The present disclosure pertains generally to firearms. In particular the present disclosure describes and explains the construction and use of a two-stage, drop-in trigger assembly, for M4/M16 (AR) firearms, which is compliant with what is described herein as the “European Standard”.
The “European Standard”, as used herein, requires that the safety selector must allow selection to the “SAFE” position when the hammer is in the upright or “as fired” condition. This upright condition of the hammer is also described herein as being an up/forward position. Once in this position it is desired that the bolt carrier be allowed to fully retract thereby cocking the hammer, without damaging any components of the trigger assembly. The European Standard requires a trigger assembly construction which is different from those constructions normally built for US produced M4/M16 (AR) firearms.
One prior art construction for a trigger assembly required the hammer to keep the trigger depressed when the hammer is in the upright position. This construction effectively prevents the safety selector from being turned to the “SAFE” position. This prior art construction is common for US produced M4/M16 (AR) platform rifles. Newer prior art trigger assembly constructions allow the safety to be set to “SAFE” with the hammer in the upright position. However, importantly these trigger assembly constructions are of the single stage, non-adjustable style.
In order to be compliant with the European Standard for a two-stage trigger assembly for the AR platform, the safety selector must be able to be placed into the “SAFE” position when the hammer is forward in the upright (fired) position. The present disclosure is directed to a novel and unobvious two-stage, drop-in trigger assembly which conforms to and is compliant with the European Standard. As used herein, the referenced drop-in style of trigger assembly is also described as a non-adjustable style of trigger assembly.
As further background for the present disclosure, the field of the present disclosure encompasses trigger assemblies for AR platform rifles. There are two basic classes of construction which include single-stage and two-stage. Each of these classes of construction is further divided into adjustable and non-adjustable subclasses.
A single-stage trigger assembly includes a sear notch which is below the hammer pivot axis. The radius to the release point of the hammer is typically approximately 0.30 inches (7.62 mm) from the hammer pivot axis. The hammer spring applies a torque to the hammer which develops a force at this radius which is relatively high. Accordingly, the single-stage trigger assembly is noted for having a long pull requiring considerable pressure on the trigger in order to fire the weapon. This trigger pull is usually notable for several starts and stops as the trigger pulls through this arc and this is commonly referred to as “creep”.
There is a subclass of single-stage trigger assemblies known as adjustable single-stage trigger assemblies which provides a method of reducing the amount of sear engagement by means of a block of some kind that can be adjusted by the user of the firearm (i.e. shooter) or a gunsmith. This provides a shorter trigger pull but typically without reducing the amount of trigger pressure required to fire the firearm. The hammer has a cam which keeps the trigger rotated when the hammer is in the upright or fired position. This effectively prohibits the rotation of the safety selector to the “SAFE” position.
A two-stage trigger assembly includes a construction where the sear surface on the hammer is relocated to an overhanging appendage which is typically at a radius of approximately 0.77 inches (1.96 cm) from the hammer pivot axis. Assuming use of the same hammer spring in the two-stage construction as used in the single-stage construction, there is a lower spring force which is developed. More specifically, the force developed at the sear surface is 0.3/0.77 or approximately 39% of the force of a typical single-stage trigger assembly.
A lower force at the sear surface reduces the amount or level of friction required to separate the hammer sear surface from the trigger sear surface thus requiring less trigger pressure to fire the weapon. The disconnector (also known as the rear hook) for a two-stage trigger assembly is given a second task. This rear hook is brought to bear against the backside of the hammer's overhanging appendage just prior to the hammer's release. This is felt as a second stage to the trigger pull which somewhat increases the amount of trigger pressure required to be applied to the trigger in order to release the hammer.
Because there is very little movement of the trigger required to accomplish this movement, the user of the firearm (i.e. the shooter) can simply pull the trigger to the second stage then hold it there until the shooter is ready to fire the weapon, thereby allowing for more accurate site position at the instant of firing. There is a subclass that is an adjustable two-stage trigger assembly wherein the shooter or his gunsmith can adjust a specific set of parts to have an even more precise amount of second-stage engagement.
It would be an improvement to the current state-of-the-art of two-stage, drop-in trigger assemblies if these constructions could be made compliant with the European Standard. This compliance requires that the construction enable the safety selector to be placed in the “SAFE” position when the hammer is forward in the upright (fired) position.
