This invention relates to staged impingement cooling of a wall of a component. More particularly, this invention relates to staged cooling of an outer surface of the wall when the outer surface forms discrete pockets.
Gas turbine engine components that are subjected to high temperatures are often actively cooled in order to maintain the metal temperature within acceptable limits. Components that partially define a path for the hot combustion gasses are often cooled using impingement cooling of the cooled side and/or film cooling of the hot side. Impingement cooling may be accomplished using a structure with impingement cooling holes designed to direct cooling air onto the cooled side of the component. Manufacturing limitations and design considerations constrain the design of impingement cooling holes. For example, the impingement cooling holes must be sized to permit small particles typically present in the cooling air to pass through without clogging the impingement cooling hole. Additionally, the advantageous effects impingement cooling provides are limited to a relatively small area adjacent the location of impingement. Consequently, many impingement cooling holes are required in order to effectively cool an entire area of the component. Cooling air used for impingement cooling is taken from the gas turbine engine compressor and is redirected away from the combustor to be used in the impingement cooling system. When air is redirected from combustion and used for any other purpose, the engine efficiency is reduced. As a result, increasing the number of impingement cooling holes decreases engine efficiency. Further, the minimum size of the impingement cooling holes required to avoid clogging of the holes often produces a flow volume of impingement cooling air that has a greater capacity to remove heat from the component than is necessary. In other words, a greater volume of cooling fluid may be delivered to the surface to be cooled than is actually required to sufficiently cool the surface. This extra volume of air may not be fully utilized, yet has been taken from the combustor. As a result the combustor operates at reduced efficiency.
Often impingement cooling air is then utilized to provide film cooling on the hot surface of the component via a film cooling hole that delivers the post impingement cooling air to the hot gas path. This film of post-impingement cooling air separates the surface of the component from the hot combustion gasses, and this helps to keep the surface cooler. However, film cooling air may also negatively impact engine performance by slowing the flow of the combustion gasses and by imparting turbulence to the flow (e.g. mixing losses). Any extra volume of cooling fluid in excess of the minimum necessary to sufficiently cool the surface further increases the negative impacts of film cooling on engine performance.
These problems are exacerbated in certain gas turbine engine designs where the combustion gasses are accelerated to approximately mach 0.8 as they exit the combustor, as opposed to conventional designs where this happens upon entering the first stage of the turbine. In such designs, a static pressure difference across the wall of the component that defines the hot gas path is greater than in conventional designs because the hot combustion gasses inside the component are moving much faster. This increased static pressure difference forces more cooling air through the impingement cooling holes than in the conventional design. Further, the greater static pressure difference increases the mixing losses, further reducing engine efficiency. Therefore, there exists a need in the art for improved cooling of components exposed to high operating temperatures.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
An improved cooling system for components exposed to extreme high temperatures is disclosed herein. Such a component may be a component of an internal combustion engine, including a gas turbine engine. Various designs of such components may have pockets on the relatively cool side. These pockets may be there for structural strength or may be the result of other design considerations. An example, not meant to be limiting, of such a component is an advanced transition system that directs combustion gasses from a combustor to a first row of turbine blades. One such design is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,721,547. In this design combustion gasses are accelerated from the end of the combustor to approximately 0.8 mach. The increased speed of the combustion gasses within the duct creates a larger static pressure difference between outside the component and inside the component than exists in conventional transition designs where the combustion gasses are moving much slower. The advanced transition component may have a thin wall to increase cooling and reduce thermal stresses, and the cool side may have continuous raised ribs to increase structural strength to accommodate this increased pressure difference, as described in United States Patent application titled “A Method of Fabricating a Nearwall Nozzle Impingement Cooled Component for an Internal Combustion Engine”, by C. P Lee et al., filed Apr. 27, 2011, application Ser. No. 13/094,966. The raised ribs create relatively deep pockets throughout much, if not all, of the outer surface of the component. These pockets, particularly when relatively deep, pose a particular challenge in terms of cooling. Conventional cooling schemes have proven unsatisfactory for the advanced transition duct because many impingement cooling holes are needed to effectively distribute cooling air across the inner surface of the pocket. This great number of impingement cooling holes coupled with the increased pressure driving the cooling fluid through the impingement holes results in more cooling air being delivered than is actually needed to cool the component. The manufacturing limitations and clogging considerations prevent reducing the size of the cooling holes in order to reduce the flow volume.
