This invention relates generally to the field of arc suppressors and more specifically to the area of two terminal arc suppressors used to prevent the contact points of switches, relays or contactors from suffering premature failures due to the deleterious effects of contact current arcing during the contact closed to contact open transition and during the contact open to contact closed transitions. More particularly, the present invention relates to a device for extending contact life without requiring any external control wires, power wires or any other wires other than the two contact terminal wires that are used to connect the arc suppressor invention to the two contact points between which the arc is to be suppressed.
Every time an electrical heater, lamp or motor is turned on or off, using a single or multiphase switch, relay or contactor, an electrical arc occurs between the two contact points where the single or multiphase power connects to the load. The instantaneous energy contained in the resulting arc is very high (thousands of degrees Fahrenheit). This heat causes the metal molecules in the contact points to travel from the warmer point to the colder point. This metal migration pits out and destroys the contact surfaces over time, eventually leading to equipment failure.
This type of contact failure results in increased maintenance costs, unnecessary down time on production lines, higher frequency of product failures and many other issues that cost companies time, money and reputations. Current solutions in use today address contact arcing with modestly effective devices, including Solid State Relays (SSR's), Hybrid Power Relays (HPR's) which are custom-designed and expensive, and RC snubber circuits, which barely mitigate the problem.
Contact current arc suppression technology is either expensive and short-lived or durable, but risky at the product's end-of-life.
Environmental and health concerns, over the years, have lead to the replacement of highly durable mercury displacement relays (MDR) with electromechanical relays and contactors, leaving both industry and products vulnerable to the negative effects of contact arcing.
There are various undesirable effects of using the current technology, namely, environmental risks associated with disposal, high costs of replacement, and catastrophic end-of-life that needs to be proactively mitigated. Efforts are being made to reduce or eliminate these undesirable behaviors.
Arc Suppressors generally attach across the contact and/or coil terminals of a switch, relay or contactor and require some kind of external power connection or require power from the coil connection.
The two terminal arc suppressor of the present invention extends product life of contacts used today in industry, by many orders of magnitude, typically in excess of 500 times. Its product architecture makes it a generic, low-cost component solution that fits easily into new or existing product design and can be scaled to any type of switch, relay or contactor.
The use of the arc suppressor of the present invention results in increased machinery up-time and dramatic improvements in overall system reliability. It extends switch, relay or contactor life in excess of 500 times, thus resulting in reduced maintenance, repair and replacement costs.
Standard switches, relays or contactors are durable and potentially viable for use for up to 10,000,000 cycles when no load current is flowing. However, these same switches, relays or contactors decay more rapidly when carrying a load current. Their electrical life expectancy is reduced to a fraction of their mechanical life, typically down to 10,000 cycles or less. By comparison, without being subjected to electric currents, standard switches, relays or contactors are as durable as MDR's or SSR's. However, when subjected to electric current, the durability and reliability of these same standard switches, relays or contactors are far lower than environmentally objectionable MDR's unless arc suppressor technology offered by the present invention is added to the configuration.
The inevitable end-of-life (EOL) event for any switch, relay or contactor is failure. Standard switches, relays or contactors either fail closed, open or somewhere in between. But, the EOL failure mode of an MDR is typically catastrophic, with an explosion of its mercury-filled contact chamber and the release of highly toxic mercury vapor into its operating environment. Needless to say, this type of failure is especially undesirable when the MDR is operating in equipment that is used to process or prepare food. To mitigate risk, safety dictates proactive early replacement of these MDR's. The law requires proper disposal of these MDR's, a step often overlooked, to the detriment of the environment. Due to ignorance, equipment containing MDR's is typically buried in landfills that may be close to populated communities.
Industrial and commercial fryers, dryers, heaters, cookers, steamers, rollers, burners, ovens, slicers, dicers, coolers, fridges, freezers commonly utilize MDR's in the food processing industry. Thus, there is a need for arc suppressor-fortified standard switches, relays or contactors so that the mercury-based devices can be eliminated.
Another important dimension of generic switch technology is the use of two components, namely, the relay or contactor coil and its associated contact that may fail occasionally. This is because these components operate in an asynchronous mode. Coil activation generally results in contact closure or opening and this action deploys in a time scale measured in milliseconds. However, coil deactivation may not be as responsive in opening the contact in the same time frame. This is due to micro-welding effects of the pitted-out contact surface landscape. The contact spring force is, sometimes, not strong enough to achieve the separation because of this micro-welding effect. In fact, this issue is accounted for in the relay and contactor manufacturing industry. A less-than-one-second delay in coil deactivation response is not considered a failure. This type of contact failure is reason enough to invalidate the use of the energization status of the relay or contactor coil to assume existence of suppressible arc in any contact arc suppression solution.
The arc suppressor of the present invention only uses two wires to monitor the contact status and suppress the contact current arc, at the very instant that the contacts transition either from the open-to-close state, or, from the close-to-open state. In doing so, the arc suppressor of the current invention also bridges the gap between the electrical life and the mechanical life of standard switches, relays or contactors. It enables these lower-cost, lower-risk and green standard switches, relays or contactors to achieve the equivalent durability and reliability of MDR's and SSR's.
The arc suppressor of the present invention extends the inevitable EOL of a standard switch, relay or contactor by a factor in excess of 500 times. The arc suppressor to be described herein enables innately environmentally-friendly, low cost, designed standard switches, relays or contactors to be used in applications that these devices could historically not be applied to. Where the industry-standard arc solution was the durable but highly-toxic MDR's or expensive and inefficient, but non-toxic SSR's and HPR's, it can now be standard switches, relays or contactors fortified by a two terminal arc suppressor of the present invention.
Other advantages of the arc suppressor of the present invention include: Two wires only, no cooling required, no need for an external power supply, no neutral connection is required to feed its power supply, it monitors contact status, it suppresses an arc when it occurs and it is only turned on for the duration of one-half period which substantially reduces the fire hazard stemming from having the arc suppressing semiconductor turned on all the time during the contact closed state. When switches, relays or contactors fail, serious fire hazard conditions are often present.
There is a general assumption in the prior art that the coil and contact of a relay or contactor are a somewhat rigidly connected structure which response uniformly to cause and effect. This is not the case. The relay or contactor coil, which in turn activates the relay or contactor contact, is operating in an asynchronous mode. Simply expressed, they appear to not be related to each other, at least on an electronic level. When the coil is being energized by the application of a current through the two associated electromagnetic coil wires and thus forced to a change states from the non-magnetized state to the magnetized state, the relay or contactor contact will not timely respond with a corresponding change in state. In most relay or contactors, there is no guaranteed instance of simultaneity between a relay or contactor coil energization and its associated contact activation. The relationship between a relay or contactor coil and a contact is magnetic and mechanical. Because of the magnetic/mechanical connection, there is a great deal of resulting time lags between the relay or contactor coil change of state and the relay or contactor contact change of state. The time delays between the coil state changes and the contact state changes differ significantly from relay or contactor state-to-relay or contactor state, from time-to-time, from environment-to-environment, from device-to-device, from manufacturer-to-manufacturer, from changes in contact operating current, contact operating voltage and coil operating voltage.
Arcing and resulting micro-welding occur even with most prior art arc suppression approaches.
The only element that determines arc suppression timing is the contact and not the energizing coil of a relay or contactor. Thus the ideal arc suppressor should only require 2 wires for operation, not three, four or more.
Those skilled in the arc recognize that arcing only occurs when the contact transitions from the closed state (make) to the open (break) state. This includes contact bouncing during the transition to the on-state. The arc suppression element in the present invention is only active for not more than 10 ms during the contact transitions. Arc suppression timing is determined by the opening or closing of the contact only. As earlier indicated, arc suppression timing does not depend on the status of the relay or contactor coil.
Appropriate, i.e., timely arc suppression offered by the present invention minimizes thermal and mechanical stresses on the arc suppressor components and thus mitigates the need for cooling. It also minimizes thermal and mechanical stresses on the switch, relay or contactor components and thus mitigates the need for venting. Further, it minimizes the effects of metal migration.
Full arc suppression of mechanical switches, relays or contacts with current state-of-the-art technology is not achievable for mechanical contacts.
Arc suppression is only required for mechanical contacts such as the ones on switches, relays and contactors. It is not required for solid state switches or hybrid power relays; however, those devices are expensive and not universal.
An arc suppressor whose arc suppression element is “always on” during the closed contact state is dangerous. They must be inherently safe and, if not designed correctly, the arc suppressor becomes a fire hazard and a liability.
Arc suppressors of the prior art with three or more wires are neither optimal nor inherently safe because they rely on coil and power to decide when to suppress the arc.
Arc suppressor suppress the arcs generated during switch, relay or contactor transitions when switching lamps, heaters, motors and similar electric loads. Such loads are ref erred to as resistive, inductive and capacitive loads.
Contact stick times due to the effect of microwelding of 200 ms are common. Even contact stick times of up to 999 ms are deemed acceptable by relay and contactor manufacturers.
Metal migration is the movement of metal alloy material from one contact surface to another. Metal molecules move from the warmer contact point (usually the moving one) to the colder contact point (usually the static one) as the heat of the arc melts the contact alloy material. This micro welding occurs with each contact made under power and increases as the contact surface deteriorates. Only the spring loaded contact armature strength breaks the micro welded contact connection.
Microwelding is due to the arcing that occurs during the transition from contact open to contact close occurring in high current density areas of the contact surface. This effect is also amplified by contact bounce during the transition from the open to the close contact state. The strength of the microweld connection greatly depends on the switch contact surface condition and the strength of the contact arc welding power.
The present invention provides an arc suppressor for switch contacts coupling a voltage source to a load where the arc suppressor comprises a pair of terminals adapted to be connected across a set of switch, relay or contactor contacts to be protected and where a solid state triggerable switch is connected between the pair of terminals. A triggering circuit is operatively coupled to the solid state triggerable switch and operative when the switch contacts move from a closed state to an open for driving the solid state triggerable switch into a conductive state to short out the switch contacts and further including a pinch-off circuit that is coupled to the triggering circuit for controlling the length of time that the solid state triggerable switch remains in its conductive state following movement of the switch contacts from the closed state to the open state.
Embodiments are disclosed for use when the power source feeding the load through the switch contacts is alternating current and direct current.
While the present disclosure is directed toward suppression of contact current arcs, further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The forgoing features, objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, especially when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like the numerals in the several views refer to the corresponding parts:
The following detailed description relates to a two terminal arc suppressor directed toward extending the life of switches, relays and contactors used to switch either an alternating current (AC) or a direct current (DC) source to a load.
The following detailed description includes discussion of a two terminal arc suppressor connected to a mechanical switch, relay or contactor. Additionally, elements of a two terminal arc suppressor discussed including a contact power harvester, a pinch-off circuit, a triggering circuit, a solid state triggerable switch, an RC snubber circuit, contact lead terminals, a voltage surge limiter and a timing diagram is included.
The present invention can be readily understood from a discussion of
In
The IR emitter diode 46 of the optoisolator triac U1 is connected across the DC output terminals of a full wave bridge rectifier BR2 and, marked +− in
The pinch-off circuit 28 of
The contact power harvester 24 of
The oppositely poled IR emitter diodes of the AC Darlington optoisolator U10 are connected across the DC power contact via current limiting resistor R10 and differentiating and timing capacitor C10. As soon as the DC current carrying contact that is connected to terminals 5′ and 14′ transition from the closed to the open state, current rushes through C10 limited by R10 and forward biased either of the LR emitter diodes of U10. The IR detector section of U10 conducts a base current for Q10 so that Q10 becomes saturated and temporarily conducts the load current through bridge rectifier BR10. BR10 provides for non polarized operation of the DC two terminal arc suppressor.
In the timing diagram of
Having described the constructional features of the preferred embodiments of the two terminal arc suppressor for both AC and DC power sources, consideration will next be given to their mode of operation and, in this regard, reference will be made to the timing diagram of
Timing graph 110 depicts the status of the contact state starting at a contact open state, followed by a contact transition to closed state, followed by a contact closed state and followed by a contact transition to open state. Timing graph 120 depicts the status of the contact arc suppression pulse timing especially during the contact transition to closed state and the contact transition to open state. During the contact open state the contact power harvester 24 is able to harvest power from the AC terminals 3 and 12 of
During the contact closed state the contact power harvester 24 is shorted out and cannot harvest power as it could earlier from the open contact that is connected to terminals 5 and 14. As soon as the contact of the mechanical switch, relay or contactor 9 opens, an AC voltage is again present on the internal wiring connections 7 and 11 of the two terminal arc suppressor 8. As soon as voltage is available on the two internal wiring connections 7 and 11, the triggering circuit 32 receives AC current, via its AC coupling capacitor C4, wire connection 45, rectified by bridge rectifier BR2 and it is passed as a DC current through the IR emitter diode 46 of the input section of U1. As soon as current is flowing through the input section of U1, the output section of U1 in the triggering circuit 32 responds with placing the triac Q2 of the solid state triggerable switch 36 into the conduction state and, in effect, shorting out the connected contact of the mechanical switch, relay, or contactor 9 and taking over the current conduction for one half period of an AC power cycle.
At the same time, as the mechanical switch, relay or contactor 9 transitions to the open state, an AC voltage is available for the contact power harvester 24. As soon as AC voltage is available at the internal wire connections 7 and 1 of the two terminal arc suppressor, capacitor C1 and wire connection 47 of the contact power harvester circuit pass an AC current through bridge rectifier BR1. The rectified output of BR1 is available on its DC plus and minus terminals. A zener diode D1 limits the rectified DC voltage to a maximum voltage, in this example to 3.3V. As soon as DC voltage becomes available at the rectified output of BR1, capacitor C2 starts charging and making its charge voltage available to the base of Q1, via a current limiting resistor R2. The collector and emitter of Q1 connect to the input section of U1. U1 is already in the conducting state and, in return, firing power triac Q2 as soon as the contact made AC voltage available at terminals 5 and 14 through its action of transitioning from the closed to open state. A short time later, that is determined by the charging time constant of C2, the input voltage to U1 is pinched off by Q1 resulting in termination of the firing pulse, and resulting in holding of Q2 until the end of the current half cycle in that since the mechanical switch, relay or contactor contact is now in the open state.
Generally, when a mechanical switch, relay or contactor contact transitions from the open to closed state, the force at which the two contact points hit each other cause them to repel each other thus resulting in repeated opening and closing of the contacts again, and again, i.e., contact bounce. The two terminal arc suppressor of the present invention suppresses contact arcing during contact bounce conditions because a contact bounce consists of a series of contact transitions to the open state and the arc suppressor acts accordingly in the manner already described.
In addition, due to the optimal and short timing of the firing of the sold state triggerable switch the two terminal arc suppressor is also tolerant of contact chatter during which a mechanical switch, relay or contactor rapidly, successively, and continuously changes between the open and close states.
It can be seen, then, that the present invention provides a two terminal arc suppressor that is adaptable for use with AC and DC power sources in single or multiphase power systems and that does not require a neutral connection or any external power beyond that which is being switched by a switch, relay or contactor or other contacts are being protected. Having only two wires to contend with, the arc suppressor of the present invention can be quickly installed in that it does not require any additional or other connections to associated or auxiliary equipment. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the circuits of
In that the circuit is active only during contact transitions, the device undergoes minimal thermal stress on its internal components which is projected to lead to a Mean-Time-Between-Failures (MTBF) in excess of 20 years.
This invention has been described herein in considerable detail in order to comply with the patent statutes and to provide those skilled in the art with the information needed to apply the novel principles and to construct and use such specialized components as are required. However, it is to be understood that the invention can be carried out by specifically different equipment and devices, and that various modifications, both as to the equipment and operating procedures, can be accomplished without departing from the scope of the invention itself.
The description of the various embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the examples and detailed description herein are intended to be within the scope of the present disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/929,559, filed Jul. 15, 2020, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/167,043, filed Oct. 22, 2018, issued on Aug. 18, 2020 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,748,719, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/361,835, filed Nov. 28, 2016, issued on Nov. 20, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,134,536, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/803,501, filed Jul. 20, 2015, issued on Nov. 29, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,508,501, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/085,438, filed Nov. 20, 2013, issued on Jul. 21, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,087,653, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/723,055, filed Mar. 12, 2010, issued on Dec. 31, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,619,395, the contents of each which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1368325 | Crichton | Feb 1921 | A |
2011395 | Cain | Aug 1935 | A |
2052318 | Siegmund | Aug 1936 | A |
2356166 | Lee et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2467937 | Jackson | Apr 1949 | A |
2476843 | Curtis | Jul 1949 | A |
2608607 | Wharton et al. | Aug 1952 | A |
2629798 | Salzer | Feb 1953 | A |
2637769 | Walker | May 1953 | A |
2705766 | Tung | Apr 1955 | A |
2722649 | Immel et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2736857 | Klug | Feb 1956 | A |
2768264 | Jones et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
2782345 | Kesselring | Feb 1957 | A |
2789253 | Vang | Apr 1957 | A |
2802149 | Germer et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
2845580 | Smith | Jul 1958 | A |
2859400 | Kesselring | Nov 1958 | A |
2873419 | Brandt | Feb 1959 | A |
2958808 | Miller | Nov 1960 | A |
2970196 | Reagan | Jan 1961 | A |
3075124 | Bagno | Jan 1963 | A |
3152282 | Baltensperger et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3184619 | Zydney | May 1965 | A |
3223888 | Koppelmann | Dec 1965 | A |
3237030 | Coburn | Feb 1966 | A |
3260894 | Denault | Jul 1966 | A |
3264519 | Minck | Aug 1966 | A |
3278801 | Chauvineau | Oct 1966 | A |
3309570 | Goldberg | Mar 1967 | A |
3321668 | Baker | May 1967 | A |
3324271 | Schuck et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3330992 | Perrins | Jul 1967 | A |
3339110 | Jones, Jr. | Aug 1967 | A |
3372303 | Knott | Mar 1968 | A |
3389301 | Siwko | Jun 1968 | A |
3395316 | Denes et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3401303 | Walker | Sep 1968 | A |
3402302 | Coburn | Sep 1968 | A |
3412288 | Ostrander | Nov 1968 | A |
3430016 | Hurtle | Feb 1969 | A |
3430063 | Webb | Feb 1969 | A |
3431466 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3466503 | Goldberg | Sep 1969 | A |