The present disclosure pertains generally to trigger assemblies for M4/M16 (AR) platform firearms. More particularly the present disclosure pertains generally to two-stage, drop-in trigger assemblies which are compliant with the European Standard. As described herein, the European Standard requires that the safety selector is able to be placed in the “SAFE” position when the hammer is in the upright or “as fired” condition.
A starting point for the conception and design work which resulted in the construction of the present disclosure was to consider the design and components of earlier constructions related to a military “BURST” trigger assembly. As part of this earlier design work it was learned that removal of the “BURST” actuator provided a place or location in which to mount a front hook for interfacing with a new hammer. The new hammer construction included an overhanging appendage with a new sear surface. The front hook was offset from the center of the trigger and required an overhanging portion for a sufficient sear engagement surface.
Following this earlier design work it was envisioned that the design of the front hook could be changed so as to allow it to rotate just enough to allow the hammer to move the front hook of the trigger assembly out of the way. This in turn would then allow recocking of the hammer when the trigger's rotation was impaired by having the safety selector being placed in the “SAFE” condition.
As a further aspect of the present disclosure, the trigger assembly is constructed and arranged so as to not require the trigger to be depressed when the hammer is in the upright position. As a result, the disclosed construction allows the safety selector to be engaged and for the hammer to be recocked with the safety selector in the “SAFE” position. This construction is thereby compliant with the European Standard.
In order to provide a preferred drop-in or non-adjustable trigger assembly construction, it was desired to design the parts such that they were relatively insensitive to manufacturing tolerances. This was accomplished by having the surface on the front hook which contacts the trigger and thus controls the relative position of the front hook to the trigger to be at a considerable distance from the front hook pivot axis compared to prior art structures. In the design which is represented by the present disclosure this distance was set at approximately 1.16 inches (2.95 cm). The radius from the front hook pivot axis to the actual sear surface is approximately 0.38 inches (9.65 mm). Accordingly a manufacturing tolerance of +/−0.006 inches (0.152 mm) at the contact point only moves the sear surface approximately +/−0.002 inches (0.051 mm). Maintaining the front hook position relative to the trigger enables standard manufacturing tolerances with minimal change to the hook position relative to other fire control components.
A further aspect of the disclosed trigger assembly is the relocation of the front hook spring to a position ahead of the trigger pivot axis. A related construction aspect is to allow the front hook to pivot up to 8.5 degrees but only when the hammer must move by the front hook when the trigger is prevented from rotating by the safety selector. At all other times the front hook remains stationary to the trigger. A standard disconnector spring is used under the front hook to allow sufficient force to be applied to the front hook in order to prevent it from moving under severe shock loadings (normally associated with drop-testing of the firearm).
By constructing and arranging the front hook for pivoting about the trigger pivot axis, the center of mass of the front hook is kept close to its center rotation thereby preventing shock loadings from developing a level of force which could lead to the front hook losing contact with the sear surface of the hammer under these shock loadings. The disclosed construction is relatively insensitive to manufacturing tolerances by having long parts instead of short parts. Having the front hook bridge the disconnector (rear hook) also enhances the stability of the front hook during trigger pull.
In many triggers, if the operator holds the trigger in a depressed position through the reload cycle, the operator can experience a forward counter force applied to the pull surface of the trigger due to the hammer impacting the rear hook, which often would compress the spring between the trigger and the rear hook to the spring's stack height causing some portion of the impact to be transmitted through the trigger to the operator's finger depressing the trigger. This has been referred to as “trigger slap.” Conversely, holding the trigger of the disclosed trigger and hammer group in the depressed position during the reload cycle resulted in a significant reduction and even elimination of felt trigger slap.
For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the claimed invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the claimed invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the claimed invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the claimed invention relates. One embodiment of the claimed invention is shown in great detail, although it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that some features that are not relevant to the present claimed invention may not be shown for the sake of clarity.
With respect to the specification and claims, it should be noted that the singular forms “a”, “an”, “the”, and the like include plural referents unless expressly discussed otherwise. As an illustration, references to “a device” or “the device” include one or more of such devices and equivalents thereof. It also should be noted that directional terms, such as “left”, “right”, “up”, “down”, “top”, “bottom”, and the like, are used herein solely for the convenience of the reader in order to aid in the reader's understanding of the illustrated embodiments, and it is not the intent that the use of these directional terms in any manner limit the described, illustrated, and/or claimed features to a specific direction and/or orientation.
Referring to
Receiver 20 is constructed and arranged in a manner which is generally consistent with and M4/M16 (AR) platform, modified if or as necessary to accommodate trigger assembly 22 and to enable the use of trigger assembly 22 in the intended manner. Included as a part of receiver 20 is a safety selector 24 which is constructed and arranged in the typical manner so as to have a “SAFE” position (see
With continued reference to
As would be understood from the shapes, dimensions, positioning and assembly of the component parts of trigger assembly 22, see
With continued reference to
With reference to the firearm condition which is illustrated in
The trigger 28 rotates about the axis of the pivot bushing 36 and this in turn causes the front hook 30 to rotate in a CW direction about the axis of the pivot bushing 36. As the right side of the front hook 30 acts on spring 34, the rear hook 32 rotates in a CW direction about the axis of pivot bushing 36. With the abutment surface 48 moved out of the way, the safety selector 24 does not inhibit or prevent this described rotation of the trigger 28, the front hook 30 and the rear hook 32.
With reference to
Further rotation of the trigger 28 (trigger pull) results in the rear hook 32 remaining in the illustrated position (i.e. generally stationary) against the hammer 26 while other components of the trigger assembly, notably the trigger 28 and the front hook 30, continue to rotate in a CW direction about the axis of pivot bushing 36.
During the second stage of a two-stage trigger assembly, the spring 34 is compressed by the continued CW rotation of the front hook 30 and the generally stationary condition of the rear hook 32 due to its abutment against (i.e. engagement with) abutment surface 52 of the hammer 26. As the spring 34 is compressed, the reacting force creates an increased force against trigger pull due to needing to compress spring 34 to move front hook 30 with rear hook 32 resisting that movement thereby requiring a greater force to pull or rotate the trigger 28. As a result, the second stage of movement of trigger assembly 22 requires a higher pull force, but only for a relatively short travel distance. The safety selector 24 does not inhibit or prevent the trigger assembly 22 from progressing through both of these described stages when in the “FIRE” position (setting).
With continued reference to
With reference to
First, with the hammer 26 in the illustrated up/forward position (see
Compliance with the European Standard by trigger assembly 22 is enabled in part by a change in the design of the front hook 30. This change in design of its shape and dimensions allows the front hook to rotate just enough to allow the hammer 26 to move front hook 30 out of the way to allow recocking of the hammer 26 when the trigger 28 rotation would otherwise be impaired or blocked by having the safety selector 24 in the “SAFE” position. A further feature of trigger assembly 22 relates to the design of trigger 28. Trigger 28 has been designed so as to not require the trigger 28 to be depressed when the hammer 26 is in the up/forward position (see
A related design feature of the disclosed embodiment is to relocate the spring 34 to a position to the right of (i.e. ahead of) the trigger pivot (i.e. the axis of pivot bushing 36) and to allow the front hook 30 to pivot up to approximately 8.5 degrees. This permitted rotation of the front hook 30 would only be enabled when the hammer 26 must move by the front hook 30 when the trigger 28 is prevented from rotating due to the safety selector 24 being placed in the “SAFE” position. At all other times the front hook 30 remains stationary with or to the trigger 28.
Disconnector spring 34 positioned under the front hook 30, as illustrated in the drawings, applies sufficient force to the front hook 30 to lessen any potential movement due to shock loading. Shock loading would typically occur during drop-testing of the corresponding firearm. Further, by having the front hook 30 pivot about the trigger pivot axis, i.e. the axis of pivot bushing 36, the design and construction of trigger assembly 22 keeps the center of mass of the front hook 30 relatively close to its axis of rotation. This construction helps to minimize or lessen any adverse effects of shock loading. One such adverse effect could be the front hook 30 losing contact with the sear surface 44 of hammer 26.
A further design feature of trigger assembly 22 pertains to the overall design concept for the component parts. Ideally these component parts would be relatively insensitive to manufacturing tolerances. This has been accomplished, at least in part, by shaping and dimensioning the front hook 30 such that the front hook surface which contacts the trigger 28, and thus controls the relative position of the front hook 30 to the trigger 28, be at a distance from the front hook pivot (pivot bushing 36) which lessens the effect of manufacturing tolerances. In the exemplary construction of trigger assembly 22, this distance of the contact point to the front hook pivot is approximately 1.16 inches (2.95 cm). The radius from the front hook pivot of pivot bushing 36 to sear surface 40 is approximately 0.38 inches (9.65 mm). As a result, and as one example, a manufacturing tolerance of +/−0.006 inches (0.152 mm) at the contact point only moves the sear surface 40 approximately +/−0.002 inches (0.05 mm). Maintaining the front hook 30 position relative to trigger 28 enables the use of standard manufacturing tolerances with only minimal effect on the front hook position relative to other fire control components.
With reference to
Various aspects of the present disclosure are set out in the following numbered clauses.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As best seen in
Hammer 180 is biased in a counter-clockwise direction by spring 190. Hammer 180 includes sear 185 and relief 184 proximate to sear 185. Sear 185 is operable with a conventional M16 trigger to hold hammer 180 in a cocked position. However, in the disclosed configuration, there is no complementary sear on trigger 130 as relief 137 removes such a sear. With the inclusion of sear 185, hammer 180 is operable with other trigger mechanisms such as a conventional M16 trigger.
As described above, sear surfaces 151 and 181 interlock when hammer 180 is in a cocked position. Pulling trigger 130 rotates trigger assembly 122 in a counter-clockwise direction against the biasing force of spring 191 until edge 182 abuts surface 173. At this point rear hook 170 resists further rotation in the counter-clockwise direction. Applicant of additional force to the trigger causes spring 192 to compress and increases a gap between front hook 150 and rear hook 170 until sear surfaces 151 and 181 release, at which point hammer 180 is rotated counter-clockwise under the basing force of spring 190.
The impact of hammer 180 on a firing pin (not illustrated) fires a bullet. As a result, a bolt carrier group (not illustrated) cycles to reload another round. The cycling bolt carrier group also pushes hammer 180 in a clockwise direction to be re-cocked. Edge 182 on clockwise moving hammer 180 first impacts surface 173 on rear hook 170, rotating rear hook 170 clockwise until edge 182 clears projection 172 at which point rear hook 170 rotates clockwise so that surface 174 captures surface 183. Once pressure is removed from trigger 130 so that it rotates clockwise back to the illustrated position, retention of hammer 180 transfers from surface 174 and surface 183 to sear surfaces 151 and 181.
During testing of trigger and hammer group 124, an unexpected improvement was identified. In many triggers, if the operator holds the trigger in a depressed position through the reload cycle, the operator can experience a forward counter force applied to the pull surface of the trigger due to the hammer impacting the rear hook, which often would compress the spring between the trigger and the rear hook to the spring's stack height causing some portion of the impact to be transmitted through the trigger to the operator's finger depressing the trigger. This has been referred to as “trigger slap.” Conversely, holding the trigger of trigger and hammer group 124 in the depressed position during the reload cycle resulted in a significant reduction and even elimination of felt trigger slap (compared to conventional two-stage M16 triggers). The illustrated configuration of the front hook and rear hook results in the hammer generating insignificant trigger slap during re-cocking of the hammer. For individuals who frequently shoot weapons with triggers that produce trigger slap, trigger slap can result in problems such as tendonitis and/or nerve damage. Eliminating trigger slap may be beneficial for some operators who experience such negative effects.
Testing the magnitude of the force exerted by the trigger during re-cocking found similar or even increased measured maximum force. Applicant theorizes that while the amount of maximum force is not reduced, the rate of change of force may be more gradual, resulting in a smaller resultant impulse of the trigger on the shooter's trigger finger that reduces the feeling of trigger slap.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
While the above triggers have been described in the context of use with M4/M16 type weapons, the disclosed trigger system could be readily modified to work with other types of weapons as well as other calibers of ammunition. For example, the disclosed trigger system could be used in weapons chambers for many different calibers, including, but not limited to, 9 mm, 10 mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .300 AAC Blackout, .308 Winchester, 7.62 mm×51 mm and 50 BMG.
