The present subject matter relates to ammunition articles with plastic components such as cartridge casing bodies, and, more particularly, a two-piece insert used with the plastic cartridges.
It is well known in the industry to manufacture projectiles and corresponding cartridge cases from either brass or steel. Typically, industry design calls for materials that are strong enough to withstand extreme operating pressures and which can be formed into a cartridge case to hold the projectile, while simultaneously resist rupturing during the firing process.
Conventional ammunition typically includes four basic components, that is, the projectile, the cartridge case holding the projectile therein, a propellant used to push the projectile down the barrel at predetermined velocities, and a primer, which provides the spark needed to ignite the propellant which sets the projectile in motion down the barrel.
The cartridge case is typically formed from brass and is configured to hold the projectile therein to create a predetermined resistance, which is known in the industry as bullet pull. The cartridge case is also designed to contain the propellant media as well as the primer. However, brass is heavy, expensive, and potentially hazardous. For example, the weight of .50 caliber ammunition is about 60 pounds per box (200 cartridges plus links).
The cartridge case, which is typically metallic, acts as a payload delivery vessel and can have several body shapes and head configurations, depending on the caliber of the ammunition. Despite the different body shapes and head configurations, all cartridge cases have a feature used to guide the cartridge case, with a projectile held therein, into the chamber of the gun or firearm.
The primary objective of the cartridge case is to hold the projectile, primer, and propellant therein until the gun is fired. Upon firing of the gun, the cartridge case seals the chamber to prevent the hot gases from escaping the chamber in a rearward direction and harming the shooter. The empty cartridge case is extracted manually or with the assistance of gas or recoil from the chamber once the gun is fired.
One of the difficulties with polymer ammunition is having enough strength to withstand the pressures of the gases generated during firing. In some instances, the polymer may have the requisite strength, but be too brittle at cold temperatures, and/or too soft at very hot temperatures. Additionally, the spent cartridge is extracted at its base, and that portion must withstand the extraction forces generated from everything from a bolt action rifle to a machine gun.
A number of U.S. patents and applications by Padgett, see above, disclose a single metal insert with a one or two piece polymer cartridge case. The two-piece case facilitates the manufacturing of a bottleneck cartridge. Molding a polymer cartridge requires a “pin” to be inserted into a mold to form the polymer and then extracted. The wider diameter of the powder chamber of a standard bottleneck cartridge opposed to the diameter of the mouth makes it impossible to remove the molding pin. The two-piece design allows a pin to be inserted through the wider bottom to the narrower neck. The second piece of the cartridge can overmold the metal insert for maximum strength and the two polymer sections can be fused together. For a blank or subsonic polymer cartridge, the walls can be made straight from the mouth which eliminates the need for an internal diameter change.
Hence a need exists for a polymer casing that can perform as well as or better than the brass alternative. A further improvement is the base inserts to the polymer casings that are capable of withstanding all of the stresses and pressures associated with the loading, firing and extraction of the casing, while reducing manufacturing costs and maintaining strength.
Turning now to the concept of flash tubes, it is not new and is currently used in many large caliber weapon systems. The flash tube is essentially a tube that runs through the center of the cartridge from the primer pocket to the middle area of the case with the goal of enhancing the ignition of the propellant charge.
In large caliber weapons, the flash tube is often filled with an extremely fast burning propellant such as black powder. These flash tubes often have vents in multiple locations along the axis of the tube to ignite the powder in the cartridge at the same time resulting in better ignition.
In small caliber ammunition, the propellant volume is not significant enough to warrant the need for such a device. That said, research conducted during World War II and again in the 1970's using a flash tube vented only at the top showed that the ignition of the propellant in a 50 BMG case could be significantly improved.
During the 1930's, small arms expert Elmer Keith proposed that the use of a flash tube in small caliber ammunition could result in better performance. The concept can be reduced to this: igniting the powder column near the top of the cartridge would result in the powder burning top down thus keeping the propellant in the case instead of propelling it down the bore. By keeping the powder in the case until fully consumed, the heat of combustion would be better localized enhancing the burn and reducing the heat generated in the bore. This has the added benefit of reducing barrel erosion caused by the “sand blasting effect” of the powder granules being propelled down the bore. Using this pioneering technique, Mr. Keith was able to maintain the same velocity as the standard cartridge, yet peak chamber pressure was reduced by close to 10,000 PSI. He termed this method as Duplex Loading. This should not be confused with current use of the term which describes the use of one or more powders of varying burn rate stacked in a case.
The use of the flash tube is now better known as front or forward priming. Mr. Keith continued his testing and showed because the pressure had been reduced, he could increase the charge to get back to “normal” pressures resulting in substantial velocity increases.
During WWII, Mr Keith was called to Frankford Arsenal to work on the .50 caliber cartridge using his forward priming technique. Using this technique, Mr Keith was able to produce documented increases in velocity of 200 fps. Unfortunately due to the conflict at hand, the research was concluded as the army deemed that changes to an already extremely effective cartridge would be inadvisable at a time when maximum production was the primary goal. The work on the forward primed .50 caliber cartridge was essentially dropped and never really picked up again by the army.
Mr Keith continued his work on small caliber ammunition, employing his forward priming technique on the 30-06 cartridge and eventually forming a small ammunition company. Though the results of his efforts showed great promise, manufacturing processes kept the technique from the larger market.
Later in the 1970's, Richard Culver picked up where Mr. Keith left off and began testing forward priming as well as duplex and triplex loading. I will not cover the research associated with duplex and triplex loading due to the fact that the results can have disastrous effects, but Mr. Culver's testing of the forward priming confirmed Mr Keith's earlier work conclusively.
Culver used the 30-06 and 7.62 NATO cartridges for his study. He produced cases using a flash tube very similar to what Mr Keith described. Culver created a very detailed experimental study to test the effects of a flash tube in small caliber ammunition. His work was based on the concepts that Mr Keith has postulated, that the forward priming had two significant benefits. The first is directing the primer blast toward the base of the projectile and the second being the ignition of the top of the powder charge first. The initial primer blast propels the projectile into the bore, sealing it, before the charge is ignited thus increasing the volume prior to ignition. This has the effect of reducing the peak pressure. In conventionally loaded ammunition, the charge is ignited from the rear forward resulting in much of the charge burning prior to any movement of the projectile.
The results of Mr Culver's experiments confirmed that forward priming of a 7.62 cartridge significantly reduced the peak pressures for a given load. He furthered the testing to increase the pressure back to normal by increasing the load and was able to gain an additional 100 fps while maintaining normal pressures.
Mr Culver proposed that these benefits could be extremely beneficial in machine gun use where the reduced barrel temperatures could allow for longer strings of firing without damaging the barrel. The reduced erosion could also increase barrel life. In his closing, he recommended that the 300 Win Mag cartridge was an ideal cartridge for further studying this technique due to is volume to bore diameter ratio. Some examples of forward primed brass cartridges are illustrated in
The examples of the present invention for a high strength polymer-based cartridge casing can include an upper polymer component, molded from a polymer. The upper component has a first end having a mouth, at least a wall between the first end and a second end of the upper component opposite the first end, an overlap portion extending from the wall near the second end. An upper insert is included and has a first end and an opposing second end, a molded area disposed approximate the first end, that engages the overlap portion to join the upper polymer component and the upper insert, and an insert engagement area disposed approximate to the second end. Further, a lower insert has a front end and a back end, an upper insert engagement area engaging with the insert engagement area, a rim and groove disposed around an outside of the lower insert, and a primer pocket disposed inside the back end. Lastly, a flash hole is inside the lower insert and communicates between the primer pocket and upper polymer component.
Another example of a high strength polymer-based cartridge casing has an upper polymer component, molded from a polymer, with a first end having a mouth, at least a wall between the first end and a second end of the upper component opposite the first end, a volume inside the wall at least partially forming a propellant chamber, and an overlap portion extending from the wall near the second end. Then an upper insert has a first end and an opposing second end with a molded area disposed approximate the first end that engages the overlap portion to join the upper polymer component and the upper insert. An insert engagement area is disposed approximate to the second end. A lower insert has a front end and a back end with an upper insert engagement area engaging with the insert engagement area, a rim and groove disposed around an outside of the lower insert, a primer pocket disposed inside the back end, and a flash hole, inside the lower insert and communicating between the primer pocket and upper polymer component. Additionally included is a flash tube in fluid communication with the primer pocket and the propellant chamber.
The file of this patent contains at least one drawing executed in color. Color drawings are necessary because color is an integral part of the claimed design. Copies of this patent with color drawings will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The drawing figures depict one or more implementations in accord with the present teachings, by way of example only, not by way of limitation. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The present example provides a cartridge case body strong enough to withstand gas pressures that equal or surpass the strength required of brass cartridge cases under certain conditions, e.g. for both storage and handling. At the same time, the cartridge can be easily produced and still maintain surpass brass cartridges.
Referring now to
The polymer used is lighter than brass. A high impact polymer can be used where the glass content is between 0%-50%. An example of an impact modified polymer is polyetherimide (PEI). Further examples include using polysulfones (PSU), polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), siloxane, polycarbonates, and any co-polymers, alloys or blends of the above.
The upper and lower inserts 300, 400 can be made of brass or steel, and, in examples, stainless steel. The nature of the features allows examples of the insert to be made of “softer” steel. Other examples use heat treated carbon steel, 4140. The 4140 steel has a rating on the Rockwell “C” scale (“RC”) hardness of about 20 to about 50. However, any carbon steel with similar properties, other metals, metal alloys or metal/non-metal alloys can be used to form the inserts.
In an example, the upper component 200 is made of high impact polymer combined with the inserts 300, 400 made of brass or steel that result in a cartridge that is approximately 50% lighter than a brass formed counterpart. This weight savings in the unloaded cartridge produces a loaded cartridge of between 25%-30% lighter than the loaded brass cartridge depending on the load used, i.e. which projectile, how much powder, and type of powder used.
The propellant is typically a solid chemical compound in powder form commonly referred to as smokeless powder. Propellants are selected such that when confined within the cartridge case, the propellant burns at a known and predictably rapid rate to produce the desired expanding gases. The expanding gases of the propellant provide the energy force that launches the projectile from the grasp of the cartridge case 100 and propels the projectile down the barrel of the gun at a known and relatively high velocity.
Turning to
The body 202 includes a wall 214 having a thickness T. The upper component second end 212 has an overlap portion 216, which is the portion of the upper component 200 that engages the upper insert 300. The overlap portion 216 has a thinner wall thickness t, or a second thickness, at the second end 212 than the thickness T of the wall 214 before the overlap portion 216. In examples, this can be an average second thickness as the overlap portion 216 can have bands 218 which can vary the height (see below).
As illustrated in
The undermolded area 304, in an example, can include one or more keys (not illustrated). The keys can be flat surfaces on the ridges 306 that can prevent the upper insert 300 and the upper portion 200 from rotating in relation to one another, i.e. the upper insert 300 twisting around in the upper portion 200. Keys are only an example thereof, and other methods can be used to prevent the relative rotation of the two parts. Other examples can be any surface changes, i.e. dimples, teeth, etc., that perform the same non-rotational function.
The upper insert 300 also has a second end 308 with an insert engagement area 310. The insert engagement area 310 can be the area of the upper insert 300 that engages the lower insert 400. An example of the second end 308 of the upper insert 300 can also have a bevel 312 to ease the insertion of the lower insert 400 into the second end 308.
Further, the insert engagement area 310 has a thickness Ti and this can be equal to or about equal to the wall thickness T of the body wall 214 (T≈Ti) and is greater than the undermolded area thickness ti (Ti>ti). This allows the upper component 200 and the upper insert 300 to be molded in the same mold with the same pin so as the pin can be easily extracted from the second ends 212, 308. If the upper insert engagement area thickness Ti is greater than the body wall thickness T (Ti>T) then the molding pin cannot either properly enter or be extracted from this portion of the molded cartridge. Further to the concept of molding pin insertion, in examples, no barrier can be formed along the length of the upper portion 200. The body 202 can be hollow and uninterrupted from the mouth 208 to the second end 212.
In comparing all of the thicknesses, the examples focus on the wall thickness T, the upper insert engagement area thickness Ti, the overlap portion wall thickness t, and the undermolded (overmolded) area thickness ti. As described above, one object of the invention is to allow molding a bottleneck polymer cartridge 100 with a single molding pin removed from the second ends 212, 308. Thus, the sum of the overlap portion wall thickness t and the undermolded area thickness ti should not exceed either the wall thickness T or the upper insert engagement area thickness Ti. In mathematical terms T≈Ti≈(t+ti). The values can be exactly equal, or within enough tolerances to allow the molding pin to be inserted on the inside for molding, and the outside dimensions allow the cartridge to be chambered in a weapon chambered for the particular caliber.
Said differently, that the discussions of examples of thicknesses herein are how thick the interior segments of the element are. The outside dimensions on the cartridge case 100 are typically within the tolerances of cases for a particular caliber projectile.
Turning to the insert 400, as illustrated in
The insert 400 includes an upper insert engagement area 408, where the insert engagement area 310 engages the insert 400. The upper insert engagement area 408 can be smooth, have one or more ridges, threads, snaps, etc. 410. The upper insert engagement area 408 allows for a metal-on-metal connection between the upper and lower inserts 300, 400. This connection can be bonded (e.g., adhesives, welds, etc.) and/or mechanical (e.g., friction fit, snap, threading, interference fit, press fit, etc.) or any other metal-on-metal bonding known to those of ordinary skill. The strength of this bond is most important during the extraction of the cartridge from the firearm by an extractor (not illustrated).
The upper insert engagement area 408 can also include a polymer engagement area 412. The polymer engagement area 412 can be any structure that further engages the polymer of the body wall 214. In one example, the engagement can be at the overlap portion 216. This polymer engagement area 412 can add to the strength of maintaining the lower insert 400 engaged with the cartridge 100. Also, the polymer engagement area 412 can prevent the insert 400 and the upper component 200 from rotating in relation to one another, i.e. the insert 400 twisting around. Keys are only an example thereof, and other methods can be used to prevent the relative rotation of the two parts. Other examples can be any surface changes, i.e. dimples, teeth, etc., that perform the same non-rotational function.
Furthermore, the polymer engagement area 412 “pinches” against the overlap portion 216 and can act as a gasket, preventing gases from getting between the polymer of the body 202 and the upper component 300. This gasket effect keeps the polymer that flows into undermolded area 304 from separating away from the insert engagement area 310.
In another example, below the upper insert engagement area 408, toward the back end 402, is a self reinforced area 414. This portion extends to the back end 402 of the lower insert 400 and includes the extraction groove 404 and rim 406. The self reinforced area 414 must, solely by the strength of its materials, withstand the forces exerted by the pressures generated by the gasses when firing the projectile and the forces generated by the extractor. In the present example, the self reinforced area 414 withstands these forces because it is made of a heat treated metal or a metal/non-metal alloy.
Forward of the primer pocket 416 is a flash hole 418. Again, the flash hole 418 is dimensioned according to the standards for the caliber of the cartridge case and intended use. The flash hole 418 allows the explosive force of the primer, seated in the primer pocket 418, to communicate with the upper component 200.
In another example, forward of the primer pocket 416 and inside the upper insert engagement area 408 can be a basin 420. The basin 420 is adjacent to and outside of the inner bowl 314 of the lower component 300. The basin 420 is bowl shaped, wherein the walls curve inwards toward the bottom. The bottom of the basin 420 is interrupted by the flash hole 418.
The example of
The present example can also use, either with or without providing headspacing, the belt 424 as stopping point of the upper insert engagement area 408. Another feature of the lower insert 400 is two ridges 410, to reduce the amount of the insert that is required to be upper insert engagement area 408 by the upper insert 300.
The belt 424 can also be used to stop the insertion of the lower insert 400 into the upper insert 300. The belt 424 can engage the bottom of the bevel 312 and act as a stop.
In examples, the upper and lower inserts 300, 400 engage around the inside of the upper 300 and the outside of the lower 400. The upper insert 300 does not contact, or act as an extension of, the flash hole 418.
All examples contemplate that the flash tube 500 can be preassembled to the lower insert 400 before the lower insert 400 is engaged to the upper insert 300 or assembled after engagement. Additionally, the flash tube 500 can be manufactured directly into the lower insert 400, removing extra assembly steps.
As noted above, the use of a flash tube 500 can reduce the amount of propellant needed to generate a given pressure in comparison to the amount of propellant needed without the tube 500. This allows for different configurations where more propellant is used (to fill the propellant chamber 203) to increase pressures and increase the velocity of the discharged projectile. Alternately, the size of the propellant chamber can be reduced to accommodate the reduced propellant load. These reductions can extend to not only typical ammunition, but blank and subsonic ammunition, reducing the propellant load even further. See, at least U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,763,535 and 9,003,973, which are incorporated herein by reference.
While the foregoing has described what are considered to be the best mode and/or other examples, it is understood that various modifications may be made therein and that the subject matter disclosed herein may be implemented in various forms and examples, and that the teachings may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein. It is intended by the following claims to claim any and all applications, modifications and variations that fall within the true scope of the present teachings.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/482,068 filed Apr. 7, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/319,609 filed Apr. 7, 2016. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/482,068 filed Apr. 7, 2017 is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/043,026 filed Feb. 12, 2016, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/531,124 filed Nov. 3, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,261,335 issued Feb. 16, 2016, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/865,040 filed Apr. 17, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,633 issued Nov. 4, 2014, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,607 filed Jan. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,443,730 issued May 21, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,170 filed Jan. 14, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/509,337 filed Jul. 19, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/532,044 filed Sep. 7, 2011 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/555,684 filed Nov. 4, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/482,068 filed Apr. 7, 2017 is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/187,421 filed Jun. 20, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,995,561 issued Jun. 12, 2018, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/642,922 filed Mar. 10, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,372,054 issued Jun. 21, 2016, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/315,564 filed Jun. 26, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,003,973 issued Apr. 14, 2015, which is Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/549,351 filed Jul. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,763,535 issued Jul. 1, 2014, which is Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,585, filed Jan. 13, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,170 filed Jan. 14, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/482,068 filed Apr. 7, 2017 is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/463,906 filed Mar. 20, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,989,343 issued Jun. 5, 2018, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/482,843 filed Sep. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,443 issued Mar. 21, 2017. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/482,843 filed Sep. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,443 issued Mar. 21, 2017, is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/865,040 filed Apr. 17, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,633 issued Nov. 4, 2014, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,607 filed Jan. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,443,730 issued May 21, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,170 filed Jan. 14, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/509,337 filed Jul. 19, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/532,044 filed Sep. 7, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/555,684 filed Nov. 4, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/482,843 filed Sep. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,443 issued Mar. 21, 2017 is also a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/460,877 filed Aug. 15, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,194,680 issued Nov. 24, 2015, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/836,192 filed Mar. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,807,008 issued Aug. 19, 2014, which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,607 filed Jan. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,443,730 issued May 21, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,170 filed Jan. 14, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/509,337 filed Jul. 19, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/532,044 filed Sep. 7, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/555,684 filed Nov. 4, 2011 U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/482,843 filed Sep. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,443 issued Mar. 21, 2017 is also a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,585, filed Jan. 13, 2012, claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,170 filed Jan. 14, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/482,843 filed Sep. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,599,443 issued Mar. 21, 2017 is also a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/041,709 filed Sep. 30, 2013, which is a Continuation of Ser. No. 12/847,319 filed Jul. 30, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,573,126 issued Nov. 3, 2013. All of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62319609 | Apr 2016 | US | |
61433170 | Jan 2011 | US | |
61509337 | Jul 2011 | US | |
61532044 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61555684 | Nov 2011 | US | |
61433170 | Jan 2011 | US | |
61443170 | Feb 2011 | US | |
61509337 | Jul 2011 | US | |
61532044 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61555684 | Nov 2011 | US | |
61433170 | Jan 2011 | US | |
61509337 | Jul 2011 | US | |
61532044 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61555684 | Nov 2011 | US | |
61433170 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13865040 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14531124 | US | |
Parent | 13350607 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13865040 | US | |
Parent | 13549351 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14315564 | US | |
Parent | 13350607 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13865040 | US | |
Parent | 13836192 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14460877 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15482068 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 17550636 | US | |
Parent | 14531124 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15043026 | US | |
Parent | 14642922 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15187421 | US | |
Parent | 14315564 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 14642922 | US | |
Parent | 13865040 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14482843 | US | |
Parent | 14460877 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14482843 | US | |
Parent | 13350585 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14482843 | US | |
Parent | 14041709 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14482843 | US | |
Parent | 12847319 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 14041709 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15043026 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15482068 | US | |
Parent | 15187421 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15482068 | US | |
Parent | 13350585 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13549351 | US | |
Parent | 15463906 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 15482068 | US | |
Parent | 14482843 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15463906 | US | |
Parent | 13350607 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13836192 | US |