3474293 | Siwko et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3491284 | Pascente | Jan 1970 | A |
3504233 | Hurtle | Mar 1970 | A |
3513274 | Jullien-davin | May 1970 | A |
3529210 | Ito et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3539775 | Casson | Nov 1970 | A |
3543047 | Renfrew | Nov 1970 | A |
3555353 | Casson | Jan 1971 | A |
3558910 | Dale et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3558977 | Beaudoin | Jan 1971 | A |
3562584 | Yoshimura | Feb 1971 | A |
3588605 | Casson | Jun 1971 | A |
3596026 | Rys | Jul 1971 | A |
3614464 | Chumakov | Oct 1971 | A |
3633069 | Bernard et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3639808 | Ritzow | Feb 1972 | A |
3644755 | Shaw | Feb 1972 | A |
3648075 | Mankovitz | Mar 1972 | A |
3673436 | Adams, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
3708718 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3711668 | Harnden, Jr. | Feb 1973 | A |
3731149 | Sherman et al. | May 1973 | A |
3739192 | Oswald | Jun 1973 | A |
3743860 | Rossell | Jul 1973 | A |
3783305 | Lefferts | Jan 1974 | A |
3801832 | Joyce | Apr 1974 | A |
3818311 | Mattson et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3828263 | Blomenkamp | Aug 1974 | A |
3868549 | Schaefer | Feb 1975 | A |
3870905 | Chikazawa | Mar 1975 | A |
3883782 | Beckwith | May 1975 | A |
3889131 | Speller | Jun 1975 | A |
3940634 | Grogan | Feb 1976 | A |
3982137 | Penrod | Sep 1976 | A |
4025820 | Penrod | May 1977 | A |
4041331 | Westerman et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4056836 | Knauer | Nov 1977 | A |
4068273 | Metzler | Jan 1978 | A |
4074098 | Pullen | Feb 1978 | A |
4074333 | Murakami et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4110806 | Murano et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4152634 | Penrod | May 1979 | A |
4172288 | Yanabu et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4216513 | Tokuyama et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4225895 | Hjertman | Sep 1980 | A |
4246621 | Tsukioka | Jan 1981 | A |
4249223 | Shuey et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4250531 | Ahrens | Feb 1981 | A |
4251845 | Hancock | Feb 1981 | A |
4289941 | Cannon | Sep 1981 | A |
4296331 | Rodriguez | Oct 1981 | A |
4296449 | Eichelberger | Oct 1981 | A |
4349748 | Goldstein et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4351014 | Schofield, Jr. | Sep 1982 | A |
4356525 | Kornrumpf et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4360847 | Bloomer et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370564 | Matsushita | Jan 1983 | A |
4375021 | Pardini et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4389691 | Hancock | Jun 1983 | A |
4392171 | Kornrumpf | Jul 1983 | A |
4393287 | Nakano | Jul 1983 | A |
4405904 | Oida et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4420784 | Chen et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4429339 | Jaeschke et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4438472 | Woodworth | Mar 1984 | A |
4445183 | McCollum et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4446347 | Eguchi et al. | May 1984 | A |
4466038 | Robertson | Aug 1984 | A |
4500934 | Kinsinger | Feb 1985 | A |
4503302 | Chrisp | Mar 1985 | A |
4525762 | Norris | Jun 1985 | A |
4536814 | Theisen et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4564768 | Komiya et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4583146 | Howell | Apr 1986 | A |
4598330 | Woodworth | Jul 1986 | A |
4613801 | Tatom, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4618906 | Paice et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4631621 | Howell | Dec 1986 | A |
4631627 | Morgan | Dec 1986 | A |
4636906 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4636907 | Howell | Jan 1987 | A |
4642481 | Bielinski et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4644309 | Howell | Feb 1987 | A |
4652962 | Howell | Mar 1987 | A |
4658320 | Hongel | Apr 1987 | A |
4685019 | Needham | Aug 1987 | A |
4700256 | Howell | Oct 1987 | A |
4704652 | Billings | Nov 1987 | A |
4723187 | Howell | Feb 1988 | A |
4725911 | Dieppedalle et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740858 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4745511 | Kugelman et al. | May 1988 | A |
4752659 | Spooner | Jun 1988 | A |
4754360 | Nakada | Jun 1988 | A |
4760483 | Kugelman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4767944 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4772809 | Koga et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4802051 | Kim | Jan 1989 | A |
4811163 | Fletcher | Mar 1989 | A |
4816818 | Roller | Mar 1989 | A |
4831487 | Ruoss | May 1989 | A |
4855612 | Koga et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864157 | Dickey | Sep 1989 | A |
4885654 | Budyko et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4922363 | Long | May 1990 | A |
4937703 | Adams | Jun 1990 | A |
4939776 | Bender | Jul 1990 | A |
4959746 | Hongel | Sep 1990 | A |
4980528 | Spooner | Dec 1990 | A |
4992904 | Spencer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5053907 | Nishi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5079457 | Lu | Jan 1992 | A |
5081558 | Mahler | Jan 1992 | A |
5138177 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151840 | Siefken | Sep 1992 | A |
5162682 | Lu | Nov 1992 | A |
5164872 | Howell | Nov 1992 | A |
5192894 | Teschner | Mar 1993 | A |
5214557 | Hasegawa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216303 | Lu | Jun 1993 | A |
5241152 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242611 | Griffaw | Sep 1993 | A |
5247418 | Augo | Sep 1993 | A |
5281321 | Sturmer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283706 | Lillemo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5309068 | Hakkarainen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5402297 | Ouchi et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5406442 | Kristensen | Apr 1995 | A |
5412526 | Kapp et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430419 | Scheel et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436786 | Pelly | Jul 1995 | A |
5449988 | Gurstein et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452170 | Ohde et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5463199 | Divincenzo et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463252 | Jones et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479075 | Chen | Dec 1995 | A |
5488535 | Masghati et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489840 | Caron | Feb 1996 | A |
5517378 | Asplund et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519370 | Perreira et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528443 | Itoga et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530615 | Miller et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536980 | Kawate et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548461 | James | Aug 1996 | A |
5563459 | Kurosawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570262 | Doerwald | Oct 1996 | A |
5576919 | Wilkens, I | Nov 1996 | A |
5578980 | Okubo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589753 | Kadah et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598311 | Yang | Jan 1997 | A |
5604656 | Derrick et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629824 | Rankin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633540 | Moan | May 1997 | A |
5640113 | Hu | Jun 1997 | A |
5652688 | Lee | Jul 1997 | A |
5666257 | Yang | Sep 1997 | A |
5699218 | Kadah | Dec 1997 | A |
5703743 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5737172 | Ohtsuka | Apr 1998 | A |
5764459 | Yang | Jun 1998 | A |
5790354 | Altiti et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793589 | Friedl | Aug 1998 | A |
5796568 | Baiatu | Aug 1998 | A |
5804991 | Hu | Sep 1998 | A |
5818710 | LeVan Suu | Oct 1998 | A |
5882492 | Manley | Mar 1999 | A |
5923513 | Pelly | Jul 1999 | A |
5933304 | Irissou | Aug 1999 | A |
5953189 | Abot et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6046899 | Dougherty | Apr 2000 | A |
6052402 | Murray et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078491 | Kern et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091166 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094129 | Baiatu | Jul 2000 | A |
6140715 | Bernhoff et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6249417 | Pippen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265703 | Alton et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6291909 | Olsen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6347024 | Blain et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6491532 | Schoepf et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537092 | Hirai et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6577479 | Springer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603221 | Liu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618235 | Wagoner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621668 | Sare | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624989 | Brooks, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643112 | Carton et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654260 | Okayama et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671142 | Beckert et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683766 | Guo et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687100 | Rice et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690098 | Saldana | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703575 | Yamamoto | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707171 | Huenner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707358 | Massman | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6741435 | Cleveland | May 2004 | B1 |
6760610 | Tschupp et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797909 | Pride et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6860746 | Ota et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885535 | Hummert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891705 | Bryan | May 2005 | B2 |
6917500 | Vail et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956725 | Boughton, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969927 | Lee | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7023683 | Guo et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7061252 | Bouton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079363 | Chung | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110225 | Hick | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7145758 | King et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161306 | Ravindra et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7259945 | Cleveland | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262942 | Lam | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292045 | Anwar et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7339288 | Schasfoort | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342754 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7385791 | Ness | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416573 | Lindgren et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7463460 | Haines | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7505236 | Kobielski | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514936 | Anwar et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538990 | Belisle et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7554222 | Kumfer et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561430 | Tiedemann et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7612471 | Schasfoort | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7643256 | Wright et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660083 | Yao et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697247 | Maharsi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7782578 | Tao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7929261 | Wiedemuth | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7961443 | Pfingsten et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8033246 | Wiedemuth | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050000 | Wright et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8619395 | Henke | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9087653 | Henke | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9508501 | Henke | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10134536 | Henke | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10748719 | Henke | Aug 2020 | B2 |
11295906 | Henke | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20020039268 | Bryan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020106921 | Hirai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020171983 | Brooks, Jr. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003788 | Schoepf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030184926 | Wu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193770 | Chung | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040027734 | Fairfax et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052011 | King et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052012 | Boughton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040095091 | McNulty et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040165322 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179313 | Cleveland | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050007715 | Mukai et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050157443 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050270716 | Nakano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001433 | Bouton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060049831 | Anwar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061920 | Chun Lam | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087244 | Regan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070014055 | Ness | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024264 | Lestician | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046233 | Kobielski | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070139831 | Wright et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139829 | Arthur et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070217092 | Tao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080061037 | Asokan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080112097 | Maharsi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164961 | Premerlani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192389 | Muench et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216745 | Wiedemuth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218923 | Wiedemuth | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250171 | Pfingsten et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258556 | Ewing et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266742 | Henke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080308394 | Premerlani et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090168273 | Yu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201617 | Yamaguchi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100134931 | Orozco | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100213184 | Harris | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110122663 | Huang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110222191 | Henke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120013200 | Kroeker et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120113550 | Anand et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130154774 | Bhavaraju et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140078623 | Henke | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150325389 | Henke | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170236661 | Henke et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190237276 | Henke | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20210005404 | Henke | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0521017 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0550054 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0703595 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0810618 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1170762 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1209772 | May 2002 | EP |
1229609 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1714321 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1928005 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2162897 | Dec 2008 | EP |
WO-9519631 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-2005074094 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2006014377 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2007011692 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2008153574 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2008153960 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2011112564 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 23, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Response filed Jan. 9, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Response filed Jul. 15, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/723,055, Response filed Sep. 18, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 17, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 20, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Response filed Nov. 3, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,438, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 25, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/803,501, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/803,501, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/803,501, Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 20, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/803,501, Response filed May 25, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/361,835, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/361,835, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/361,835, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 16, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/361,835, Response filed Nov. 27, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/167,043, Non Final Office Action dated May 27, 2020”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/167,043, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2020”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/167,043, Response filed Jun. 1, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated May 27, 2020”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/929,559, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2021”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/929,559, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2021”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/929,559, Preliminary Amendment Filed Sep. 24, 2020”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/929,559, Response filed Nov. 5, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2021”, 7 pgs. |
“Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/027519, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 27, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/027519, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220293353 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16929559 | Jul 2020 | US |
Child | 17680881 | US | |
Parent | 16167043 | Oct 2018 | US |
Child | 16929559 | US | |
Parent | 15361835 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16167043 | US | |
Parent | 14803501 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15361835 | US | |
Parent | 14085438 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 14803501 | US | |
Parent | 12723055 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 14085438 | US |