While the present disclosure has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that a preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes, equivalents, and modifications that come within the spirit of the claimed invention defined by following claims are desired to be protected. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference and set forth in its entirety herein.
The language used in the claims and the written description and in the above definitions is to only have its plain and ordinary meaning, except for terms explicitly defined above. Such plain and ordinary meaning is defined here as inclusive of all consistent dictionary definitions from the most recently published (on the filing date of this document) general purpose Merriam-Webster dictionary.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/683,542 filed Nov. 14, 2019 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/280,574 filed Feb. 20, 2019, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,488,134 on Nov. 26, 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/632,590 filed Feb. 20, 2018, which are all hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2090656 | Williams | Aug 1937 | A |
2361519 | Williams | Oct 1944 | A |
2366823 | Williams | Jan 1945 | A |
2373213 | Williams | Apr 1945 | A |
2383487 | Johnson, Jr. | Aug 1945 | A |
2461670 | Williams | Feb 1949 | A |
3292492 | Sturtevant | Dec 1966 | A |
4004496 | Snodgrass | Jan 1977 | A |
4693169 | Beretta | Sep 1987 | A |
5012604 | Rogers | May 1991 | A |
5274939 | Scaramucci | Jan 1994 | A |
5501134 | Milazzo | Mar 1996 | A |
5881485 | Milazzo | Mar 1999 | A |
6131324 | Jewell | Oct 2000 | A |
6615527 | Martin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6772548 | Power | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6966138 | Deckard | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7293385 | McCormick | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331136 | Geissele | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7421937 | Gangl | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7600338 | Geissele | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7854084 | Rutherford | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7878106 | Hu | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7992335 | Gangl | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8220192 | Fluhr | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8667881 | Hawbaker | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8756847 | Huther | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8820211 | Hawbaker | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8826789 | Bagley | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8893607 | Audibert | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8985006 | Christensen | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9267751 | Ruiz | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9310150 | Geissele | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9618288 | Wilson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9618289 | Geissele | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9638485 | Geissele | May 2017 | B2 |
9835398 | Biegel | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9869522 | Larson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9927197 | Geissele | Mar 2018 | B1 |
10156410 | McKillips | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10393460 | Geissele | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10393461 | Fellows et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10488134 | Olson | Nov 2019 | B2 |
20030126781 | Herring | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050241470 | Hochstrate | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060086031 | Geissele | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070180984 | Huther | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090183414 | Geissele | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090188145 | Fluhr | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100281739 | Geissele | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20150068090 | Christensen | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150153125 | Lutton | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150233662 | Ruiz | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253095 | Wilson | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160010933 | Bonner | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018176 | Fellows et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160131449 | Horch | May 2016 | A1 |
20160161202 | Larue | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160178304 | Geissele | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170089655 | Geissele | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170138689 | Biegel | May 2017 | A1 |
20170299306 | Larson, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170299309 | Fellows et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170328663 | Fellows et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190257606 | Olson | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200132405 | Noonan | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
687221 | Mar 1967 | BE |
20201104556 | Aug 2012 | DE |
102014107620 | Feb 2015 | DE |
1530296 | Jun 1968 | FR |
WO 03076863 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of DE102014107620B3 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Oct. 9, 2015 (pp. 27). |
English translation of DE202011004556U1 by Lexis Nexis Total Patent on Oct. 9, 2015 (pp. 17). |
Heckler& Koch, “MR556A1 Operator's Manual,” Columbus, Georgia, Apr. 4, 2011. |
Knights Armament Company, “Knight's Manufacturing Description of the 2-stage trigger,” http://quarterbore.com/kac/kac2stage.html, dated Mar. 26, 2004 (downloaded Jan. 22, 2019). |
Machine translation of BE687221A by PatBase on Mar. 25, 2019 (pp. 21). |
Machine translation of FR1530296A by PatBase on Mar. 25, 2019 (pp. 14). |
Screenshort from Knights Armament Company website showing the Knight's Armament AR-15 Drop-In 2-Stage Match Trigger Kit, Semi-Auto 25926 on Sep. 26, 2019. |
Screenshort from Knights Armament Company website showing the Knight's Armament SR-15 IWS Lower Receiver Assembly on Sep. 26, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210254918 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62632590 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16683542 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 17096997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16280574 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 16683542 | US |