Patent Application
20170370489
The embodiments described herein relate to improved two-way valve assemblies especially useful in venting containers and the like.
Pressure relief valves prevent excessive pressure or vacuum buildup in sealed containers, which reduces container weight, cube, and cost. A variety of pressure relief valves have been developed over the years, including valves that keep dust, water, and blowing sand from entering containers.
In some applications, the pressure or vacuum differential versus flow rate profile of a valve can be a critical factor in whether a sealed container will deform (or even explode). In other words, if a valve cannot expel or intake air fast enough, damage to the container and contents can result.
One specific container pressure-buildup situation that occurs during air transport is the rapid decompression event, when the air pressure outside the container drops precipitously. This can occur when an aircraft hold suddenly loses pressure while the aircraft is at high altitude, and the containers in the hold need to be depressurized very quickly. A container that cannot equalize pressure quickly might explode, thereby putting the aircraft and persons at risk.
While traditional two-way pressure relief valves may effectively defuse decompression events for small containers, they usually have insufficient flow capacity for containers with volumes larger than several cubic feet. The reason for this is that a traditional valve depends upon a compression spring to keep its poppet closed, and, although the poppet needs to open as far as possible to maximize the valve's air flow, the poppet meets with increasing opening resistance from the compression spring the farther it opens. This behavior of the compression spring limits the maximum flow rate of the valve.
In one aspect, pressure relief valves featuring both spring and magnet controlled poppets that allow very rapid gas or air outflow are disclosed. Embodiments of the two-way valve include a valve housing enclosing a hollow interior containing a stationary member with a first magnet coupled proximally to a first end of the housing and a first pressure-movable (outflow) poppet disposed in sealing arrangement proximally to a second end of the housing and including a second magnet. The first pressure-moveable poppet further includes a second poppet disposed coaxially and in sealing arrangement with the first pressure-moveable poppet and is coupled to a spring that extends from a first end of the second poppet to a support member coupled to the second magnet.
Thus, this disclosure generally relates to an improved pressure relief valve that utilizes a pair of magnets that control actuation of a first poppet (to allow flow in a first direction) in combination with a compression spring poppet to allow flow in the other/opposite direction. This design yields a higher flow rate for the “magnet poppet” than a spring-actuated valve because the attraction between two magnets decreases with the square of the distance between them. This means that once the poppet overcomes the threshold pressure and the valve opens, the force holding the poppet closed actually decreases rather than increases. The only force acting on the “magnetic poppet” to close it again is either the attraction of the pair of magnets or a return force member. For example, a third magnet or weak compression spring that is just strong enough to push the poppet closed against a zero pressure differential may be utilized.
Various other purposes and advantages of the invention will become clear from its description in the specification that follows. Therefore, to the accomplishment of the objectives described above, this invention includes the features hereinafter fully described in the detailed description of the preferred embodiments, and particularly pointed out in the claims. However, such description discloses only some of the various ways in which the invention may be practiced.
As shown in perspective view in
Preferably, magnets 19 and 20 are substantially centrally disposed in relation to the stationary member 8 and first pressure-moveable poppet 14 and are configured such that the pressure relief valve 2 stays closed until a gas or air pressure overcomes an attraction force between the magnets, thereby opening valve by “lifting” poppet 14 such that sealing ring 16 is raised (see
Nonetheless, it has been found that the attraction of magnets 19 and 20 alone may not be sufficient to close the poppet consistently in all orientations. For example, when the valve is oriented so that gravity is pulling the poppet open, the magnets coupled with the poppet and stationary member may not be strong enough to pull the poppet closed again. Thus, a return force member may be added. The return force member may be, for example a spring 21 or a third magnet (not shown) disposed at the top or under the top of the first poppet under cover 22. The spring or magnet is not strong enough to impede the flow significantly, just strong enough to close the poppet under about zero pressure differential.
In some applications, it was found that even a stainless steel spring is magnetic enough to get pulled to its solid height by the large, powerful magnets in the 4″-diameter valve. Accordingly, a non-magnetic (e.g., phosphor bronze spring) is preferred in such applications.
As shown in this embodiment, the valve housing 4 is cylindrical and contains a threaded portion 24 along the hollow interior portion 6. Thus, the stationary member 8 can threadedly engage the threaded portion 24, thereby making stationary member adjustable such that the distance (and thus attraction force) between magnets 19 and 20 is adjustable.
Preferably, the valve is made from aluminum with a polycarbonate poppet and silicone seals. However, any suitably rigid plastic or other material may be used. Also preferably, the magnets are nickel-plated neodymium.
To accommodate gas or air flow in a second direction (i.e., inflow as shown in
As with the first poppet 14, the second pressure-movable poppet 30 is configured to be circular. Moreover, as can be seen in
Conceiving of the improved pressure relief valve was not straight forward. On the one hand, the pair of magnets had to be capable of keeping their properties over a wide range of temperatures and of providing a large amount of force (in keeping the poppet closed) in a fairly compact volume. On the other hand, the magnets could not be so powerful as to interfere with electronic equipment (such as aircraft avionics) and had to be prevented from striking each other upon closing, which could lead to damage. Thus, the magnets preferably are covered in plastic 50.
The magnet valve is a design that improves upon “traditional” valve designs in that it yields much higher air flow. Traditional valves utilize compression springs for sealing, which means that the spring force on the valve's poppet increases linearly as the valve opens. However, the magnet design replaces the compression spring with a pair of magnets, whose attraction forces for each other decrease with the square of the distance of separation. This allows far more air to pass through the valve at a given pressure differential. In fact, the pressure differential between the inside and outside of a container can be almost completely eliminated, which is nearly impossible for a “traditional” pressure relief valve.
This inventive valve will be useful for many applications that require a maximum amount of air flow in the smallest possible valve. Its most apparent application is for rapid decompression events, during which an aircraft hold suddenly loses pressure, and containers in the hold need to be depressurized very quickly to avoid catastrophic damage.
It was found that the flow performance of the valves is mostly independent of the cracking point. As soon as the poppet opens, it “flies” all of the way open and stays open so long as a pressure differential and flow are maintained. So, a valve that opens at ½ psi flows the same amount of air as a valve that opens at 2 psi, in the pressure region where both valves are open. This is drastically different from a traditional valve with a compression spring, where a valve with a higher cracking point will flow less air than a valve with a lower cracking point, at all pressure points. For a traditional valve, not only is the pressure versus flow curve for higher cracking valves translated to the right, but the curve is flattened.
One unexpected consequence of the magnet valve's flow characteristics is that it allows more air entry into storage containers and therefore more moisture ingress. One of the primary sources of pressure differentials in containers that pressure relief valves are used to relieve is diurnal temperature variations during container storage. A pressure relief valve will prevent the container from exploding or imploding due to pressure or vacuum buildups. The second poppet solves this problem such that air and moisture ingress is not a concern. Nonetheless, the flow directions may be reversed in some embodiments for certain applications (i.e., the configuration of the magnet and spring valves could be reversed to provide a greater rate of inflow rather than outflow).
Another unique feature of the flow through the magnet valve is that the pressure drop across the valve actually falls with increasing flow, at least until the poppet is fully open. This behavior is also far different from the behavior of a traditional pressure relief valve, where an increase in flow is always accompanied by a rise in pressure differential.
Various changes in the details and components that have been described may be made by those skilled in the art within the principles and scope of the invention herein described in the specification and defined in the appended claims. Therefore, while the present invention has been shown and described herein in what is believed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is recognized that departures can be made there from within the scope of the invention, which is not to be limited to the details disclosed herein but is to be accorded the full scope of the claims so as to embrace any and all equivalent processes and products. All references cited in this application are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/272,849 filed on May 8, 2014. The contents of that application are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14272849 | May 2014 | US |
| Child | 15674065 | US |
