This invention relates to a detonator system and to a detonator and a connector for use in a detonator system.
An electronic detonator system can be constructed in different ways. In one approach use is made of a plurality of identifiable detonators which are connected to a two-wire bus. The unique identity of each detonator allows the individual detonators to be correctly addressed.
In another approach use is made of a so-called “daisy chain” in which the wiring order of the detonators is established by control equipment connected to a multi-wire bus. The wiring order is important for it allows each detonator to be distinguished from the others.
In certain blasting situations, particularly where regular timing delays are programmed into each detonator, the connection order of detonators can be used to establish a blast timing pattern, and a daisy chain system may be preferable in this application. A drawback is that, generally, three or four wires are required to make suitable connections to the detonators. The cost per detonator in this type of system is often higher than in a similar two-wire system. Reliability is also adversely impacted as the use of more wires requires correspondingly more connections and this increases the prospect of connectivity problems.
PCT/AU2006/000315 describes an electronic blasting system in which detonators are connected to a surface harness by two-wire leads. A respective actuator is positioned between each adjacent pair of detonators. The actuator is responsive to a command signal from a control unit. This means that the actuator must possess the capability to identify, and then respond to, the command signal which may be one of a plurality of possible signals. The inherent requirement for intelligence on-board the actuator increases the complexity of the actuator and thus increases the cost of a detonator system based on the use of a plurality of the actuators.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,066 discloses detonators which are connected so that programming signals will only be received by a given detonator when an adjacent detonator, nearer to a signal output, has been programmed. This is achieved by making use of a respective connector which is associated with each detonator and which includes a switching device which is operated by a logic element. Signals can only pass beyond a connector when a detonator which is associated with that connector has been programmed. To do this an additional wire is presumed to be required between the detonator and the connector. This feature increases the cost, and decreases the reliability, of a detonator system which makes use of this technique. The patent specification is silent regarding the use of the detonator wires for the transmission of logic signals.
ZA2009/06238 describes a system in which two-wire detonators are connected successively to a two-wire bus with appropriate connectors. Each connector includes a timer which initiates a timing interval and a switch, responsive to an end of the timing interval, to effect an electrical connection between control equipment and a detonator associated with the connector. This approach, which allows the detonators to be enumerated (identified), is relatively slow since the duration of the time interval, typically nominally the same for each connector, must permit for possible multiple communication attempts on the bus, before a following detonator is connected, to ensure that the system can function in noisy signal environments. Also, the control equipment is unable to effect a change in state of a connector even if communication with an associated detonator is successful on a first attempt.
An object of the present invention is to provide a detonator system wherein detonators and connectors can be connected to a two-wire bus without the passing of a time interval of fixed duration between successive connections.
Another object is to provide a low-cost connector of relatively simple construction for use in a detonator system.
The invention provides, in the first instance, a detonator which includes a circuit which, in response to at least one command on a two-wire bus, generates a first signal using a first modulation process and, upon occurrence of at least one designated event, generates a second signal, using a second modulation process, which is distinguishable from the first signal.
The circuit may, upon occurrence of a further event, generate a third signal, using a third modulation process, which is distinguishable from the first and second signals.
Each modulation process may be based on use of any appropriate modulation technique. Preferably though for practical and cost reasons each modulation process is based on the use of current modulation and, to enable one signal to be distinguished from another, the amplitude of the current of each signal is varied in a controlled manner.
The first modulation process may result in a signal having a relatively low current amplitude. The second modulation process may result in a signal having a substantially higher current amplitude which is readily distinguishable from the low current amplitude.
The invention provides, in the second instance, a connector, for connecting a detonator to a two-wire bus, which includes a sensor and a switch which is operable in response to the sensor, wherein the detonator is capable of generating a first signal using a first modulation process and, in response to occurrence of at least one designated event, of generating a second signal using a second modulation process and wherein the first signal is distinguishable, by the sensor, from the second signal on the basis of the modulation processes used in the generation of the signals, e.g. on the basis of the relative amplitudes of the signals.
The sensor may cause operation of the switch, in a desired way, only upon detection of the second signal by the sensor. The action of the switch may affect one or both wires of the two-wire bus i.e. only one wire is open-circuited and then closed, or both wires are open-circuited and then closed.
Each modulation process may be based on any appropriate modulation technique. Preferably for practical and cost reasons each modulation process is based on current modulation. For example the first signal may have a current amplitude at a relatively low level and the second signal may have a current amplitude at a relatively high level which is clearly distinguishable from the first level.
The invention also provides an electronic detonator system which includes an elongate two-wire bus, at least one detonator of the aforementioned kind and at least one connector of the aforementioned kind which connects the detonator to the two-wire bus.
In the system the detonator may be capable of responding to commands on the two-wire bus, emanating for example from control equipment connected to the bus, by generating a first signal using the first modulation process and, upon occurrence of the at least one designated event, by generating a second signal using the second modulation process.
In a preferred form of the invention the detonator, in response to a signal, e.g. a command signal, from the control equipment generates a first signal at a first level of current modulation and, upon occurrence of at least one designated event in, or notified to, the detonator, generates a second signal at a second level of current modulation which is higher than the first level.
The switch in the connector may be responsive only to the signal at the higher level of modulation.
The level of current modulation may be detected in the connector by means of at least one resistor which is in series with the detonator.
The switching action of the switch in the connector may be implemented through the use of field effect transistors, or of any other appropriate switching means.
The switch in the connector may be latched, or toggled, according to requirement, in response to the second signal from the detonator i.e. the signal which is at the higher level of modulation.
It is also possible for the detonator to generate a third signal which is distinguishable on the basis of the level of current modulation of the third signal, from the first and second signals. The third signal may be used to change the state of the switch e.g. open to closed, or vice versa.
The designated event which initiates the generation of the second signal at the higher level of current modulation may be any appropriate event related to the effective or desired mode of operation of the detonator system. Without being limiting the event may be one or more of the following:
In a different form of the invention the connector includes first and second switches which are respectively responsive to signals from the detonator which have different levels of current modulation.
The invention is further described by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The connector 26 includes a sensing circuit 40 (shown in block form in
In the detonator system 10 the bus 12 has two wires 12A and 12B only Each detonator is connected by means of two wires 22, 24 only to the bus via a corresponding connector 26. Once all the detonators have been connected to the bus the control equipment 16 transmits a first command signal on the bus.
The first command signal is received by the first detonator i.e. the detonator which is closest to the control equipment. The remaining detonators, which are downstream from the first detonator, are isolated from the first command signal because the switch 42, in the first connector, is open. An identity number can be assigned to, or can be read from, the first detonator and validation or other checks can be done on the first detonator. The first detonator can also be programmed at this stage, if required. The specifics of the detonator command sequences are not considered further herein as these are well known in the art and are dependent, inter alia, on the design of the detonator.
Commands to the first detonator from the control equipment are processed by the processor 30 in the detonator. A signal 36, in response to the commands, is generated by the circuit 32 using techniques which are known in the art. The signal 36, shown in a representative manner only in
Assume that at least one designated event occurs. This event may be selected for the purpose and, by way of example only, may be one or more of the following:
For example validation checks may have been carried out successfully on the first detonator and an identifier may have been assigned to the first detonator. When this occurs the processor 30 (in the first detonator) actuates the circuit 32 to produce a second output signal 36B (see
For example a command signal may be uniquely linked to the first or second detonator, or to the state of the first or second detonator, in a way which ensures that the signal can only reach the second detonator.
The aforementioned process continues in succession down the two-wire bus. Each detonator thus, in sequence, is uniquely and directly addressable by the control equipment 16 in a manner which allows for secure bidirectional communications. Each detonator, in turn, is uniquely identified. Upon the occurrence of a designated or predetermined event at each detonator the following detonator is enabled in the sense that it is connected to the control equipment by closure of the switch in the preceding connector. An inherent time delay of a minimum duration is not associated with each connector and switch closure takes place in the shortest possible time.
The switch 42, in the illustrated example, is closed by the second signal 36B which is generated by the circuit 32 of the associated detonator upon detection of a predetermined event by the associated processor/asic 30. It is possible for the circuit 32 to generate a third signal, not shown, at a level of modulation which is distinct from the levels 46 and 48. The sensor 40, or an additional sensor, could be responsive to the third signal and this could be used to open the switch 42.
In a variation of the invention (shown in
The connector circuit includes four field effect transistors 50, 52, 54 and 56 respectively (which are used to implement the switching action of the switch 42, notionally shown in
A capacitor 70 is connected across the gate and source of each of the transistors 50 and 52 respectively. A capacitor 72 is connected across the gate and source of each of the transistors 54 and 56 respectively.
Assume that the terminal 60 is positive with respect to the terminal 62. The current to the detonator 20 passes through the resistor 68. In normal operation, or during talk back from the detonator to the control equipment 16, the voltage developed across the resistor 68 is insufficient to switch either of the transistors 50 and 52 on. Thus the transistors 54 and 56 are held off. As a result voltage modulated signals, from the control equipment 16 to the detonator, that are present at the terminals 60 and 62 are not present at the terminals 64 and 66, i.e. the switch 42 (shown in
If the detonator draws a higher current then the voltage across the resistor 68 increases and the transistors 50 and 52 are turned on. When the transistor 52 turns on the transistor 54 turns on and so does the transistor 56. The transistor 56, when turning on, produces a latching action in that the transistor 50 is held on even though the voltage across the resistor 68 might drop below the initial high value at which the transistors 50 and 52 were turned on. The voltage across the resistor 68 would drop in this way when the high current consumption or sink of the detonator 20 terminates.
At this stage each of the transistors 50 to 56 is conducting. This remains the case even for brief alternate polarity signalling on the terminals 60 and 62 for the capacitors 70 and 72 respective hold the transistors 50 and 54 on.
Consequently a signal which is presented at the terminals 60 and 62 is present at the terminals 64 and 66. If power is removed from the terminals 60 and 62, or if the polarity of the signal applied to these terminals is reversed for a sufficiently long period to allow either of the capacitors 70 and 72 to discharge, the switch (42) embodied in the connector opens. Diodes 80 and 82 prevent the capacitors 70 and 72 from discharging forcibly if the polarity at the terminals 60 and 62 is reversed by the control equipment. These capacitors normally discharge via resistors 84 and 86 which are connected in parallel with the capacitors, with a polarity reversal or if power is removed.
In the circuit shown in
The principles described herein can be used, with substantial benefit, in conjunction with known techniques in the art and, in particular, in combination with the markers which are described in the specification of International Patent Application No. PCT/ZA2004/00079 to provide flexible or various time delays to the detonators or to adjust these time delays. Clearly time assignments or delays can be transmitted from the control equipment 16 to respective detonators.
In
The functioning of the connector 26 is preferably carried out by means of circuitry included in a housing of the connector. An equivalent effect, which is intended to fall within the scope of the present invention, can however be achieved by providing suitable circuitry in an appropriate module which is associated with the detonator wires 22, 24, if required.
In the arrangement shown in
The circuit shown in
This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/582,688 filed on Sep. 4, 2012, which is a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/ZA2011/000025 filed on Apr. 18, 2011, which claims priority to South African Patent Application No. 2010/03087 filed May 4, 2010. The entire contents of each of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4846066 | Beattie et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5997343 | Mills | Dec 1999 | A |
6966262 | Jennings, III | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7617775 | Teowee | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7694627 | Koekemoer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7911760 | Lownds | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8582275 | Yan et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9157719 | Schlenter | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20050122201 | Davis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060273661 | Toebes | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20100288149 | Schlenter | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110121654 | Recker | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200906238 | May 2010 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/ZA2011/000025 dated Sep. 6, 2011 (10 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160033247 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13582688 | US | |
Child | 14881101 | US |