This invention relates to a scroll compressor which self-modulates between high and low capacity based upon two distinct criteria.
Scroll compressors are becoming widely utilized in refrigerant compression applications. In a scroll compressor, a first scroll member has a base and a generally spiral wrap extending from the base. A second scroll member is held in a non-orbiting fashion relative to the first scroll member and has a wrap that interfits with a wrap from the first scroll member. The first scroll member is driven to orbit relative to the second, and the interfitting wraps define compression chambers for compressing an entrapped refrigerant.
It is a goal in modern compressor design to be able to provide at least two capacity levels. In some instances, such as when the cooling load on a refrigerant cycle is not particularly high, a lower capacity may be desirable. Less energy is used to compress a lesser amount of refrigerant in low capacity operations. Thus, various modulation schemes have been developed in the prior art.
In one modulation scheme, the compressor moves to low capacity operation when the pressure differential is low. The pressure differential is the delta (difference) of the discharge pressure to the suction pressure. When this quantity is low, there is some indication that lower capacity operation may be in order.
This prior art compressor performs adequately to provide low capacity operation when the compressor is utilized in an air conditioning cycle. However, it is also desirable to use such compressors as part of a heat pump system. In a compressor that is utilized for both air conditioning and heat pump operation, there are times when a relatively low pressure differential is not indicative of a need for low capacity. In particular, if the suction pressure is also low, the compressor may be operating in heat pump mode, and high capacity operation would still be desirable. The prior art will still provide low capacity operation under those circumstances.
In a disclosed embodiment of this invention, two distinct criteria are considered by the self-modulating capacity control. A first valve is operative to move between an open and closed position based upon the suction pressure. If the suction pressure is low, then the valve is maintained in the closed position, and high capacity operation occurs. A second valve is maintained in a closed position when the pressure differential is high. As long as either of these two conditions (low suction pressure or high pressure differential) are maintained, then high capacity operation occurs. However, if neither condition occurs, then both valves move to the open position and the compressor self-modulates to low capacity operation.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The compressor shown in
A valve stop is identified by element 30, which stops the valve body 40 as it is driven to the right. As a worker of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate, the valve stop 30 is configured such that fluid can pass from the tap 28 into the chamber to the left of the valve stop 30, and against the rightmost of the enlarged portions 41.
A second valve 44 includes a piston 46 in a housing 54 that sees discharge pressure on the left hand side from a discharge pressure chamber 47. A suction pressure tap 49 and an intermediate pressure tap 51 deliver refrigerant pressure into a chamber to the right hand side of the piston 46. A stop 50 and 48 will stop piston 46 when it is driven to the right from the illustrated position. This pressure fluid along with the spring force 52 tends to hold the piston 46 at the illustrated position against a piston stop 60. In
As shown in
As shown in
In sum, the present invention discloses a simple system which requires two distinct conditions to occur before the compressor self-modulates to low capacity operation. Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4669962 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4904164 | Mabe et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5236316 | Iio | Aug 1993 | A |
5356271 | Miura et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5993171 | Higashiyama | Nov 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63212789 | Sep 1988 | JP |
01106990 | Apr 1989 | JP |
04287888 | Oct 1992 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040265140 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |