The present invention relates to tying tools, and more particularly to tools for tying balloons, cord, rope, and similar media.
The following is a tabulation of some prior art that presently appears relevant:
It is common to tie knots in cords, strings, and the like for the purpose of securing these materials to other objects, to terminate the end of these materials (e.g., to prevent fraying of the ends, etc.), or, in the case of balloons, to close off the inlet to the balloon and prevent entrapped gasses from escaping. While this often can be done by hand, a tool to assist with the tying process is needed to reduce hand fatigue, to protect hands from abrasion, and to perform the tying operation more quickly.
A variety of methods and devices have been devised to assist with tying balloons and other elastic media. Windson (1946) discloses a disk which, when affixed to an inflated balloon, prevents it from deflating. However, his device requires a separate disk to be permanently attached to each balloon.
Alternatively, several types of reusable tools have been proposed. A first type, which might be generically referred to as a slotted probe, consists of an elongated member, stick, or probe into which slots or other narrow features have been formed to retain one or more sections of the balloon and make tying a knot easier. Examples of this type include U.S. Pats. 5,039,142 (1991) to Muma, 5,314,217 (1994) to Place, 5,611,578 (1997) to Angelico et al., 6,082,785 (2000) to Morgan et al., and 7,549,683 (2007) to Sikorcin. Johansson et al. (2012) uses a similar technique to others in this type, though it is a more complex device incorporating an inflation pump, as well. Boesl (2001) similarly employs slots at the end of a rod as holding features, though this device is hollow rather than solid as some of the others. All of these devices involve gripping the device in the palm of the hand while tying the balloon with the other. This hinders dexterity because the fingers of the tool hand cannot be used to help secure the balloon or otherwise assist in the tying operation. Peverley (1989) also consists of a rod with a slot through which to pass the end of the balloon, but it is designed to be affixed to a gas tank, limiting the mobility of the operator.
A second type, generally referred to as a multi-post type, consists of two or more raised protrusions on the tool around which the material is wound and tied—for example, U.S. Pats. 5,647,615 (1997) to Messier, 6,540,267 (2003) to Rochbock, 6,902,212 (2005) to Mize, 8,292,335 (2009) to Hemingway, and 5,882,051 (1999) to Dreger et al., U.S. Pat. Application 20160059141 (2016) to Plouffe, and U.K. Patent Application 2250032 (1992) to Jones et al. Plouffe is held in the palm of a hand, suffering the same dexterity limitation as the slotted probe types discussed earlier. Messier and Rohbock are designed to be affixed to a desk or other solid surface, which limits mobility of the operator while the device is in use. Mize and Hemingway are held on the back of two fingers, but the two-post design presents a small gap through which the end of the balloon can be passed, in contrast to the designs of Plouffe, whose three-post design naturally creates a larger gap. Additionally, in both Mize and Hemingway the device is retained around the fingers by a single loop rather than independent finger holes, limiting mechanical stability and control, and if the loop or strap is snug enough to secure it to the fingers without gripping it, the strap will also hinder dexterity. Jones is a variant of these designs in which the posts are affixed to a disk held by the thumb and finger, which can cause fatigue rather quickly, as is the case for Dreger et al., where the posts protrude radially from the disk rather than axially as in Jones.
A third type features a hollow cylindrical structure with an opening running the length of it. Kentfield (1969) describes a tool for knotting bands together consisting of a handle-mounted cylinder with an opening on one side. With two or more bands wrapped around the cylinder, a separate pick is used to grab one of the bands, pull it through the cylinder, around the remaining bands, and thereby form a knot holding them all together. This design is not intended for forming simple knots in the end of a single piece of material, and it is gripped in the palm of one hand, limiting the user’s dexterity. U.S. Pats. 5,568,950 (1996) and 7,967,344 (2011), both to Herren, describe a curved structure integral with a solid loop that is held on two fingers as in Mize, except that the tying feature is designed to be held toward the volar or palm side of the hand, rather than the dorsal or back side as in Mize. This keeps the working surface in closer proximity to the pinch point of the balloon where it is held by the thumb than in Mize, limiting the length that the balloon is stretched and consequently the amount of force needed to tie the knot. However, because the tool feature protrudes from the palm, it hinders the use of the tool hand from holding the balloon when inflating it. U.S. Pat. 8,141,326 (2012) and U.S. Pat. Application 20110030844 (2011), both to Wang, describe a similar curved tying tool, except that it is threaded for attachment to a water hose and includes a fill nozzle, while U.S. Pat. Application 20010253255 to Dellaquila (2011) is designed for attachment to a gas supply such as helium. Chinese Patent Application 104274978 (2015) to Sun is a simplified design intended to be held with a single finger via a short ring or tube; as such, it will quickly lead to user fatigue and discomfort due to the pressures it will apply to the hand, especially when wrapping an elastic material such as a balloon.
