High voltage gain direct current (DC) to DC converters are employed in many electrical systems, including but not limited to: (i) integration of photovoltaic (PV) power sources with an electrical power grid, (ii) PV or battery powered alternating current (AC) sources also known as uninterrupted power supplies, (iii) battery powered electric vehicles (EV), (iv) fuel cell powered electric vehicles, and (iv) hybrid electric vehicles (HEV).
In many of the above applications, a high voltage (Voltage>200 V DC) is preferred for the common DC bus, as higher voltages result in more power transfer at higher efficiency in a compact size. The output voltage level of input energy sources for the above applications is typically low (usually 24 V to 48 V). The low voltage power supplied by the input energy sources is typically converted to a high voltage power (e.g. 110 V to 400 V). For example, a low input voltage level (say 12 V or 24 V DC) is preferred in electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles and fuel cell powered vehicles. A low input voltage level often results in the use of compact batteries and paralleling of batteries to get high power density. In these applications, high voltage (110 V AC or 220 V AC) motors are preferred because high voltage motors have higher efficiencies, higher power, and smaller overall size compared to low voltage motors. In heavy vehicles, motors with still higher voltage rating (e.g. 400 V AC) are preferred, requiring a DC bus voltage of the order of 800 V. Similarly, in PV systems, batteries in the range 12 V to 24 V are preferred. In PV applications, output loads match a power grid voltage, which (depending on region) may be on the order of 220 V single phase AC, 400 V line-to line (L-L) three phase AC, or comparable, which requires DC bus voltages of 400 V or 800 V. Any of the above systems may have the capacity of regeneration, i.e. allowing energy flow from an output load to an input source, in addition to normal energy flow from an input source to output load. Therefore, all such systems require high voltage gain (step up or boost) from the input source to the output load, and at the same time require a high voltage reduction ratio (step down or buck) from the output load to the input source during reverse energy flow or regeneration.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:
In the following description, various embodiments will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the embodiments may be practiced in other configurations, or without the specific details. Furthermore, well-known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the embodiment being described.
Power ratings and battery voltages for EV/HEVs vary depending on the application. For example, power ratings for EV/HEVs generally vary from 300 W to 400 kW. At a lower end of the spectrum, the power rating for an electric scooter rating is typically a fraction of a kilowatt. The power ratings for cars are typically in a range from 3 kW to 110 kW. The power ratings for trucks are typically in a range from 100 kW to 390 kW. The voltage ratings for EV/HEVs typically vary depending upon the drive system employed. Battery voltages for EV/HEVs is typically in a range from of about 24 V to 96 V where lower voltage is preferred.
In addition to having bidirectional power flow capability, embodiments of the DC-DC converter 12 can have the following attractive features:
In the embodiment illustrated in
Nomenclature: Symbols and variables used herein is set forth below:
A. Step-Up or Boost Mode of Operation (Energy Transfer from Input Source to Output Load)
The step-up mode of operation of the DC-DC converter 12 is illustrated in
and (1−D)T is OFF time. The step-up mode of operation of the DC-DC converter 12 can be achieved by three different combinations of gating signals. PWM pulses of the gating signals are described herein and illustrated in
1. Step-Up Operation Mode PWM1
In a step-up operation mode PWM1, switch S1 and switch S2 are gated in a complementary mode as illustrated in
for different values of D is shown in
2. Step-Up Operation Mode PWM2
In a step-up operation mode PWM2, switch S1 and switch S2 are gated in a complementary mode as illustrated in
for different D is shown in
3. Step-Up Operation Mode PWM3
In a step-up operation mode PWM3, switch S1 and switch S2 are gated in a complementary mode as illustrated in
B. Step-Down Mode (Buck Mode) of Operation (Energy Transfer from Output Load Source to Input Load)
1) Step-Down Operation Mode PWM1
In a step-down operation mode PWM1, switch S1 and switch S2 are gated in a complementary mode illustrated in
for different D is shown in
for the DC-DC converter 12 in the set-down operation mode PMW 1 is produced when D=0.414.
2) Step-Down Operation Mode PWM2
In a step-down operation mode PWM2, switch S1 and switch S2 are gated in a complementary mode illustrated in
for different D is shown in
for the step-down operation mode PWM2 is produced when D=0.414.
Steady State Analysis and Simulation Results
Steady state analysis and simulation was performed for the DC-DC converter 12 for each of the step-up operation mode PWM1, the step-up operation mode PWM2, the step-down operation mode PWM1, and the step-down operation mode PWM2. The circuit parameters used in the simulation are listed in Table I below.
Step-Up Operation Mode PWM1
In the step-up operation mode PWM1, switch S1 is in the CLOSED state and switch S2 is in the OPEN state for DT duration, and switch S2 is in the CLOSED state and switch S1 is in the OPEN state for (1−D)T duration. Switches S3, S4 and S5 maintained in the OPEN state as shown in
A. Steady Sate Analysis for 0≤t<DT Interval
The circuit status for the DC-DC converter 12 in the step-up operation mode PWM1 in the 0≤t<DT interval is illustrated in
vL1=vL (1);
vL2=vL−vC1+vC2 (2);
iC1=iL2 (3);
iC2=−iL2 (4); and
iCH=−iH (5).
B. Steady Sate Analysis for DT≤t≤(1−D)T Interval
The circuit status for the DC-DC converter 12 in the step-up operation mode PWM1 in the DT≤t≤(1−D)T interval is illustrated in
vL1=vL−vC2 (6);
vL2=vL (7);
iC1=iC2−iL1 (8);
iC2=iL1+iC1 (9); and
iCH=iC1−iH (10).
In steady state, the capacitor average current and inductor average voltage over one switching interval should be zero. By applying volt-seconds balance principle to the L1 and L2 over one switching interval, we get following voltage relations:
By implementing charge-seconds balance principle to the all the capacitors over one switching instant, we get following current relations:
C. Switch Voltage and Current Stress
The following gives the maximum voltage stress across each switch and maximum current through switches. This is helpful in selecting voltage and current rating of the switches.
D. Simulation Verifications
The DC-DC converter 12 is simulated for circuit condition given in Table I for D=0.55 and (1-D)=0.45.
The inductors L1, L2 are designed to limit the current ripple to less than 35% which is clear from the simulation results. One advantage of the step-up operation mode PWM1 control strategy is that the input ripple current will be less than (35/2) % because the operation of charging and discharging the inductors (L1 and L2) is complementary in nature. Moreover, the total current is the summation of the both inductor' currents (IL1 and IL2), significantly reducing the source current ripple.
The simulation results show the for 48 V input voltage (VL), the output voltage (VH) is 300 V when operating at 0.55 duty cycle. In one example, the DC-DC converter 12 operating at 300 W provides for an output current rating (IH) obtained as 1 A, with capacitor voltages being Vc1=200 V and Vc2=100 V.
Step-Up Operation Mode PWM2
The operation of the DC-DC converter 12 in the step-up operation mode PWM2 is similar to the operation in the step-up operation mode PWM1 except that the CLOSED state and OPEN state interval of the switch S1 and the switch S2 are interchanged. So,
A. Steady Sate Analysis for 0≤t<DT Interval
The circuit status is given in
vL1=vL−vC2 (15)
vL2=vL (16)
iC1=iC2−iL1 (17)
iC2=iL1+iC1 (18)
iCH=−iC1−iH (19)
B. Steady Sate Analysis for DT≤t≤(1−D)T Interval
The circuit in interval DT≤t≤(1−D)T is shown in
vL1=vL (20)
vL2=vL−vC1+vC2 (21)
iC1=iL2 (22)
iC2=−iL2 (23)
iCH=−iH (24)
In steady state, the capacitor average current and inductor average voltage over one switching interval should be zero. So, by utilizing volt-seconds balance principle to the L1 and L2 over one switching interval, we get following voltage relations:
The currents are given by:
C. Switch Voltage and Current Stress
The following gives the maximum voltage stress across each switch and maximum current through switches. This is helpful in selecting voltage and current rating of the switches.
D. Simulation Verifications
The simulation conditions as shown in Table I are used. The nominal duty cycle is D=0.45. So, the switch S2 is operated as 0.45 duty cycle and switch S1 operated at 0.55 duty cycle as shown in
Step-Down Operation Mode PWM1
In step-down mode of operation PWM1, the load and source terminal are interchanged and energy flow is high side to low side. In the DT interval, only switch S4 is in the CLOSED state and switches S3, S5 are in the OPEN state. In the (1-D)T interval, switches S3, S5 are in the CLOSED state and switch S4 is in the OPEN state. Switches S1, S2 are maintained in the OPEN state in the step-down mode of operation PWM1 as described herein. The circuit condition for step-down mode of operation is shown in
A. Steady Sate Analysis for 0≤t<DT Interval
The circuit status is given in
vL1=−vL (29);
vL2=−vL+vC1−vC2 (30);
iC1=−iL2 (31);
iC2=iL2 (32); and
iCH=iH (33).
B. Steady Sate Analysis for DT≤t≤(1−D)T Interval
The circuit in interval DT≤t≤(1−D)T is showing in
vL1=−vL+vC2 (34);
vL2=−vL (35);
iC1=iC2+iL1 (36);
iC2=−iL1+iC1 (37);
iCH=−iC1+iH (38); and
iCL=iL1+iL2−iL (39).
In steady state, the capacitor average current and inductor average voltage over one switching interval should be zero. By utilizing volt-seconds balance principle to the L1 and L2 over one switching interval, we get following voltage relations:
By implementing charge-seconds balance principle to the all the capacitors over one switching instant, we get following current relations:
C. Switch Voltage and Current Stress
The maximum voltage and current rating of the switches are as follows:
D. Simulation Verifications
In the step-down operation mode PWM1 control strategy, the maximum voltage buck ration is G=0.172 at the duty cycle of D=0.414. The circuit parameters are given in Table I and same as that of Boost operation except the input and output terminals are interchanged.
The energy transfer is from VH to VL side. The nominal duty cycle is 0.445. The switch S4 is on for 0.45 T interval and switches S3 and S5 are ON for (1−D)T=0.55 T duty cycle as shown in
Step-Down Operation Mode PWM2
The operation of the DC-DC converter 12 is similar to the step-down operation mode PWM2 except that the ON and OFF interval of the switch S4 is interchanged with the switches S3, S5. So, the circuit given in
A. Steady Sate Analysis for 0≤t<DT Interval
The interval DT is showing in
vL1=−vL+vC2 (44);
vL2=−vL (45);
iC1=iC2+iL1 (46);
iC2=−iL1+iC1 (47); and
iCH=−iC1+iH (48).
B. Steady Sate Analysis for DT≤t≤(1−D)T Interval
For the step-down operation mode PWM2, the DC-DC converter 12 in interval (1-D)Tis shown in
vL1=−vL (49);
vL2=−vL+vC1−vC2 (50);
iC1=−iL2 (51);
iC2=iL2 (52); and
iCH=iH (53).
In steady state, the capacitor average current and inductor average voltage over one switching interval should be zero. So, by utilizing volt-seconds balance principle to the L1 and L2 over one switching interval, we get following voltage relations:
By implementing charge-seconds balance principle to the all the capacitors over one switching instant, we get following current relations:
C. Switch Voltage and Current Stress
The maximum voltage and current stress of the switches are as follows.
D. Simulation Verifications
In the step-down operation mode PWM2, the maximum buck gain is G=0.172 at the duty cycle of D=0.586. Nominal duty cycle is 0.54806. So, the switch S3, S5 is operated as 0.45194 duty cycle and switch S4 operated at 0.54806 duty cycle as shown in
The simulation results show the for 300 V input voltage (VH), the output voltage (VL) is 48V when operating at 0.54806 duty cycle. The prototype is design for 300 W so the output current rating (IL) is obtained as 6.25 A. The capacitor voltages are Vc1=194V and Vc2=106V. Other parameters are given in the
Design Criteria and Selection of Components
In order to ensure the operation of the DC-DC converter 12 in continuous conduction mode (CCM), it is important to select the values of inductors and capacitors so that the current ripple in inductors and the voltage ripple in the capacitors are within the desired value. Operating the converter below this rating leads to the converter in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). The selection of voltage and current rating of switches are based on the peak reverse voltage across the switches as well as peak current through the switches.
The capacitors and inductors are designed to limit the ripple voltage and switching frequency current ripple. Thus, for the proposed converter, the inductors and capacitors are obtained as follows:
where i=1 and 2, ΔiL1 and ΔiL2 represent ripple currents in L1 and L2. ΔVc1 and ΔVc2 represent ripple voltages in C1 and C2. fs is the switching frequency. The design procedures for all the PWM strategies are same.
The above quantities for PWM1 can be derived in terms of VL and IH as follows. As the proposed converter is bi-directional the design percentage ripple will be same for boost mode of operation as well as buck mode of operations.
where ΔiH, is the current ripple of the IH and ΔvCL is the voltage ripple of the VL.
For buck mode, CL is the filter capacitor across the load or output terminals and is given by
Where ΔvC is the voltage ripple across CL.
For the converter to operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM) the critical values of the inductors are
Small Signal Analysis of the Proposed Converter
The control to output transfer function for both mode (i.e. Boost mode of operation and Buck mode of operation) are presented in this section. The dynamic performance is very similar in PWM1 and PWM2, so the small signal analysis of only PWM1 strategy is presented.
A. Small Signal Analysis for Boost Mode of Operation
The simplified equivalent circuit of proposed converter is shown in
After applying perturbation and linearization technique to equations leads to following state space model.
K{dot over ({circumflex over (x)})}=A{circumflex over (x)}+B{circumflex over (v)}L+[(A1−A2)X+(B1−B2)VL]{circumflex over (d)} (68)
{dot over ({circumflex over (x)})}=(K−1A){circumflex over (x)}+(K−1B){circumflex over (v)}L+K−1[(A1−A2)X+(B1−B2)VL]{circumflex over (d)} (69)
Let. S1=(K−1 A);
After simplification,
{dot over ({circumflex over (x)})}=S1{circumflex over (x)}+S2{circumflex over (v)}L+S3{circumflex over (d)}
A=A1D+A2(1−D), and B=B1D+B2(1−D)
From (68), the control to output transfer function for the proposed converter deduced as follows:
Therefore, the boost mode of operation in the ON interval can be written as:
Where rC=rC1+rC2
In the OFF interval:
The representation (˜) denotes the small signal ac variation of the signal. The lower cases correspond to the instantaneous values, and upper cases correspond to the steady state values.
XT=[iL1iL2vC1vC2vH]
By using equation (69) and using the parameters used in the proposed converter (Table I), the control to output transfer function can be written as:
B. Small Signal Analysis for Buck Mode of Operation
For the buck mode of operations of PWM1, the matrixes are written as:
In the ON interval:
Where rC=rC1+rC2
In the OFF interval:
The representation (˜) denotes the small signal ac variation of the signal. The lower cases correspond to the instantaneous values, and upper cases correspond to the steady state values.
XT=[iL1iL2vC1vC2vH]
By using equation (70) and using the parameters used in the proposed converter (Table I), the control to output transfer function can be written as:
Non-Ideal or Practical Voltage Gain of the Proposed Converter
This section gives the effect of parasitic element such as inductors and capacitors on voltage gain performance with duty cycle.
A. Boost Mode:
The actual practical steady state gain (GPractical) for PWM1 strategies is given by,
Let,
The above can be written as,
The actual practical steady state gain (GPractical) for PWM2 strategies is given by,
Let,
The above can be written as,
The influence of parasitic components on the converter gain in boost mode is very small in the interval D=0.1 to 0.9, as shown in
B. Buck Mode:
The performance of voltage buck with duty cycle is also investigated in similar manner. The non-ideal voltage transfer ration is given for PWM1 as (87).
Let,
The above can be written as,
The parasitic elements will reduce the buck gain of the duty cycle as shown in
Let
The above can be written as,
Similar performance can be seen for PWM2 as shown in
Thus, the non-ideal performances show that the passive components parasitic are not dominating much as compared to the conventional converters. In buck mode, the desired voltage gain can be achieved in practical system and is very close to the ideal gain.
Variations on the converter designs described above can be used as unidirectional high gain DC to DC boost converters or buck converters, as shown in
Advantages of the DC-DC converter 12 over many existing DC-DC converters includes:
Through analytical methods it is shown that the inductors and capacitors have no significant influence on gain in boost mode, and the small signal model of the DC-DC converter 12 is presented and verified through simulation.
Various computational methods discussed above may be performed in conjunction with or using a computer or other processor having hardware, software, and/or firmware. The various method steps may be performed by modules, and the modules may comprise any of a wide variety of digital and/or analog data processing hardware and/or software arranged to perform the method steps described herein. The modules optionally comprising data processing hardware adapted to perform one or more of these steps by having appropriate machine programming code associated therewith, the modules for two or more steps (or portions of two or more steps) being integrated into a single processor board or separated into different processor boards in any of a wide variety of integrated and/or distributed processing architectures. These methods and systems will often employ a tangible media embodying machine-readable code with instructions for performing the method steps described above. Suitable tangible media may comprise a memory (including a volatile memory and/or a non-volatile memory), a storage media (such as a magnetic recording on a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape, or the like; on an optical memory such as a CD, a CD-R/W, a CD-ROM, a DVD, or the like; or any other digital or analog storage media), or the like.
The particulars shown herein are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of various embodiments of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for the fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings and/or examples making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
The following definitions and explanations are meant and intended to be controlling in any future construction unless clearly and unambiguously modified in the following examples or when application of the meaning renders any construction meaningless or essentially meaningless. In cases where the construction of the term would render it meaningless or essentially meaningless, the definition should be taken from Webster's Dictionary, 3rd Edition or a dictionary known to those of skill in the art, such as the Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Ed. Anthony Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words ‘comprise’, ‘comprising’, and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to”. Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural and singular number, respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” and “below” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of the application.
The description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise form disclosed. While the specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
All references, including patent filings (including patents, patent applications, and patent publications), scientific journals, books, treatises, technical references, and other publications and materials discussed in this application, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the above references and application to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure. These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the detailed description.
Specific elements of any foregoing embodiments can be combined or substituted for elements in other embodiments. Furthermore, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the disclosure have been described in the context of these embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the disclosure.
While the above provides a full and complete disclosure of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, various modifications, alternate constructions and equivalents may be employed as desired. Consequently, although the embodiments have been described in some detail, by way of example and for clarity of understanding, a variety of modifications, changes, and adaptations will be obvious to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, the above description and illustrations should not be construed as limiting the invention, which can be defined by the appended claims.
Other variations are within the spirit of the present disclosure. Thus, while the disclosed techniques are susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrated embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and have been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the disclosure to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as defined in the appended claims.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the disclosed embodiments (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the disclosure and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the disclosure unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the disclosure.
Disjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, or Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is intended to be understood within the context as used in general to present that an item, term, etc., may be either X, Y, or Z, or any combination thereof (e.g., X, Y, and/or Z). Thus, such disjunctive language is not generally intended to, and should not, imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, or at least one of Z to each be present.
Preferred embodiments of this disclosure are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the disclosure. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate and the inventors intend for the disclosure to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this disclosure includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the disclosure unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 62/987,811, filed on Mar. 10, 2020, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2021/051955 | 3/9/2021 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/181273 | 9/16/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9641079 | Schmalnauer | May 2017 | B2 |
10199924 | Fu | Feb 2019 | B2 |
11784600 | Xu | Oct 2023 | B2 |
20130119966 | Touzani | May 2013 | A1 |
20170264205 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180138816 | Katrak | May 2018 | A1 |
20190013683 | Greening et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101730636 | May 2017 | KR |
2019049009 | Mar 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Application No. PCT/IB2021/051955 , International Search Report and Written Opinion, Mailed On Jun. 24, 2021, 8 pages. |
“Voltage Classes for Electric Mobility”, ZVEI—German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association Centre of Excellence Electric Mobility, Dec. 2013. Available Online: https://www.zvei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Presse_und_Medien/Publikationen/2014/april/Voltage_Classes_for_Electric_Mobility/Voltage_Classes_for_Electric_Mobility.pdf. |
S. Chakraborty, H.-Nam Vu, M. Mahedi Hasan, D.-Duong Tran, M. El Baghdadi, O.Hegazy, “DC-DC Converter Topologies for Electric Vehicles, Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Fast Charging Stations: State of the Art and Future Trends”, Energies 2019, 12, 1569, pp. 1-43. |
S. Hu, Z. Liang and X. He, “Ultracapacitor-Battery Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on the Asymmetric Bidirectional Z-Source Topology for EV,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 7489-7498, Nov. 2016. |
M. Veerachary and P. Shaw, “Controller Design and Analysis for Fifth-Order Boost Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 4894-4907, Sep.-Oct. 2018. |
M. Lakshmi and S. Hemamalini, “Nonisolated High Gain DC-DC Converter for DC Microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 1205-1212, Feb. 2018. |
Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, F. Gao, S. Gao and D. Rogers, “A Switched-Capacitor Interleaved Bidirectional Converter with Wide Voltage-Gain Range for Super Capacitors in EVs,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 35, No. 2; Feb. 2020; pp. 1536-1547. |
C. Lai, Y. Cheng, M. Hsieh and Y. Lin, “Development of a Bidirectional DC/DC Converter with Dual-Battery Energy Storage for Hybrid Electric Vehicle System,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 1036-1052, Feb. 2018. |
R. H. Ashique and Z. Salam, “A high-gain, high-efficiency nonisolated bidirectional DC-DC converter with sustained ZVS Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, No. 10, pp. 7829-7840, Oct. 2018. |
J. C. Rosas-Caro, F. Mancilla-David, J. C. Mayo-Maldonado, J. M. Gonzalez-Lopez, H. L. Torres-Espinosa and J. E. Valdez-Resendiz, “A Transformer-less High-Gain Boost Converter With Input Current Ripple Cancelation at a Selectable Duty Cycle,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, No. 10, pp. 4492-4499, Oct. 2013. |
A. Ahmad, R. K. Singh and R. Mahanty, “Bidirectional quadratic converter for wide voltage conversion ratio,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Trivandrum, 2016, pp. 1-5. |
Yun Zhang, Qiangqiang Liu, Yongping Gao, Jing Li, Mark Sumner, “Hybrid Switched-Capacitor/Switched-Quasi-Z-Source Bidirectional DC-DC Converter with a Wide Voltage Gain Range for Hybrid Energy Sources EVs”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 2680-2690, 2019. |
Y. Zhang, Q. Liu, J. Li and M. Sumner, “A Common Ground Switched-Quasi-Z-Source Bidirectional DC-DC Converter with Wide-Voltage-Gain Range for EVs With Hybrid Energy Sources,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 5188-5200, Jun. 2018. |
L. Yang, T. Liang and J. Chen, “Transformerless DC-DC Converters With High Step-Up Voltage Gain,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 3144-3152, Aug. 2009. |
Y. Gu, Y. Chen, B. Zhang, D. Qiu and F. Xie, “High Step-Up DC-DC Converter With Active Switched LC-Network for Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 321-329, Mar. 2019. |
M. A. Salvador, T. B. Lazzarin and R. F. Coelho, “High Step-Up DC-DC Converter With Active Switched-Inductor and Passive Switched-Capacitor Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, No. 7, pp. 5644-5654, Jul. 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230084872 A1 | Mar 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62987811 | Mar 2020 | US |