This patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. Facsimile reproduction is allowed of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records as allowed by US patent law, but otherwise all copyright rights are reserved.
Published Patent Application 2009-0044991 A1 Bullis, filed Aug. 16, 2007
1. Field of the Invention
This present invention relates to motor vehicles.
2. Description of the Prior Art
U.S. Pat. No. 7,338,061 Bullis 2008 provided a wheel system that makes a narrow car stable, thus enabling major improvements in aerodynamic efficiency. Using this wheel system with a tandem seating arrangement, a car concept resulted that was about half as wide as a conventional car. Therefore, frontal area would be much reduced, thus reducing one factor that determines air drag force. Very efficient shapes were then disclosed in Patent Application 2009-0044991 A1 Bullis, filed Aug. 16, 2007 which resulted in a large reduction in the drag coefficient, which is a second factor that determines air drag force. The resulting car would eliminate much of the fuel efficiency problem that comes from driving cars at highway speeds. The narrow car with tandem seating was discussed with inclusion of protective structure built into the sides of the vehicle. Entry from the top of the vehicle was shown. However, it seemed that side entry would be needed to make the car popular. This new car concept was so big a change from traditional automotive practice, it seemed like a good opportunity to avoid the traditional, but unsafe, side door systems.
At the same time, it was seen to be very important to take advantage of car safety developments where front and rear crumple zones, where structure prevented crash effects from reaching occupants, yet allowed for significant energy absorption. Amazingly, unless cars are quite wide, the pre-disposition of the auto industry to side-by-side seating leaves little side space for such protective crumple zones. Side doors cause further vulnerability to side impacts. It is not clear that air-bags are of much use in making up for these defects in design.
The Isetta is a known automobile where the front opens to allow two persons to step up and sit on a fixed seat. In this car the driver and passenger sit side-by-side just behind the combination front door and windshield.
An embodiment is a two part, wheeled vehicle for tandem seating of motorists that has an elevated aerodynamic shell that is held above the wheels at a height that allows significant air flow under the vehicle.
Protective side structure is uninterrupted for purposes of allowing entry through side openings. Therefore, a ramp system provides a walk in entry pathway to the vehicle shell when this ramp lowers from the bottom of this shell. Seats are movable such that a walkway is made clear for motorists to walk to a position ahead of their respective seats, from which position they would then be able to move their seats to the necessary position for riding in the car. A roof top can be opened to enable motorists to walk, nearly erect, into the vehicle.
There are various possible access arrangements based on this concept.
FIG. 1—Example showing two part vehicle with hatches open.
FIG. 2—Side view showing hatch actions.
FIG. 3—Vehicle arranged for high speed travel.
FIG. 4—Seating arranged to allow an access pathway by moving seats from normal positions for seated operation to out of the path positions.
FIG. 5—Front access variation.
FIG. 6—Vehicle with aerodynamic shell removed showing protective structure and to show seats moved for access.
FIG. 7—Placeholders showing motorist positions on seats arranged for riding.
FIG. 8—Aerodynamic shell with opening parts.
FIG. 9—Rear side access.
FIG. 10—Top hinging variation.
FIG. 11—Integrated wheel variation.
The embodiment design is part of a project to adapt airship research to the automotive field. Airship research carried out prior to WWII provides a high performance aerodynamic body shape that is here used as a carriage to enclose persons riding in the automobile. Wind tunnel tests were carried out in those years producing air drag force measurement data that can be used to design this high efficiency automobile. This data is especially complete for the USS Akron shape, even including drag force data for the model at a variety of pitch angles. For vehicle speeds of interest the drag force can be quite accurately determined, especially for data from one of the models that is approximately the same as the intended automobile, that data being reported by H. B. Freeman, Force Measurements on a 1/40-scale model of the U.S. Airship “Akron”, NACA Report No. 432, 1932.
This airship is a highly refined version of the general shape known as a body of revolution having its axis aligned with the car's travel direction. To make such a form large enough to give adequate head room for a large person, a width is needed that is somewhat more than half the width of an ordinary car. Rather than work to make this car thinner, it was decided to take advantage of the side space to make a product that would be as safe as possible. Building in a strong protective side structure was thus seen as an important design objective. However, this protection would be significantly degraded by cutting it to make side door openings.
There are obvious limits to car length, but there is more flexibility here than there is in car width if aerodynamic drag is a primary concern. Thus, the fore and aft crumple zones can be made significantly large, and there is still some opportunity to provide for access through such zones, while retaining substantial crumple zone protection.
The carriage 1 is an aerodynamic shell 1 having an outer surface shaped to minimize aerodynamic drag on the carriage 1 when traveling as indicated by motion vector 10. This carriage 1 is fitted with an access ramp 2 that is shown in lowered position 2, along with a cut-out of the shell that makes an opening in the carriage 1 bottom. The carriage 1 is also fitted with a roof top 3 that is shown in a tipped up position 3.
Protective rear structure 4 within the shell 1 is connected to side structure which is connected to the wheel system 5 by supporting structure 67 that serves to elevate the aerodynamic shell 1 above the roadway 16 to an indicated elevation height 15. The supporting structure 67 acts to distinctly separate the wheel system 5 from the elevated aerodynamic shell 1. The indicated elevation height 15 is above the top of wheels as indicated 68. Placeholders 6, 7 show provisions for seating of two motorists in tandem. Access pathway indicating arrow 14 shows the rear entry path up the ramp 2. As motorists walk upwards to higher positions, the top opening gives increasing head clearance height. The intended forward travel direction is indicated by the arrow 10.
When the top 3 is open it leaves a cut-out opening 98 that is exactly closed when the top 3 closes. The surface piece that is cut out of the opening is indicated the same as the top 3.
An equivalent embodiment shown in
Returning to the initial example embodiment,
Examples with variations have been here provided to show the invention with some of its equivalents. The scope of the invention is to be determined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1501530 | Driggs | Jul 1924 | A |
1872845 | Sullivan | Aug 1932 | A |
2262762 | Hicks | Nov 1941 | A |
2384997 | Hansson | Sep 1945 | A |
2517509 | Sikorsky | Aug 1950 | A |
2577385 | Troendle | Dec 1951 | A |
2668027 | Burnelli | Feb 1954 | A |
2781226 | Walter | Feb 1957 | A |
2923494 | Strong | Feb 1960 | A |
2953322 | Lewis | Sep 1960 | A |
3128068 | Pauli | Apr 1964 | A |
3576300 | Palfreyman | Apr 1971 | A |
4201412 | Williams et al. | May 1980 | A |
4437698 | Tantalo | Mar 1984 | A |
4625825 | Ethier | Dec 1986 | A |
4841871 | Leibowitz | Jun 1989 | A |
5116069 | Miller | May 1992 | A |
5137413 | Ressler | Aug 1992 | A |
5201478 | Wooley | Apr 1993 | A |
5401055 | Pham | Mar 1995 | A |
5584369 | Makino et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5626310 | Kelly | May 1997 | A |
5908217 | Englar | Jun 1999 | A |
6123295 | Wexler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6792872 | Valdespino | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6908128 | Strong | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7131613 | Kelly | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7303037 | Yatagai et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20070018037 | Perlo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080295595 | Tacklind et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014585 | Gygax | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044991 | Bullis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100060030 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |