Patent Application
20180025707
The present invention relates to picks for stringed instruments.
This section describes the technical field in more detail, and discusses problems encountered in the technical field. This section does not describe prior art as defined for purposes of anticipation or obviousness under 35 U.S.C. section 102 or 35 U.S.C. section 103. Thus, nothing stated in the Problem Statement is to be construed as prior art.
Picks for stringed instruments have been around since ancient times. The sound each stringed instrument generates is unique and different compared to the sound generated when the same instrument is strummed. Conventional flat picks are commonly held between one's thumb and forefinger, with sound being generated through strumming. A variation to this method, known as “finger picking” has evolved over the years and increased in popularity. However, finger picking involves plucking the strings with one's fingernails, which can lead to torn nails, bleeding, and pain. Not only is there a need in the art for devices that enable finger picking without damage to one's own fingers and nails, but there is also a need for a similar device for the very unique digit known as the human thumb, which generally plucks the strings from a different angle, compared to the upstroke of the human fingers. The present invention is just that very device, solving the special needs specific to the thumb.
The following detailed description will aid in the understanding of various aspects of the invention, as well as an embodiment. We utilized the cot embodiment from our existing U.S. Pat. No. 8,502,053, and then proceeded in a completely unique and unobvious direction to accommodate the unique needs of the human thumb. The detailed description, given by way of examples and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and parts in which:
When reading this section (An Exemplary Embodiment of a Best Mode, which describes an exemplary embodiment of the best mode of the invention, hereinafter “exemplary embodiment”), one should keep in mind several points. First, the following exemplary embodiment is what the inventor believes to be the best mode for practicing the invention at the time this patent was filed. Thus, since one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize from the following exemplary embodiment that substantially equivalent structures or substantially equivalent acts may be used to achieve the same results in exactly the same way, or to achieve the same results in a not dissimilar way, the following exemplary embodiment should not be interpreted as limiting the invention to one embodiment.
Likewise, individual aspects (sometimes called species) of the invention are provided as examples, and, accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize from the following exemplary structure (or a following exemplary act) that a substantially equivalent structure or substantially equivalent act may be used to either achieve the same results in substantially the same way, or to achieve the same results in a not dissimilar way.
Second, the only essential aspects of the invention are identified by the claims. Thus, aspects of the invention, including elements, acts, functions, and relationships (shown or described) should not be interpreted as being essential unless they are explicitly described and identified as being essential.
Third, a function or act should be interpreted as incorporating all modes of doing that function or act, unless otherwise explicitly stated (for example, one recognizes that “tacking” may be done by nailing, stapling, gluing, hot gunning, riveting, etc., and so a use of the word “tacking” invokes nailing, stapling, gluing, etc., and all other modes of that word and similar words, such as “attaching”).
Fourth, unless explicitly stated otherwise, conjunctive words (such as “or”, “and”, “including”, or “comprising” for example) should be interpreted in the inclusive, not the exclusive, sense. Fifth, the invention is also described in view of the Festo decisions, and, in that regard, the claims and the invention incorporate equivalents known, unknown, foreseeable, and unforeseeable.
Sixth, the language and each word used in the invention should be given the ordinary interpretation of the language and the word, unless indicated otherwise. As will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, various structures and devices are depicted in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention.
It should be noted in the following discussion that acts with like names are performed in like manners, unless otherwise stated. Of course, the foregoing discussions and definitions are provided for clarification purposes and are not limited. Words and phrases are to be given their ordinary plain meaning unless indicated otherwise.
The cot 130 is made of an elastic material that “hugs” the digit (finger or thumb) 160 of the user, such as rubber, nitrile material, plastics, latex or similar materials (herein, “cot” is used in the “sheath or protective covering” sense of the word, and not in its “bedding” sense). The cot 130 is in varying embodiments as long as the proximate, intermediate or distal portions of a human digit. The cot has an opening 155, a tip 133, and a breath hole 140, and has a substantially uniform thickness, preferably ranging from 13 to 40 mils (thousandths of an inch). The cot may be smooth and unbroken, perforated, with or without breath-holes.
In the preferred embodiment, the pick pocket 110 allows the user to interchange a variety of plectrums, made of a variety of materials, in order to “draw out” different sounds from the instrument being played or for purely ornamental reasons. As an example, a banjo player might insert a metal plectrum into the pick pocket 110, especially if the user utilizes metal finger picks, so as to produce more uniformity in tonal qualities between fingers and thumb. A selected plectrum 190 might also be attached by the end-user, with an adhesive, such as a cyanoacrylate, or polyurethane, or some type of fusing bonding agent, making it a permanent addition to the invention.
Furthermore, though the invention has been described with respect to a specific preferred embodiment, many advantages, variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present application. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims and their equivalents be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art, to include all such variations and modifications.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/195,785 to common inventor Gustafson et al, dated 22 Jul. 2015 and entitled, “Ultimate Thumb Pick, for stringed musical instruments”. This application will also reference U.S. Pat. No. 8,502,053, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/455,119 to common inventor Gustafson et al, dated 15 Oct. 2010 and entitled, “‘Ultimate’ fingerpick: ‘finger nailer’ fingerpick ‘awesome pluckers’ fingerpick: fingerpicks to be used on stringed musical instruments.”
