The present invention relates generally to a prosthesis for the distal radio-ulnar joint and more particularly to a prosthesis for the restoration of pain free rotation of the forearm and stability of the ulna and wrist.
The ulnar head is an integral portion of the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ). The DRUJ is essential for stable forearm rotation and the ulnar head serves as the fixed fulcrum at which the radius sigmoid notch articulates. The radius of curvature of the sigmoid notch is approximately twice that of the ulnar head and the motion between the two surfaces can be accurately described as rolling and sliding.
Disorders of the distal radio-ulnar joint are common and usually associated with pain, weakness, instability and loss of forearm rotation. Any loss of congruity between the sigmoid fossa of the radius and the ulnar head will result in painful loss of forearm rotation. Causes include congenital abnormalities such as Madelung's deformity, radial fractures, inflammatory arthritis and tears of the triangular fibro-cartilage complex. Furthermore, trauma may result in acute dislocation of the distal radio-ulnar joint itself, often in association with radial head fracture and tear of the interosseous membrane. Finally, many patients suffer from painful instability following previous surgical procedures on the distal radio-ulnar joint.
It is important to restore the ulnar head if an individual is to achieve stable and pain free forearm rotation in cases of DJD, inflammatory arthritis, or post traumatic arthritis of the ulnar head. The current salvage procedures without a prosthetic implant include, Darrach resection, hemi-resection, and suave-kapandji; however, all the surgical techniques render the distal ulna unstable leading to recurrence of pain, instability, and weakness.
Although any of the above procedures may produce reasonable results if correctly carried out and in appropriate patients, there are, however, many patients who are discontented with the results of surgery and who are seeking a suitable revision procedure to restore stability and pain free rotation at the distal radio-ulnar joint.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides an ulnar prosthesis assembly comprising a head formed with a curved surface extending between opposed ends and a stem. One of the ends of the head has an attachment bore defined therein. The attachment bore generally has a first diameter and includes an attachment groove thereabout with a second diameter greater than the first diameter to define at least one attachment shoulder. The stem has a stem body extending between a proximal end configured for implantation in a target bone and a distal end configured to be received in the attachment bore. The distal end has a locking flange extending radially therefrom. The locking flange defines a locking shoulder having a diameter greater than the first diameter such that upon receipt in the attachment bore, the locking shoulder engages the attachment shoulder.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides an ulnar prosthesis assembly comprising a head formed with a curved surface extending between opposed ends and a stem. One of the ends of the head has an attachment bore defined therein. The attachment bore generally defines a bore end surface. The stem has a stem body extending between a proximal end configured for implantation in a target bone and a distal end configured to be received in the attachment bore. The distal end has a distal end surface with at least one projection extending therefrom and configured such that when the distal end is received in the attachment bore, the at least one projection penetrates the bore end surface and prevents relative rotation between the head and the stem.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides an ulnar prosthesis assembly comprising a head formed with a curved surface extending between opposed ends and a stem. One of the ends of the head has an ulnar styloid prominence or process with one or more holes for reattachment of stabilizing soft tissues, the other end having an attachment bore defined therein. The stem has a stem body extending between a proximal end configured for implantation in a target bone and a distal end configured to be received in the attachment bore.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention provides an ulnar prosthesis assembly comprising a head and a stem. The head includes a radially curved surface extending between opposed ends with the curved surface extending circumferentially less than 360° between opposed side edges with an ulnarly flat surface defined between the side edges. The stem has a radial collar extending therefrom between distal and proximal ends thereof, the radial collar configured to complement the curved and flat configuration of the head. The proximal end of the stem is configured for implantation in a target bone and has a first central axis and the distal end of the stem is configured to be received in the attachment bore and has a second central axis that is offset relative to the first central axis.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the invention.
Referring to
Referring to
A radially extending collar 28 is provided about the stem body 22 proximate to the distal end 25 of the stem 20. The collar 28 has a proximal surface 27 and a distal surface 29. The proximal surface 27 and the distal surface 29 are configured to contact the locking edge of the stem extraction and insertion tool and the proximal collar 40 defines a stop surface to prevent over insertion of the stem 20. The proximal surface 27 also provides a gripping surface that assists in head attachment as described hereinafter.
The distal surface 29 of the collar 28 defines a stop surface for the head 50. A tapered head locking flange 30 is provided about the distal end 25 of the stem body 22 distally of the collar 28. The locking flange 30 defines a proximally facing shoulder 31 spaced a distance from the distal surface 29 of the collar 28. A locking groove 32 is thereby defined between the distal surface 29 of the collar 28 and the shoulder 31 of the locking flange 30. The locking groove 32 is configured to receive and retain a proximal engagement portion 58 of the head 50, as described hereinafter.