The present inventors have devised a system that cools a component yet requires a reduced volume of cooling air when compared to conventional cooling schemes because the system takes advantage of more of the cooling capacity of the cooling air that is used. Using more of the cooling capacity of the cooling air means that less cooling air needs to be diverted from combustion and used to cool the component. Using less cooling air increases engine efficiency because less air is taken from the combustion process. Further, the reduced volume of cooling air means reduced aerodynamic losses associated with the mixing of the cooling air with the combustion gasses. The innovative system disclosed herein accomplishes the above using a structure that induces minimal thermal stress on the component. Some embodiments do so using a seal that improves as a temperature of the component increases. In some embodiments impingement cooling and film cooling cooperate with each other to more effectively cool the component.
The present cooling scheme stages the cooling of the wall by separating the outer surface to be cooled into a plurality of regions, and impingement cooling each region using the same cooling air in a series pathway. In this manner, a pressure drop large enough to throttle the flow to an acceptably low rate is provided without the need to use hole sizes that present a clogging concern, and each pressure drop is used to accomplish a heat transfer which combined is more effective in removing heat than would be a similar pressure drop accomplished with only a single impingement hole. In one embodiment the number of regions is two, but more regions are equally possible. In one embodiment this staging is accomplished by enclosing each structural pocket with a plate and then physically separating the inner surface of the structural pocket into a first region and the second region, where the cooling air enters the pocket through the first region and exits the pocket through the second region. This physical separation ensures that cooling air follows the series path cooling circuit as intended. In an embodiment the physical separation is achieved using an inner wall formed inside the structural pocket and integral to the component, where the inner wall forms an inner pocket inside the structural pocket, and a cap is placed on the inner wall. In an embodiment the cap forms a seal with the inner wall and includes impingement cooling holes; however a seal is not necessary. This design creates a cooling circuit with a first stage and a second stage within the pocket.
Cooling air is directed through at least one impingement cooling hole in the plate and onto the surface of the wall within the first region. That cooling air then travels through at least one impingement cooling hole in the cap and impinges on the surface of the wall within the second region. The spent impingement cooling air then exits the pocket, such as through a film cooling hole to form a cooling film on an inner side of the wall. In this manner, the cooling air flow is directed to impinge upon the surface of the wall not once, but twice within each pocket. Each impingement as well as the film cooling hole accomplishes a drop in the pressure of the cooling air and also accomplishes a heat transfer from the wall to the cooling air. Because the total pressure drop is distributed among the several heat transfers, each pressure drop can be accomplished with a respective hole size that is large enough to pass a design basis particle size without clogging of the cooling holes in the flow path.
Conventional cooling schemes that introduce structures to cool the component may also introduce thermal stress on the component. For example, when the cooling structure is fixed to the component and each has a different thermal expansion due to temperature differences, thermal stresses may result. These thermal stresses may decrease a service life of the components. The design disclosed herein avoids these unwanted thermal stresses by thermally and mechanically decoupling the cap from the inner wall. A mechanical joint between the inner wall and cap holds the cap in place yet permits the cap to expand and contract with respect to the inner wall. Some embodiments take advantage of the thermal mismatch to improve a seal between the inner wall and the cap at operating temperatures of the component. In particular, the cap is thermally and mechanically decoupled from an upper end of the inner wall so the upper end of the inner wall is free to move with respect to the abutting surface of the cap. This decoupling may improve service life of the component and improve seal-dependent operation.
Further, such conventional cooling schemes may be formed integral to the component. This may require complicated casting and core removal techniques. However, the present invention does not require these techniques. Instead, the cooling structures may be readily fabricated using sheet metal, or any similar structure. This represents a particular advantage given that some components may have as many as thousands of the structural pockets that require cooling.
Turning to the drawings,
The cooling system takes advantage of various pressures P1, P2, P3, and P4 to ensure the cooling air 34 flows optimally. Pressure P1 is greatest, and pressure gradually decreases from P2 to P3 to P4. Plate 14 serves to decrease the pressure from P1 to P2, and thereby regulates the flow of cooling air 34. The size of plate impingement cooling holes 16 may vary as design requires, as does the size of cap impingement cooling holes 20. Together they must be sized to deliver sufficient air to accomplish the required cooling of both stages. Ideally they would deliver very little extra cooling air. However, many factors may be considered in order to optimize the design, including a ratio of the size of the first region 28 and the second region 40, changes in temperature of the cooling air 34 as it enters the respective region, different pressure P1 along an axial length of the component, and different operation conditions of the component, to name a few. The pressure P2 is greater than P3 and this drives the cooling air 34 through cap impingement cooling holes 20, and the pressure P3 is greater than pressure P4, likewise driving the cooling air 34 through film cooling hole 22. Film cooling hole 22 must also be properly sized such that the cooling air 34 does not separate from the inner surface 30. In one embodiment, the ratio of the number of cooling holes per unit of surface area can be made lower in the first region 28 than in the second region 40 due to the relatively cooler temperature of the cooling air in the respective impingement jets.
In
In this embodiment skirt 52 is also curved. Such a design may help ensure a proper seal in the event where P2 produces a deflection 68 in the span 50 of the cap 18. Normally, such a deflection 68 might tend to separate the skirt 52 from the outer surface 54 of the inner wall 26. However, in an embodiment where the skirt 52 is biased inward, when the span 50 deflects, the bias will hold the skirt 52 against the outer surface 54 of the inner wall 26, and the curve will accommodate any rotation of the skirt 52 in order to retain the seal. In addition to the seal at 64, the pressure difference P2-P3 that may produce deflection 68, the pressure difference P2-P3 also presses the span 50 onto an upper end 70 of the inner wall 26. Consequently, a second seal may form at 70. The pressure difference P2-P3 not only holds the cap 18 in place, but it also improves the seal at upper end 70. Further, both the seal 64 on the outer surface 54 and the seal 71 at upper end 70 are formed by abutting surfaces of the cap 18 and inner wall 26, yet the abutting surfaces of each seal are free to expand and contact with respect to each other. As a result, when the cap 18 and inner wall 26 form a seal they are still thermally and mechanically decoupled from each other, and thus thermal stresses are reduced.
In an embodiment shown in
In an alternate configuration of the cap 18, as shown in
In
In an embodiment shown in
Numerous variations in the number, size, and shape of the plate impingement cooling holes 16, the cap impingement cooling holes 20, and the film cooling holes 22 are possible, and limited only by the cooling conditions required for each structural pocket 10 and the local region of that structural pocket 10. Further, a pattern of the holes used in one pocket need not be the same as adjacent pockets. For example, one pattern may be used at one location of the component where a certain pressure P1 exists, and another may be used where the pressure P1 is slightly different. Further demonstrated in
The unique cooling system disclosed herein represents an improvement in the art because it decreases the amount of air extracted from the combustion flow for use as cooling air, it increases the efficiency of the use of that cooling air, it provides more air for combustion, and it decreases losses due to the entry of spent cooling air into the combustion gasses. The system reduces thermal stresses, thereby extending the life of the component, and it is more easily manufactured than conventional systems, and thus represents a cost savings.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Development for this invention was supported in part by Contract No. DE-FC26-05NT42644, awarded by the United States Department of Energy. Accordingly, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3391904 | Albert et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
4063851 | Weldon | Dec 1977 | A |
4337016 | Chaplin | Jun 1982 | A |
4526226 | Hsia et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4573865 | Hsia et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4642024 | Weidner | Feb 1987 | A |
4650394 | Weidner | Mar 1987 | A |
5584651 | Pietraszkiewicz | Dec 1996 | A |
6036441 | Manning et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6139257 | Proctor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6508623 | Shiozaki et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6602048 | Fujikawa et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6666645 | Arilla et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6779597 | CeMarche et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6899518 | Lucas et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7008183 | Sayegh et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7097418 | Trindade et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137779 | Liang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147432 | Lowe et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7665962 | Liang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7670108 | Liang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8092146 | Legare et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8123466 | Pietraszkiewicz et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137056 | Fujimoto et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8246299 | Razzell et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8439636 | Liang | May 2013 | B1 |
8475121 | Liang | Jul 2013 | B1 |
20030131980 | DeMarche et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040047725 | Tomita et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060160225 | Gipp et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070209366 | Gerendas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080206046 | Razzell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090035125 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067994 | Pietraszkiewicz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100000197 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100266386 | Broomer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110188993 | Bacha et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110229305 | Bergman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130011238 | Liang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051972 | Romanov | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-200805 | Jul 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Ching-Pang Lee; “A Method of Fabricating a Nearwall Nozzle Impingement Cooled Component for an Internal Combustion Engine”; USPTO Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,966, filed Apr. 27, 2011; 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130031914 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |