The field is internal combustion engines. Particularly, the field relates to two-stroke engines with ported cylinders. In more particular applications, the field relates to constructions and methods for releasing compressed air from a ported cylinder equipped with opposed pistons so as to enable engine braking, and/or other operations in a two-stroke, opposed-piston engine.
When compared with four-stroke engines, ported, two-stroke, opposed-piston engines have acknowledged advantages of specific output, power density, and power-to-weight ratio. For these and other reasons, after almost a century of limited use, increasing attention is being given to the utilization of opposed-piston engines in a wide variety of modern transportation applications. A representative opposed-piston engine is illustrated in
Opposed Piston Fundamentals: Operation of an opposed-piston engine with one or more cylinders 10 is well understood. In this regard, and with reference to
As per
Compression release: Release of compressed air is advantageous in some aspects of diesel engine operation. Engine braking (also called “decompression braking” and “compression-release braking”) is a particularly useful feature for medium and heavy duty trucks equipped with diesel engines. Engine braking is activated in a valved, four-stroke diesel engine by halting fuel injection, closing EGR valves, and releasing compressed charge air from the cylinder when the piston is at or near the top of its compression stroke, immediately before the expansion stroke begins. Releasing the compressed air at this point releases energy that would otherwise urge the piston from top to bottom dead center during the expansion stroke. This significantly reduces the work extracted from the pistons as they return to BDC, which produces the desirable braking effect.
In valved engines constructed for engine braking, the compressed air is released by opening an exhaust valve out of sequence at or near the end of the compression stroke. The compressed air flows through the open valve into the exhaust system. At BDC, charge air is again admitted to the cylinder. As the cycle repeats, potential engine energy is discarded by release of the compressed air, which causes the engine to slow down. Engine braking significantly enhances the braking capability of medium and heavy duty vehicles, thereby making them safer to operate, even at higher average speeds. Furthermore, in contributing significant additional braking capacity, a engine braking system extends the lifetime of the mechanical braking systems in medium and heavy duty trucks, which reduces the costs of maintenance over the lifetime of such vehicles.
Engine braking constructions for four-stroke engines typically operate in response to a manually-generated signal accompanied by release of the throttle. When engine braking is activated, the cylinder is vented through an exhaust valve that is opened out of sequence during the compression stroke. In a representative embodiment of engine braking in a four-stroke engine, U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,047 teaches the provision of two exhaust valves per cylinder. During normal operation, both valves are open during the exhaust stroke. When engine braking is actuated, one of the exhaust valves is opened at or near TDC of the compression stroke.
Compression Release Constructions: Conventional four-stroke diesel engines achieve the advantages of engine braking by modifications of the exhaust valve mechanism designed to release compressed air from the cylinder during certain portions of the engine operating cycle. The intake and exhaust valves are supported in a cylinder head. However, two-stroke opposed-piston engines do not include valves or cylinder heads. Instead, they intake charge air and exhaust combustion products through cylinder ports that are separated longitudinally on the cylinder and controlled by the pistons. Accordingly, without a cylinder head and intake and exhaust valves, an opposed-piston engine cannot incorporate the compression release solutions tailored for valved diesel engines. Nevertheless, the addition of engine braking to opposed-piston engine operation would confer the same benefits and advantages as are realized by valved engines with this capability. Accordingly, there is a need for opposed-piston cylinder constructions that provide compression release engine braking.
In order to realize advantages and benefits obtained with engine braking in an opposed-piston engine, it is desirable that air being compressed in a cylinder of the engine between the end surfaces of the opposed pistons as they move toward and/or reach TDC be released from the cylinder.
As is illustrated in a number of embodiments in this disclosure, provision of a port including a valve and a passage with an opening through the cylinder wall that is located between the cylinder's intake and exhaust ports enables the release of compressed air from the cylinder after the intake and exhaust ports are closed. The valve controls airflow through the passage, and is opened to permit compressed air to move out of the cylinder through the passage or closed to retain compressed air in the cylinder. The valve provides a controllable path for releasing compressed air from the cylinder to the charge air channel, the exhaust channel, and/or another device.
If compressed air is released through the port to an exhaust channel when the pistons are at or near TDC, while fuel injection into the cylinder is halted, the potential energy accumulated in moving the pistons to TDC when the valve is closed during the intake/compression stroke is dissipated, and engine braking is enabled.
Engine starting and shutdown operations can also be assisted by briefly releasing compressed air from the cylinder through the port.
The principles of compression release engine braking set forth in this specification are presented in an explanatory context that includes a ported, two-stroke engine having at least one cylinder with a bore in which a pair of pistons is disposed with their end surfaces in opposition. This context is intended to provide a basis for understanding various embodiments of compression release engine braking by way of illustrative examples for opposed-piston constructions. The constructions can be applied to opposed-piston engines with one crankshaft or two crankshafts and to opposed-piston engines with three or more crankshafts. From another aspect, the constructions can be applied with any scheme for piston articulation in opposed-piston engines. In other aspects, the constructions can be applied to an internal combustion engine that includes one or more ported cylinders, each with a bore, piston-controlled exhaust and intake ports, and a pair of pistons disposed in opposition in the bore.
In
In the engine of
With further reference to
With reference to
Decompression port: In this disclosure, a ported cylinder with opposed pistons disposed therein is provided with a port that is constituted of a compression release passage, a valve, and one or more output passages. The compression release passage opens through the wall of the cylinder at a location between the cylinder's exhaust and intake ports. Preferably, the compression release passage opening is located at or near the longitudinal center of the cylinder, between the TDC positions of the piston end surfaces. The central location is optimal for engine braking; It affords a wide range of intake/compression time within which to optimize the process. This location also permits release of the maximum amount of compressed air during engine braking, giving full effect to the braking influence of the pistons during the power/exhaust stroke. When the port is opened, the compression release passage provides a route for compressed air to flow out of the cylinder. In this respect, the port decompresses the cylinder, and so, for descriptive convenience; but not for limitation, it is termed, a “decompression port”. As will become evident, a ported cylinder can be equipped with one or more decompression ports. For example, the cylinder can be equipped with two decompression ports. Such a decompression port is denoted in
Decompression port construction: A preferred decompression port construction is shown in
In the construction illustrated in
Opposed-piston engine compression release operations:
In
Opposed-piston engine operations other than engine braking are aided by release of compressed air from a combustion chamber through a decompression port. For example, a decompression port can be used to improve engine starting by releasing compressed air to achieve higher engine and supercharger speeds before full compression is restored and fuel is injected. For another example, release of compressed air through a decompression port can relieve engine shake during engine shut down. A decompression port with a single two-state valve for releasing compressed air from a cylinder can be also utilized in combination with one or more additional valves in a vehicle air management system for diversion of released compressed air to charge air and/or exhaust channels
Alternate Configurations:
On path 1 compressed air from the decompression port 180 is ducted to an upstream location of the charge air cooler 219 to preserve its enthalpy.
On path 2 compressed air released through the valve 184 is routed directly to the exhaust channel 162 as shown in
On path 3 compressed air released during engine braking can flow through a one-way check valve 201 to be collected in the accumulator 200 and selectively released therefrom into the air charge channel 160 through an accumulator release valve 202 during normal operation to supplement work performed by a supercharger in order to thereby improve fuel consumption. Compressed air collected in the accumulator 200 can also or alternatively be used for various vehicle systems, such as brakes, pneumatic hybrids, etc. In this case, the accumulator release valve 202 is controlled by the ECU 188, which sets the valve 202 to a first state placing the accumulator 200 output in communication with the air charge channel 160 and to a second state blocking the accumulator output from the air charge channel. Once the accumulator 200 reaches a predetermined pressure, the passage to the exhaust channel 162 can be gated through a bypass valve 185 to continue providing engine braking. The valve 185 is controlled by the ECU 188, which sets the valve 185 to a first state placing the output of the valve in communication with the exhaust channel 162 and to a second state blocking the output of the valve 180 from the exhaust channel. In another operation, once the accumulator 200 has reached a predetermined pressure, the valve 202 could be modulated to maintain a desired air charge input pressure while flow through the bypass valve 185 continues providing engine braking. Pressure set points for controlling the bypass and accumulator release valves 185 and 202 could be electronically or mechanically controlled depending upon application requirements. An alternate route from the output of the accumulator 200 could be through a second cooler (not shown).
Compression-release engine braking has been described with reference to a ported, opposed-engine construction, and it should be understood that various aspects of this operation can be applied to opposed-piston engines with one, two, and three or more crankshafts, without departing from the spirit of this disclosure. Furthermore, the opposed-piston engine can be one with any method of piston articulation. Moreover, various aspects of this operation can be applied to opposed-piston engines with cylinders disposed in opposition, or on either side of one or more crankshafts.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application for patent 61/456,964, filed Nov. 15, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1660610 | Fornaca | Feb 1928 | A |
2581600 | Pescara | Jan 1952 | A |
2646779 | Fiser | Jul 1953 | A |
3220392 | Cummins | Nov 1965 | A |
3367312 | Jonsson | Feb 1968 | A |
3547087 | Siegler | Dec 1970 | A |
3707952 | Knebel | Jan 1973 | A |
3875744 | Brooks et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4305349 | Zimmerly | Dec 1981 | A |
4385597 | Stelzer | May 1983 | A |
4426985 | Kanesaka | Jan 1984 | A |
4473047 | Jakuba et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4474006 | Price et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4512154 | Ueno | Apr 1985 | A |
4873822 | Benaroya | Oct 1989 | A |
5397922 | Paul et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5564386 | Korte et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5758620 | Warner | Jun 1998 | A |
5775886 | Terwilliger | Jul 1998 | A |
6170443 | Hofbauer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182619 | Spitzer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213091 | Haugen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6470851 | DeGroot et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6866017 | Ruggiero et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892688 | Korenjak et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899079 | Hill et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7162996 | Yang | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7347171 | Leman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7546819 | Lemke et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549401 | Lemke et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7753036 | Lents et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7784436 | Lemke et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7950356 | Hyde et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8127544 | Schwiesow et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8286596 | Lemke et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8397685 | Lowi | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20040079304 | Notaras et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134455 | Korenjak et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050257759 | Pischinger et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284427 | Barth | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080319687 | Kurosawa | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090159022 | Chu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165754 | Howard | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20120210985 | Fuqua et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103 44 737 | Aug 2004 | DE |
2 053 219 | Apr 2009 | EP |
102002 | Nov 1916 | GB |
562635 | Jul 1944 | GB |
1 466 311 | Mar 1977 | GB |
2464704 | Apr 2010 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2012/000102, mailed Jul. 12, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/ US2011/001896, mailed May 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/000102, mailed Sep. 6, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120125298 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61456964 | Nov 2010 | US |