This invention relates generally to accumulators for high pressure applications, and more particularly to high pressure accumulators of the piston-in-sleeve (or “piston and sleeve”) type. This invention further relates to the potential use of such accumulators in conjunction with fuel efficient hydraulic hybrid motor vehicles.
Presently, hybrid powertrains are an increasingly popular approach to improving the fuel utilization of motor vehicles. “Hybrid” refers to the combination of a conventional internal combustion engine with an energy storage system, which typically serves the functions of receiving and storing excess energy produced by the engine and energy recovered from braking events, and redelivering this energy to supplement the engine when necessary. This decouples the production and consumption of power, thereby allowing the internal combustion engine to operate more efficiently, while making sure that enough power is available to meet load demands.
Several forms of energy storage are known in the art, with electrical storage using batteries being the best known. Recently, hydraulic hybrids have been demonstrated to offer better efficiency, greater power density, lower cost, and longer service life than electric hybrids. A hydraulic power system takes the form of one or more hydraulic accumulators for energy storage and one or more hydraulic pumps, motors, or pump/motors for power transmission. Hydraulic accumulators operate on the principle of storing energy by compressing a gas. An accumulator's pressure vessel contains a charge of gas, typically nitrogen, which becomes compressed as a hydraulic pump pumps liquid into the vessel. The liquid thereby becomes pressurized and when released may be used to drive a hydraulic motor. A hydraulic accumulator thus utilizes two distinct working media, one a compressible gas and the other a relatively incompressible liquid. Throughout this document, the term “gas” shall refer to the gaseous medium and the term “fluid” shall refer to the liquid working medium, as is customary in the art.
In the present state of the art, there are three basic configurations for hydraulic accumulators: spring type, bladder type and piston type. Spring type are typically limited to accumulators with small fluid volumes due to the size, cost, mass, and spring rates of the springs. Bladder accumulators typically suffer from high gas permeation rates and poor reliability. Of these, the piston type is the least costly design that can store desirable volumes of fluid. In addition, properly designed piston accumulators are physically robust, efficient, and reliable.
Standard piston accumulators are also well represented in the art. In a standard piston accumulator, the hydraulic fluid is separated from the compressed gas by means of a piston, which seals against the inner walls of a cylindrical pressure vessel and is free to move longitudinally as fluid enters and leaves and the gas compresses and expands. Because the piston does not need to be flexible, it may be made of a gas impermeable material such as steel. However, the interface between the piston and the inner wall of the cylinder must be controlled tightly to ensure a good seal, and the degree of dimensional tolerance necessary to ensure a good seal may increase the cost of manufacturing. It also requires that the pressure vessel be extremely rigid and resistant to expansion near its center when pressurized, which would otherwise defeat the seal by widening the distance between the piston and cylinder wall. This has eliminated the consideration of composite materials for high pressure piston accumulator vessels, as composite materials tend to expand significantly under pressure (e.g., about 1/10 of an inch diametrically for a 12 inch diameter vessel at 5,000 psi pressure).
As a result of the foregoing, standard piston accumulator vessels tend to be made of thick, high strength steel and are very heavy. Standard piston accumulators have a much higher weight to energy storage ratio than either steel or composite bladder accumulators, which makes them undesirable for mobile vehicular applications (as such increased weight would, for example, reduce fuel economy for the vehicle). More specifically, piston accumulators for the same capacity (i.e., size) and pressure rating are many times heavier (e.g., by up to 10 times) than an accumulator with a lightweight composite pressure vessel design, as would be preferred in such applications where accumulator weight is an issue. Therefore, despite their potentially superior gas impermeability, piston accumulators are largely impractical for vehicular applications.
Several prior art piston accumulator concepts utilize a piston-in-sleeve accumulator design, in which the piston resides within and seals against a cylindrical sleeve that is separate from the inner wall of the pressure vessel. The sleeve is defined as a hollow member substantially incapable of withstanding stresses applied thereto were a full pressure differential of the accumulator applied across a hollow member. While this approach provides at least two benefits over the prior art: (i) separating the pressure containment function of the vessel wall from its piston sealing function, allowing an effective seal to be pursued with a sleeve independently of issues relating to pressure vessel construction, and (ii) providing an intervening or interstitial volume between the sleeve and vessel wall which may be filled with the charge gas to allow tailoring of the ratio of gas to fluid to optimize performance and which also allows shaping the pressure profile of the discharged oil.
A disadvantage of these systems is that such designs comprise a generally thick-walled strong cylindrical pressure vessel constructed of a steel alloy, and a metal sleeve that is thin relative to the vessel walls. The sleeve is permanently attached to the inner surface of one end of the pressure vessel near its circumference, creating (with the piston) a closed or “inside” chamber for the working fluid. The other end of the sleeve extends toward the other end of the vessel and is generally left open to create an “outside” chamber that consists of the open volume of the sleeve, the remaining volume of the pressure vessel, and the intervening/interstitial space between the outer wall of the sleeve and the inner wall of the pressure vessel, each filled with the gaseous medium of the accumulator.
Another disadvantage of these systems is the operation of such requires the sleeve to be tightly retained and centered within the vessel to prevent radial movement, for example, due to vibrations in use with mobile (e.g. aircraft) applications. Sleeve movement fatigues the rigid fixed end of the sleeve possibly leading to leakage due to cracking, distortion, or wear of the sealing gasket if one is present. This requires the sleeve to either be stiffened by connecting it at points to the vessel wall, or requires the sleeve to be thicker than the minimum that would be necessary to withstand the small pressure differentials normally encountered in charging and discharging. Further, the outer walls of the vessel must be thicker than would be necessary for pressure containment alone because the walls must be prevented from expanding and thus loosening the sleeve or distorting it from the true circular form necessary for piston sealing.
Prior art piston-in-sleeve designs also uniformly contain the fluid within the closed (inside) chamber, with the charge gas residing on the other side of the piston and in the interstitial space between the sleeve and vessel wall. This arrangement is naturally preferable because it maximizes the fluid capacity and hence energy capacity of the device. That is, the working medium that resides inside the sleeve may be discharged completely, while some portion of the medium outside the sleeve will always remain trapped in the interstitial space; because working capacity is determined by how much fluid may be discharged, it is a natural choice to have the fluid reside on the inside of the sleeve and gas on the outside.
Like standard piston accumulators discussed above, these prior art piston-in-sleeve accumulators are unacceptably heavy for a hydraulic hybrid motor vehicle application or other application where accumulator weight is a significant issue. Attempts have been made to reduce the weight of such piston-in-sleeve accumulators through the use of lightweight composite materials in place of steel for the pressure containment function in the vessel wall. However, such devices still require an internal metallic core to the vessel wall and a thickened metal area at one end of the accumulator. As such, the device remains undesirably heavy for a hydraulic hybrid motor vehicle application. The intense duty cycle experienced by the accumulator (i.e., the extremely large number of charge-discharge cycles, in some cases exceeding one million cycles) and the significant radial expansion of composite materials (about 1/10 of one inch diametrically for a 12 inch diameter vessel at 5,000 psi pressure) together would result in expected fatigue failure of the metal core or liner.
To resolve these shortcomings, prior art devices employ a thermoplastic sleeve, with a carbon-fiber wound pressure vessel shell. The device also places the fluid outside the core, thus the fluid fills the interstitial spaces. There are several significant issues with this design: (i) the physical size of the accumulator is larger than necessary to enclose the same volume of useful working fluid as the fluid in the interstitial spaces cannot be used; (ii) optimal accumulator design require that the gas volume be greater than the fluid volume; (iii) the design cannot be serviced—any failure of any component requires that the entire cylinder be discarded, (iv) the thickness of the pressure vessel wrapping is thicker than needed because the wrapping must counter both axial and tangential loads, and (v) the design does not provide the means to protect the integrity of the sleeve should the oil pressure exceed that of the gas pressure.
Most recently, a compact hydraulic accumulator has been developed that provides a serviceable piston and sleeve design using an extremely light-weight composite pressure vessel. The modular design provides accumulator cylinders and auxiliary gas cylinders in fluid communication via manifolds doubling as removable end caps with ties rods maintaining the module in tension. Such a device is disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,661,442, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
A drawback to this device is the bulk of the end caps housing the manifold along with the tie rods required to seal the vessel. These components add substantially to the package space required to fit into a vehicle. A more compact end cap would improve the utility of the accumulator by virtue of reducing its size and package requirements.
In concordance and agreement with the present invention, an ultra lightweight and compact accumulator has surprisingly been discovered.
In one embodiment, an accumulator assembly comprises at least one accumulator cylinder, including a cylindrical, gas-impermeable shell; a cylindrical gas-impermeable sleeve disposed within and substantially concentric with the shell, an interstitial space formed between the sleeve and the shell; a piston slidably disposed within the sleeve, the piston separating an interior of the sleeve into a first chamber configured to contain a compressed gas, and a second chamber configured to contain a pressurized fluid; and a pair of removable axial closures retained to the gas-impermeable sleeve at opposing ends and sealingly engaged with corresponding opposing ends of the gas-impermeable shell, the axial closures configured to provide maximum resistance to the tensional stress of the sleeve.
In another embodiment, an accumulator system comprises an accumulator assembly, including a plurality of accumulator cylinders, each having a cylindrical, gas-impermeable shell, a cylindrical gas-impermeable sleeve disposed within and substantially concentric with the shell, an interstitial space formed between the sleeve and the shell, a piston slidably disposed within the sleeve, the piston separating an interior of the sleeve into a first chamber configured to contain a compressed gas, and a second chamber configured to contain a pressurized fluid, a pair of removable axial closures retained to the gas-impermeable sleeve at opposing ends and sealingly engaged with corresponding opposing ends of the gas-impermeable shell, wherein at least one of the axial closures includes a gas port and a fluid port formed therein; and a removable manifold housing comprising a gas manifold and a fluid manifold fluidly connecting respective fluid ports and gas ports of the axial closures of each accumulator cylinder.
In another embodiment, an accumulator assembly comprises a fluidly sealed housing; at least one accumulator cylinder within the housing, the cylinder including a cylindrical, gas-impermeable shell; a cylindrical gas-impermeable sleeve disposed within and substantially concentric with the shell, an interstitial space formed between the sleeve and the shell; a piston slidably disposed within the sleeve, the piston separating an interior of the sleeve into a first chamber configured to contain a compressed gas, and a second chamber configured to contain a pressurized fluid; a pair of removable axial closures retained to the gas-impermeable sleeve at opposing ends and sealingly engaged with corresponding opposing ends of the gas-impermeable shell, wherein at least one of the axial closures includes a gas port and a fluid port formed therein; and a removable manifold housing comprising a gas manifold and a fluid manifold fluidly connecting respective fluid ports and gas ports of the axial closures of each accumulator cylinder; a relief valve fluidly connected to the gas manifold and the fluid manifold; and a drain relief port formed through a wall of the manifold housing configured to drain one of the fluid and gas into the housing.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present invention, will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment when considered in the light of the accompanying drawings in which:
The following detailed description and appended drawings describe and illustrate various exemplary embodiments of the invention. The description and drawings serve to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner.
FIGS. 2 and 3A-3B more clearly illustrate the sleeve 20 disposed within the Shell 18. The shell 18 is substantially gas-impermeable. The shell 18 may be formed from any suitable material, such as at least one of a metal, a polymer, and a composite material, as desired. The shell may be formed from a material that is optimized for strength in relation to directional stresses, such as one of an axial stress and a hoop stress, for example. The shell 18 may have an overwrap 24, as desired, to contain the hoop stress. The overwrap 24 is typically formed of a strong lightweight material such as carbon fiber, E-glass, or other suitable material as known in the art. The material of the overwrap 24 may be wrapped to maximize an angle between the over-wrap 24 and an axial axis of the accumulator cylinder 12. In a preferred embodiment, the material is carbon fiber oriented purely radially. To avoid separation due to longitudinal stress, a releasing agent is provided on the outside of the cylinder 12 prior to carbon winding. The releasing agent allows the carbon fiber to break free from the cylinder 12 before substantial strain is transferred to the carbon windings, thus eliminating the possibility of the carbon fibers separating axially and failing to support the cylinder 12 under pressure.
A first metal boss 26 resides at one end of the cylinder 12 and a second metal boss 28 resides at the opposing end of the cylinder 12. The shell 18 is affixed to the first metal boss 26 and the second metal boss 28 using any substantially gas-impermeable means know in the art such as welding, adhesive, sealant, and the like.
The inner sleeve 20 is disposed between the first metal boss 26 and the second metal boss 28. The inner sleeve 20 is divided into two chambers: a gas-side chamber 29 and a fluid-side chamber 31, The gas-side chamber 29 is configured to contain a gas, such as nitrogen, helium, or other suitable gas as known in the art. The fluid-side chamber 31 is configured to contain a fluid such as hydrocarbon oil or other suitable fluid or gas known in the art. The two chambers 29, 31 are described and illustrated in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,661,442 and incorporated by reference herein.
The inner sleeve 20 may be readily removable and replaceable for easy servicing. The first metal boss 26 and the second metal boss 28 preferably hold the inner sleeve in place. A damaged inner sleeve 20 may be inexpensively and easily repaired or removed and replaced. The inner sleeve 20 may be constructed from a light-weight, substantially gas-impermeable material such as a composite material, or sheet metal for example.
An interstitial space 30 is formed between the shell 18 and the inner sleeve 20. The size of the inner sleeve 20 and the shell 18 may be chosen to contain a desired quantity of gas within the interstitial space 30.
An auxiliary cylinder 50 is fluidly connected to the manifold housing 48 by the tubing 52. In the illustration, the auxiliary cylinder 50 is fluidly connected to the gas manifold 54 by tubing 62, thus the auxiliary cylinder 50 contains compressed gas that may be provided to the accumulator 10 as needed. In other embodiments, the auxiliary cylinder 50 may contain fluid that is fluidly connected to the fluid manifold 56 by tubing such as that shown. The auxiliary fluid may be provided to the accumulator 10 as needed.
The relief valve 60 is spring-loaded dosed to the atmosphere through a drain relief port 64 within the manifold 56 and may be opened to relieve excess pressure or to express excess gas or fluid from the accumulator 10 into the environment. Preferably, the accumulator 10 is placed within a housing 100 (
From the foregoing description, one ordinarily skilled in the art can easily ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention and, without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications to the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.
This application claims the benefit to provisional patent application No. 61/385,328 entitled “ULTRALIGHTWEIGHT AND COMPACT ACCUMULATOR” filed Sep. 22, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1841337 | Roessler | Jan 1932 | A |
1879020 | Balsiger | Sep 1932 | A |
2005813 | Thorsen | Jun 1935 | A |
2011333 | Clifton | Aug 1935 | A |
2118398 | Farmer | May 1938 | A |
2352041 | Van Den Berg | Jun 1944 | A |
2417873 | Huber | Mar 1947 | A |
2703108 | McCuistion | Mar 1955 | A |
2715419 | Ford et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
2734531 | Bizak | Feb 1956 | A |
2742929 | Treseder | Apr 1956 | A |
RE24223 | Ford et al. | Sep 1956 | E |
2928417 | Buckner et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3004561 | Henry | Oct 1961 | A |
3850195 | Olsson | Nov 1974 | A |
4187682 | Shen | Feb 1980 | A |
4207563 | Soupal | Jun 1980 | A |
4432393 | Mills | Feb 1984 | A |
4500487 | Christie et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4518955 | Meyer | May 1985 | A |
4577663 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4611634 | Kruckewitt et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4714094 | Tovagliaro | Dec 1987 | A |
4997009 | Niikura et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018547 | Alcorn | May 1991 | A |
5098354 | Kuwayama et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5483994 | Maurer | Jan 1996 | A |
5507144 | Gray, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5603244 | Tischer | Feb 1997 | A |
5771936 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6068022 | Schultz et al. | May 2000 | A |
6390133 | Patterson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418970 | Deul | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6478051 | Drumm et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6619325 | Gray, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631734 | Smith, III | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644354 | Dinkel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6834680 | Baugh | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866066 | Weber | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6971411 | Draper | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7066208 | Kort et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7097748 | Duffy et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108016 | Moskalik et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121304 | Gray, Jr. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7493916 | Rose | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7661442 | O'Brien et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7918246 | Stroganov | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8020587 | Gray, Jr. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056666 | Portell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8291938 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8389180 | Hawkes et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20030075225 | Dinkel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030111124 | Gray, Jr. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050028879 | Suzuki | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061379 | Mori et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050155658 | White | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050224122 | Kort et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060075892 | Dorr | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070044461 | Burdick et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070084516 | Rose | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102052 | Yoshihara et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080308168 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314467 | Gray, Jr. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007863 | Matsuda | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007979 | Isono et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090126815 | Rajabi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133768 | Miyake et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158877 | Vernacchia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090293977 | Lauterbach | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090293978 | Lauterbach | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050622 | Stroganov | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100050623 | O'Brien, II | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084033 | Hummelt | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100206389 | Kennedy et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110023977 | Fong et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120305120 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120067446 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61385328 | Sep 2010 | US |