The present invention relates to roller finger followers for actuating the valves of internal combustion engines; more particularly, to two-step roller finger followers for controllably activating and deactivating engine valves; and most particularly, to a two-step roller finger follower having a guided lost-motion compression spring.
Two-step roller finger followers (RFF) for controllably activating compression valves in a variable valve actuation train in an internal combustion engines are well known. An RFF extends between a hydraulic lash adjuster (HLA) and the stem of a valve. Engagement with a cam lobe of an engine camshaft causes the RFF to be pivoted about the HLA and thereby to depress the valve stem, opening the valve. A two-step RFF mechanism allows an engine valve to be operated by two different cam lobe profiles, one with the mechanism locked and the other with the mechanism unlocked. When the mechanism is unlocked, the RFF portion that is not directly in contact with the valve stem and the HLA, known in the art as the high-lift follower, typically is provided with a spring means, known in the art as a “lost-motion” spring, to keep that portion in contact with the cam. A typical lost-motion spring is disposed in compression between the high-lift follower and the remainder of the RFF, known in the art as the low-lift follower. Thus, when the high-lift follower engages the cam lobe, all lash is removed from the RFF and force begins to be exerted by the spring against the HLA. If the force of the lost motion spring is too small, the high-lift follower may not be able to stay in contact with the cam under all engine operating conditions. If the spring force is too large, the force of the lost motion spring may overcome the force of the internal spring in the HLA causing the HLA to leak down and become undesirably compressed and depleted of oil.
In some prior art two-step RFFs, a torsional lost-motion spring is disclosed. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,769,387. Experience has shown that a torsional lost-motion spring can have excessive variation in its free angle, resulting in excessive variation in the installed load, making it difficult to balance the force of the torsional lost motion spring from being too large a force and too small a force. Further, a torsion spring exerts substantial friction in use, resulting in undesirably large hysterisis, again affecting the installed load.
It is known to employ compression lost-motion springs. See, for example, US Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/02003/0209216. A disadvantage of compression springs as disclosed in this publication is that the springs are not guided. Because the opposing spring seats follow rotational rather than linear paths, the springs can flex as well as compress in use, resulting in unstable spring dynamics and uncontrolled spring rates.
Compression lost-motion springs have been found to have significantly less load variation and less friction than torsional springs. However, actually implementing compression springs for this purpose is difficult because of the non-linearity of the actuating path and the limited space available in a typical two-step RFF structure.
What is needed in the art is a two-step roller finger follower having an improved arrangement of a compression lost-motion spring wherein frictional losses are minimized, spring compression is substantially linear rather than rotational, and spring length and diameter are maximized.
It is a principal object of the present invention to reduce frictional hysterisis and improve RFF working life cycle.
Briefly described, a two-step roller finger follower in accordance with the invention includes a high-lift follower portion that rotates relative to a low-lift follower portion about a pivot shaft. A lost-motion compression spring is disposed in a linear bore formed in the high-lift portion and exerts force against a radiused pad on the back side of the valve pallet of the low-lift portion. The spring is retained and guided in its bore by a spring retainer having a planar bottom for engaging the radiused pad. In an alternate embodiment the retainer is a cup positioned in the spring bore such that the stroke of the cup is limited to prevent load from being applied on the hydraulic lash adjuster when the cam is on base circle. Driving the spring by a linear-acting retainer in a linear bore causes the spring to be compressed linearly, resulting in a highly stable and predictable spring rate.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a is an elevational cross-sectional view of
Referring to
A high-lift follower 110 including a cam-follower surface 111 is disposed in a central opening 112 in a generally box-shaped low-lift follower 114. High-lift follower 110 pivots within opening 112 about a pivot shaft 116. A roller shaft 118 mounted in low-lift follower 114 supports a roller 120 for following a low-lift lobe of an engine camshaft (not shown). Low-lift follower 114 includes a socket 122, for pivotably mounting RFF 100 at a first end 124 thereof on a hydraulic lash adjuster (not shown), and a pad 126 at a second end 128 thereof for actuating a valve stem (not shown). A latching assembly 130 disposed in low-lift follower 114 selectively latches high lift follower 110 in position to actuate the valve stem in response to the high-lift cam lobe base circle and eccentric, or selectively unlatches high-lift follower 110 to follow the high-lift cam lobe base circle and eccentric in lost motion. Curved slot 132 in high-lift follower 110 accommodates roller shaft 118 during the pivoting motions of high-lift follower 110 about pivot shaft 116. All of these relationships are known in the RFF prior art and need not be further elaborated here.
Referring still to
Because shoe 136 makes continuous tangential contact with end surface 142, preferably over less than the full diameter of surface 142, as end surface 142 rotates along shoe surface 137 all thrust against shoe 136 is in a direction parallel to the axis 139 of bore 134. Thus, the compressive force on spring 138 is co-linear with axis 139, and there is no bending moment imposed on the spring, as opposed to the cited prior art.
The use of a curved, and preferably cylindrical, radius on surface 137 makes a line contact with end surface 142 and helps to minimize contact stress in end surface 142 in comparison to a prior art spherical bottom surface of the spring retainer. Also, this arrangement maximizes the length of the lost-motion spring in comparison to prior art spherical bottoms wherein an undesirably large portion of the potential spring space is consumed by the spherical bottom.
An advantage of a spring arrangement as shown in
a shows the position of high-lift follower 110 relative to low lift follower 114 when high lift follower 110 is on the base circle portion of the cam lobe. As shown, the free lengths of the springs may be sized such that only low-rate spring 138′ is in contact when the high-lift follower is on the base circle portion of the cam lobe, thus preventing leakdown of the HLA. As shown, the free length 150 of high rate spring 138 is selected to be less than the length 152 of spring cavity 154 when the high-lift follower is on the base circle portion of the cam lobe so that high-rate spring 138 comes into effect only when the follower moves onto the eccentric portion of the cam lobe. Since the compression springs in accordance with the invention operate linearly and their operating lengths are less than they would be if they were disposed between roller shaft 118 and latching assembly 130, the range of operating spring forces can be selected to prevent undesirable HLA leak down of the HLA. While
Another means for preventing HLA leakdown is to limit the outward extent of travel of spring retainer 140. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In providing for a compression spring within a bore in a high-lift follower in accordance with the invention, space constraints are severe in providing a spring of adequate spring rate. If the bore is large, to accommodate a large-diameter spring, the follower can be structurally weakened. Thus there is a practical limit on the diameter of a bore. In a typical high-lift follower, the bore may have a maximum diameter of about 7 mm. If the bore is long, to accommodate a long spring, the follower can be similarly weakened. In embodiments 100 and 200, the spring diameter is constrained to about 6 mm by the necessary wall thickness of the cup-shaped spring retainer 140,240, resulting in a spring diameter sacrifice of about 14%. In embodiments 400 and 500, the length of the spring is constrained by the presence of guide elements 445,545 at the inner end of the bore 434,534.
Referring now to
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5099806 | Murata et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5515819 | Groh et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524580 | Muir | Jun 1996 | A |
5544626 | Diggs et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5615647 | Nielsen | Apr 1997 | A |
6220213 | Haas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6382153 | Rohe et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6769387 | Hayman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20040226523 | Kreuter et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 18 287 | Dec 1992 | DE |
103 11 358 | Sep 2004 | DE |
0 442 460 | Aug 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060249110 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |