. In addition, a deburring tool sometimes chamfers the edges of the workpiece.
Presently, in an automated machine tool process, a drill bit or end mill is used to deburr one edge of a workpiece after cutting or boring. The automated machine tool is programmed to traverses the rough edges on the top of the work piece with the drill bit or end mile, removing burrs and metal fragments. This process works fine for a top edge, but the workpiece must be reoriented to deburr the bottom edge, requiring an extra operator intervention. The added operator intervention greatly reduces the efficiency of the automated machine tool operation.
Several solutions to this problem have been developed in the past. U.S. Pat. No. 5,288,184 to Heule describes a cutting tool that also has a deburr feature. This tool has one or more cutting knives affixed to a tool. The tool described requires separate operations, one for cutting the bore, one for deburring a first edge of the bore and another for deburring a second edge of the bore.
Another tool is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,468,100 to Naim. This tool has opposing cutting edges but is not designed to operate at high speeds, as required when the workpiece material is steel. Furthermore, the described tool is adjustable, making it difficult to obtain an accurate setting of the cutting surfaces in relationship to the width of the workpiece.
What is needed is a deburr tool that will accurately deburr and/or chamfer two surfaces of a workpiece simultaneously.
In one embodiment, a rotating tool for simultaneously deburring two surfaces of a workpiece is disclosed including a rotatable shaft having a first end and a second end with a first deburr surface on the first end facing towards the second end and having a first angle. A second deburr surface is formed between the first end and the second end facing towards the first end and having a second angle. The distance between a first mid-point of the first deburr surface and a second mid-point of the second deburr surface is substantially equal to the width of the workpiece.
In another embodiment, a method of simultaneously deburring two surfaces of a workpiece is disclosed, the workpiece has a width. The method includes providing a rotating tool for simultaneously deburring two surfaces of a workpiece, the tool includes a rotatable shaft having a first end and a second end with a first deburr surface formed on the first end facing towards the second end and having a first angle. A second deburr surface is formed between the first end and the second end facing towards the first end having a second angle. The distance between a first mid-point of the first deburr surface and a second mid-point of the second deburr surface is substantially equal to the width of the workpiece. The method continues with rotating the tool and simultaneously contacting a top edge of the work piece with the first deburr surface and contacting a bottom edge of the work piece with the second deburr surface, thereby simultaneously removing burrs from the top edge of the workpiece and the bottom edge of the workpiece.
In another embodiment, a rotating tool for simultaneously deburring two surfaces of a workpiece is disclosed including a rotatable shaft with a first end and a second end. A first deburr edge is situated on the first end, facing towards the second end and having a first angle. A second deburr edge is situated between the first end and the second end, facing towards the first end having a second angle. The distance between a first mid-point of the first deburr edge and a second mid-point of the second deburr edge is substantially equal to a width of the workpiece.
The invention can be best understood by those having ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Throughout the following detailed description, the same reference numerals refer to the same elements in all figures.
Referring to
The deburr tool 10 is constructed similar to an end mill. The number of flutes or cutting edges 16 can be any number greater than or equal to one and usually relates to the type of stock being deburred and the amount of material being removed. For example, for a 2-flute deburr tool 10 is used for chamfering aluminum stock and a 3-flute deburr tool 10 is used for lighter finishes. The spiral or helix flute is at any angle from zero (straight flutes) to just less than 90 degrees, but it is preferred to be 35 degrees, 45 degrees or 60 degrees. In some embodiments, the cutting edges of the flute are diamond coated.
The deburr tool 10 has two generally symmetrical opposing sets of deburr surfaces 15/18 for making simultaneous contact with the top edge and bottom edge of the workpiece 40 (see
In one embodiment, the deburr tool 10 is formed by cutting out a portion 14 of an existing tool such as a mill end, leaving the two sets of deburr surfaces 15/18. A partial helix or spiral 14 from the initial tool (mill end) is shown, though in some embodiments, the mill end is cut deep enough as to eliminate the helix or spiral 14. The original flutes 16 are shown with their original cutting edges 17 and these edges can still be used for their original milling purposes. Furthermore, the end of the mill end retains its original cutting edges and can still be used as a mill end. It is preferred that the sets of opposing deburr surfaces 15/18 are formed at an angle that is typically 45 degrees with reference to the axis of rotation so as to chamfer the workpiece's 40 edges at a 45 degree angle. Alternately, the opposing deburr surfaces 15/18 can be formed at any desired angle and can be of a straight edge or can be curved to produce a finished edge on the workpiece 40 that has a radius.
Referring to
Equivalent elements can be substituted for the ones set forth above such that they perform in substantially the same manner in substantially the same way for achieving substantially the same result.
It is believed that the system and method of the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description. It is also believed that it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely exemplary and explanatory embodiment thereof. It is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1014794 | Weirbach | Jan 1912 | A |
3377890 | Cogsdill | Apr 1968 | A |
3442162 | Cogsdill | May 1969 | A |
3718958 | Brucker | Mar 1973 | A |
3751804 | Pulrang | Aug 1973 | A |
4147463 | Robinson | Apr 1979 | A |
4504178 | Seidenfaden | Mar 1985 | A |
4505086 | Hansen | Mar 1985 | A |
4589805 | Duffner | May 1986 | A |
4820091 | Koski | Apr 1989 | A |
4993465 | Cotton et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5288184 | Heule | Feb 1994 | A |
5433563 | Velepec | Jul 1995 | A |
5468100 | Naim | Nov 1995 | A |
5615718 | Venditto | Apr 1997 | A |
5755538 | Heule | May 1998 | A |
5931616 | Daub | Aug 1999 | A |
5944462 | Woodward | Aug 1999 | A |
5996659 | Burgess | Dec 1999 | A |
6007281 | Eriksson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6280126 | Slocum et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343902 | Nishikawa | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354347 | Brewer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367524 | Brewer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6471452 | Trionfetti | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6773211 | Zackrisson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6839953 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840718 | Newmark | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851901 | Havskog | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887017 | Klesser | May 2005 | B2 |
7150589 | Nordlin | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20020054799 | Anjanappa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030077130 | Klesser | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118413 | Bruhn et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138301 | Kuerzel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030215295 | Gaiser et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050000072 | Wolff et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050084353 | Hecht | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089383 | Nordlin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095072 | Gaiser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |