The present invention relates to methods and systems for detection and tracking of animate and inanimate objects, and to ultra low frequency (ULF) radio frequency tags that are carried by such objects.
Radio Frequency Identity tags or RFID tags have a long history and have been based largely upon the use of “transponders” tags with a fixed pre-programmed ID. These tags are often designed to replace barcodes and are capable of low power two way communications (U.S. Pat. No. 3,713,148, The Mercury News, RFID pioneers discuss its origins. Sun, Jul. 18, 2004). Active RFID tags have a battery to power the tag circuitry. They are typically large devices operating in the 13 Mhz to 2.3 Ghz frequency range. and work as transponders. A transponder uses a carrier transmitted by a base station to and the tag usually communicates by simply shorting or de-tuning a resonate tuned antenna to produce a change in the reflected energy. This produces a reflected signal that can be detected by a base station and minimizes the complexity of the circuity contained in the tag. Passive RFID transponder tags do not have a battery and use the same carrier signal for power.
Passive RF-ID tags also have an antenna consisting of a wire coil or an antenna coil etched onto a PC board. In passive tags, such an antenna coil serves four functions;
It is generally assumed that a Passive transponder tag is less costly than an active transponder tag since it has fewer components and is less complex. Thus, a passive transponder tag has the potential to eliminate the need and cost for a battery as well as an internal frequency reference standard such as a crystal or compensated oscillator (e.g U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,286) for precise control of phase and frequency. An active transponder tag only eliminates the crystal and requires the extra cost of battery. In addition, since passive transponder tags have precise known phase and frequency since they can use an external common reference (the carrier signal) it is possible to enhance extraction of the tag signal from background noise (U.S. Pat. No. 4,821,291). It is also possible to use this precise reference to provide enhanced anti-collision methods so as to make it possible to read many tags within a carrier field (U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,734, U.S. Pat. No. 6,566,997, U.S. Pat. No. 5,995,019. U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,951). Transponder RFID tags typically operate at several different frequencies within the Part15 rules of the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) between 10 Khz to 500 Khz (Low frequency or Ultra Low Frequency ULF), 13.56 Mhz (High Frequency, HF) in or 433 MHz and 868/915 MHz or 2.2 Ghz (Ultra High Frequency UHF). The higher frequencies are typically used to provide high bandwidth for communications, on a high speed conveyor for example, or where many thousands of tags must be read rapidly. In addition, the higher frequencies are more efficient for transmission of signals and require much smaller antennas for optimal transmission. (It may be noted that a self-resonated antenna for 915 Mhz can have a diameter as small as 0.5 cm).
Advantages of High Frequency Passive RFID Tags
These higher frequency (HF) and ultra high frequency (UHF) radio frequency (RF) tags are often used since they have the advantages of longer transmission distance (potentially over 100 feet) within the Part 15 FCC rules. As the transmission frequency goes down below 500 Khz, it is no longer possible to use optimal Electric Field antennas on the tag or from the base station, since the wave length is so very long (which requires a large antenna for signal detection). Because of the need for a smaller antenna foot print, HF and UHF are preferred frequencies for most RFID tags. In addition, optimal antennas at HF and UHF frequencies require very few turns to achieve resonance and may be printed directly onto flexible PC (printed circuit) boards as part of the etched traces on the board itself. Thus, the higher frequencies are thought to be far more efficient for transmission of signals because they require much smaller antennas and therefore eliminate the cost and need for a separate coil or wound antenna. In theory, this reduces production cost, and in some cases size, and makes it possible to produce, passive transponders tags with highly automated equipment at costs below 30 or 40 cents, at current (2005) price levels.
Finally, the higher HF/UHF frequencies also typically provide high speed and high bandwidth for communications. On a high speed conveyor for example, many 1,000's of tags attached to individual packages on a pallet moving at 6 mph. This means 200-300 tags must identified and read in under a few seconds. This result can only be achieved with a high bandwidth system with data rates near 1 Mhz and a carrier frequency in the 100's of Mhz.
One minor disadvantage of a system using HF and UHF passive tags is that the reader or base station must be more complex (over an active tag system) and is often more expensive. The reader must transmit a reference signal to power the passive RF tag as well as to provide a frequency standard. Often the algorithms used to network such HF/UHF tags may require complex circuitry in the base station as well. Finally, as the frequency goes up the cost of the integrated circuits require to read and write to the passive RF tags in the base station also rises. However, the working assumption is that the reader cost is not a major factor since it can be used over many millions of RF tags and that the tag cost is far more critical. Any functionality that can be moved to the reader from the RF tag therefore makes economic sense.
These passive HF/UHF tags may therefore be functionally quite simple and contain only an integrated circuit (IC), mounted on an etched flexible circuit board with no other components. No battery, no crystal and no other components are required, and the speed of data transmission can be high, so that the HF/UHF tags can be read at long range and at a low cost.
Disadvantages of Current Ultra Low Frequency (ULF)
Passive ultra low frequency (ULF) transponder radio tags are in widespread use as RFID tags for pets and livestock and even humans, largely because these frequencies are not affected by water or liquids contained in living animals. Higher frequencies are affected by the presence of water. However, because of many other disadvantages described below, ULF tags are generally not used for other applications.
The major disadvantage of ULF tags is that the detectable radiant energy leaving the transmission antenna is largely a magnetic (M) field rather than an electric (E) field. This magnetic mode of transmission (also called inductive transmission), has the major disadvantage of short range. The inductive signal drops off as 1/d3 while the electric field signals at higher frequency drops off 1/d2, in the near field and 1/d in far field conditions, where “d” is distance from a point source antenna that radiates the signal. Thus, the inductive or M radiance mode of transmission will, theoretically and in practice, severely limit the distance of transmission to only a few inches. In addition ULF tags are very slow because the carrier frequency (e.g. 100 Kz to 200 Khz) is low compared to HF and UHF.
Since transmission is inductive the tag requires a separate, many-turn, wound wire antenna in place of the etched circuit board antenna. Thus, in general it is often assumed that ULF radio tags will be more expensive since they do require a wound wire antenna. However, it is possible to make a low cost ULF passive tag with an antenna coil and chip and no PC board (WO03094106A1) there are many other disadvantages with current commercial ULF tags.
Because of these many disadvantages of ULF, the RF-ID frequencies now recommended by many commercial (Item-Level Visibility In the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: A Comparison of HF, UHF RFID Technologies, July 2004, Texas Instruments, Phillips Semiconductors, and TagSys Inc.), government organizations (see Radio Frequency Identification Feasibility Studies and Pilot, FDA Compliance Policy HFC-230, Sec 400.210, November, 2004, recommend use of LF, HF or UHF,) as well as standards associations (EPCglobal, web page tag specifications, January 2005, note ULF is excluded) do not mention or discuss the use of ULF as an option in many important applications. Many of the commercial organizations recommending the higher HF?UHF frequencies believe that passive and or active radio tags in these low frequencies are not suitable for any of these applications for reasons given above.
Many commercial companies actually manufacture both ULF and LF radio tags (e.g. both Texas Instruments and Philips Semiconductor. See Item-Level Visibility In the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: A Comparison of HF, UHF RFID Technologies, July 2004, Texas Instruments, Phillips Semiconductors, and TagSys Inc.) yet recommend the use of 13.56 Mhz or higher again because of the many disadvantage of ULF outlined above, and the many advantages of HF and UHF).
A detailed summary of many of the reasons that current ULF radio tags have not generally been considered for use in many applications is summarized below.
Many, unexpected functional disadvantages have recently been discovered with actual widespread use of passive radio HF, and UHF tags in the field (“Radio tags are falling off the fast track”, The Boston Globe, Scott Kirsner, May 31, 2004; “Despite Wal-Mart's Edict, Radio Tags Will Take Time”, The New York Times, Barnaby Feder, Dec. 28, 2004).
Thus, many unexpected complex issues have appeared as passive HF/UHF RFID tags have been put into widespread use for detection and tracking of animate and inanimate objects attached to the tags. While many of the current passive transponder tags can be used in applications that do not require significant memory and do require high speed, many of the existing commercial passive transponder tags can not be used reliably in applications that might make use of steel or metal shelves, on liquid products, or in applications that must read near or in living animals or humans (eg. livestock identification) especially on injectable or liquid pharmaceuticals, or on medical devices such as DES stents, boxes of sutures, or orthopedic joints where sealed aluminum pouches are often used to hold the sterile joint device, wrist bands used to track patents in hospitals. Similar technical problems are encountered when blood plasma is tracked in one liter bags, with livestock, cattle, pigs and the like and other that must be tracked to establish a health pedigree prior to slaughter, with steel replacement parts and tools used for aircraft maintenance, with systems that track tools during maintenance, and with toxic wastes contained in steel 55 gallon drums, when tracking airline baggage that may contain steel or metal and liquids; all such readings have proven to be unreliable with passive radio transponder tags that operate at high and ultra-high frequencies (HF and UHF).
Finally, passive transponder tags have not been successful in providing real time inventory or automated visibility for products in harsh environments or near steel shelves because of the issues raised above and the limited ability to read many HF/UHF tags within a carrier field in such harsh environments. These problems occur for:
Broadly and generally, the present invention provides an ultra low frequency (ULF) tag for detection and tracking of animate and inanimate objects attached thereto, the aforesaid ULF tag comprising:
a) a tag antenna operable at a low radio frequency below 1 megahertz;
b) a communication device operatively connected to the aforesaid tag antenna and operable to transmit data at the aforesaid low radio frequency;
c) a clock device operatively connected to the aforesaid communication device and operable to emit clock data to determine the aforesaid low radio frequency; and
d) a storedenergy storage device operable to activate the aforesaid communication device and the aforesaid clock device.
According to a preferred embodiment, the aforesaid clock device comprises a crystal operable to emit said clock data at a selected natural frequency. For example, the aforesaid low radio frequency (e.g. 128 kilohertz) can be a whole number multiple of the aforesaid natural frequency (e.g. 32 kilohertz).
Advantageously, the aforesaid tag antenna comprises a coil wound around a ferrite core.
Preferably, the aforesaid ULF tag further comprises:
e) a data storage device operable to store data comprising identification data for identifying the aforesaid ULF tag;
f) a data processor operable to process the aforesaid data received from the aforesaid communication device, the aforesaid data storage device, and the aforesaid clock device, and to transmit response data to cause the aforesaid communication device to emit an identification signal based on the identification data stored in the aforesaid data storage device, the aforesaid stored energy storage device comprising a battery operable to activate said data processor.
Advantageously, the aforesaid ULF tag further comprises a warning device (e.g. LCD screen, LED, buzzer) operable to identify the aforesaid ULF tag (e.g. by a visible message, warning light, or audible sound) upon emission of the aforesaid identification signal.
According to a preferred embodiment, the aforesaid ULF tag further comprises:
i) a data storage device operable to store data comprising identification data for identifying the aforesaid ULF tag;
ii) a sensor operable to generate status data upon sensing exposure to a condition;
iii) a data processor operable to process data received from the aforesaid sensor, the aforesaid storage device, and the aforesaid clock device, and to transmit data to cause the aforesaid communication device to emit data comprising the aforesaid status data together with an identification signal based on the identification data stored in the aforesaid data storage device, the aforesaid energy storage device comprising a battery operable to activate said data processor. Advantageously, the aforesaid condition may be selected from temperature, expiration of a freshness period, shock, illumination level, dampness, and radiation exposure.
Broadly and generally, the present invention further provides a system for detection and tracking of animate and inanimate objects, the aforesaid system comprising:
i) a ULF tag carried by each of the objects, the aforesaid ULF tag comprising:
a) a tag antenna operable at a low radio frequency below 1 megahertz (e.g. 128 kilohertz);
b) a communication device operatively connected to the aforesaid tag antenna and operable to transmit data at the aforesaid low radio frequency, the aforesaid communication device being operable to receive query data from the aforesaid tag antenna at the aforesaid low radio frequency,
c) a clock device (e.g. crystal) operatively connected to the aforesaid communication device and operable to emit clock data to determine said low radio frequency; and
d) a stored energy storage device operable to activate the aforesaid communication device and the aforesaid clock device;
e) a data storage device operable to store data comprising identification data for identifying the aforesaid ULF tag;
f) a data processor operable to process the aforesaid data received from the aforesaid communication device, the aforesaid storage device, and the aforesaid clock device, and to transmit response data to cause the aforesaid communication device to emit an identification signal based on the identification data stored in the aforesaid data storage device, the aforesaid stored energy storage device comprising a battery operable to activate the aforesaid data processor;
ii) a field antenna disposed at an orientation and within a distance from each object that permits effective communication with the ULF tag thereof at the aforesaid low radio frequency,
iii) a field reader in operative communication with said field antenna, the aforesaid field reader being operable to send query data to, and to receive data from, the aforesaid ULF tag;
iv) a central data processor in operative communication with the aforesaid field reader and operable to process data received therefrom.
Preferably, the aforesaid tag antenna comprises a coil wound around a ferrite core and the aforesaid ULF tag further comprises a warning device operable to identify the aforesaid ULF tag upon emission of the aforesaid identification signal.
According to a preferred embodiment, the aforesaid ULF tag further comprises a sensor operable to generate status data upon sensing exposure to a condition; the aforesaid data processor being operable to process data received from the aforesaid sensor, the aforesaid data storage device, and the aforesaid clock device, and to transmit data to cause the aforesaid communication device to emit data comprising the aforesaid status data together with an identification signal based on the identification data stored in the aforesaid data storage device. Advantageously, the aforesaid condition may be selected from temperature, expiration of a freshness period, shock, illumination level, dampness, and radiation exposure.
According to another preferred embodiment, the aforesaid system comprises a plurality of ULF tags, each ULF tag being characterized by an aforesaid natural frequency that comprises a random characteristic variation in at least one of phase and amplitude, said characteristic variation being capable of distinguishing a selected the aforesaid ULF tag from other aforesaid ULF tags.
The present invention broadly and generally also provides a method for detection and tracking of animate and inanimate objects, the aforesaid method comprising the steps of:
a) attaching a ULF tag to each of the objects, each ULF tag comprising a tag antenna operable at a low radio frequency below 1 megahertz; a communication device operatively connected to the aforesaid tag antenna and operable to transmit data at the aforesaid low radio frequency; a clock device operatively connected to the aforesaid communication device and operable to emit clock data at a selected natural frequency to determine the aforesaid low radio frequency, each ULF tag being characterized by an aforesaid natural frequency that comprises a random characteristic variation in at least one of phase and amplitude, the aforesaid characteristic variation being capable of distinguishing a selected aforesaid ULF tag from other aforesaid ULF tags; a data storage device operable to store data comprising identification data for identifying the aforesaid ULF tag; a data processor operable to process said data received from the aforesaid communication device, the aforesaid data storage device, and the aforesaid clock device, and to transmit response data to cause the aforesaid communication device to emit an identification signal based on the identification data stored in said data storage device; and an energy storage device operable to activate the aforesaid communication device, the aforesaid clock device, and the aforesaid data processor;
b) storing, in the data storage device of each ULF tag, data comprising identification data for identifying the aforesaid ULF tag;
c) disposing a field antenna at an orientation and within a distance from each object that permits effective communication with the ULF tag thereof at the aforesaid low radio frequency;
d) reading the data from the data storage device of a ULF tag selected by sending a query at an aforesaid radio frequency below 1 megahertz characterized by an aforesaid characteristic variation thereof;
e) transmitting the data read from the selected tag to a central data processor to provide a tally of the aforesaid objects;
f) sending a signal to the selected ULF tag to temporarily turn off further transmission from the aforesaid selected ULF tag; and
g) repeating steps (d), (e), and (f) with different aforesaid characteristic variations to discover and tally all the aforesaid objects.
Preferably, each aforesaid ULF tag may comprise a sensor operable to generate status data upon sensing a condition (as exemplified hereinabove), the aforesaid data processor being operable to process the status data received from the aforesaid sensor and to emit data comprising the aforesaid status data together with the aforesaid identification data for receipt thereof by the aforesaid field antenna.
The invention further provides a system for communicating with hearing-impaired people, the aforesaid system comprising:
i) a hearing aid device carried at an ear of each of the people, the aforesaid hearing aid device comprising:
a) a tag antenna operable at a low radio frequency below 1 megahertz, the aforesaid tag antenna preferably comprising a coil wound around a ferrite core;
b) a communication device operatively connected to the aforesaid tag antenna and operable to receive data therefrom at the aforesaid low radio frequency,
d) an energy storage device operable to activate said communication
ii) a field antenna disposed at an orientation and within a distance from each of the people that permits effective communication with the hearing aid device thereof at the aforesaid low radio frequency,
iii) a field transmitter in operative communication with the aforesaid field antenna, the aforesaid field reader being operable to send data to the aforesaid hearing aid device; Preferably, the aforesaid field antenna may be a loop antenna, which can advantageously be large, as discussed and exemplified with respect to
For a better understanding of the invention, various features of preferred embodiments of the novel system, method, and tag, are illustrated in the drawings, as will be described hereinbelow:
Block Diagram of a more complex radio tag. In this example we may add a low cost 4 bit microprocessor so the tag can be programmed. The processor may connect to the RF radio modem 5. In addition detectors 6 for humidity, angle, temperature and jog can be added. LEDS (not shown)e and displays may also optionally be added.
A typical application for these ULF tags may be specialty pharmaceuticals with an injectable vial 35 and a tag 31 placed on the cap 32. In this case, the vial, about 15 mm in diameter, contains liquid that will interfere with UHF as well as UHF-interfering metal in the crimped cap 32 and 34. Other HF tags would not work reliably because of the metal. Moreover the FDA has recommended that these tags store information about the product (serial number, lot number expiry date) after the tag 31 has been placed on the vial 35. Thus the tag requires memory and must work near metal and liquids.
An alternative location for placing the tag 42 might be on the bottom of the vial 41. In some cases an HF tag might function, however the antenna dimensions would be small (about 15 mm in diameter) and would be very short range. UHF would also not work in this configuration because of the liquid in contact with the bottom of the vial. The ULF tag disclosed in this patent application, with a wire coil and ferrite, can function from a distance of many feet and in any orientation in this configuration and in the configuration shown in
Many passive RFID tags have requirement to store data in the tag. In all cases they must use EEPROM since they have no battery to power SRAM or DRAM 3. An EEPROM requires many extra steps in the processing of its chip wafer and also increases the area of the chip itself by about 60% over what would be required by SRAM. Thus EEPROM raises the cost of a chip in a passive RFID tag. A ULF frequency active tag operates at such low frequency and as a result may use metal gate CMOS or optionally silicon gate CMOS. This has the advantage of low power consumption and low fabrication cost of the chip. In most cases the cost of the battery (6 cents), and a crystal (4 cents) and CMOS chip (5-10 cents) is less than a EEPROM chip with less than 24 bytes of memory. In addition the write speed with a EEPROM device is very slow compared to SRAM. The communication speed of the ULF active tag is slow (1200 to 4800 baud) however the write time of EEPROM makes it possible for it operate faster and have a lower materials cost. Thus, as shown in
In most cases the base station or reader antenna signal strength is measured axially from the center of the antenna. When inductive or magnetic fields are measured one meter from the antenna with a constant voltage at 100 Khz (1 volt) placed on the loop antenna 81, the strength of the signal decreases as the antenna diameter increases. This graph is the outputs D1, D2, D4, and D8 at 100 Khz for a readily available simulation program (MOMAC) for a 1 Meter, 2 meter, 4 meter, and 8 meter field loop.
When the signal strength is measured as a function of distance it drop off along the axis of an antenna 92 as 1/d3. The graph in
An omni-directional loop antenna 102, placed horizontally on the floor and having a radius of 8 feet, produces a strong signal S over that entire area. A tag 101 may be read anywhere within the area of the loop plus the same distance outside the loop at the same distance found for
The area or size of a loop than can be tuned is limited by the intrinsic capacitance C and inductance L of a loop antenna. As the loop becomes larger these two values go up and the maximum tunable frequency goes down for a magnetic field. The advantage of using the magnetic field over electric field for communication is that the magnetic field is relatively immune to steel and liquids. The electric field can be absorbed by liquids and reflected or blocked by any conductive metal. The distance transmitted using a loop antenna is totally dependent upon size of the loop, and the size of the loop is inverse of maximum tunable frequency. Thus, much longer transmission distance may be obtained with lower frequencies when using the magnetic field.
As a practical limit the field loops for ULF can be up to 150×150 feet in area and may, as shown in
One of the unexpected advantages of the crystal in an active ULF tag is that it provides a random phase for each tag T1 making it possible to read a single tag's ID even though many tags may respond. The base station has filters the operate a two phases 180 degrees shifted and each phase has its own amplifier. Tags transmit to the A channel and B channel at the same time and the base station simply picks the channel that provides the greatest amplitude.
In a field with many tags T1, T2, T3, and T4, all with different phases and at different amplitudes, because they are at different distances one tag will “win” and the ID can be read correctly. This tag is addressed using the discovered ID and then turned off. Then the next group of tags is interrogated and so on until all Ids are discovered. This works efficiently for a field of 50-100 tags.
It will be understood that the present invention provides an integrated “visibility system” that overcomes many of the objections described above for ULF systems and overcomes many of the problems outlined for HF and UHF in many applications. The visibility system tag has the capability of high memory capacity (e.g. 8 K Bytes), full data logs, temperature monitoring, optional LED's and LCD displays. These tags do not use the transponder method of communication's and actually transmit a signal through a tuned antenna using induction. Because the tags work at relatively low frequencies they do not require much power and have a battery life of 10 to 15 years using a 300 MAH lithium battery. They may store data that might normally be contained in a database, can be read anywhere within an open area up to 150 feet by 150 feet or a defined area of 15 feet by 500 feet. In effect we have read ULF tags at distances of over 500 feet with this system. In the preferred embodiment the ULF tags can write stored data in some cases at higher speeds than current HF and UHF tags.
The system uses a low cost active ULF radio tag, a novel antenna design optimized for long range area reads and inductive communication for tracking products, and providing real time visibility of products, especially products that require provide real time inventory of products, and real time status of products in harsh environments. The tags maybe small and often have a lower direct cost than passive RF tags, and can reduce systems cost by eliminating much of the IT software required for passive tags.
Examples of uses of the tags is:
The ULF tag System's unique features are:
In brief, some advantages/features of the novel ULF tags include:
POC time reference
No hand held—issues
EPC global
wrist bands—touch less reads.
medicines dispensing
human visibility
noise reduction and location identification
area antenna vs directional antenna
omindirectional
Active high frequency radio tags overcome many of these objections, especially the transmission distance issue, and in many cases they can be designed to function in harsh environments using advanced communication algorithms (e.g. Spread Spectrum), the memory speed issues may be addressed using high speed static memory, and finally these active tags may use. However active LF, HF and UHF tags have two major disadvantages: First, since the power consumption of any solid state circuit is proportional to the operating speed, active LF,HF and UHF tags require large batteries with limited life (two to maximum five years) and as a result are bulky heavy devices; Second, they must use high speed semiconductor devices that have a major impact on the active tag costs as compared to other semiconductor processes that operate at lower frequencies. Since, these high speed semiconductor devices require many more fabrication steps over lower cost commodity processes such as static metal gate CMOS (8 steps vs maybe 22 steps) for a silicon wafer these cost disadvantages of LF,HF and UHF active tags are fundamental and will always be an issue.
While the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, numerous obvious changes and variations may readily be made by persons skilled in the fields comprising radio frequency transmission, RFID tags, logistics, and impaired hearing. Accordingly, the invention should be understood to include all such variations to the full extent embraced by the claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. US/60/652,554 Ultra Low Frequency Tag and System, filed Feb. 14, 2005; and U.S. Ser. No. 11/161,032 filed on Jul. 20, 2005 entitled “RF Enablement of Products and Receptacles Therefor”, which are all incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60652554 | Feb 2005 | US |