One or more locking projections 34A and 34B extend longitundinally from an end surface 21 of the proximal end 25 of the stem 20. In the present embodiment, each locking projection 34A, 34B tapers from the end surface 21 to a pointed edge 33. Each projection 34A, 34B has a width W such that the tapering surfaces thereof define contact surfaces 37 which are configured to engage the head 50 and prevent rotation thereof, as described below. In the present embodiment, two projections 34A and 34B are provided spaced apart by an opening 35 and extending at 180° relative to one another. More or fewer projections may be utilized. For example, three projections spaced apart by 120° or four projections spaced apart by 90° may be utilized. Alternatively, a single projection 34′ may be utilized as illustrated with the stem 20′ in
Referring to
As illustrated in
The attachment bore 60 also includes a reduced diameter portion 68 adjacent its internal end wall 67. The reduced diameter portion 68 thereby defines annular end shoulder 65. The end shoulder 65 is configured to be engaged by the engagement projections 34A and 34B as illustrated in
Assembly of the head 50 onto the stem 20 and an exemplary assembly tool 200 will be further described with reference to
With the tool body 202 so positioned, the distal end 25 of the stem 20 extends into an open area 214 of the tool assembly 200. The head 50 is positioned within the open area 214 and placed on the stem distal end 25 such that the distal end 25 is received in the attachment bore 60 until the locking flange 30 begins to contact the engagement portion 58 of the head 50. A threaded shaft 220 extends through a threaded opening 206 in the support portion 204 and terminates in a transition assembly 224 attached to a pressure block 222. The transition assembly 224 is configured such that it will apply axial motion of the shaft 220 to the pressure block 222 without causing rotation of the pressure block 222. A handle 226 or the like is provided at the opposite end of the shaft 220 and is configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft 220.
To assemble the head 50 to the stem 20, the pressure block 222 is engaged upon the end surface 51 of the head 50. As the handle 226 is rotated, the threaded 220 is caused axially, which in turn causes the pressure block 222 to move axially toward the foot portion 210. Again, the transition assembly 224 provides axial motion to the pressure block 222 without causing rotation to the pressure block 222. As the pressure block 222 is moved axially toward the foot portion 210, it applies an axial force to the head 50 such that the head 50 is forced onto the stem 20, with the engagement portion 58 flexing over the locking flange 30 as described above. The handle 226 is rotated until the head 50 is fully positioned on the stem distal end 25 with the locking flange 30 received in the attachment groove 62, the engagement portion 58 received in the locking groove, and the projections 34A, 34B engaged with the end shoulder 65 and the end wall 67. The operator will feel a tacticle sensation as the engagement portion 58 snaps into the locking groove 32, thereby providing confirmation that the head 50 is fully assembled to the stem 20. Additionally, a known axial force will typically be determined for each head 50 and stem 20 arrangement such that the operator knows ahead of time the necessary axial force to achieve proper attachment.
This is contrary to modular head and stem designs utilizing a tapered stem distal end to provide a friction fit. The amount of securing axial force necessary to for proper attachment is left completely to the discretion of the operator without any indication when such has been achieved. Additionally, in such systems, the axial force is typically supplied using a mallet or the like with one or more successive blows to the head. This further causes a random application of axial force.
In trials using a stem 20 manufactured from ASTM F136 Ti6AIV4 and a head manufactured from UHMWPE, it was found that an average assembly force of 50 lbs. was necessary to fully assemble the head 50 to the stem 20. Engagement of the proximally facing shoulder 31 of the stem 20 with the attachment shoulder 61 within the head 50 securely maintained the components attached and required an average axial disassembly force of 112 lbs. to disassemble the head 50 from the stem 20. Similarly, engagement of the projections 34A, 34B with the end shoulder 65 and end wall 67 provided a secure rotational connection between the components with an average torsional torque of 4.75 inch-lbs. necessary torsionally separate disassemble the head 50 and stem 20. These disassembly force values represent high values which are unlikely to occur in a patient, thereby providing a desired stability of the prosthesis ulnar head 50.
Referring again to
Furthermore, while the notch 70 of the present embodiment has a semicircular shape, the invention is not limited to such. For example, in the head 50′ shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The distal end 25′″ of the stem 20′″ is substantially the same as in the first embodiment, except that the distal end 25′″ includes an axially extended portion 38 between the locking flange 30 and the end surface 21. This extended portion 38 can be configured with various lengths such that the stem 20′″ may be utilized in revision cases where there is excessive bone loss, with the extended portion 38 making up the length for the removed bone.
To complement the stem 20′″, the head 50″″ is formed with an extended bore portion 69 which corresponds to the extended portion 38 of the stem 20′″. The head 50″″ again includes a body 52″″ with a spherical portion 54, a neck portion 56 and an engagement portion 58. Since the collar 28 and the locking flange 30 remain unchanged in the stem 20′″, the attachment groove 62 and the engagement portion 58 remain unchanged in head 50″″ and the snap-fit connection is achieved in the same manner as described above. To compensate for the extended bore portion 69, an extended body portion 57 extends between the neck portion 56 and the engagement portion 58. The length of the extended body portion 57 may be varied to compensate for missing bone of the distal ulna during revision procedures to salvage and restore stability to the distal radioulnar joint after failed Darrach resection or hemiresection arthroplasties. In all other respects, the stem 20′″ and the head 50″″ are the same as described in the first embodiment.
Referring to
With reference to
As in the first embodiment, the head 150 includes an attachment bore 160 extending through an end surface 159 of the engagement portion 158 and into the body 152 of the head 150. The attachment bore 160 has an axis BA which is preferably centered within the head 150. Due to the flattened side 168, this may move the axis BA slightly toward the opposite side compared to the the head 50. The attachment bore 160 again includes an internal attachment groove 162 formed thereabout and configured to receive the locking flange 130 of the stem 120. The attachment groove 162 defines an attachment shoulder 161 at the proximal engagement portion 158 and a stop shoulder 163 further therein. The attachment bore 160 also includes a reduced diameter portion 168 adjacent its internal end wall 167. The reduced diameter portion 168 thereby defines annular end shoulder 165. The head 150 also includes a suture extension 176 representing the ulna styloid process with suture holes 177, but other suture configurations may also be utilized.
Referring again to
As illustrated in
In all other respects, the stem 120 and the head 150 are the same as described in the first embodiment.
Referring to
Referring to
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described herein, it will be understood that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the appended claims cover all such variations as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3506982 | Steffee | Apr 1970 | A |
3593342 | Niebauer et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3694821 | Moritz | Oct 1972 | A |
3795922 | Herbert et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3837008 | Bahler et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3868730 | Kaufer et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3916451 | Buechel et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3978528 | Crep | Sep 1976 | A |
4003096 | Frey | Jan 1977 | A |
4040130 | Laure | Aug 1977 | A |
4100626 | White | Jul 1978 | A |
4106128 | Greenwald et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4180871 | Hamas | Jan 1980 | A |
4259752 | Taleisnik | Apr 1981 | A |
4304011 | Whelan, III | Dec 1981 | A |
4645505 | Swanson | Feb 1987 | A |
4677971 | Lindemann | Jul 1987 | A |
4784661 | Beckenbaugh et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4936854 | Swanson | Jun 1990 | A |
4944758 | Bekki et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4955915 | Swanson | Sep 1990 | A |
4963155 | Lazzeri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
5037440 | Koenig | Aug 1991 | A |
5080685 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5133761 | Krouskop | Jul 1992 | A |
5152796 | Slamin | Oct 1992 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5290313 | Heldreth | Mar 1994 | A |
5458646 | Giachino et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5507821 | Sennwald et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5628740 | Mullane | May 1997 | A |
5702470 | Menon | Dec 1997 | A |
5782926 | Lamprecht | Jul 1998 | A |
5888211 | Sanders | Mar 1999 | A |
5906210 | Herbert | May 1999 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
5931839 | Medoff | Aug 1999 | A |
5951604 | Scheker | Sep 1999 | A |
6059832 | Menon | May 2000 | A |
6096084 | Townley | Aug 2000 | A |
6132467 | Keller | Oct 2000 | A |
6146424 | Gray et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168630 | Keller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217616 | Ogilvie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224634 | Keller | May 2001 | B1 |
6238436 | Lob et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6302915 | Cooney et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306171 | Conzemius | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6440171 | Doubler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454808 | Masada | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6613092 | Kana et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656225 | Martin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689169 | Harris | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709459 | Cooney et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736852 | Callaway et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746486 | Shultz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6811568 | Minamikawa | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6814757 | Kopylov et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818019 | Horber | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827741 | Reeder | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6869447 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890358 | Ball et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6969407 | Klotz et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986790 | Ball et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001672 | Justin et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011686 | Ball et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044975 | Cheal et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7108719 | Horber | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7160329 | Cooney et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160331 | Cooney et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179297 | McLean | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7241732 | Puzas | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7470287 | Tornier et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7520902 | Deloge et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531003 | Reindel | May 2009 | B2 |
7563287 | Guerard et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608110 | O'Driscoll et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608111 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7625408 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7722676 | Hanson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740661 | Baratz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766970 | Shultz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010025199 | Rauscher | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020016634 | Maroney et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030135280 | Kopylov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030204262 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216813 | Ball et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040117025 | Reindel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138756 | Reeder | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171924 | Mire et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220674 | Pria | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230312 | Hanson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004675 | Shultz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050085921 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112168 | Puzas | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123672 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137709 | Klotz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171613 | Sartorius et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246020 | Southworth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004431 | Fuller et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004462 | Gupta | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030946 | Ball et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036330 | Shultz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060073356 | Justin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094645 | Lawless | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116773 | Cooney, III et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161260 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167559 | Johnstone et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070055381 | Berelsman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070142919 | Cooney, III et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198095 | VanDer Meulen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202351 | Justin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213645 | Zumeris et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225820 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233134 | Bastian et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287027 | Justin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051909 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080133024 | Meswania | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195217 | Scheker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249630 | Brunneke | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288079 | Leibel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090143865 | Hassler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090254189 | Scheker | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281631 | Naidu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281632 | Naidu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312839 | Scheker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319050 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010636 | Shultz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030339 | Berelsman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4445892 | Jun 1996 | DE |
2680968 | Mar 1993 | FR |
2770770 | May 1999 | FR |
05168656 | Jul 1993 | JP |
WO2006048520 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090281631 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |