The present invention is generally related to medical devices and apparatus. In particular, the invention provides systems and methods for delivering a pressure equalization tube to a tympanic membrane of an ear.
Otitis media is among the most common diagnoses made by pediatricians. A majority of children may have at least one episode of otitis media (“earache”) prior to their third birthday. Otitis media is often caused by an inability of the eustachian tube to drain fluid from the middle ear. Otitis media is often treated with antibiotics.
A significant number of children exhibit recurrent episodes of otitis media and/or otitis media with effusion. Treatment of these more severe cases often involves the placement of a tympanostomy tube through the tympanic membrane to provide adequate drainage of the middle ear and reduce the likelihood of future infections. Tympanostomy tubes provide fluid communication between the middle and outer ear (e.g., pressure equalization) and typically fall out spontaneously within about a year of placement. Tympanostomy tube placement is among the most frequent surgical procedures performed in the pediatric population. It has been estimated that more than a million tympanostomy tubes may be placed each year, with typical patients being between about 18 months and 7 years of age at the time of the procedure.
Tympanostomy tube placement is typically performed in an out-patient surgery setting under general anesthesia. The physician typically first examines the external auditory canal and tympanic membrane under microscopic visualization through a hand-held conical shaped speculum. The physician then makes an incision in the tympanic membrane (a “myringotomy”), typically using a standard, small profile scalpel which the physician advances through the conical speculum. In many cases, the physician will then place the tympanostomy tube through the tympanic membrane, typically using a basic tool for holding and advancing the tube into the myringotomy. The physician may then pass a suction device through the tube, into the middle ear, to aspirate fluid/effusion from the middle ear.
A wide variety of tympanostomy tubes is commercially available, and a still wider variety of other tubes has been proposed. Systems have also been proposed to both perform the myringotomy and deploy the tympanostomy tube with a single treatment assembly. In recent years, more complex and expensive systems have been proposed for diagnosis or treatment of the tissues of the ear, including systems using laser energy for forming a myringotomy, video systems for imaging of the ear canal, and the like. These various proposed alternatives for tympanostomy tubes and tube placement systems have met with varying degrees of acceptance. Some proposed alternatives have been overly complex, overly expensive and/or ineffective. Thus, have primarily used standard tubes and tube placement procedures and devices.
A standard tympanostomy tube placement procedure is both effective and quite safe. Nonetheless, further improvements would be desirable. For example, the standard tube placement procedure described above requires multiple tools (speculum, scalpel, tube placement device) and usually requires the patient to be under general anesthesia. Tympanostomy tube placement error can occur due to using multiple operator-performed steps and devices, and/or patient movement. The likelihood of error is increased when operating on young children under local anesthesia, as they often find it difficult to remain in a stationary position for an extended period of time.
One disadvantage of currently available tube placement methods is that the tympanostomy tubes may fall out of the tympanic membrane sooner than would be ideal. This may be due to the fact that the myringotomy must be made large enough to allow the distal flange on a standard tympanostomy tube to pass through it, and thus the typical myringotomy may be larger than ideal for holding the tube in place.
Another disadvantage of currently available tube placement methods is that the myringotomy needed to insert the tympanostomy tube is relatively large and may cause increased scaring during the healing process.
In light of the above, it would be desirable to provide improved devices, systems, and methods for delivering a pressure equalization tube to a tympanic membrane. It would generally be beneficial if these improvements facilitated tympanostomy tube placement without requiring multiple devices and operator-performed steps. At least some of these advantages may be provided by the embodiments described herein.
The present invention provides systems and methods for automatically puncturing and delivering a tympanic membrane equalization tube (i.e., tympanostomy tube) into a tympanic membrane.
In one aspect, a system is provided for delivering a pressure equalization tube. The system includes a housing including a handle. An elongate shaft assembly is coupled with the housing. The shaft assembly includes an outer shaft having a blunt (atraumatic) distal tip portion. The distal tip portion of the elongate shaft has an inner diameter that may be equal to or larger than the inner diameter of the remainder of the outer shaft. A cutter is linearly moveable within the elongate shaft. A pusher is slidably disposed over the cutter within the elongate shaft. A pressure equalization tube is slidably disposed about the cutter at a distal end of the pusher. A shield is slidably disposed over the pusher and the pressure equalization tube. A dilator is slidably disposed over the shield. In one alternate embodiment, the cutter and the dilator may be combined as one feature as hereinafter described.
The system also includes a cam assembly. The cam assembly includes a cam shaft rotationally coupled within the housing. The cam shaft includes a first cam profile, second cam profile, a third cam profile, and a fourth cam profile. A first cam follower is moveably coupled to the first cam profile. The first cam follower is attached to the cutter. A second cam follower is moveably coupled to the second cam profile. The second cam follower is attached to the pusher. A third cam follower is moveably coupled to the third cam profile. The third cam follower is attached to the shield. A fourth cam follower is moveably coupled to the fourth cam profile. The fourth cam follower is attached to the dilator.
In one embodiment, a spring may be biased between the housing and the cam shaft. The spring has a wound position, which places torsion on the cam shaft, and a released position.
A release button may be moveably coupled to the cam shaft. The release button has a first position, which maintains the spring in the wound position, and a second position, which allows the spring to move into the released position. When the release button is moved into the released position, the spring is released to move the cam shaft and cause the cam followers to linearly move respective portions of the shaft assembly to form an incision in a tympanic membrane using the cutting member, dilate the incision using the dilator, and advance the pressure equalization tube out of the shield and into the incision using the pusher.
In another aspect, a method is provided for forming an incision and placing a pressure equalization tube in a tympanic membrane of an ear. The method includes contacting a blunt (atraumatic) distal end of a shaft of a tube delivery device with a tympanic membrane. A cutter is advanced out of the shaft distal end to form an incision in the tympanic membrane. A dilator is disposed over at least a portion of the cutter. A shield disposed over the cutter and within the dilator is advanced out of the shaft distal end and into the incision to dilate the dilator. The shield is disposed over a pressure equalization tube. The cutter is retracted into the shaft. The shield is retracted into the shaft, thereby releasing a distal flange of the pressure equalization tube such that it assumes an expanded configuration. The pressure equalization tube is pushed out of the shield using a pusher disposed within the shield, thereby releasing a proximal flange of the pressure equalization tube such that it assumes an expanded configuration. After being pushed out of the shield, a middle portion of the pressure equalization tube is disposed within the incision in the tympanic membrane and the distal and proximal flanges are disposed on opposite sides of the incision.
Advantageously, such systems and methods facilitate automatic delivery of a tympanic membrane equalization tube with minimal steps to be performed by an operator, such as advancing the system into an ear canal and triggering a release button.
For a further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures. However, each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments of the present invention.
The embodiments of the invention are intended to provide systems for automatically puncturing and delivering a tympanic membrane equalization tube into a tympanic membrane. According to embodiments of the invention, tympanic membrane equalization tube delivery systems generally include a housing with a dedicated handgrip, or a graspable housing. A shaft extends out of the housing to access the tympanic membrane, and a tympanic membrane equalization tube is loaded within the tip of the shaft. An internal spring loaded cam-based mechanism is located within the housing and coupled to a button. The mechanism can be triggered to initiate a fast and automatic process which punctures the tympanic membrane, and delivers the tympanic membrane equalization tube. The tympanic membrane equalization tube is a grommet like device which is folded and/or compressed within the tube, and recovers its shape when delivered into the tympanic membrane.
In use, an operator grasps the housing by the handgrip and brings the tip of the shaft into contact with the tympanic membrane. The operator then triggers the cam-based mechanism by pressing the button. The system then automatically punctures and inserts the tympanic membrane equalization tube into the tympanic membrane. Thus, a simple and effective delivery system is provided, which requires minimal operator steps for use.
Embodiments of the invention are compatible for use with a suite of medical devices for visualizing, guiding other medical devices, delivering a tympanic membrane equalization tube, puncturing the tympanic membrane, and anesthetizing the tympanic membrane. Examples of such medical devices are shown in co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/749,733, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference. Accordingly, aspects of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/749,733 may be integrated, combined, and used in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein.
Exemplary Configurations of the Delivery System:
Two exemplary systems are described below and shown in separate figures (
The system represented by
The four cam followers 120a-d include pins 122a-d and are housed in cam follower chamber 130. Each pin 122a-d is slidable within a track 123a-d. The tracks 123a-d are profiled grooves in the circumference of the camshaft 112. As each pin 122a-d is attached to a corresponding cam follower 120a-d, movement of a pin 122a-d moves the corresponding cam follower 120a-d and a respective portion of the shaft assembly 104. For example, when the camshaft 112 is rotated, pin 122a follows track 123a, and is moved parallel to axis A-A to translate rotational movement of the camshaft 112 into linear motion of the cutting member 121a along axis A-A. Similarly, track 123b corresponds with pusher 121b; track 123c corresponds with shield 121c; and track 123d corresponds with dilator 121d.
A trigger mechanism chamber 124 houses the button housing 116. The trigger mechanism chamber 124 includes an opening for the button 106 to pass through. The first housing portion 108 is shown holding the camshaft 112 within a camshaft chamber 126, which includes rotational mounting points for the camshaft 112. A portion of the camshaft 112 extends into a spring chamber 128, where the spring 114 mounts to the camshaft 112. The spring 114 can be wound so as to be biased between the camshaft 112 and a portion of the spring chamber 128. The cam followers 120a-d are linearly arranged within a follower chamber 128.
In many embodiments, the delivery system 100 includes provisions for noise dampening to reduce shock to the patient. After the spring 114 is released, the camshaft 112 will rotate until it encounters a stop in the first or second housing portion 108, 110, which can result in an unwanted noise which can shock the patient. The camshaft 112 and spring 114 can include lubrication and noise dampening members, such as a rubber stop 149 (such as shown in
The dilator 121d has a folding tip 138 which is capable of expanding from a narrow position to an expanded position. The folding tip 138 has a cone like shape when in the narrow position, as shown. The folding tip 138 abuts the back of the diamond shaped cutting head 134 when in the narrow position. The folding tip 138 can be formed by making a plurality of triangular cuts at the distal end of a tube to form folding members, and folding the folding members into a cone. The folding tip 138 generally only requires two folding members, while in this embodiment four folding members are used.
The shield 121c is a tube which is placed within the dilator 121d and proximally to the folding tip 138. When the shield 121c is moved in a distal direction, it can force open the folding tip 138. A straightened tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 is placed within the shield 121c. The tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 is restrained within the shield 121c, and proximal and distal flanges of the tube 140, which are forced into a straightened configuration within the shield 121c, apply a constant expansive force to the interior diameter of the shield 121c to stay in place. The tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 can have an interior diameter greater than the outer diameter of the diamond shaped cutting head 134 to allow removal of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140. The tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 can also have an interior diameter equal to or smaller than the outer diameter of the diamond shaped cutting head 134, as the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 may comprise an elastic material which allows for slight deformation/stretching of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 during movement of the diamond shaped cutting head 134. The pusher 121b is a tube which is placed proximally to the folded tympanic membrane equalization tube 140. The pusher 121b can be moved distally to push the folded tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 out of the shield 121c.
The outer shaft 121e surrounds the dilator 121d and is stationary with respect the movement of the other portions of the shaft assembly 104. The outer shaft 121e provides axial stiffness to the shaft assembly 104, and can be formed from a metal such as stainless steel. A tip 142 is attached to the distal end of the outer shaft 121e. The tip can be composed of a clear material to allow visualization of the tube 140 as well as anatomical structures abutting the delivery system 100 in order to facilitate accurate placement of the tube 140. Alternatively, the tip 142 may be formed from the same piece of material as the outer shaft 121e. The tip 142 includes an inner diameter which is greater than the inner diameter of the outer shaft. This larger inner diameter of the tip 142 allows a proximal flange of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 to open into its expanded/unconstrained configuration within the tip 142 when advanced by the pusher 121b. This expansion of the proximal flange within the tip 142 may help prevent advancement of the entire equalization tube 140 through a myringotomy into the middle ear.
In some embodiments, a pressure/contact/distance sensor may be coupled to the tip 142. The sensor provides a signal when the tip 142 contacts or is near the tympanic membrane. The signal may trigger a visual indicator (e.g., an LED) on the housing 102 to indicate that the tip 142 is in a proper position for inserting the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 into the tympanic membrane. The sensor can be a piezoelectric, optical, capacitive based sensor, or any other suitable sensor. The signal may also trigger other operations, such triggering movement of the camshaft 112, or a sound tuning operation as described herein.
In some embodiments, the distal portion of the shaft assembly 104 may be configured to better access the tympanic membrane. The tympanic membrane has a conical shape and is angled with respect to the axis of the ear canal. Accordingly, the distal end of the shaft assembly 104 may contact the tympanic membrane at non-optimal angle (e.g. non-perpendicular). In this case, the operator may mistakenly stop short of applying sufficient pressure to the tympanic membrane to ensure complete delivery of the pressure equalization (PE) tube. In other cases, the operator may overcompensate and place too much pressure on the tympanic membrane, thus, driving the tip of the shaft assembly 104 through the tympanic membrane. To overcome these situations, the distal portion of the shaft assembly 104 can incorporate an angle such that the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 can have better access to the tympanic membrane. In use, the operator can either rotate all or a portion of the system 100 to place the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 in an optimal position with respect to the tympanic membrane. In some embodiments, the shaft assembly 104 is malleable so that the operator can bend the shaft assembly 104 to a desired position.
In some embodiments, the outer shaft 121e of the shaft assembly 104 includes a flexible zone, such that when the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 presses against the tympanic membrane, the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 automatically adjusts to an optimal position. For example, a portion of the outer shaft 121e can utilize a spring section, accordion section, or stent-like scaffold which elastically or plastically compresses when the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 presses against the tympanic membrane. Compression of the tip can give the operator visual feedback as to the amount of pressure being applied to the tympanic membrane. In some embodiments, the outer shaft 121e has a laser cut portion removed such that a helical section exists between a mid-portion of the outer shaft 121e and a distal end of the outer shaft 121e. The helical section can be configured to flex only when sufficient pressure has been applied, thus, the operator would need to apply enough pressure to completely compress at least one side of the helical section to ensure a proper tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 delivery. In some embodiments, all or discrete portions of the shaft assembly 104 can include similar flexible zones and/or be constructed from flexible materials, for example, the cutting member 121a may be constructed from a super-elastic material (e.g., nickel-titanium alloy).
Methods of Operating of the Exemplary Delivery System:
As previously noted, the pins 122a-d follow movement of the tracks 123a-d. The pins 122a-d are attached to corresponding cam followers 120a-d. Thus, movement of the pins 122a-d results in movement of the corresponding cam followers 120a-d and respective movement of portions of the shaft assembly 104 along axis A-A, which is parallel to Axis X. Each track 123a-d is shown with a numeric displacement value at the various positions. The numeric displacement values are the distances in millimeters between the distal end of the tip 142 and the distal most position of the related shaft assembly 104 portions 121a-d. The views of the distal tip of the shaft assembly 104 show incremental positioning with respect to the displacement diagram, however, the movement of the shaft assembly 104 and camshaft 112 is one continuous movement. In various embodiments, the camshaft 112 may take between about 5 milliseconds and about 500 milliseconds to rotate from the initial position to a final position, after the button 106 has been pressed. In other words, it may take from about 5 to about 500 milliseconds from the time the button 106 is pressed until a pressure equalization tube 140 is deployed in a TM using the device 100. In some embodiments, this time period may be between about 30 milliseconds and about 250 milliseconds, with average times of between about 100 milliseconds and about 130 milliseconds. In other embodiments, the time period may be outside the ranges listed above.
1. Initial Camshaft Position:
At the initial position of the camshaft 112, the shaft assembly 104 is positioned as shown in
2. First Camshaft Position:
At a first camshaft position, the button 106 has been pressed to release the wound spring 114 which rotates the camshaft 112 from the initial camshaft position to the first camshaft position. Accordingly, as described herein, movement of the camshaft causes the cam followers 120a-d to move respective portions of the shaft assembly 104. At the first camshaft position the cutting member 121a punctures the tympanic membrane TM and the dilator 121d follows to dilate the puncture site to a larger diameter. The pusher 121b and shield 121c also advance, but remain behind the tip 142. At the first camshaft position the cutting member 121a is 2.79 mm ahead (i.e., distal) of the extreme distal end of the tip 142; the pusher 121b is 1.66 mm behind the tip 142; the shield 121c is 1.04 mm behind the tip 142; and the dilator 121d is 1.37 mm ahead of the tip 142.
3. Second Camshaft Position:
The camshaft 112 rotates from the first camshaft position to a second camshaft position. At the second camshaft position, the shield 121c advances past the tip 142 to open the folding tip 138 of the dilator 121b and further dilate the puncture site, and the cutting member 121a retracts behind the dilator 121b. The pusher 121b also advances, but remains behind the tip 142. At the second camshaft position the cutting member 121a is 0.58 mm ahead of the extreme distal end of the tip 142; the pusher 121b is 1.55 mm behind the tip 142; the shield 121c is 0.66 mm ahead of the tip 142; and the dilator 121d remains 1.37 mm ahead of the tip 142.
4. Third Camshaft Position:
The camshaft 112 rotates from the second camshaft position to a third camshaft position. At the third camshaft position, the cutting member 121a and dilator 121d retract behind the tip 142. The shield 121c also retracts, while the pusher 121b advances to partially push the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 out of the shield 121c. A medial flange 144 (or “distal flange”) of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 is pushed out of the shield 121c to expand medial (or “distal”) to the tympanic membrane. At the third camshaft position the cutting member 121a is 1.78 mm behind the extreme distal end of the tip 142; the pusher 121b is 1.45 mm behind the tip 142; the shield 121c is 1.02 mm behind the tip 142; and the dilator 121d is 1.23 mm behind the tip 142.
5. Final Camshaft Position:
The camshaft 112 rotates from the third camshaft position to a final camshaft position. At the final camshaft position, the cutting member 121a, shield 121c, and dilator 121d remain stationary with respect to the third camshaft position. The pusher 121b advances to a final position, but remains behind the tip 142, to push a lateral flange 146 (or “proximal flange”) of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 outside of the shield 121c to expand within the tip 142 of the device 100 and lateral (or “proximal”) to the tympanic membrane. At the final camshaft position the cutting member 121a is 1.78 mm behind the extreme distal end of the tip 142; the pusher 121b is 0.84 mm behind the tip 142; the shield 121c is 1.02 mm behind the tip 142; and the dilator 121d is 1.23 mm behind the tip 142.
An alternative embodiment for the camshaft design is depicted in
When the pressure equalization tube 140 has been successfully placed, with the medial flange 144 and lateral flange 146 flanking the TM, the shaft assembly 104 may then be withdrawn from the ear canal, leaving the tube 140 behind. The above steps may then be repeated, if desired, in the patient's other ear using a second device 100 or by reloading the first device 100 with another equalization tube 140. In some embodiments, device 100 may be reloadable, while in alternative embodiments device 100 may be a one-use device only. Thus, according to the method described above, by simply positioning the delivery system 100 within the ear canal, with the tip 142 against the tympanic membrane TM, and pressing button 106, the delivery system 100 both punctures the tympanic membrane TM and also delivers the tympanic membrane equalization tube 140 in one effective movement.
Alternative Structure of the Delivery System:
Referring now to
With reference now to
Elevating the tympanic membrane can result in reduction of noise admittance during penetration of the cutting member 136. Elevating the tympanic membrane can also provide local stabilization of a target site to enhance the reliability of use of the system 100, thus preventing accidental deviation or slipping of the cutting member 136 during penetration. Elevation of tissue, can also be especially useful for patients with retraction pockets. Long term retraction of the eardrum, caused by negative pressure in the middle ear, will cause erosion of the ear canal and formation of a deep pocket. Eventually the pocket may trap skin, forming a skin cyst or cholesteatoma. Further progression of retraction pockets can cause destruction of the tympanic membrane. Tissue elevation enhances safety by providing additional space away from anatomical structures distal to the tympanic membrane for penetration and placement of the tympanic membrane pressure equalization tube 140. Accordingly, tissue elevation also allows a larger patient population to be treated, as a significant portion of patients who require placement of tympanostomy tubes have some degree of retraction.
In use, with reference to
An addition to the above alternate embodiment would include using the applied negative pressure as a means to actuate the device.
The system includes a vacuum chamber 402 that has a contiguous, sealed lumen providing communication between the device tip 142 (that comes into contact with the tympanic membrane) and the proximal end of the delivery system 100. The chamber includes a vacuum actuated trigger mechanism such as vacuum cylinder 404 and piston 400 and a vacuum port 406 that can be attached to a vacuum source such as through a vacuum line normally available in an operating room or other clinical setting.
Advantages of the above embodiment include more accurate and consistent PE tube deployment into the tympanic membrane, minimal button actuation force providing greater device stability, and ensuring delivery system actuation when the device tip is fully opposed to the tympanic membrane.
Other mechanisms or structure may be employed in lieu of, or in conjunction with, application of negative pressure to the tympanic membrane, for elevation thereof. For example, an adhesive or sticky substance may be used, or a mechanical application using micro-barbs.
Tympanic Membrane Pressure Equalization Tube:
A central lumen 502 of the tube 500 is flanked by an integral medial flange 504 and lateral flange 506. The medial flange 504 and lateral flange 506 prevent the tube 500 from falling out of an opening created in the tympanic membrane. In some embodiments, the lateral flange 504 can be smaller in diameter than the medial flange 506, as shown, as the lateral flange 504 can be expanded within the tip 142 of the delivery system 100, while the medial flange is intended to expand distally past the tympanic membrane. In alternative embodiments, the lateral flange 504 and medial flange 506 are of equal diameters. The exterior surface of the tympanic membrane equalization tube 500 includes optional flexible zones 508 which facilitate straightening of the medial flange 504 and lateral flange 506 for loading into a delivery system, as shown in
In many embodiments, the tympanic membrane equalization tubes disclosed herein can include features which help recover a misplaced tympanic membrane equalization tube. A misplaced tympanic membrane equalization tube located distally to the tympanic membrane can be especially difficult to remove. Such features can include tethers attached to any portion of the tympanic membrane equalization tubes. The tethers can be grasped proximally to the tympanic membrane and used to pull the misplaced tympanic membrane equalization tube out of the ear.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential characteristics thereof These other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/457,412, filed Aug. 12, 2014, entitled “Trigger Assembly for Tympanostomy Tube Delivery Device,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,539,146, which is a continuation in part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/836,654, filed Jul. 15, 2010, entitled “Tympanic Membrane Pressure Equalization Tube Delivery System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,864,774, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/225,893, filed Jul. 15, 2009, entitled “Tympanic Membrane Pressure Equalization Tube Delivery System,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
858673 | Croswell | Jul 1907 | A |
1920006 | Dozier et al. | Jul 1933 | A |
2162681 | Ryan | Jun 1939 | A |
3473170 | Hassee et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3638643 | Hotchkiss | Feb 1972 | A |
3741197 | Sans et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3807404 | Weissman et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3888258 | Akiyama | Jun 1975 | A |
3897786 | Garnett et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3913584 | Walchle et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3948271 | Akiyama | Apr 1976 | A |
3991755 | Vernon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4168697 | Cantekin | Sep 1979 | A |
4335713 | Komiya | Jun 1982 | A |
4335715 | Kirkley | Jun 1982 | A |
4380998 | Kieffer, III et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4406282 | Parker et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4468218 | Armstrong | Aug 1984 | A |
4473073 | Darnell | Sep 1984 | A |
4552137 | Strauss | Nov 1985 | A |
4564009 | Brinkhoff | Jan 1986 | A |
4712537 | Pender | Dec 1987 | A |
4750491 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4796624 | Trott et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800876 | Fox et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4913132 | Gabriel | Apr 1990 | A |
4946440 | Hall | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971076 | Densert et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5026378 | Goldsmith, III | Jun 1991 | A |
5044373 | Northeved et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5047007 | McNichols et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053040 | Goldsmith, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5107861 | Narboni | Apr 1992 | A |
5135478 | Sibalis | Aug 1992 | A |
5158540 | Wijay | Oct 1992 | A |
5178623 | Cinberg et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5254120 | Cinberg et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261903 | Dhaliwal et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D352780 | Glaeser et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
5370656 | Shevel | Dec 1994 | A |
5421818 | Arenberg | Jun 1995 | A |
5466239 | Cinberg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5489286 | Cinberg et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496329 | Reisinger | Mar 1996 | A |
D378611 | Croley | Mar 1997 | S |
5610988 | Miyahara | Mar 1997 | A |
5643280 | Del Rio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645584 | Suyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5658235 | Priest et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674196 | Donaldson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676635 | Levin | Oct 1997 | A |
5681323 | Arick | Oct 1997 | A |
D387863 | Herman et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
5707383 | Bays et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5775336 | Morris | Jul 1998 | A |
5782744 | Money | Jul 1998 | A |
5792100 | Shantha | Aug 1998 | A |
5827295 | Del Rio et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5893828 | Uram | Apr 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5984930 | Maciunas et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D418223 | Phipps et al. | Dec 1999 | S |
D420741 | Croley et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
6022342 | Mukherjee | Feb 2000 | A |
6024726 | Hill | Feb 2000 | A |
6039748 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045528 | Arenberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D424197 | Sydlowski et al. | May 2000 | S |
6059803 | Spilman | May 2000 | A |
D426135 | Lee | Jun 2000 | S |
6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
6110196 | Edwards | Aug 2000 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6171236 | Bonutti | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183469 | Thapliyai et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200280 | Brennenman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206888 | Bicek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245077 | East et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251121 | Saadat | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258067 | Hill | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D450843 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6358231 | Schindler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398758 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416512 | Ellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440102 | Arenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6475138 | Schechter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6512950 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514261 | Randall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520939 | Lafontaine | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522827 | Loeb et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553253 | Chang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6645173 | Liebowitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648873 | Arenberg et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663575 | Leysieffer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682558 | Tu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6770080 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6916159 | Rush et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6962595 | Chamness et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7127285 | Henley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137975 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7160274 | Ciok et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7344507 | Bruggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351246 | Epley | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D595410 | Luzon | Jun 2009 | S |
7563232 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7654997 | Makower et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677734 | Wallace | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704259 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7749254 | Sobelman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D622842 | Benoist | Aug 2010 | S |
D640374 | Liu et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
8052693 | Shahoian | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8192420 | Morriss et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249700 | Clifford et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8282648 | Tekulve | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8409175 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425488 | Clifford et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8498425 | Graylin | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518098 | Roeder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8702722 | Shahoian | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8840602 | Morriss et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849394 | Clifford et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8864774 | Liu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8998927 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011363 | Clopp et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9216112 | Clifford et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9320652 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9387124 | Clifford | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010020173 | Klumb et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020026125 | Leysiefer | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020069883 | Hirchenbain | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111585 | Lafontaine | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138091 | Pflueger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161379 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169456 | Tu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018291 | Hill et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040717 | Saulenas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060799 | Arenberg et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030187456 | Perry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199791 | Boecker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040054339 | Ciok et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064024 | Sommer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050033343 | Chermoni | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050165368 | Py et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182385 | Epley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187546 | Bek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050235422 | Wallace | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240147 | Makower et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060004323 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060095050 | Hartley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142700 | Sobelman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155304 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161218 | Danilov | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163313 | Larson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060282062 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070233222 | Roeder et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276466 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027423 | Choi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051804 | Cottler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080212416 | Polonio et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262468 | Clifford et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262508 | Clifford et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262510 | Clifford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090163828 | Turner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090209972 | Loushin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090299344 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299379 | Katz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041447 | Graylin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048978 | Sing et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061581 | Soetejo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100198135 | Morriss et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217296 | Morriss et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100274188 | Chang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100324488 | Smith | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015645 | Liu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022069 | Mitusina | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110077579 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110288559 | Shahoian | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120179187 | Loushin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120265097 | Melchiorri et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310145 | Clifford et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030456 | Assell et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130090544 | Clifford et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130338678 | Loushin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140094733 | Clopp et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100584 | Konstorum et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140194891 | Shahoian | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140276906 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277050 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150142029 | Fahn et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150209509 | O'Cearbhaill et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150305944 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160038341 | Clopp et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038342 | Van et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045369 | Clopp | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045370 | Andreas et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045371 | Girotra et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86105171 | Mar 1987 | CN |
19618585 | Nov 1997 | DE |
19918288 | Oct 2000 | DE |
0214527 | Mar 1987 | EP |
H 07-116190 | Mar 1987 | EP |
2526656 | Nov 1983 | FR |
WO 9911175 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 2006119512 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008030485 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008036368 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008131195 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009010788 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2011008948 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2014075949 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014143543 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014158571 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2016022899 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025308 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025309 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025310 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025453 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 61/085,360, filed Jul. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/225,893, filed Jul. 15, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,412, filed Aug. 12, 2014. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Nov. 12, 0214 re Application No. 2010273372. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2013 re Application No. 201080041755.6. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 6, 2013 for Application No. EP 13173409. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 re PCT/US2008/060779. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 17, 2012 re PCT/US2010/042128. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2010 for Application No. PCT/US2010/042128. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 3, 2008 re PCT/US2008/060779. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 6, 2009 re PCT/US2009/052395. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2010 re PCT/US2009/069388. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 17, 2011 re PCT/US2010/058718. |
Japanese Notification of Reason for Refusal dated Feb. 18, 2014 re Application No. 2012-520778. |
Mexican Communication of the Substantive Examination Report dated Apr. 24, 2014 re Application No. MX/a/2012/000691. |
Comeau, M. et al ‘Anesthesia of the Human Tympanic Membrane by Iontophoresis of a Local Anesthetic 11978’ The Larynogoscope vol. 88 pp. 277. |
Comeau, M. et al ‘Local Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis’ (1973) Arch Otolaryngol. vol. 98 pp. 114. |
Echols, D.F. et al ‘Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis of Lidocaine’ (1975) Arch Otolaryngol. vol. 101, pp. 418. |
Epley, J.M. ‘Modified Technique of Iontophoretic Anesthesia for Myringotomy in Children’ (1977) Atch Otolaryngol. vol. 103 pp. 358. |
Hasegawa, M. et al ‘Iontophorectic Anaesthesia of the Tympanic Membrane’ (1978) Clinical Otolaryngoloy. vol. 3 pp. 63-66. |
Medtronic XOMED. Activent®, Antimicrobial Ventilation Tubes. 4 pages. |
Micromedics Innovative Surgical Products. [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http.//www.micromedics-usa.com/products/otology/micromedicstubes.htm. 7 pages. |
Ramsden, R.T. et al ‘Anaesthesia of the Tympanic Membrane Using Iontophoresis’ (1977) The Journal of Layngology and Otology. vol. 56, No. 9. pp. 779-785. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,412, mailed Mar. 25, 2016. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/044179, mailed Dec. 18, 2015, 15 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2013209354, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 5 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880020861.9, dated Jul. 12, 2011, 10 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880020861.9, dated Dec. 31, 2011, 3 pages. |
Search Report for Chinese Patent Application No. 201310047126.X, dated Mar. 6, 2015, 2 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201310047126.X, dated Mar. 16, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 08746237.0, dated Mar. 24, 2016, 3 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 08746237.0, dated Aug. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Supplementary Partial Search Report for European Application No. 08746237.0, dated Jun. 30, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-504267, dated Nov. 20, 2012, 4 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-504267, dated Nov. 12, 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,729, dated May 26, 2011, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,729, dated Jun. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,733, dated Jun. 10, 2009, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,733, dated Dec. 2, 2008, 9 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,768,009, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2012-7003590, dated Sep. 27, 2016, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,654, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 16 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,654, dated Mar. 1, 2013, 23 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/018320, dated Jun. 2, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/018347, dated Apr. 17, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044173, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/456,080, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 31 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044177, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,266, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 21 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044183, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,293, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044610, dated Nov. 5, 2015, 12 pages. |
“Definition of Plenum,” Compact Oxford English Dictionary [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/plenum>, Retrieved on Aug. 6, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Definition of Plenum,” Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary, 11th Edition [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plenum>, Retrieved on Aug. 14, 2012, 1 page. |
Armstrong, “A New Treatment for Chronic Secretory Otitis Media” A.M.A. Archives of Otolaryngology, pp. 653-654 (1954). |
Feuerstein, “A Split-Tube Prosthesis in Serous Otitis Media” Sixty-ninth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 18-23, 1964, Chicago, IL, pp. 343-344. |
Jurgens. et al., “Three New Middle Ear Ventilation Tubes” Seventy-sixth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Sep. 20-24, 1971, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1017-1019 (1971). |
Lindeman et al., The “Arrow Tube” Residents in Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 1 page (1964). |
Pappas, “Middle Ear Ventilation Tubes” Meeting of the Southern Section of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc., Williamsburg, VA, Jan. 12, 1974, pp. 1098-1117. |
Per-Lee, “A Wide Flanged Middle Ear Ventilation Tube” Seventy-first Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 16-21, 1966, Chicago, IL, pp. 358-359. |
Reuter, “The Stainless Bobbin Middle Ear Ventilation Tube” Seventy-second Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 29-Nov. 3, 1967, Chicago, IL, pp. 121-122. |
Ringenberg, “A New Middle Ear Ventilation Device” Seventy-second Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 29-Nov. 3, 1967, Chicago, IL, 1 page. |
Schmidt et al. “Transtympanic Aeration of the Middle Ear With Blocked Eustachian Tube” Acta Otolaryng., pp. 277-282 (1965). |
Sheehy, “Collar Button Tube for Chronic Serous Otitis” Sixty-eighth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 20-25, 1963, New York, NY, pp. 888-889. |
Santa Barbara Medco, Inc. “Otological Ventilation Tubes” Product Brochure from http://www.sbmedco.com/ptfe—shepard.asp, 8 pages (Feb. 11, 2001). |
Rhinology Products, Boston Medical Products, www.bosmed.com [date of publication unknown], pp. 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150164695 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61225893 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14457412 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14570157 | US | |
Parent | 12836654 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 14457412 | US |