Two-wheel self-balancing vehicle with independently movable foot placement sections

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE49608
  • Patent Number
    RE49,608
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 5, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 15, 2023
    9 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Carlson; Jeffrey D
Abstract
A two-wheel, self-balancing personal vehicle having independently movable foot placement sections. The foot placement sections have an associated wheel, sensor and motor and are independently self-balancing which gives the user independent control over the movement of each platform section by the magnitude and direction of tilt a user induces in a given platform section. Various embodiments are disclosed including those with a continuous housing, discrete platform sections and/or tapering platform sections.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to two-wheel, self-balancing vehicles and, more specifically, to such vehicles with two platform sections or areas that are independently movable with respect to one another and that thereby provide independent control and/or drive of the wheel associated with the given platform section/area.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A first group of prior art two-wheel self-balancing vehicles is represented by a product known commonly as the “Segway.” This product is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230, issued to Sramek et al (the '230 patent). While a contribution in the field, the Segway and like devices are disadvantageous in that they are large, heavy and expensive, i.e., too heavy to be carried by a commuter or youth, too expensive for most to buy. Furthermore, turning is achieved through a handle bar structure that ascends from the platform upward toward the chest of a user. This tall steering structure is a trip hazard when a user makes an unplanned exit from the vehicle.


Another group of prior art two-wheel self-balancing vehicles has two platform sections, each associated with a given wheel, that tilt from side-to-side as a user leans left or right. The two platform sections move in a linked or “dependent” manner (for example, through a parallelogram frame, and not independently) and there is a single “vertical” axis for the platforms. When the axis is tilted directly forward or backward, both wheels drive at the same speed (as required for self-balancing). If a user leans to the side (tilts the “vertical” axis sideways), then the outside wheel is driven faster than the inside wheel to effect a turn toward the direction of the tilt.


These devices typically require a multi-component parallelogram structure to coordinate/link movement of the two platform sections and the wheels. Such componentry adds to the weight, bulk, complexity, and potential for mechanical failure of the device. Also, the turning radius is fairly large as one wheel is typically rotating around the other (moving in the same direction though at different speeds).


A need exists for a two-wheel self-balancing vehicle that provides independent wheel control, is light-weight and compact, is easy and safe to use, and that may be made in a cost-effective manner. A need also exits for a two-wheel self-balancing vehicle that is more maneuverable and more ergonomic (functioning more naturally with the bio-mechanics of a user's legs and body) than prior art devices.


Other prior art includes skateboards that have two platforms sections that are movable with respect to one another. Some have a shared shaft about which the two platform sections pivot, while others have a degree of flexibility in the platform. In both of these arrangements, the platform sections are arranged longitudinally, one primarily behind the other in the longitudinal line-of-direction of travel.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle that overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle that has independently movable foot placement sections.


It is also an object of the present invention to provide such a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle in which the independently movable foot placement sections are used by an operator to assert independent control over the driving of the wheel associated with the respective foot placement section. These and related objects of the present invention are achieved by use of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable foot placement sections as described herein.


The attainment of the foregoing and related advantages and features of the invention should be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art, after review of the following more detailed description of the invention taken together with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of components within the vehicle of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.



FIGS. 4-5 are a top perspective view and a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, is a perspective view of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle 100 with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention is shown.


Vehicle 100 may have a first and a second platform section 110,130. Each platform section 110,130 may include a housing formed of a bottom housing member 111,131 and a top housing member 112,132. The top housing members may have a foot placement section or area 113,133 formed integrally therewith or affixed thereon. The foot placement section is preferably of sufficient size to receive the foot of a user and may include a tread or the like for traction and/or comfort.


The housing may be formed of metal, sturdy plastic or other suitable material. The housing members may be molded and incorporate strengthening reinforcements, and be shaped to receive and “nest” the internal components (discussed below) of the vehicle. The bottom and top housing sections are formed complementarily so that after the internal components are installed, the top housing section is fitted onto the bottom housing section and secured with screws or other fasteners. FIG. 1 illustrates holes 161, through which the fasteners are inserted.