More complex tying mechanisms exist as well, such as U.S. Pat. 6,227,580 (2001) to Sundby and Korean patent application 20120056025 (2012) to Gil et al., but these devices are constructed from multiple moving parts, significantly increasing the cost of the device.
The available tying tools heretofore known suffer from one or more of the following disadvantages:
In accordance with one embodiment a tying tool comprises a finger grip having two loops to which is attached a tapered tube having an opening running the length of the tube, where the walls of the opening are nonparallel to the tube’s axis.
Accordingly several advantages of one or more aspects are as follows: to provide a tying tool that can be held without unduly hindering the use of the operator’s hands, that provides mechanical leverage while tying elastic media, that can be easily manufactured, that is a single-piece design, that has a notch which hinders the material being tied from slipping off, that can be used for tying a variety of cord-like materials inclusive of but not limited to balloons, and that is simple to use. Other advantages of one or more aspects will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description.
In the drawings, closely related figures have the same number but different alphabetic suffixes.
10 tool head
11 junction of the handle rings
12 opening in the tube wall
14 flange
16 support posts
18 handle
20 tool head centerline
22 axis of cut of the opening
24 edges of the opening
26 notch
30 body
32 neck
34 lip
36 body-neck transition
50 thumb rest
52 curved corner
60 spacer
62 handle narrowing
64 joined finger loops
66 triple finger loops
70 alternate opening edge
72 alternate notch
80 alternate head
82 alternate head post
One embodiment of the tool is illustrated in
The tube is typically tapered from the flange side toward the opposite end to facilitate manufacture using injection molding, where the angle of this taper or draft is normally 0.5 to 2 degrees.
To operate the tool, an inflated but untied balloon is held closed at the lip 34, typically by the user’s dominant hand, to prevent the escape of gasses. The operation of the tool first begins by holding it by the handle 18, typically using the index and middle fingers of the nondominant hand, with the tool resting on the intermediate phalanges of those fingers. The independent loops for the two fingers allow greater control of the tool, making it easier to both hold it while not in use and to apply leverage when the elastic balloon material is stretched over it. Instead of curling the fingers to grip the handle, the tool can be lightly held by letting it simply rest on the two fingers, by laterally squeezing the two fingers against the junction of the rings 11 (
The completion of the tying operation is shown in
Additional embodiments are shown in
The handle design provides a number of benefits to the user and could be adapted to tying tool designs other than the open tube described in the first embodiment.
From the description above, a number of advantages of some embodiments of this tying tool become evident:
Accordingly, the reader will see that at least one of the embodiments provides a tying tool that can be used to tie inflated balloons simply and easily, that allows simultaneous use of the hands with little encumbrance, and that can be manufactured inexpensively. Furthermore, the tying tool has the additional advantages that:
Although the description above contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments but as merely providing illustrations of some of several embodiments. For example, the cross-section of the tube can have other shapes, such as oval, elliptical, rectangular, etc.; the opening can extend less than the full length of the tube; the flange can be omitted; the support posts can be omitted so that the handle attaches directly to the head; etc.
Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/801,031, filed 2019 Feb 4 by the present inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2396906 | Windson | Mar 1946 | A |
3476423 | Kentfield | Nov 1969 | A |
3993230 | Oakes | Nov 1976 | A |
4989906 | Peverley | Feb 1991 | A |
5039142 | Muma | Aug 1991 | A |
5314217 | Place | May 1994 | A |
5568950 | Herren | Oct 1996 | A |
5609175 | Gerry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611578 | Angelico et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5647615 | Messier | Jul 1997 | A |
5882051 | Dreger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6082785 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6227580 | Sundby | May 2001 | B1 |
6286173 | Briones | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325426 | Boesl | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6540267 | Rohbock et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6902212 | Mize | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7549683 | Sikorcin | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7685684 | James | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7967344 | Herren | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8141326 | Wang | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8292335 | Hemingway | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20070028727 | Schiller | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20110253255 | Dellaquila et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120085430 | Johansson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20150027280 | Euloth | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160059141 | Plouffe | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104274978 | Jan 2015 | CN |
206867718 | Jan 2018 | CN |
19610585 | Sep 1997 | DE |
202016103231 | Sep 2017 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62801031 | Feb 2019 | US |