Some children may exhibit recurrent episodes of otitis media and/or -otitis media with effusion. Treatment of severe cases may involve the placement of a pressure equalization tube or tympanostomy tube through the tympanic membrane to provide adequate drainage of the middle ear by providing fluid communication between the middle and outer ear. In particular, such a tube may provide a vent path that promotes drainage of fluid from the middle ear via the Eustachian tube and may thus reduce stress imposed on the tympanic membrane from pressure within the middle ear. This may further reduce the likelihood of future infections and pressure induced ruptures of the tympanic membrane. Pressure equalization tubes may fall out spontaneously within about a year of placement. Exemplary pressure equalization tube delivery systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,693, entitled “System and Method for the Simultaneous Automated Bilateral Delivery of Pressure Equalization Tubes,” issued Nov. 8, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Additional exemplary pressure equalization tube delivery systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,249,700, entitled “System and Method for the Simultaneous Bilateral Integrated Tympanic Drug Delivery and Guided Treatment of Target Tissues within the Ears,” issued Aug. 21, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Still additional exemplary pressure equalization tube delivery systems are disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2011/0015645, entitled “Tympanic Membrane Pressure Equalization Tube Delivery System,” published Jan. 20, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Insertion of a pressure equalization tube may be performed using general anesthesia in some cases, which may require additional resources such as an operating room, the presence of an anesthesiologist, and time in a recovery room. Furthermore, the use of general anesthesia may include certain risks that a patient may or may not be comfortable with undertaking. Some pressure equalization tube delivery systems and methods provide a local anesthetic through iontophoresis. Examples of such systems and methods are disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0198135, entitled “Systems and Methods for Anesthetizing Ear Tissue,” published Aug. 5, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Additional examples of such systems and methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,420, entitled “Iontophoresis Methods,” issued Jun. 5, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
While a variety of pressure equalization tube delivery systems and methods have been made and used, it is believed that no one prior to the inventor(s) has made or used an invention as described herein.
It is believed the present invention will be better understood from the following description of certain examples taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify the same elements and in which:
The drawings are not intended to be limiting in any way, and it is contemplated that various embodiments of the invention may be carried out in a variety of other ways, including those not necessarily depicted in the drawings. The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention; it being understood, however, that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements shown.
The following description of certain examples of the technology should not be used to limit its scope. Other examples, features, aspects, embodiments, and advantages of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description, which is by way of illustration, one of the best modes contemplated for carrying out the technology. As will be realized, the technology described herein is capable of other different and obvious aspects, all without departing from the technology. Accordingly, the drawings and descriptions should be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
It is further understood that any one or more of the teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. described herein may be combined with any one or more of the other teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. that are described herein. The following-described teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. should therefore not be viewed in isolation relative to each other. Various suitable ways in which the teachings herein may be combined will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims.
I. Exemplary Tympanic Tube Delivery Instrument
As noted above, a pressure equalization (PE) tube may be delivered to the tympanic membrane (TM) of a patient as a way of treating, for example, otitis media. In some instances, a delivery instrument may be used to insert PE tubes in the tympanic membrane (TM) without the use of general anesthesia.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
A cam follower (152) is fixedly secured to the proximal end of dilator tube (150). Cam follower (152) includes a laterally projecting pin (154) that is disposed in dilator track (132), such that rotation of camshaft (130) causes cam follower (152) and dilator tube (150) to translate. Similarly, a cam follower (162) is fixedly secured to the proximal end of shield tube (160). Cam follower (162) includes a laterally projecting pin (164) that is disposed in shield tube track (134), such that rotation of camshaft (130) causes cam follower (162) and shield tube (160) to translate. A cam follower (172) is fixedly secured to the proximal end of pusher tube (170). Cam follower (172) includes a laterally projecting pin (174) that is disposed in pusher tube track (136), such that rotation of camshaft (130) causes cam follower (172) and pusher tube (170) to translate. Finally, a cam follower (182) is fixedly secured to the proximal end of piercer (180). Cam follower (182) includes a laterally projecting pin (184) that is disposed in piercer track (138), such that rotation of camshaft (130) causes cam follower (182) and piercer (180) to translate.
