The subject invention refers to a two-stroke crankcase scavenged internal combustion engine, in which a piston ported air passage is arranged between an air inlet and the upper part of a number of transfer ducts. Fresh air is added at the top of the transfer ducts and is intended to serve as a buffer against the air/fuel mixture below. This buffer is mainly lost out into the exhaust outlet during the scavenging process; fuel consumption and exhaust emissions are thereby reduced. The engine is especially well suited for incorporation in handheld working tools.
Combustion engines of the above mentioned type are known. They reduce fuel consumption and exhaust emissions, but it is difficult to control the air/fuel ratio in such an engine. U.S. Pat. No. 4,075,985 shows an example of a two-stroke engine where air ducts connect to the upper part of the engine's transfer ducts. Check valves are arranged at the connection between the ducts. A restriction valve is arranged in the air supply system to the transfer ducts. This is mechanically connected to the throttle valve of the carburetor of the engine, so that the two valves are following each other.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,425,346 shows an engine with a somewhat different design than that described above. In the '346 patent, channels are arranged in the piston of the engine which at specific piston positions are aligned with ducts arranged in the cylinder. Fresh air, as shown in FIG. 7, or exhaust gases can thereby be added to the upper part of the transfer ducts. This only happens at the specific piston positions where the ducts in the piston and the cylinder are aligned. This happens both when the piston moves downwards and when the piston moves upwards, but far away from the top dead center position. To avoid unwanted flow in the wrong direction in the latter case, check valves are arranged at the inlet to the upper part of the transfer ducts. In this respect it consequently corresponds to the previously mentioned patent. These type of check valves, usually called reed valves, have a number of disadvantages. They frequently have a tendency to come into resonant oscillations and can have difficulties coping with the high rotational speeds that many two-stroke engines can reach. Besides, it results in added cost and an increased number of engine components. Should such a valve break into smaller pieces, the pieces can enter into the engine and cause severe damages. The amount of fresh air added is, for the solution according to the '346 patent, varied by means of a variable inlet, i.e. an inlet that can be advanced or retarded in the work cycle. This is, however, a very complicated solution.
The international patent application WO98/57053 shows a few different embodiments of an engine where air is supplied to the transfer ducts via L-shaped or T-shaped recesses in the piston. Thus, there are no check valves. In all embodiments, the piston recess has, where it meets the respective transfer duct, a very limited height, which is essentially equal to the height of the actual transfer port. A consequence of this embodiment is that the passage for the air delivery through the piston to the transfer port is opened by the piston significantly later than is the passage for the air/fuel mixture to the crankcase. The period for the air supply is consequently significantly shorter than the period for the supply of air/fuel mixture, where the period can be counted as crank angle or be measured in time. This means that the amount of air that can be delivered to the transfer duct is significantly limited since the underpressure driving this additional air has significantly decreased because the inlet port has already been open during a certain period of time when the air supply is opened. This implies that both the period and the driving force for the air supply are small. Furthermore, the flow restriction in the L-shaped and the T-shaped ducts becomes relatively high. This is partly because the cross section of the duct is small close to the transfer port and partly because of the abrupt bend created by the L-shape or T-shape. In all, this contributes to reducing the amount of air that can be delivered to the transfer ducts which in turn reduces the possibilities to reduce the fuel consumption and the exhaust emissions by means of this arrangement.
A combustion engine configured in accordance with the present invention is at least partially characterized in that an air passage is arranged from an air inlet equipped with a restriction valve that is controlled by at least one engine parameter, such as the carburettor throttle control. The mentioned air inlet is provided via at least one connecting duct channelled to at least one connecting port in the cylinder wall of the engine, which is arranged so that it, in connection with piston positions in a top dead center configuration, is connected with flow paths embodied in the piston. The flow paths extend to the upper part of a number of transfer ducts, and the flow paths in the piston are arranged so that the recess in the piston that meets the respective transfer duct's port is configured so that the air supply is given an essentially equally long or longer period, counted as crank angle or time period, in relation to the fuel and air inlet mixture.
Because at least one connecting port in the engine's cylinder wall is arranged so that it, in connection with piston positions in a top dead center configuation, is connected with flow paths embodied in the piston so that a supply of fresh air to the upper part of the transfer ducts can be arranged entirely without check valves. This can take place because at piston positions at or near a top dead center position, there is an underpressure in the transfer duct in relation to the ambient air. As a result, piston ported air passages without check valves can be arranged which is a major advantage. Because the air supply has a very long period, a lot of air can be delivered so that a very high exhaust emissions reduction effect can be achieved. Control is applied by means of a restriction valve in the air inlet that is controlled by at least one engine parameter. Such control is a significantly less complicated design than a variable inlet. The air inlet has preferably two connecting ports, which in one embodiment are located so that the piston is covering them at its bottom dead center position. The restriction valve can suitably be controlled by the engine speed alone or in combination with another engine parameter. These and other characteristics and advantages are clarified in the detailed description of the different embodiments of the presently disclosed invention and which is supported by the enclosed drawing figures.
The invention will be described in greater detail in the following by means of various embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawing figures. For parts that are symmetrically located on the engine, the part on the one side has been given a numeric designation while the part on the opposite side has been given the same designation but with a prime (′) symbol.
In
One special aspect is that an air inlet 2 equipped with a restriction valve 4 is provided so that fresh air can be supplied to the cylinder. The air inlet 2 is divided into two branches referred to as connecting ducts 6 and 6′. These are channelled to the cylinder, which is equipped with connecting or air inlet ports 7, 7′. These connecting ports 7, 7′ are shaped as a cylindrical hole, each with a fitted connecting nipple 34, 34′. In the context of the present disclosure, the terminology of connecting port is utilized to identify connections on the inside of the cylinder, while corresponding ports on the outside of the cylinder are called outer connecting ports. This is clearly shown in
Flow paths 9, 9′ are arranged in the piston 13 so that they, when the piston is in a top dead center configuration, connect the respective connecting or air inlet port 7, 7′ to the upper part of the transfer or scavenging ducts 3, 3′. The flow paths 9, 9′ may be configured as local recesses in the piston 13. As shown in
This means that exhaust gases can be pressed in through the connecting ports and further on up through the connecting ducts 6, 6′, with a possibility of reaching the air inlet 2. This is suitably designed so that a moderate amount of exhaust gas is added to the fresh air. If too much exhaust gas flows upstream, however, the carburetor function may be disturbed and in extreme cases the air filter 28 may of course get dirty from this function. Moderation of the amount of exhaust gas is accomplished by moving the respective connecting ports 7, 7′ downwards. Their vertical location determines the period of time available for the exhaust gases to be in contact or fluid communication with the respective connecting ports. In
When the connecting ports 7, 7′ are lowered, the recesses must be given increased height in the longitudinal axial direction of the piston. The recess is obviously intended to be a connection between the connecting or air inlet ports 7, 7′ and the respective ports 31, 31′ of the transfer or scavenging ducts 3, 3′. This clearly appears from a comparison with FIG. 3. In the embodiment according to
The recess is preferably downwards shaped in such a way that the connection between the recess 10, 10′ and the connecting or air inlet port 8, 8′ is maximized since it reduces the flow resistance. This means that when the piston is located at its top dead center position the recess 10, 10′ preferably reaches so far down that it is in complete communication with the connecting port 8, 8,′. If the piston in
The relative location of the connecting or air inlet port 7, 7′; 8, 8′ and the transfer duct's port 31, 31′, or scavenging port 31, 31′, with respect to an axial direction, can be varied considerably, provided that the ports are shifted sideways, i.e. in the cylinder's tangential direction as shown in
In the embodiments according to
What the illustrated embodiments have in common is that the flow path from the air inlet 2 to the upper part of the transfer duct 3, 3′ is carried out entirely without a check valve. This is, as already mentioned, a great advantage, but at the same time it is naturally possible to use a check valve in special embodiments. The invention has been exemplified with an engine with two transfer ducts 3, 3′, but naturally it can also have a different number of ducts, for instance four, which is common. Five ducts or even one duct is of course also plausible. Normally the flow paths in the piston shall extend to the upper part of all of the transfer ducts in the different embodiment examples. However, it is also possible that the flow paths only extend to the transfer ducts which are located closest to the exhaust outlet 19. The flow paths, which have been illustrated in the various embodiment examples, are primarily intended for the stated purpose. However, the favorable duct locations, as illustrated, are naturally also useful for kindred purposes. One example of this can be that the air inlet 2, the connecting ducts 6 and the flow paths in the piston are instead used for adding cooled exhaust gases to the upper part of the transfer ducts. Another example is that certain transfer ducts are supplied with a rich mixture.
One challenge in connection with the usage of the above described design can be to control the air/fuel ratio of the engine. This is suitably carried out by means of a restriction valve 4. At idling, the valve 4 shall be completely or almost completely closed and then open at higher engine speeds. The transition can occur suddenly by means of the valve snapping over or opening gradually more and more. The latter function can be achieved by joining the throttle valve 26 and the restriction valve 4. In this case, the restriction valve 4 is solely guided by the throttle valve position. It has, however, been found that engine load variations tend to result in unacceptable variations in the air/fuel ratio. This problem can be avoided by letting the restriction valve 4 be controlled by the engine speed so that the valve is essentially closed at idling and then opened at engine speeds above a specified, low engine speed. A solution of this type is illustrated schematically in FIG. 6. The figure also shows that the restriction valve is controlled by at least one additional engine parameter, apart from the engine speed. In the illustrated case, the additional engine parameter is the throttle valve position. However, the additional parameter can also be the underpressure in the engine's fuel and air inlet tube. An engine speed dependent torque or force transducer 46 can be arranged in a number of different ways, but is shown here relatively schematically. The engine speed dependent transducer 46 consists of, together with the crankshaft, a rotating disc or cup 35 made of aluminium or similar material for instance the flywheel. One or two segments 36, 37, equipped with permanent magnets, can be turned in the direction of rotation in accordance with arrow 38 or 39 respectively against a spring force. The two segments can be separately movable, or joined so that they turn together, essentially around the rotational center of the disc or the cup 35. A cable 40 is attached to the segment 36 at one end and influences the restriction valve 4 with its other end. A pulley 41 with a variable unrolling radius is mounted to the shaft 47 of the restriction valve 4. The system allows substantial variation possibilities for the opening, closing and restricting functions of the valve. Naturally, the cable can also act directly on a simple lever instead of the pulley 41, if these variation possibilities are not wanted. The restriction valve 4 is suitably closed or almost closed at idling, and will start opening at a specified engine speed thereabove. Suitably, the opening takes place gradually. The valve can possibly also over-rotate so that it starts throttling at overspeeds; that is, it rotates further than the point at which it gives the least possible flow resistance in the air inlet 2. The restriction valve 4 could hereby also act as a protection against overspeeding by means of enriching the air/fuel mixture. This engine speed dependent control can also be combined with a control that is dependent on the throttle valve position. In this case, the cable 42 is attached either to a pulley 43 or a lever attached to the shaft of the restriction valve 4. The other end of the cable is attached to the throttle linkage 45 via a tensile spring 44. Thus, by means of the cable 40, the restriction valve 4 is influenced by an engine speed dependent, rotational force and, via the cable 42, by a throttle valve position dependent, cooperative, rotational force. In other words, the restriction valve 4 is in a torque equilibrium between the mentioned, rotational torques and the torque from a return spring; that is, a force equilibrium system. Alternatively, one could consider a position defined system, where a speed controlled, electric control device turns the restriction valve 4 on its own, or in combination with a linkage connected to the throttle valve position. If an electric control device is used, it will naturally have to be supplied with power from the engine itself, while the illustrated engine speed dependent transducer 46 is self-supporting and in that respect simpler. If an electric control device is used, it is easy to detect different, suitable engine parameters, even underpressure in the inlet tube, and feed these into a micro computer, from which to give signals for suitable maneuvering of the restriction valve 4.
The restriction valve 4 can also be controlled by the underpressure which prevails in the engine's inlet tube, so that the valve is essentially closed at idling, to be opened at an underpressure less than a specified underpressure. The underpressure in the engine's inlet tube can affect a small cylinder, which by itself or via an intermediate element influences the restriction valve 4. In a corresponding way, as in the example given above concerning the engine speed and the throttle valve position, the control of the underpressure can also be weighed together with an additional engine parameter, such as the throttle valve position and the engine speed.
The different methods, as described above, to control the restriction valve 4, co-operate with the piston control of the flow path from the air inlet to the respective transfer duct in order to provide the correct amount of air or gas at different engine speeds and loads. However, by means of a somewhat different tuning of the restriction valve control, the different, described control methods also ought to be able to co-operate with flow paths that are controlled by check valves.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9900138 | Jan 1999 | SE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 968200 | Scott | Aug 1910 | A |
| 980134 | Springer | Dec 1910 | A |
| 1113456 | McIntosh | Oct 1914 | A |
| 1121584 | Harper, Jr. | Dec 1914 | A |
| 2317772 | Huber et al. | Apr 1943 | A |
| 3916851 | Otani | Nov 1975 | A |
| 4067302 | Ehrlich | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4075985 | Iwai | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4084556 | Villella | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4176631 | Kanao | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4248185 | Jaulmes | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4253433 | Blair | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4306522 | Fotsch | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4340016 | Ehrlich | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4478180 | Fujikawa et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4481910 | Sheaffer | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4969425 | Slee | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4987864 | Cantrell et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5163388 | Jonsson | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5379732 | Mavinahally et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5425346 | Mavinahally | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5447129 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5645026 | Schlessmann | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5678525 | Taue | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5727506 | Tajima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5857450 | Staerzl | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5992375 | Nagashima | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6016776 | Jonsson | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6085703 | Noguchi | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6112708 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6216650 | Noguchi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240886 | Noguchi | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6289856 | Noguchi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 394755 | Nov 1991 | AT |
| 420100 | Oct 1925 | DE |
| 470603 | Jan 1929 | DE |
| 748415 | Nov 1944 | DE |
| 749456 | Nov 1944 | DE |
| 2 151 941 | Apr 1973 | DE |
| 26 50 834 | Jun 1977 | DE |
| 3329791 | Feb 1985 | DE |
| 37 22 424 | Jan 1988 | DE |
| 19520944 | Jan 1996 | DE |
| 19857738 | Jul 1999 | DE |
| 0 337 768 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0 391 793 | Oct 1990 | EP |
| 0971110 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0997620 | May 2000 | EP |
| 784.866 | Jul 1935 | FR |
| 1434710 | May 1965 | FR |
| 2 022 699 | May 1979 | GB |
| 2 130 642 | Jul 1983 | GB |
| 585423 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 585424 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 58-005423 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 58005424 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 57-183520 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 144740 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 426657 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 7139358 | May 1995 | JP |
| 07269356 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 9125966 | May 1997 | JP |
| 10252565 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 2000170611 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000328945 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2000337154 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| WO 89 02031 | Mar 1989 | WO |
| WO 0043650 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 00 65209 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 01 25604 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 01 44634 | Jun 2001 | WO |