Each platform section includes a wheel 115,135, and each wheel preferably has an axle 116,136 and motorized hub assembly 117,137 (shown in FIG. 2). Motorized hub assemblies are known in the art.


Referring to FIG. 2, a block diagram of components within vehicle 100 in accordance with the invention is shown. The dot-dash line represents a rough outline of the housing members. Each platform section preferably includes a position sensor 120,140, which may be a gyroscopic sensor, for independent measurement of the position of the respective platform section. The sensors are preferably mounted on circuit boards 121,141 that may be attached to the interior of the respective bottom housings. Sensed position information from sensor 120,140 is used to drive the corresponding motor 117,137 and wheel 115,135. The control logic for translating position data to motor drive signals may be centralized or split between the two platform sections. For example, control logic 150 may be electrically connected to sensors 120,140 and to drive motors 117,137, with electrical conduits connecting through the connecting shaft 170 between sensor 140, control logic 150, and drive motor 137.


Alternatively, a separate processor/control logic 151 may be provided in the second platform section 130. Logic 151, in this case, would be is connectconnected directly to sensor 140 and drive motor 137 and generategenerates drive signals to motor 137 (and wheel 135) based on data from sensor 140.


Communication between these components is primarily in the direction of data from the sensor and drive signals to the motor. However, communication in the other direction may include start signals (iei.e., to the sensor), status signals (iei.e., from the motor indicating an unsafe condition (e.g., excessive rpm), or a motor/drive failure or irregularity). This information, in addition to battery information, etc., could be communicated back to a user via lights or another interface, or communicated wirelessly (e.g., blue-tooth) from the vehicle to a hand-held device such as a mobile phone. In addition, if the platform sections have separate and independent control logic 150,151, these processing units may still share information with one another, such as status, safe operation information, etc.


The two platform sections 110,130 are movably coupled to one another. FIG. 2 illustrates a shaft 170 about which they may rotate (or pivot with respect to one another). Brackets 164 and flange brackets 165 may secure the shaft to the platform sections, with the flange brackets preferably configured to prevent or reduce the entry of dirt or moisture within the housings. Shaft 170 may be hollow in part and thereby allowing for the passage of conduits therethrough. Pivoting or rotating shaft arrangements are known in the art, and others may be used without deviating from the present invention as long as the foot placement sections may move independently.


Since the platform sections may rotate or pivot with respect to one another, the left section 110, for example, may tilt forward while the right section tilts backward. This would cause the wheels to be driven in opposite directions, causing a user to spin-in-place or “pirouette” much like a figure skater. Alternatively, the platform wheels could be tilted in the same direction, but one platform more than the other. This would cause the wheel associated with the more steeply tilted platform to drive faster, in turn causing the vehicle to turn. The sharpness of the turn could be readily adjusted by the user based on the relative tilt of the platform sections.


This leg movement to control turning is a very ergonomic and natural movement, akin to skiing and other gliding/sliding activities.


The rotating shaft 170 may also include a bias mechanism integral with the flange bracket 165 or otherwise configured to return the platform section to an even level in the absence of displacement from a riders weight.


Each platform section 110,130 may also include a platform or “shut-off” sensor 119,139 that detects when a user is standing ofon the platform. When a user falls off, the absence of the rider is sensed and the control logic, in response, stops driving the wheels such that the vehicle comes to a stop (and does not carry on rider lessriderless). In the absence of such a shut-off sensor, the vehicle would still stop rather soon as the wheels will be driven to a self-balancing position for their respective sections bringing the device to rest.


Referring to FIG. 3, a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle 200 with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention is shown. Vehicle 200 may include first and second platform section 210,230 that are formed of bottom 211,231 and top 212,232 housing sections, similar to those in vehicle 100 above.


Each platform section 110,130 includes a wheel 215,235 which is respectively driven by a motorized hub 217,237 and an associated position sensor 220,240. Control logic 250 receives the sensed position information and drives the associated wheel toward self-balancing. As discussed above, the control logic 250 may be independent, provided in each platform section, or centralized, provided in one section. Regardless, the driving of each wheel is based on the position sensed by the sensor associated with that wheel.


A pivoting shaft or other arrangement may be used to movably/rotatably join the two platform sections.


Referring to FIGS. 4-5, a top perspective view and a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections 300 in accordance with the present invention is shown. Vehicle 300 is similar to the other vehicles herein, yet instead of a pivoting or rotating connection between platform sections, the frame or housing is made of a sturdy yet sufficiently flexible material that the two foot placement sections are effectively first and second platform sections that move independently with respect to each other for independent control of wheels 315,335.


Vehicle 300 may include a bottom 311 and a top 312 housing sections. These may be made of a flexible steel or durable flexible plastic or the like. The two sections are preferably configured to receive the internal components. They are preferably complementary in shape and may be secured by fasteners from below. The top housing may include or have attached to it a rubber coating or surface or the like in the foot placement areas 313,333 to increase traction and/or comfort with the foot of a user.


The internal components may include position sensors for both sections 320,340, hub motors 317,337, and control logic 350 for independently driving wheels 315,335 toward a self-balancing position based on position information sensorsensed by their respective sensors 320,340. These components may be the same or similar to those discussed above for vehicles 100 and 200 (FIGS. 1-3).


While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modification, and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as fall within the scope of the invention and the limits of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising: a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are coupled to one another and are independently movable with respect to one another;a first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;a first position sensor and a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel, a second position sensor and a second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel; andcontrol logic that drives the first wheel toward self-balancing the first foot placement section in response to position data from the first sensor and that drives the second wheel toward self-balancing the second foot placement section in response to position data from the second foot placement section.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the first foot placement section and the second foot placement section are rotatably coupled to one another.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the first foot placement section and the second foot placement section are positioned substantially linearly between the first and second wheel.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein said first and second foot placement sections are mounted to a frame that is sufficiently flexible that the first and second foot placement platforms can move independently with respect to one another under the weight of a user.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, further comprising: a first housing section on which the first foot placement section is provided, the first housing section housing the first sensor and first drive motor; anda second housing section on which the second foot placement section is provided, the second housing section housing the second sensor and second drive motor.
  • 6. The device of claim 5, wherein the control logic include a first control logic controlling the first drive motor located in the first housing section and a second control logic controlling the second drive motor located in the second housing section.
  • 7. The device of claim 5, wherein the first drive wheel extends from the first housing section on an end substantially opposite where the first housing section is coupled to the second housing section, and the second drive wheel extends from the second housing section on an end substantially opposite where the second housing section is coupled to the first housing section.
  • 8. The device of claim 1, further comprising a platform sensor provided at at least one of the first and second foot placement sections that detects when a user is standing on that foot placement section.
  • 9. The device of claim 1, further comprising a bias mechanism for returning the two independently movable first and second foot placement sections toward alignment in the absence of a force by a user displacing the two foot placement sections from alignment.
  • 10. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising: a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are rotatably coupled to one another;a first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;a first position sensor configured to sense the position of the first foot placement section;a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel;a second position sensor configured to sense the position of the second foot placement section; anda second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel,wherein the device excludes a steering structure that ascends upward from the foot placement sections, and wherein the first foot placement section is coupled to the second foot placement section such that the first foot placement section can rotate forward while the second foot placement section can rotate backward.
  • 11. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising: a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are rotatably coupled to one another;a first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;a first position sensor configured to sense the position of the first foot placement section;a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel;a second position sensor configured to sense the position of the second foot placement section; anda second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel,wherein the device excludes a steering structure that ascends upward from the foot placement sections, and wherein the first foot placement section is coupled to the second foot placement section such that the first foot placement section can rotate in the same direction as, and more steeply than, the second foot placement section.
  • 12. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising: a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are rotatably coupled to one another;a first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;a first position sensor configured to sense the position of the first foot placement section;a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel;a second position sensor configured to sense the position of the second foot placement section; anda second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel,wherein the device excludes a steering structure that ascends upward from the foot placement sections, and wherein the vehicle is configured to move in a forward direction and a rearward direction, and wherein the first foot placement section is configured to rotate in the forward direction and the second foot placement section is configured to rotate in the rearward direction.
  • 13. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising: a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are rotatably coupled to one another;a first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;a processor; anda first position sensor associated with the first foot placement section and a first motor configured to drive the first wheel, and a second position sensor associated with the second foot placement section and a second motor configured to drive the second wheel,wherein tilting the first foot placement section forward results in the first wheel being driven forward, and tilting the first foot placement section more steeply forward than the second foot placement section is tilted forward results in the first wheel being driven faster forward than the second wheel, and wherein tilting the first foot placement section forward while tilting the second foot placement section backward results in the wheels being driven in opposite directions.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present applicationThis is an application for reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,278. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 as a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/165,654, which is an application for reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,278. Each of the aforementioned patent and applications claims the benefit of provisional application No. 61/597,777, filed Feb. 12, 2012, for a Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Vehicle by the inventor herein.

US Referenced Citations (74)
Number Name Date Kind
5131875 Lee Jul 1992 A
6302230 Kamen Oct 2001 B1
6367817 Kamen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6538411 Field et al. Mar 2003 B1
6581714 Kamen et al. Jun 2003 B1
6651763 Kamen et al. Nov 2003 B1
6845829 Hafendorfer Jan 2005 B2
6920947 Kamen et al. Jul 2005 B2
7023330 Kamen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7083178 Potter Aug 2006 B2
7090040 Kamen et al. Aug 2006 B2
7195259 Gang Mar 2007 B2
7275607 Kamen et al. Oct 2007 B2
7338056 Chen Mar 2008 B2
7363993 Ishii Apr 2008 B2
7367572 Jiang May 2008 B2
7467681 Hiramatsu Dec 2008 B2
7479872 Kamen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481291 Nishikawa Jan 2009 B2
D601922 Imai et al. Oct 2009 S
7597334 Chen Oct 2009 B2
7740099 Field et al. Jun 2010 B2
7775534 Chen et al. Aug 2010 B2
7783392 Oikawa Aug 2010 B2
7857088 Field et al. Dec 2010 B2
7958956 Kakinuma et al. Jun 2011 B2
8014923 Ishii et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028777 Kakinuma et al. Oct 2011 B2
8047556 Jang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8113524 Karpman Feb 2012 B2
8157274 Chen Apr 2012 B2
8170780 Field et al. May 2012 B2
8225891 Takenaka et al. Jul 2012 B2
8408565 An Apr 2013 B2
8459668 Yoon Jun 2013 B2
8467941 Field et al. Jun 2013 B2
8490723 Heinzmann et al. Jul 2013 B2
8606468 Kosaka Dec 2013 B2
8738278 Chen May 2014 B2
8978791 Ha et al. Mar 2015 B2
20030155167 Kamen Aug 2003 A1
20040005958 Kamen et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040262871 Schreuder et al. Dec 2004 A1
20060202439 Kahlert et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060260857 Kakinuma et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070273118 Conrad Nov 2007 A1
20080029985 Chen Feb 2008 A1
20080147281 Ishii et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090032323 Kakinuma et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090078485 Gutsch et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090105908 Casey et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090115149 Wallis et al. May 2009 A1
20090200746 Yamamoto Aug 2009 A1
20090315293 Kosaka Dec 2009 A1
20100025139 Kosaka et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100114468 Field et al. May 2010 A1
20100121538 Ishii et al. May 2010 A1
20100222994 Field et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100225080 Smith Sep 2010 A1
20100237645 Trainer Sep 2010 A1
20110131759 An Jun 2011 A1
20110209929 Heinzmann et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110220427 Chen Sep 2011 A1
20110221160 Shaw Sep 2011 A1
20110238247 Yen et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110282532 Kosaka et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120035809 Kosaka Feb 2012 A1
20120205176 Ha et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239284 Field et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120290162 Stevens et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130032422 Chen Feb 2013 A1
20130032423 Chen Feb 2013 A1
20130105239 Fung May 2013 A1
20130228385 Chen Sep 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
2486450 Apr 2002 CN
100431906 Nov 2008 CN
101309730 Nov 2008 CN
101353070 Jan 2009 CN
201205442 Mar 2009 CN
101444667 Jun 2009 CN
101513569 Aug 2009 CN
201283206 Aug 2009 CN
201350326 Nov 2009 CN
20142315 Mar 2010 CN
201419008 Mar 2010 CN
201431762 Mar 2010 CN
101920728 Dec 2010 CN
101920728 Dec 2010 CN
101939065 Jan 2011 CN
102089200 Jun 2011 CN
101513569 Jul 2011 CN
301604610 Jul 2011 CN
201978449 Sep 2011 CN
202201103 Apr 2012 CN
10251663 Jun 2012 CN
102514662 Jun 2012 CN
102514662 Jun 2012 CN
102514663 Jun 2012 CN
102602481 Jul 2012 CN
102616310 Aug 2012 CN
1791609 Nov 2011 EP
2001178863 Jul 2001 JP
2004359094 Dec 2004 JP
200594898 Apr 2005 JP
2005094898 Apr 2005 JP
2005094898 Apr 2005 JP
2005335471 Dec 2005 JP
2006001384 Jan 2006 JP
2006001385 Jan 2006 JP
2006008013 Jan 2006 JP
3981733 Sep 2007 JP
2010030436 Feb 2010 JP
2010030437 Feb 2010 JP
2010030438 Feb 2010 JP
2010030568 Feb 2010 JP
2010030569 Feb 2010 JP
2010035330 Feb 2010 JP
2011131620 Jul 2011 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (101)
Entry
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court, No. 2017-2591, Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc. and Shane Chen v. International Trade Commission and Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Limited., Swagway, LLC, and Jetson Electric Bikes, LLC., Investigation No. 337-TA-1000, Reply of Appellee U.S. International Trade Commission to Appellants' Response to the Commission's Motion for Dismissal of the Appeal, May 25, 2018, 52 pages.
Administrative Judgment, Beijing Intellectual Property Court of the People's Republic of China, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 10 pages.
Exhibit 11 from co-pending Chinese litigation for rejected Application No. CN201210112847.X (CN102602481), including Office Actions from the Examiner, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 81 pages.
Appellants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc. and Shane Chen), Non-Confidential Brief, Appeal from ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. 17-2591, Jan. 8, 2018, 174 pages. [Divided Into 4 Parts].
Kim el al., Development of a Two-Wheeled Mobile Tilting & Balancing (MTB) Robat, 2011 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Gyeonggi-do, 2011, pp. 1-6.
Clark, et al. “Edgar, A Self-Balancing Scooter Final Report” (2005). (Divided in to 2 parts for submission).
Li et al., A coaxial couple wheeled equilibrium robot with T-S fuzzy equilibrium control, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 202-300, 2011.
Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen), Documents in Support of Request to commence an investigation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Exhibit 1010, Mar. 21, 2016, pp. 1-132. [References split in to 6 parts].
Declaration of Dr. Gerald Cook, Exhibit 1008, Inter Partes Review No. 2016-01778, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-98.
Respondents' (Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sorting Goods, Inc., Newegg, Inc., Powerboard a.k.a. Optimum Trading Co., United Integral, Inc. dba Skque Products, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Ltd., and Jetson Electric Bikes LLC) Opening Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-229 [References split in to 4 parts].
Contingent Petition for Review of Initial Determination by Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., and Newegg, Inc., ITC Cass No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-39.
Quick, Darren, Nissan Joins Personal Mobility Field with “Segway-skis”, http://www.gizmag.com/nissan-personal-mobility-device/13210/, New Atlas, Urban Transport, Oct. 27, 2009, pp. 1-9.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R. 42.108, Petravick et al., Admnistrative Patent Judges, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Mar. 16, 2017, pp. 1-20.
Quick, Darren, Nissan joins personal mobility field with Segway-skis, www.gizmag.com, Oct. 27, 2009.
Sasaki, Makiko, et al., Steering Control of the Personal Riding type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP), 2005 IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Aug. 2005, pp. 54-60.
Hornyak, Tim, Robot roller skates less bulky than Segway, www.cnet.com, Nov. 27, 2009.
Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-93.
Declaration of W. Mark Richter in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Dec. 27, 2016, pp. 1-8.
Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen), Documents in Support of Request to commence an investigation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Exhibit 1010, Mar. 21, 2016, pp. 1-132.
Declaration of Dr. Gerald Cook, Exhibit 1008, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-98.
Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Initial Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-217.
Respondents' (Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Newegg, Inc., Powerboard a.k.a. Optimum Trading Co., United Integral, Inc. dba Skque Products, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Ltd., and Jetson Electric Bikes LLC) Opening Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-229.
Claim Construction Brief of The Commission Investigative Staff, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 29, 2016, pp. 1-26.
Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Rebuttal Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 2, 2016, pp. 1-24.
Respondents' (Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Newegg, Inc., Powerboard a.k.a. Optimum Trading Co., United Integral, Inc. dba Skque Products, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Ltd., and Jetson Electric Bikes LLC) Rebuttal Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 2, 2016, pp. 1-48.
Notice of Institution of Investigation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, May 20, 2016, pp. 1-48.
Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Dec. 27, 2016, pp. 1-51.
Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Petition for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-40.
Contingent Petition for Review of Initial Determination by Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., and Newegg, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-39.
Respondent Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd's Contingent Petition for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-22.
Petition of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations for Review In-Part of the Initial Determination on Violation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-28.
Jetson's Opposition to Petitions Filed by the ITC Attorney and Razor, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-16.
Complainants' Opposition to Respondents' Contingent Petitions for Review Filed By (1) Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Co., Ltd., and (2) Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., and Newegg, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-62.
Combined Response of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations to Complainants' Petition for Review and Respondents' Contingent Petitions For Review of the Initial Determination on Violation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-48.
Response to Complainants' and Staff's Petitions for Review of Initial Determination by Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., and Newegg.com, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-34.
Alibaba's Response to the Petitions for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-7.
Order 25: Construing the Terms of the Asserted Claims of the Patent at Issue, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Nov. 1, 2016, pp. 1-26.
Consolidated Initial Proposed Claim Constructions, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jul. 19, 2016, pp. 1-8.
Respondents Powerboard LLC's and Jetson Electric Bikes, LLC's Motion for Summary Determination of Non-Infringement, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Dec. 12, 2016, pp. 1-30.
Respondent Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.'s Objections and Responses to Compliantants' First Set of Contention Interrogatories, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 9, 2016, pp. 1-208.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,278, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-73.
Steering Control of the Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP) Edmonton, AB, Canada (Sasaki) 2005.
“More Weird Ways to Skate the Streets” (Tran), Sep. 7, 2007.
Personal Mobility Robot, Mar. 2011.
“Getting Started Manual, Segway Personal Transporter (PT) i2, x2” (Segway Manual) 2006.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; Exhibit AA (Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 6,845,829).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; Exhibit BB (Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 5,131,875).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; DGL Defendant's Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3.3 U.S. Pat. No. RE. 46,964 Exhibit E, Sasaki-Steering Control of the Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP) Published: 2005.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; Amended Exhibit I—JP 2005-94898 A, Published: Apr. 7, 2005.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; Exhibit Y (Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Second Amended Invalidity Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-MF; Exhibit Z—“Getting Started Manual, Segway Personal Transporter (PT) i2, x2” (Segway Manual).
Kim, Sangtae et al., Development of a Two-Wheeled Mobile Tilting & Balancing (MTB) Robot, 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Oct. 26-29, 2011, pp. 1-6, Kintex, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Quirk, Trevor, “Why you shouldn't expect a hoverboard any time soon,” Christian Science Monitor, URL=https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0213/Why-you-shouldn-t-expect-a-hoverboard-any-time-soon, Feb. 13, 2012, Web. Jul. 5, 2016, pp. 1-5.
Ouick, Darren, Nissan Joins Personal Mobility Field with “Segway-skis”, http:///www.gizmag.com/nissan-personal-mobility-device/13210/, New Atlas, Urban Transport, Oct. 27, 2009, pp. 1-9.
Bash, John D., “How Do Self Balancing Scooters Work?” URL=https://bestelectrichoverboard.com/hoverboard-faq/how-do-self-balancing-scooters-work/, Exhibit 2012, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 12, 2015, Web. Oct. 8, 2016, pp. 1-7.
Wells, Georgia, “What It's Like to Have Wheels for Feet: Test Driving the Latest ‘Hoverboards,’” The Wall Street Journal, URL=https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-its-like-to-have-wheels-for-feet-test-driving-the-latest-hoverboards-1446055640, Exhibit 2011, Oct. 28, 2015, Web. Oct. 8, 2016, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, pp. 1-5.
Google Trends—Web Search Interest: hoverboard—United States, Jan. 2004-Jul. 2016, Jul. 5, 2016, Exhibit 2010, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, pp. 1-6.
Banks, Alec, “Everything You Need to Know About the ‘Hoverboard’ Craze,” URL=http://www.highsnobiety.com/2015/10/14/hoverboard-history/, Exhibit 2004, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Oct. 14, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-13.
Detrick, Ben, “Celebrities on Scooters (Catch Them if You Can),” The New York Times, URL=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/fashion/cara-delevingne-justin-bieber-meek-mill-stephen-curry-on-scooters.html, Exhibit 2005, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 15, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-6.
Murphy, Mike, “Everything you've ever wanted to know about the hoverboard craze,” Quartz, URL=https://qz.com/495935/everything-youve-ever-wanted-to-know-about-the-hoverboard-craze/, Exhibit 2006, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 11, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-12.
Kantrowitz, Alex, Everything You Need to Know About The Hoverboard Craze, BuzzFeed News, URL=https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/a-crash-course-in-hoverboards?utm_term=.qwV3MnB77#.debmbaMjj, Exhibit 2007, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 27, 2015, Web. Dec. 26, 2016, pp. 1-9.
Hoverguru, http://hoverguru.com/, “‘They're completely different products’: IO HAWK President John Soibatian not concerned about infringing on Hovertrax patent,” URL=http://hoverguru.com/posts/theyre-completely-different-products-io-hawk-president-john-soibatian-not-concerned-about-infringing-on-hovertrax-patent/, Exhibit 2008, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 31, 2015, pp. 1-5.
Robinson, Mandy, “Hoverboard Black Friday Sales: Best Places to Get One Before Christmas,” URL=https://www.inquisitr.com/2589773/hoverboard-black-friday-sales-best-places-to-get-one-before-christmas/, Gadgets, INQUISITR.com. Exhibit 2009, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 24, 2015, Web. Jul. 27, 2016, pp. 1-8.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/597,777, filed Feb. 12, 2012, Applicant: Shane Chen, 8 pages.
Abeygunawardhana et al., Vibration Suppression of Two-Wheel Mobile Manipulator Using Resonance-Ratio-Control-Based Null-Space Control, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 4137-4146 (2010).
Kim et al., Development of a Two-Wheeled Mobile Tilting & Balancing (MTB) Robot, 2011 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Gyeonggi-do, 2011, pp. 1-6.
Azizan et al., Fuzzy Control Based on LMI Approach and Fuzzy Interpretation of the Rider Input for Two Wheeled Balancing Human Transporter, 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, Xiamen, 2010, pp. 192-197.
Cardozo et al., Prototype for a Self-Balanced Personal Transporter, 2012 Workshop on Engineering Applications (WEA), Bogota, 2012, pp. 1-6.
Chiu et al., Design and implement of the self-dynamic controller for two-wheel transporter, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vancouver, BC, 2006, pp. 480-483.
Tsai et al., Intelligent Adaptive Motion Control Using Fuzzy Basis Function Networks for Self-Balancing Two-Wheeled Transporters, 2010 IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Barcelona, 2010 pp. 1-6.
Choi et al., Four and Two Wheel Transformable Dynamic Mobile Platform, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, pp. 1-4.
Clark, et al. “Edgar, A Self-Balancing Scooter Final Report” (2005).
Coelho et al., Development of a Mobile Two-Wheel Balancing Platform for Autonomous Applications, 15th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, Auckland, 2008, pp. 575-580.
Rebuttal Expert Report of William Singhose, Ph.D., on Claim Construction Issues (dated Aug. 10, 2016), including all attachments thereto and exhibits thereto.
Sasaki et al., Forward and Backward Motion Control of Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 3331-3336.
Li et al., A coaxial couple wheeled equilibrium robot with T-S fuzzy equilibrium control, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 292-300, 2011.
Li et al., Controller Design of a Two-Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Mobile Robot, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Takamatsu, pp. 7-12.
Seo et al., Simulation of Attitude Control of a Wheeled Inverted Pendulum, International Conference on Control, Automation, and Systems, 2007, Seoul, pp. 2264-2269.
Li et al., Mechanical Design and Dynamic Modeling of a Two-Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Mobile Robot, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Jinan, 2007, pp. 1614-1619.
Lin et al., Adaptive Robust Self-Balancing and Steering of a Two-Wheeled Human Transportation Vehicle, 62 J Intell Robot Syst, pp. 103-123 (2011) (first published online Aug. 27, 2010).
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R. 42.108, Petravick et al., Administrative Patent Judges, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Mar. 16, 2017, pp. 1-20.
Sasaki, Makiko et al., Steering Control of the Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP), IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Dec. 5, 2005, pp. 3821-3826, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group, Ltd.'s Notice of Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend its Second Amended Non-Infringement Contentions, Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Benjamin A. Katzenellenbogen in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Defendant DGL Group Ltd.'s Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Notice of Motion to Stay, Oral Argument Requested [L.Civ.R. 78.1]; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Brief in Support of Motion to Stay, Oral Argument Requested [L.Civ.R. 78.1]; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Order Granting Motion to Stay; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Supplemental Declaration of Benjamin A. Katzenellenbogen in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME.
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Bryan J. Jaketic in Support of Defendant DGL Group Ltd.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 1 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Bryan J. Jaketic in Support of Defendant DGL Group Ltd.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 2 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Bryan J. Jaketic in Support of Defendant DGL Group Ltd.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 3 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Bryan J. Jaketic in Support of Defendant DGL Group Ltd.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Their Fourth Amended Infringement Contentions; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 4 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Steven M. Auvil in Support of Motion to Stay; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 1 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Steven M. Auvil in Support of Motion to Stay; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 2 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Steven M. Auvil in Support of Motion to Stay; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 3 of 4).
Razor USA LLC and Shane Chen, Plaintiffs. v. DGL Group, Ltd., Defendant; Declaration of Steven M. Auvil in Support of Motion to Stay; Case No. 2:19-cv-12939-JMV-AME, with Exhibits (Part 4 of 4).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61597777 Feb 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15165654 May 2016 US
Child 13764781 US
Reissues (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13764781 Feb 2013 US
Child 16000535 US
Parent 13764781 Feb 2013 US
Child 15165654 US