As shown in
Upon completion of the above described sequence shown in
As noted above, PETDD (100) of the present example includes a vacuum port (112) that is operable to couple with a vacuum source (not shown). As also noted above, this vacuum port (112) is in fluid communication with the interior of housing (102), which is further in fluid communication with cannula (120). It should be understood that cannula (120) and/or one of the tubes (150, 160, 170) within cannula (120) may provide a path for fluid communication between the interior of housing (102) and tip (122). By way of example only, such a path may be formed by a gap between the outer diameter of dilator tube (150) and the inner diameter of cannula (120). In addition or in the alternative, such a path may be formed through the interior of pusher tube (170), through interior (196) of PE tube (1200), and through gaps (158) between leaves (156) of dilator (150). Other suitable ways for providing a path for fluid communication between the interior of housing (102) and tip (122) will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein. Regardless of how the path is formed, it should be understood that the path may be used to communicate a vacuum to tip (122), which may assist in drawing the tympanic membrane (TM) toward tip (122). For instance, an operator may make an initial contact between tip (122) and TM, then activate a vacuum source that is in communication with port (112) to communicate a vacuum to tip (122), thereby completing full contact between tip (122) and the tympanic membrane (TM). Such vacuum assisted contact may reduce risks that may be associated with operator error when the operator fails to achieve sufficient contact between tip (122) and the tympanic membrane (TM).
As also noted above, PETDD (100) of the present example includes a trip mechanism (200) that is configured to selectively resist rotation of camshaft (130) by torsion spring (140). As best seen in
Trip mechanism (200) of the present example automatically transitions from a first position (
It should be understood from the foregoing that a vacuum may be used to assist in achieving full apposition between tip (122) of cannula (120) and TM; and that once such apposition is achieved, trip mechanism (200) may effectively unlock camshaft (130) to thereby automatically trigger a PE tube (1200) deployment sequence.
In some versions, housing (102) also includes one or more lateral vent ports (106) that are positioned to be selectively covered or otherwise closed by the hand of the operator that is grasping housing (102). While
II. Exemplary Pressure Equalization Tube
PE tube (1200) is formed of a resilient material that is biased to assume the rivet like configuration shown in
III. Exemplary Dilator with Integral Cutting Features
In some instances, it may be desirable to consolidate the functionality of dilator tube (150) and piercer (180) in a single structure. In other words, it may be desirable to provide a component within cannula (120) that is operable to both create a myringotomy incision in the tympanic membrane (TM) like piercer (180) and expand the myringotomy incision like dilator tube (150). Such a component may be expandable in response to distal advancement of shield tube (160), similar to dilator tube (150). Such a component may also be driven by a cam follower like cam follower (152). The following examples represent merely illustrative variations of dilator tube (150) that are operable to both create a myringotomy incision in the tympanic membrane (TM) like piercer (180) and expand the myringotomy incision like dilator tube (150).
While the examples are provided herein in the context of PETDD (100), it should be understood that the variations of dilator tube (150) discussed below may also be readily incorporated into a variety of other PETDDs. By way of example only, the variations of dilator tube (150) discussed below may be readily incorporated in any of the PETDDs disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0198135, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. As another merely illustrative example, the variations of dilator tube (150) discussed below may be readily incorporated into any of the PETDDs disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/800,113, entitled “Tympanic Membrane Pressure Equalization Tube,” filed on Mar. 13, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein; and/or U.S. Pat. No. 9,320,652, entitled “Features to Improve and Sense Tympanic Membrane Apposition by Tympanostomy Tube Delivery Instrument,” issued on Apr. 26, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Still other PETDD variations that may incorporate the variations of dilator tube (150) discussed below will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein.
A. Exemplary Dilator with Sharp Distal Point
Leaves (310, 320) are resiliently biased to assume the collapsed, inwardly deflected positioning shown in
The distal edge (314) of leaf (310) is generally round. However, the distal edge of leaf (320) includes a sharp point (324). Sharp point (324) projects distally relative to distal edge (314), such that dilator tube (300) leads with sharp point (324). It should be understood that, as dilator tube (300) is driven into the tympanic membrane (TM), sharp point (324) will pierce the tympanic membrane (TM) and thereby create a myringotomy incision like piercer (180) would create. In some instances, the incision created by sharp point (324) is in the form of a substantially straight line. After sharp point (324) creates the incision, leaves (310, 320) may be held in place within the incision while shield tube (160) is advanced distally through the interior of tubular portion (302), eventually driving leaves (310, 320) outwardly within the incision to dilate the incision. Dilator tube (300) and shield tube (160) may then be retracted proximally while pusher tube (170) remains longitudinally stationary, resulting in deployment of PE tube (1200) in the tympanic membrane (TM) as described above.
It should be understood that eliminating piercer (180) in the present example provides a more open fluid path within the lumen of pusher tube (170). In other words, without piercer (180) being positioned in the lumen of pusher tube (170), pusher tube is now more effective at providing fluid communication to the distal end of cannula (120). By way of example only, this larger fluid path may more effectively communicate suction to the distal end of cannula (120) in versions where PETDD (100) is coupled with a vacuum source. As noted above, such suction may be used to assist in drawing the tympanic membrane (TM) against tip (122) to improve apposition between the tympanic membrane (TM) and tip (122). In addition or in the alternative, suction may be used to remove fluid from the middle ear, and the larger fluid path provided by the elimination of piercer (180) may facilitate communication of the fluid proximally through the lumen of pusher tube (170). This suction of fluid may be performed after PE tube (1200) is deployed in the tympanic membrane (TM), with the fluid being drawn through passageway (1204) of the deployed PE tube (1200) and tip (122). Thus, PETDD (100) may be used to suction fluid from the middle ear immediately after deployment of PE tube (1200), instead of having to use a separate suction instrument.
B. Exemplary Dilator with Sharp Longitudinal Edges
Leaves (410, 430, 450, 470) are resiliently biased to assume the collapsed, inwardly deflected positioning shown in
Leaves (410, 450) are on diametrically opposed sides of tubular portion (402) and have pointed yet generally blunt distal tips (416, 456). Leaves (430, 470) are on diametrically opposed sides of tubular portion (402), offset by 90 degrees from leaves (410, 450), and have sharp edges (434, 474) extending along their respective lengths, with sharp distal tips (436, 476). As best seen in
By way of example only, sharp edges (434, 474) and sharp distal tips (436, 476) may be formed in a laser cutting process. For instance, initial forms of leaves (410, 430, 450, 470) may be laser cut from tubular portion (402). Then, an edge of each leaf (430, 470) may be bent outwardly. The outwardly bent edges may then be laser cut again (e.g., along the same path as a diameter of tubular portion (402)) to form sharp edges (434, 474) and sharp distal tips (436, 476). Other suitable ways in which various features of dilator tube (400) may be formed will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein. While four leaves (410, 430, 450, 470) are provided in the present example, it should be understood that any other suitable number of leaves may be used. For instance, dilator tube (400) may include more than two sharpened leaves (430, 470), regardless of how many unsharpened leaves (410, 450) are provided.
It should be understood that, as dilator tube (400) is driven into the tympanic membrane (TM), sharp distal tips (436, 476) will pierce the tympanic membrane (TM) and thereby create a myringotomy incision like piercer (180) would create. After sharp distal tips (436, 476) create the incision, leaves (410, 430, 450, 470) may be held in place within the incision while shield tube (160) is advanced distally through the interior (404) of tubular portion (402), eventually driving leaves (410, 430, 450, 470) outwardly within the incision to dilate the incision. Sharp edges (434, 474) may perform additional cutting of the tympanic membrane (TM) during this dilation step, effectively increasing the length of the incision created by sharp distal tips (436, 476). Dilator tube (400) and shield tube (160) may then be retracted proximally while pusher tube (170) remains longitudinally stationary, resulting in deployment of PE tube (1200) in the tympanic membrane (TM) as described above.
As with dilator tube (300) described above, eliminating piercer (180) in the present example provides a more open fluid path within the lumen of pusher tube (170). In other words, without piercer (180) being positioned in the lumen of pusher tube (170), pusher tube is now more effective at providing fluid communication to the distal end of cannula (120). By way of example only, this larger fluid path may more effectively communicate suction to the distal end of cannula (120) in versions where PETDD (100) is coupled with a vacuum source. As noted above, such suction may be used to assist in drawing the tympanic membrane (TM) against tip (122) to improve apposition between the tympanic membrane (TM) and tip (122). In addition or in the alternative, suction may be used to remove fluid from the middle ear, and the larger fluid path provided by the elimination of piercer (180) may facilitate communication of the fluid proximally through the lumen of pusher tube (170). This suction of fluid may be performed after PE tube (1200) is deployed in the tympanic membrane (TM), with the fluid being drawn through passageway (1204) of the deployed PE tube (1200) and tip (122). Thus, PETDD (100) may be used to suction fluid from the middle ear immediately after deployment of PE tube (1200), instead of having to use a separate suction instrument.
IV. Miscellaneous
It should be appreciated that any patent, publication, or other disclosure material, in whole or in part, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein is incorporated herein only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein will only be incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.
Versions described above may be designed to be disposed of after a single use, or they can be designed to be used multiple times. Versions may, in either or both cases, be reconditioned for reuse after at least one use. Reconditioning may include any combination of the steps of disassembly of the device, followed by cleaning or replacement of particular pieces, and subsequent reassembly. In particular, some versions of the device may be disassembled, and any number of the particular pieces or parts of the device may be selectively replaced or removed in any combination. Upon cleaning and/or replacement of particular parts, some versions of the device may be reassembled for subsequent use either at a reconditioning facility, or by a user immediately prior to a procedure. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that reconditioning of a device may utilize a variety of techniques for disassembly, cleaning/replacement, and reassembly. Use of such techniques, and the resulting reconditioned device, are all within the scope of the present application.
By way of example only, versions described herein may be sterilized before and/or after a procedure. In one sterilization technique, the device is placed in a closed and sealed container, such as a plastic or TYVEK bag. The container and device may then be placed in a field of radiation that can penetrate the container, such as gamma radiation, x-rays, or high-energy electrons. The radiation may kill bacteria on the device and in the container. The sterilized device may then be stored in the sterile container for later use. A device may also be sterilized using any other technique known in the art, including but not limited to beta or gamma radiation, ethylene oxide, or steam.
Having shown and described various embodiments of the present invention, further adaptations of the methods and systems described herein may be accomplished by appropriate modifications by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention. Several of such potential modifications have been mentioned, and others will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For instance, the examples, embodiments, geometrics, materials, dimensions, ratios, steps, and the like discussed above are illustrative and are not required. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be considered in terms of the following claims and is understood not to be limited to the details of structure and operation shown and described in the specification and drawings.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
858673 | Roswell | Jul 1907 | A |
1920006 | Dozier et al. | Jul 1933 | A |
2162681 | Ryan | Jun 1939 | A |
3473170 | Haase et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3638643 | Hotchkiss | Feb 1972 | A |
3741197 | Sanz et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3807404 | Weissman et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3888258 | Akiyama | Jun 1975 | A |
3897786 | Garnett et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3913584 | Walchle et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3948271 | Akiyama | Apr 1976 | A |
3991755 | Vernon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4168697 | Cantekin | Sep 1979 | A |
4335713 | Komiya | Jun 1982 | A |
4335715 | Kirkley | Jun 1982 | A |
4380998 | Kieffer, III et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4468218 | Armstrong | Aug 1984 | A |
4473073 | Darnell | Sep 1984 | A |
4564009 | Brinkhoff | Jan 1986 | A |
4712537 | Pender | Dec 1987 | A |
4796624 | Trott et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800876 | Fox et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4913132 | Gabriel | Apr 1990 | A |
4946440 | Hall | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971076 | Densert et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5026378 | Goldsmith, III | Jun 1991 | A |
5044373 | Northeved et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5047007 | McNichols et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053040 | Goldsmith, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5107861 | Narboni | Apr 1992 | A |
5135478 | Sibalis | Aug 1992 | A |
5178623 | Cinberg et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5254120 | Cinberg et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261903 | Dhaliwal et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D352780 | Glaeser et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
5370656 | Shevel | Dec 1994 | A |
5421818 | Arenberg | Jun 1995 | A |
5466239 | Cinberg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5489286 | Cinberg et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496329 | Reisinger | Mar 1996 | A |
D378611 | Croley | Mar 1997 | S |
5610988 | Miyahara | Mar 1997 | A |
5643280 | Del Rio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645584 | Suyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5658235 | Priest et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674196 | Donaldson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676635 | Levin | Oct 1997 | A |
5681323 | Arick | Oct 1997 | A |
D387863 | Herman et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
5707383 | Bays et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5775336 | Morris | Jul 1998 | A |
5782744 | Money | Jul 1998 | A |
5792100 | Shantha | Aug 1998 | A |
5827295 | Del Rio et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5893828 | Uram | Apr 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5984930 | Maciunas et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D418223 | Phipps et al. | Dec 1999 | S |
D420741 | Croley | Feb 2000 | S |
6022342 | Mukherjee | Feb 2000 | A |
6024726 | Hill | Feb 2000 | A |
6039748 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045528 | Arenberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D424197 | Sydlowski et al. | May 2000 | S |
6059803 | Spilman | May 2000 | A |
D426135 | Lee | Jun 2000 | S |
6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
6110196 | Edwards | Aug 2000 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6171236 | Bonutti | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183469 | Thapliyal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200280 | Brenneman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206888 | Bicek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245077 | East et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251121 | Saadat | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258067 | Hill | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D450843 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6358231 | Schindler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398758 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440102 | Arenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6475138 | Schechter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6512950 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514261 | Randall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520939 | Lafontaine | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522827 | Loeb et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553253 | Chang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6645173 | Liebowitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648873 | Arenberg et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663575 | Leysieffer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682558 | Tu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6770080 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6916159 | Rush et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6962595 | Chamness et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7127285 | Henley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137975 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7160274 | Ciok et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7344507 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351246 | Epley | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D595410 | Luzon | Jun 2009 | S |
7563232 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7654997 | Makower et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677734 | Wallace | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704259 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7749254 | Sobelman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D622842 | Benoist | Aug 2010 | S |
D640374 | Liu et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
8052693 | Shahoian | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8192420 | Morriss et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249700 | Clifford et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8282648 | Tekulve | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8409175 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425488 | Clifford et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8498425 | Graylin | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518098 | Roeder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8702722 | Shahoian | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8840602 | Morriss et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849394 | Clifford et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8864774 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8998927 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011363 | Clopp et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023059 | Loushin et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9216112 | Clifford et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9320652 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9387124 | Clifford | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010020173 | Klumb et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020026125 | Leysieffer | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020069883 | Hirchenbain | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111585 | Lafontaine | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138091 | Pflueger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161379 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169456 | Tu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018291 | Hill et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040717 | Saulenas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060799 | Arenberg et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030187456 | Perry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199791 | Boecker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040054339 | Ciok et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050033343 | Chermoni | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050165368 | Py et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182385 | Epley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187546 | Bek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050235422 | Wallace | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240147 | Makower et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060095050 | Hartley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142700 | Sobelman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155304 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161218 | Danilov | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163313 | Larson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060282062 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070233222 | Roeder et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080027423 | Choi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051804 | Cottler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080212416 | Polonio et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262468 | Clifford et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262508 | Clifford et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262510 | Clifford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090163828 | Turner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090209972 | Loushin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090299344 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299379 | Katz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041447 | Graylin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061581 | Soetejo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100198135 | Morriss et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217296 | Morriss et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100324488 | Smith | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015645 | Liu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022069 | Mitusina | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110077579 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110288559 | Shahoian | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120179187 | Loushin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120265097 | Melchiorri et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310145 | Clifford et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130090544 | Clifford et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130338678 | Loushin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140094733 | Clopp et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100584 | Konstorum et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140194891 | Shahoian | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140276906 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150164695 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150305944 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160038341 | Clopp et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038342 | Van et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045369 | Clopp | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045370 | Andreas et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045371 | Girotra et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86105171 | Mar 1987 | CN |
19618585 | Nov 1997 | DE |
19918288 | Oct 2000 | DE |
0214527 | Mar 1987 | EP |
2526656 | Nov 1983 | FR |
H 07-116190 | May 1995 | JP |
WO 9911175 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 2006119512 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008030485 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008036368 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008131195 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009010788 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2011008948 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2014075949 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014143543 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014158571 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2016022899 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025308 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025309 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025310 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2016025453 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,553, filed Mar. 14, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 17, 2014 for Application No. PCT/US2014/018347. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2013209354, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 5 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880020861.9, dated Jul. 12, 2011, 10 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880020861.9, dated Dec. 31, 2011, 3 pages. |
Search Report for Chinese Patent Application No. 201310047126.X, dated Mar. 6, 2015, 2 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201310047126.X, dated Mar. 16, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 08746237.0, mailed Mar. 24, 2016, 3 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 08746237.0, mailed Aug. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Supplementary Partial Search Report for European Application No. 08746237.0, mailed Jun. 30, 2014, 9 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-504267, dated Nov. 20, 2012, 4 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-504267, dated Nov. 12, 2013, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/060779, mailed Sep. 3, 2008. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/060779, mailed Sep. 3, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/060779, dated Nov. 17, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,729, mailed May 26, 2011, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,729, mailed Jun. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,733, mailed Jun. 10, 2009, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/749,733, mailed Dec. 2, 2008, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/085,360, filed Jul. 31, 2008. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/052395, mailed Nov. 6, 2009. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/052395, mailed Nov. 6, 2009. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058718, mailed Feb. 17, 2011. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058718, mailed Feb. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/225,893, filed Jul. 15, 2009. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2010273372, dated Nov. 12, 2014, 2 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,768,009, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080041755.6, dated Jul. 3, 2013. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2012-520778, dated Feb. 18, 2014. |
Communication of the Substantive Examination Report for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2012/000691, dated Apr. 24, 2014. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/042128, mailed Aug. 27, 2010. |
Written Opinion International Application No. PCT/US2010/042128, mailed Aug. 27, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/042128, dated Jan. 17, 2012. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 13173409.7, mailed Sep. 16, 2013. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/044179, mailed Dec. 18, 2015, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/018320, mailed Jun. 2, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044173, mailed Oct. 12, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044177, mailed Oct. 30, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044183, mailed Nov. 4, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044610, mailed Nov. 5, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/069388, mailed Jun. 30, 2010. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/069388, mailed Jun. 30, 2010. |
Comeau, M. et al., “Local Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis,” vol. 98, Arch. Otolaryngol., pp. 114-120 (Aug. 1973). |
Comeau, M. et al., “Anesthesia of the Human Tympanic Membrane by Iontophoresis of a Local Anesthetic,” The Larynogoscope, vol. 88, pp. 277-285 (1978). |
Echols, D. F. et al., “Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis of Lidocaine,” Arch. Otolaryngol., vol. 101, pp. 418-421 (Jul. 1975). |
Epley, J. M., “Modified Technique of Iontophoretic Anesthesia for Myringotomy in Children,” Arch. Otolaryngol., vol. 103, pp. 358-360 (Jun. 1977). |
Hasegawa, M. et al., “Iontophorectic anaesthesia of the tympanic membrane,” Clinical Otolaryngoloy, vol. 3, pp. 63-66 (1978). |
Ramsden, R. T. et al., “Anaesthesia of the tympanic membrane using iontophoresis,” The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 56(9):779-785 (Sep. 1977). |
“Definition of Plenum,” Compact Oxford English Dictionary [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/plenum>, Retrieved on Aug. 6, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Definition of Plenum,” Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary, 11th Edition [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plenum>, Retrieved on Aug. 14, 2012, 1 page. |
Medtronic XOMED, “Activent® Antimicrobial Ventilation Tubes,” Rev. 1.1, pp. 1-4, 2002, Jacksonville, FL. |
Micromedics Innovative Surgical Products, “Micromedics Tympanostomy Tubes,” [online], Retrieved on Jul. 15, 2010, Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.micromedics-usa.com/products/otology/micromedicstubes.htm>, 7 pages. |
Armstrong, “A New Treatment for Chronic Secretory Otitis Media” A.M.A. Archives of Otolaryngology, pp. 653-654 (1954). |
Feuerstein, “A Split-Tube Prosthesis in Serous Otitis Media” Sixty-ninth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 18-23, 1964, Chicago, IL, pp. 343-344. |
Jurgens. et al., “Three New Middle Ear Ventilation Tubes” Seventy-sixth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Sep. 20-24, 1971, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1017-1019 (1971). |
Lindeman et al., The “Arrow Tube” Residents in Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 1 page (1964). |
Pappas, “Middle Ear Ventilation Tubes” Meeting of the Southern Section of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc., Williamsburg, VA, Jan. 12, 1974, pp. 1098-1117. |
Per-Lee, “A Wide Flanged Middle Ear Ventilation Tube” Seventy-first Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 16-21, 1966, Chicago, IL, pp. 358-359. |
Reuter, “The Stainless Bobbin Middle Ear Ventilation Tube” Seventy-second Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 29-Nov. 3, 1967, Chicago, IL, pp. 121-122. |
Ringenberg, “A New Middle Ear Ventilation Device” Seventy-second Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 29-Nov. 3, 1967, Chicago, IL, 1 page. |
Schmidt et al. “Transtympanic Aeration of the Middle Ear With Blocked Eustachian Tube” Acta Otolaryng., pp. 277-282 (1965). |
Sheehy, “Collar Button Tube for Chronic Serous Otitis” Sixty-eighth Annual Session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Oct. 20-25, 1963, New York, NY, pp. 888-889. |
Santa Barbara Medco, Inc. “Otological Ventilation Tubes” Product Brochure from http://www.sbmedco.com/ptfe—shepard.asp, 8 pages (Feb. 11, 2001). |
Rhinology Products, Boston Medical Products, www.bosmed.com [date of publication unknown], pp. 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140277050 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |