Ultra-low power bias current generation and utilization in current and voltage source and regulator devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9921600
  • Patent Number
    9,921,600
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 12, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 20, 2018
    6 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 323 271-273
    • 323 311-314
    • CPC
    • G05F3/18
    • G05F3/22
    • G05F3/30
    • G05F3/247
    • G05F3/262
    • G05F1/56
    • G05F1/565
    • G05F1/575
    • H02J1/102
    • Y02B70/1466
    • H02M3/156-158
    • H02M3/1584
    • H02M3/1588
  • International Classifications
    • G05F3/30
    • G05F3/26
Abstract
A bias current topology with embodiments in current source, current reference, (pseudo bandgap) voltage reference, and bandgap voltage reference that operate at ultra low currents and low power supply voltages which may use main stream standard digital Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) processes. The bias current topology uses chiefly a self cascode (SC), whose active resistor MOSFET is paced in series with the gate input of the MOSFETs that help generate the proportional to absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage that is applied to the active resistor MOSFET to produce a bias current.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to improvements in bias current generation for use in analog and mixed signal integrated circuits (ICs), such as current and voltage references and others.


BACKGROUND

Bias current generation is a core requirement for any integrated circuits (IC), including for higher order functions such as references, regulators, amplifiers, filters, clocks, analog to digital converter (ADC), digital to analog converter (DAC) and other key building blocks in any analog, mixed mode electronic system, or system on a chip (SOC). The bias current should be relatively stable under varying power supply and temperature conditions. Ideally it may further have the capability to operate with low power consumption.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include that they can often be fabricated in standard digital complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) (e.g., for low cost and high volume applications); they may be resistor less (for ultra low power battery powered and emerging batteryless applications, and small size applications); their performance is mostly independent of metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor's (MOSFET's) threshold voltage or VTH (e.g., for tight performance despite wide manufacturing variations of VTH); and the embodiments typically operate MOSFETs in subthreshold (e.g., for low current and low supply voltage consumption applications). Also, by scaling and operating MOSFET pairs in the subthreshold region a pseudo thermal voltage or VT may be generated which has proportional to absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage characteristics.


Other aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein may be a ‘current source’ comprising: a self cascode (SC) and an amplification function (in conjunction with PTAT voltage generation) whereby the PTAT signal is generated which is mostly dependent on thermal voltage (VT). Also, a complementary to absolute temperature (CTAT) signal is generated which is mostly dependent on MOSFET's mobility (μ) so that a relatively temperature and VTH independent bias current (IBIAS) source may be produced. This may be done in part by applying the PTAT voltage (VPTAT) and supplying the IBIAS) at the gate and not the source of the reference current mirror or loop amplifier. In this way, the active MOS resistor (and the generation of the VPTAT) is effectively placed in series with the gate terminals (instead of the source terminal) of the current mirror or loop amplifier. This topology provides the option and flexibility for employing differential source followers (or differential voltage followers) in unity gain before the amplification function. This option can help in generating a higher amplitude VPTAT so to improve performance and die yield. The temperature coefficient (TC) of the current source can receive adjustments (through program or predetermination by topology with different MOSFET's aspect ratios) to exhibit approximately flat or positive or negative TC depending on electronics system's requirements.


Other aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein are a method of creating a ‘current reference’: two bias current sources (with same functional topology as the first disclosure above) ITCa and ITCb with same polarity TCs that are set by W/L ratios to yield differing slopes, and subsequently be ratioed and subtracted from each other to form a stable TC current reference (IREF). Alternatively, depending on an application, the topology has the flexibility to deliver positive TC or negative TC IREF that can also receive adjustments by programming or setting different MOSFET W/Ls. In each of the two bias current sources, the amplifier's built-in offsets are forced across MOSFETs contained in self-cascodes (SC) to make the ITCa and ITCb. The magnitudes of ITCa and ITCb are set partially independently from their TCs via MOSFET's aspect ratios. To generate an IREF with stable TC, a current scalar and subtraction circuit then scales ITCa to Sa.ITCa whose value changes by the same amount as Sb. ITCb over an objective temperature span. This resultant Sa.ITCa current is then subtracted from Sb.ITCb to yield an IREF. Sa and Sb are abbreviated formulaic representations (as a function of MOSFET W/L ratios and CMOS device constants).


Other aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein are a ‘voltage reference’ (VREF) circuit comprising: resistor free voltage reference with an output voltage VREF, which can be a pseudo bandgap voltage, VBG. Here, CTAT signal voltage (VCTAT) is generated by VBE of a parasitic bipolar junction transistor (BJT) in CMOS, and its PTAT signal voltage VPTAT is generated by summing K of pseudo thermal voltage, VT×ln(g), terms generated via K series (or chain) of scaled p-channel MOSFET (PMOSFET) self-cascodes (SC), whose operating conditions are provided through a bias current generator with substantially similar functional block diagram as the first and second disclosures above. Similarly, the TC of this VREF can be set (by programming or predetermination by topology with different MOSFET's aspect ratios) to exhibit approximately flat or positive or negative TC, depending on electronics system's need.


Other aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include a method of generating a bandgap voltage reference, VBG. In the general category of conventional bandgaps, a voltage reference is comprised of a VPTAT that is gained up by the ratios of two passive resistors and then added to a VCTAT (e.g., VBE) to produce VBG. Passive resistors are generally prohibitive, in size or cost, for ultra low power applications based in standard digital CMOS. This embodiments herein generally eliminate the need for passive resistors. Instead, this disclosure consists of a network of composite active MOS resistors whose operating conditions (e.g., current) are supplied via the substantially similar bias current functional topology. Here, the central bias current generation and the bandgap loop circuitries, independently apply VPTAT across functionally similar composite MOS resistors (i.e., RM802 and RM826r) to generate their respective operating currents (i.e., as a multiple or ratio of Ibias). The resultant VPTAT is subsequently added to a VCTAT (e.g., VEB) to generate a VBG. Again, the TC of this reference can be set (via programming or predetermination by topology with different MOSFET's aspect ratios) to exhibit approximately flat (for VBG) or positive or negative TC output VREF, depending on electronics system's requirement. Note that operations of: RBIAS and IBIAS in the SC of the bias generation circuit, the composite active MOS resistor circuit (i.e., RBS), the chain or series of the same composite active MOS resistor (i.e., p.RBG), and the bandgap's PTAT loop follow substantially similar operating mechanisms over process, temperature, and power supply variations. This embodiment which combines the bias current circuit, active resistor circuit, and bandgap PTAT loop circuit not only may avoid passive resistors (for ultra low current and low cost), but also it can enhance bandgap's overall performance by enabling tracking of operating conditions over process, temperature, and supply voltage variations.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a method of generating a bias current by using a first active resistor metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) operating in the linear region that is in series with gate input terminals of a proportional to absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage generator.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a system comprising: a means for generating a bias current is in series with gate input terminals of a proportional to absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage generator.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a bias current generator system comprising: a first current generator comprising: a first amplifier having a built in offset voltage tracking a proportional to first absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage (VPTAT); a first bias resistor metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) operating in the linear region and forming a first bias resistor, wherein the gate input terminals of the amplifier carrying the VPTAT are in series with source-drain terminals of the first bias resistor MOSFET; and wherein a first bias current is generated as a ratio of the first VPTAT over the resistance of the first bias resistor MOSFET and where adjustments can be made to the amplitude and temperature coefficient (TC) of the first bias current.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a bias current generator system comprising: a MOSFET resistor operating in the linear region which is in series with a VPTAT; and a means for generating said VPTAT voltage and a bias current by feeding back the bias current into the MOSFET resistor. The MOSFET resistor may be part of MOSFET self-cascode or a current mirror.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a bias current generator system comprising: a first current generator comprising: a first amplifier having inputs connected to the output of a first differential voltage follower, wherein the first differential voltage follower has a built in offset voltage tracking a proportional to first absolute temperature (PTAT) voltage (VPTAT); a first bias resistor metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) operating in the linear region and forming a first bias resistor, wherein the gate input terminals of the first differential voltage follower carrying the VPTAT are in series with source-drain terminals of the first bias resistor MOSFET; wherein the first amplifier output generates the bias current which flows through the source-drain of the bias resistor MOSFET until the amplifier input voltages are substantially equalized; and wherein a first bias current is generated as a ratio of the first VPTAT over the resistance of the first bias resistor MOSFET and where adjustments can be made to the amplitude and temperature coefficient (TC) of the first bias current.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a bias current generator system comprising: a MOSFET resistor operating in the linear region which is in series with a VPTAT; a means for generating a VPTAT; and a means for generating a bias current by feeding back the bias current into the MOSFET resistor. The MOSFET resistor may be part of MOSFET self-cascode or a current mirror.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a method of generating a reference current comprising: generating first and second bias currents such that the first and second bias currents have the same polarity of temperature coefficient (TC) and different TC slopes; and wherein the first and second bias currents are then scaled and subtracted from one another to yield stable TC reference current over an objective temperature range.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a system of generating a reference current comprising: a MOSFET resistor operating in the linear region; and a means for generating two bias currents with the same temperature coefficients (TC) polarity but different TC slope and different amplitudes which are subsequently subtracted from one another to form the reference current.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a method of using a composite active metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) resistors in bandgap voltage reference comprising: developing a proportional to absolute temperature voltage (VPTAT) across a composite active MOSFET resistors and subsequently adding the VPTAT to a complementary to absolute temperature voltage (VCTAT) to generate the band gap voltage.


Further aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein include: a system comprising: an active MOSFET resistor which has a VPTAT placed across it to generate a bias current; and a means for generating a floating resistance.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a system and method of generating ‘bias current’.



FIG. 2 is an alternative embodiment of FIG. 1 having a functional block diagram of the system and method of generating ‘bias current’.



FIG. 3 is another alternative embodiment FIGS. 1 and 2 having functional block diagrams of the system and method of generating ‘bias current’.



FIG. 4 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating a bias current source, or regulator, or generator utilizing FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating a current reference, or source, or regulator, or generator utilizing FIG. 2.



FIG. 6 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating a voltage reference, or regulator, or bandgap voltage utilizing FIG. 2.



FIG. 7 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating a bandgap voltage reference or regulator utilizing FIGS. 3, 8, and 9.



FIG. 8 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating a bias current source, regulator, or generator utilized in embodiment of FIG. 7.



FIG. 9 is a schematic circuit diagram of the embodiment illustrating an active MOS resistor, a composite active MOS resistor or MOS resistor utilized in embodiment of FIG. 7 in conjunction with embodiment of FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 is a schematic circuit diagram of an embodiment illustrating a prior art bandgap voltage reference.



FIG. 11 is a schematic circuit diagram of an embodiment illustrating a prior art current source.



FIG. 12 is a schematic circuit diagram of an embodiment illustrating another prior art current source.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the teachings disclosed herein. The embodiments were chosen and described to explain principles of operation and their practical applications. However, the scope of the invention is to be defined by the claims.


Battery operated or batteryless electronic systems benefit from integrated circuits and electronic components that consume minimal power, which can withstand and perform to specifications down to the lowest power supply levels over a wide span of temperatures, as well as ones that can provide stable Alternating Current (AC) and non-jittery transient power up and power down characteristics. For higher order analog functions (e.g., references, regulators, amplifiers, converters, voltage controlled oscillators, phased locked loops, clock chips, etc) and systems (e.g., mixed mode system on a chip (SOC)), higher performance of the bias generation function can facilitate a more rugged system topology and lower cost systems solutions when such functions can be fabricated in standard digital mainstream Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) technologies. While battery operation would benefit from low current consuming electronics, however, for next generation batteryless electronics (e.g., batteryless Internet of Things, energy harvesting, biometrics electronics, etc.), ultra low power consuming electronics is a not a ‘nice to have’ but a ‘must have’.


Generally, ultra low power analog and mixed signal electronic systems require large value resistors that may occupy large die sizes. Otherwise, they would require special and additional fabrication layers (which are costly) to deposit high ohm per square resistive material on silicon wafers which makes the use of passive resistors very costly. In order for the new and emerging applications (e.g., energy harvesting, biometrics, consumer medical electronics) to realize their full market size and reach potential expediently, resistor free electronics in small die size are key, and being based in main stream digital CMOS fabrication process manufacturing (that is proven) would be required. Such proven manufacturing platforms help achieve low cost and reduce manufacturing risk so as to facilitate and expedite serving such emerging applications, especially those that require passing regulatory tests (that favor proven manufacturing platforms) such as bio-electronics and consumer bio-metrics applications.


Definitions, Acronyms and Abbreviations

The following terms, definitions, acronyms, term usages and abbreviations are explained below and used throughout this detailed description:













TERMS
DESCRIPTION







Bias current, reference current
Used interchangeably


circuit, and current source



CMOS
Complementary Metal Oxide



Semiconductor (may be operated in



subthreshold or normal regions)


MOSFET
Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field



Effect Transistors (may be operated in



subthreshold or normal regions)


CMOS, PMOS, NMOS and
Used interchangeably


CMOSFET, PMOSFET,



NMOSFET



Gate, source, drain and gate
Used interchangeably


terminal, source terminal, and



drain terminal



W/L of a MOSFET
Width over length ratio (aspect ratio)



of MOSFETs


W/L of a MOSFET, scale factors,
Used interchangeably


and aspect ratios



Ohms per square or Ω/square
Resistivity of material per square area


Terms applied to the W/L of
Used interchangeably


MOSFETs such as predetermined,



or programmed, or set



A
Ampere


V
Volt


N
Nano or 10−9 (e.g., nA = nano ampere



or 10−9 A


BJT
Bipolar Junction Transistor


PTAT
Proportional to Absolute Temperature


CTAT
Complementary to Absolute



Temperature


VPTAT
Proportional to Absolute Temperature



Voltage


VCTAT
Complementary to Absolute



Temperature Voltage


PTAT signal, CTAT signal,
May be used interchangeably


VPTAT signal and VCTAT signal



VREF
Reference voltage


VBG
Bandgap voltage


IREF
Reference current


IBIAS
Bias current


RBIAS
Bias resistor


RBG
Bandgap resistor


VEB or VBE
May be used interchangeably as the



base emitter voltage of a BJT


M
MOSFET carrier mobility


VT
Thermal voltage


COX
Gate oxide capacitance


VTH
Threshold voltage of a MOSFET


M
To show MOSFET mobility exponent



factor used in device equations


N
To MOSFET gain factor correction



used in device equations


VOFS
Offset voltage between MOSFETs


VDS
Drain to source voltage of a MOSFET


IDS, ID or IDMxxx
Drain to source current of a MOSFET


VGS
Gate to source voltage of a MOSFET


TC
Temperature coefficient


VC
Voltage coefficient


PSRR
Power supply rejection ratio


‘a’ through ‘z’
To show the ratio of MOSFET W/Ls



or their aspect ratios used in a circuit



design


Ki (e.g., Ka or Kb) or
To show formulaic constants as a


Sj (e.g., Sa or Sb)
function of either set MOSFET scale



factor, or process fabrications



constants, or both


SC
MOSFET Self-cascode


MOSFET's linear, triode,
Used interchangeably


resistive regions of operations



Subthreshold
MOSFET's Subthreshold region of



operation


Differential source follower,
Used interchangeably


differential voltage follower,



differential DC level shifters,



unity gain buffers, and



differential voltage buffers



VPTAT, VBIAS, built in offset voltage
Used interchangeably


Resistance and impedance
Used interchangeably









Here is a brief introduction of the bias current generator block diagram functions (FIGS. 1, 2, and 3). The proposed bias current generation circuit belongs to a class of circuits that uses thermal voltage (VT) as a PTAT signal that work in concert with MOSFET's mobility (μ) as a CTAT signal to generate a current that can be set (predetermined and programmed via MOSFET's W/L ratios, which can be controlled most accurately in fabrication process manufacturing) to be approximately stable with temperature (i.e., have a stable TC) or have a positive or negative TC, depending on the electronics systems need.


The majority of circuit implementations (in the prior art in this category of bias current generation) derail in their current regulation at high temperatures. When operating at ultra low currents, amongst other factors, the MOSFET's small leakage currents (e.g., MOSFET source, drain, body junction diode's leakage) may no longer be ignored, when compared to that of the (also very small) circuit's operating currents. Leakage current especially mounts at hot temperatures and as such they can interfere and derail performance. Although, operating at ultra low currents generally narrows the temperature span due, in part, to standard digital CMOS device leakages, but circuits may be more or less sensitive to leakage depending on topology. For example, in the prior art implementations, where the bias resistors are in series with the source of the current mirror or loop amplifier circuit, such implementations are accompanied with asymmetries induced by mismatched MOFET W/Ls in order to generate the PTAT signal in current mirrors, loop amplifiers, and or self-cascode cells. Therefore, high temperature operation may, in part, be hindered due to MOSFET source drain body junction diode leakage imbalances. For example, in asymmetric junction diode areas in drain or source terminal's leakage currents pile on (which are hard to match and cancel) as they double every 10 degrees Celsius (10 C)—in a thin ice circuit environment so to speak—where each transistor is already operating in ultra low currents (approximately five to tens of nanoamperes (e.g., more than approximately 5 nA and less than approximately 100 nA).


In order for the leakage current imbalances present in ‘signal paths’ of current mirror's, or loop amplifier's, or self-cascode's to be contained for a majority of bias current circuit implementations in the prior art, MOSFET aspect ratios need to be somewhat restricted, which limits the magnitude of the VPTAT signal that can be generated. In the subthreshold region (for ultra low current operation), MOSFET's mismatches are dominated by VTH mismatches. The implementation of most of the prior art systems, generally limits the magnitude of the VPTAT signal (to contain leakage), which then makes the topology more sensitive to MOSFET's VTH mismatches. As such, the VTH mismatches become a large part of the intended VPTAT magnitude, which worsens the current source's die yield to specifications. Moreover, in the general cases of the prior art (e.g., when using a self-cascode structure to generate the PTAT signal) the positive TC of VT term and negative TC of VGS (VTH) can push the self-cascode stack off to the edge of the triode-saturation region and derail accuracy of the current reference at min-max temperatures. In the next sections, the proposed embodiments are described along with their benefits.


Suitable for ultra low power and high volume applications, the proposed ‘bias current generator’ IC belongs to a resistor-free category of CMOS circuits that combines a proportional to absolute temperature (PTAT) signal dependent mostly on pseudo thermal voltage (VT) and a complementary to absolute temperature (CTAT) signal dependent mostly on MOSFET's mobility (μ) to generate a relatively temperature and MOSFET threshold voltage (VTH) independent current source, although the embodiments disclosed here can be set to deliver positive or negative TC depending on application need.


First, a brief description of the general embodiments are provided where the ‘bias current generator’ block diagrams contain 2 basic functions: amplification function (in combination with some VPTAT as a built in offset voltage generation function) and self cascode (SC) function. A subset of variations of the bias current generator's functional block diagrams are depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 which demonstrate using either NMOS or PMOS self cascode (SC) with respect to a voltage source VB (e.g., negative power supply). Other variations knowable to those skilled in the art, could include, but not limited to, using n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (NMOSFET) or p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (PMOSFET) SC with respect to a positive power supply as well.


Functional block diagram of FIG. 1 is utilized in bias current source embodiment of FIG. 4. Functional block diagram of FIG. 2 is utilized in embodiment of FIG. 5 (current reference), and FIG. 6 (voltage reference, which can be a pseudo bandgap voltage reference). Functional block diagram of FIG. 3 is utilized in embodiment of FIG. 7 (bandgap voltage reference). The specific embodiments of each of the FIGS. 4, 5, 6, and 7 will be described below in detail.


The simplified block diagrams in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 could contain elements such as amplifiers. The amplifier is defined herein broadly. For example, it could be a voltage output or current output amplifier, or have voltage output combined with voltage controlled current source or VCCS. Such an amplifier, could also contain differential buffers (e.g., differential source followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators in series with its differential inputs). Other elements contained here could be voltage followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators, independent Voltage Controlled Current Sources (VCCS), current mirrors, bias current or current generator circuits, self-cascodes, and MOS transistors (e.g., MOS transistors can be configured to function as an active resistor, or VCCS, current mirrors, current sources or active resistors or can be paired in the input of an amplifier or buffer or DC level shifter—with differing scale factors—to generate offset voltage).


In FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, the amplifiers A200n, and A400p, and A800p (respectively) combined with or embed offset voltage (i.e., multiple of VT or VPTAT) generation circuits. Note that although VT is generally thermal voltage associated with BJTs. However, when operating multiple MOSFETs (which are scaled differently or are operated at different quiescent currents) in a subthreshold region, a pseudo VT term may be realized as a function of their gate terminal to source terminals voltage (VGS) differences which is what is done here. The described amplifiers, generate and force the IBIAS current (i.e., IDM202n, IDM402p, IDM802p) through the self cascode MOSFETs (i.e., M200n-M202n, M400p-M402p, M800p-M802p) until the inputs of said amplifiers are substantially equalized with some amplitude of VPTAT that can be set by W/L of input MOSFETs (e.g., combining the VPTAT generation and amplification circuits). Note that the IBIAS can be set to generate a positive, negative, or stable TC depending on settings of MOSFET's W/L ratios. The PTAT signal is mostly contributed via pseudo thermal voltage, or pseudo VT, derived from the built in or programmed offset voltages that can be generated by subthreshold MOSFET of the differential inputs, at their gates (e.g., of either the amplifier or voltage followers or combination thereof). The CTAT signal is mostly contributed via μ of the resistive MOSFET that is contained in the self-cascode.


Node description of FIG. 1 is as follows: node 200n is connected to the output of A200n, drain and gate of M200n, and gate of M202n. Node 202n is connected to sources and body of M200n, drain of M202n, and input of A200n. Node VB is connected to voltage source, the other input of A200n, and source and body of M202n.


Node description of FIG. 2 is as follows: node 400p is connected to the output of A400p, drain and gate of M400p, and gate of M402p. Node 402p is connected to sources and body of M400p, drain of M402p, and input of A400p. Node VB is connected to voltage source VB, the other input of A400p, and source and body of M402p.


Node description of FIG. 3 is as follows: node 800p is connected to the output of A800p, drain and gate of M800p, and gate of M802p. Node 802p is connected to sources and body of M800p, drain of M802p, and input of A800p. Node 1p is connected to voltage source VA, the other input of A800p, and source and body of M802p.


In FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, the MOSFET aspect ratios p1, p2, n1, and n2 can be predetermined or programmed from approximately 0.1 to approximately 20. Note that there are other variations of this embodiment. For example, self cascodes (SC) can be NMOS or PMOS types with their body terminal shorted to the sources or to voltage sources (e.g., a supply voltage), and the SC's operating current can be supplied with IBIAS via a VCCS from the positive or negative supply or other voltage source terminals. The amplifier block (i.e., A200n, A400p, and A800p) can be a voltage output or current output (e.g., trans conductance amplifier) or an amplifier with a built in offset, or series combination of an amplifier with no built offset plus source followers (or DC level shifters) with built in offsets that generates a VPTAT signal.


In summary, the higher performance of the bias current generator shown in block diagrams of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 or their other variations are achieved in part by sensing the VPTAT and forcing the IBIAS at the ‘gate’ and not the ‘source’ terminal of the reference current mirror or loop amplifier. In effect, the VPTAT is generated and applied at the gate of the current mirror or loop amplifier. In such a configuration, the active MOS resistor (RBIAS) in series with the gate of the current mirror or loop amplifier, and the IBIAS is flowing through the active MOS resistor drain to source terminals. There are additional benefits in this bias current generator, such as more flexibility, enhanced AC and transient response, less leakage, more rugged topology for manufacturability, which will be discussed in more details herein. Moreover, there are extended and combinational benefits when utilizing this bias generator function in combination with other higher level analog functions such as a current reference (i.e., FIGS. 4 and 5) and voltage reference (i.e., FIGS. 6 and 7), which will be also described in more detail in subsequent sections.


Placing the MOSFET of self cascode that establishes the RBIAS (i.e., M202n, M402p, M802p) in ‘gate’ and not the ‘source’ terminal of the current mirror or loop amplifier, effectively places the RBIAS function into the feedback loop of the current mirror amplifier signal path. One benefit of this feature is that, in effect, the open loop amplification in effect reduces the impedance effect of the RBIAS (which is in the mega ohms level for ultra low currents) at output and input nodes of the current mirror or loop amplifier.


These implementations allows for the flexibility and having the option of employing differential source followers to generate a larger VPTAT (instead of prior art use of either asymmetric current mirror's or loop amplifier's source terminal connected to RBIAS or scaled self-cascode, which in part can limit optimal amplitude for the VPTAT signal). This method's flexibility allows for larger VPTAT which helps desensitize IBIAS from offsets (e.g., due to normal manufacturing VTH and W/L mismatches associated with transistors in current mirror and loop amplifier). Therefore the IBIAS could be more insensitive to standard digital CMOS process fabrication variations and mismatches.


Source drain junctions of MOSFETs have leakage current that double with every 10 C rise in temperature. The proposed bias current generator topology allows for reduction of the impact of asymmetric aspect ratios for MOSFETs, and the narrowing their undesirable impact of their associated source drain junction leakages, for example in the cascoded current mirrors, in the IBIAS current mirror or current loop amplifier.


This bias current generation scheme provides the option of utilizing NMOSFET or PMOSFET self cascodes where with respect to either the positive and negative power supply. For example, this is demonstrated in FIG. 1 with NMOSFET SC and FIG. 2 with PMOSFET SC, where both implementations are with respect to VB which can be a negative power supply. However, in FIG. 3, a PMOSFET SC is implemented with respect to VA, which can be a positive power supply. This feature can have several benefits, including but not limited to, more power supply head room, higher PSRR, and more system topology flexibility in setting the bias current with respect to either positive or negative power supplies.


Another benefit of this bias current generation scheme is that it allows for negative power or VSS and ground potential (GND) to be same, as well as allowing for decoupling of negative power or VSS from ground (GND), where technically VSS can run at a lower voltage than the ground potential. As a result, the bias current value may be set relative to either GND or VSS depending on electronics system requirement, which provides for more system topology flexibility.


In summary, the benefits of the bias current generation circuit may include: the proposed topology can deliver current consumption in the tens of nanoamperes (nA) range (i.e., more than approximately 10 nA and less than approximately 100 nA) operate with sub 1 volt supply voltage in a small die size that is 4 to 50 times smaller in size, compared to prior art current references in its category. Benefits of this current reference may include: low cost, higher temperature span, low voltage coefficient (VC), wider TC and VDD span. The impact of source-drain junction leakages is reduced and hot temperature span of the bias current generator is extended. Low power supply operation at ultra low current can be achieved in part because of the flexibility of the bias current generation scheme. Power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) and other AC performance are enhanced. The overall benefit of this class of bias current generators is retained, including for example, that it can operate in sub-threshold, which keeps current consumption low and enables lower VDD operation. Moreover, the impact of process fabrication variation on performance is contained and controlled given the significantly less sensitivity of the bias current generation to VTH and dependence on μ, which is more tightly controlled in fabrication process. Moreover, low cost is also achieved because in part the proposed topology does not require any passive resistors. Low cost is also achieved by proposed topology's small die size that may be based in standard digital CMOS, making the topology portable to multiple digital standard CMOS fabrication facilities. Also, basing the topology on standard digital CMOS fabrication process (without any custom or special devices) facilitates process portability which should help speeding up regulatory bodies qualification of new products (i.e., biometric ICs) who view standard manufacturing ICs much more favorably.


Description of the FIG. 4 Embodiment in a ‘Bias Current Source’

The first utilization of the functional block diagram of FIG. 1 (bias current generation) is embodied in the ‘bias current source’ that is depicted in FIG. 4 which can contain elements such as amplifiers. The amplifier is defined here broadly, which could be a voltage output or current output, or have voltage output combined with voltage controlled current source or VCCS. Such an amplifier could also contain differential buffers (e.g., differential source followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators in series with its differential inputs). Other elements contained here could be independent voltage followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators, voltage controlled current source (VCCS), current mirrors, bias current or current generator circuits, self-cascodes, and MOS transistors (e.g., MOS transistors can be configured to function as an active resistor, or VCCS, current mirrors, current sources or active resistors or can be paired in the input of an amplifier or buffer or DC level shifter—with differing scale factors—to generate offset voltages).


Here is a brief summary of the description and benefits of the embodiment of FIG. 4, which flow from functional block diagram of the embodiment shown in Figure (and its various benefits that were just summarized in the previous section).


Suitable for ultra low power applications, including energy harvesting, the proposed ‘bias current source’ embodiment belongs to a resistor-free category of CMOS circuits that combines a PTAT signal dependent mostly on VT and CTAT signal dependent mostly on MOSFET's μ to generate a relatively temperature and VTH independent current source. The proposed topology consumes ultra lower currents (e.g., 50 nA to 500 nA) and can operate with sub-1V VDD. The simplicity of the topology, in part, enables its small size, compared to prior art current references in its category. It has the potential for wider temperature compared to its alternatives. Higher temperature span may be achieved by the following. First, sensing the PTAT voltage and forcing the IBIAS at the gate and not the source of the reference current mirror or loop amplifier. In effect this topology, places the RBIAS (and the development of VBIAS) in series with the gate as opposed to in series with the source of the current mirror or loop amplifier. Second, having the option of using differential source followers to generate a larger PTAT voltage instead of prior art use of either asymmetric MOSFETs in the current mirror or current loop amplifier and or scaled self-cascode. Third, using donut shaped equal W/L transistors in a circuit layout to minimize the drain size for less leakage current.


This embodiment allows for larger PTAT voltage, which helps desensitize IBIAS from error contributions of normal mismatches and offset and fabrication process variations (e.g., VTH and W/L mismatches associated with transistors in current mirror and loop amplifier). The proposed topology allows for minimization or elimination of the impact of asymmetric transistors and cascoded current mirrors in the current reference (IREF or IR or Ir) loop. As a result, compact die size is realized, the impact of source-drain junction leakages is reduced substantially, and hot temperature span is extended.


In FIG. 4, the signal loop that generates the operating current, or IBIAS, of the circuit consist of M202 (which makes the active CMOS resistor, RBIAS or RM202), source followers M204 and M206, voltage amplifier A200, and PMOS transistors M210-M216. Note that all transistors used in this embodiment of FIG. 4 circuitry operate in the subthreshold region to keep the power supply headroom and current consumption low, but this topology is not limited to subthreshold operation. The active resistor MOSFET, M200, operating in triode, takes a small die size but can generate high value resistor (RM202) needed for ultra low power applications. As noted earlier, this would otherwise be impractical (due to large size or high cost of additional thin film resistor layer) with the available passive resistor in standard digital CMOS fabrication. Transistors M214 and M216 (where aspect ratio or W/LM216 over W/LM214 is ‘d’) function as current sources for the source follower differential pairs composed of M204 (biased by IDM214) and M206 (biased by IDM216) that have a built in offset voltage (set by aspect ratios of M204 over M206 that is ‘b’) which help generate the PTAT term VT.ln(b×d) or VBIAS or VPTAT. Note that the active MOS resistor, M202, which is the RBIAS, is in series with the gates of source followers, M204 and M206, that feed the inputs of the current loop amplifier, A200. This in effect, places the RBIAS and generation of the VBIAS (or VPTAT) applied to the gate of loop amplifier, A200. The amplifier A200 substantially equalizes its inputs which are the source terminals voltages of M204 and M206 by forcing the gate voltages of transistors M210 and M212 (which operate as a voltage controlled current source (VCCS)). Accordingly, operating currents IDM210 and IDM212 flow through RM202 whose operating current scales in proportion with IBIAS. The value of RM202 or RBIAS is a function of IBIAS as well as being set in part by the SC200 (composed of M200 and M202) W/Ls and MOSFETs mobility (μ), which helps generate the CTAT term. Note that in FIG. 4 the scale factors a, b, c, and d are the ratios of transistor's width over length (W/L or scale factors or aspect ratios) that may be programmed or predetermined from approximately 0.1 to approximately 50 (but for ‘c’ that can be zero that is eliminating M212) depending on such considerations as die size and various operating specifications, including but not limited to current consumption, temperature coefficients, and power supply range objectives.


The connections of the elements in FIG. 4 are described as follows. Node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Node 2 is the negative supply voltage terminal or VSS (which can also be set as the zero voltage terminal or ground). The source and body terminals of transistors M210, M212, M214, and M216 are connected to node 1. Node 2 is connected to source and bodies of M202, M204, and M206, as well as the body of M200. Transistors M200 and M202 form the self cascode, where the diode connected M200 is cascoded with M202. Node 200 is connected to the gate and drain terminals of M200 as well as to the gate of M202 plus drain of M210. Node 202 is connected to the source terminal of M200, and drain terminal of M202, and gate of M204, and drain of M212. Note that the body terminal of M200 can be connected to either its source at node 202 or to node 2, depending on the process fabrication. In this embodiment, the body terminals of M200 and M202 are connected to node 2. Moreover, here the PTAT voltage is generated by using two source followers with a built in offset voltage, which is formed by transistors M204 and M206 combined with current sources supplied by M214 and M216. Node 204 is connected to the source and body of M204, drain of M214 and positive input of A200. Node 206 is connected to body and source of M206, drain of M216, and negative input of A200. Note that M210, M212, M214, and M216 function as current mirrors. Node 208 is connected to the output terminal of amplifier A200, and it is connected to the gates of transistors M210, M212, M214, and M216. The drain current or ID of M208 constitutes the bias current of the circuit or reference current, IBIAS.


In FIG. 4 there is the first voltage loop consisting of M202, M204, A200, and M206 produce a PTAT signal as a function of VT which is forced upon the VDS of M202 by the operation of the M204 and M206 source followers (which carry the built in offset as a function of PTAT signal), the current source's loop amplifier A200, and current mirrors M218, M214, M212, and M210 on the self cascade SC200. There is also a second voltage loop consisting of M200 and M202 where M200 operates in saturation and M202 operates in the triode region (i.e., that is acting as an active MOS resistor of RM202=RBIAS for this current source). The active MOS resistor, while functioning as the current source's resistor, contributes to a CTAT signal being mostly a function of μ. Application of PTAT signal via VT while interacting with CTAT signal via μ whose combination (using different MOSFET aspect ratios) can facilitate making a positive TC, or negative TC, as well as a stable TC for the IBIAS. Note that for demonstrative clarity of the proceeding formulations, second order effects—including but not limited to—early voltage, body effect, and subthreshold slope factor TC are ignored:

VGSM202−VGSM200=VDSM202;
RBIAS=RM202≈[μ.COX.(W/L)M202(VGSM202−VTHn−VDSM202/2)]−1;
VGSM202≈[2IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M200]1/2+VTHn;
VGSM206−VGSM204=[VT.ln(d×b)]=VDSM202;
VDSM202≈IBIAS(c+1)×RM202≈[VT.ln(d×b)];
μ.COX.(W/L)M202×[IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M200]1/2≈IBIAS(c+1)×[VT.ln(d×b)]−1; and
IBIAS≈f(S202,μ,VT).


It can be noticed that VTH term is canceled out in both the first loop (M204, A200, M206) and the second loop (M200, M202). This trait can significantly reduce IBIAS's sensitivity to VTH, where VTH has substantial variations in process fabrication and manufacturing (e.g., VTH nominal at 0.4V with +/−50% variation). As it is the case with this class of current sources, IBIAS is primarily a function of COX, VT, and u. Here COX is a function of gate oxide thickness which has a very low temperature coefficient, VT has a positive TC (PTAT like) and μ has a negative TC (CTAT like). Therefore, the TC of IBIAS can be positive or negative or approximately flat depending on the abbreviated formulaic constant (scalar), S202, which is function of MOSFET's aspect ratios a, b, and d as well as MOSFET device constants.


In this section some of the benefits of the utilization of the embodiment of FIG. 1 that is embodied in FIG. 4 are described. As noted earlier, the PTAT voltage or VPTAT or VBIAS of the current source is applied across an active resistor, RBIAS at the gate terminal compared to the prior art (see FIG. 11 and FIG. 12) that does it at MOSFET's source terminal of the PTAT voltage generation circuit.


In both prior art examples depicted in FIG. 11 and FIG. 12, M802sc or M802cm which are the active MOSFET resistor (forming the RBIAS) are placed in series with the source terminal of M804sc or M804cm, that are part of the M804sc-M806sc or M804cm-M806cm which is part of the circuit that generates the PTAT voltage (or VBIAS or VPTAT) that is applied across RBIAS to make the IBIAS (=VBIAS/RBIAS).


However, in this invention shown in FIG. 1 (or its equivalent variations FIG. 2 and FIG. 3) embodied in FIG. 4, the active MOSFET resistor M202 which forms the RBIAS (where the VPTAT or VBIAS or VPTAT signal is applied) is placed in series with the gate of M204 that is part of the M204-M206, which is part of the circuit that generates the VPTAT or VBIAS, which makes the IBIAS (=VBIAS/RBIAS). Placing the RBIAS with the gate terminal of the PTAT signal generation circuit has many benefits, some of which are explained below.


In the FIG. 4 embodiment, a larger VPTAT can be generated via M204 and M208 differential source followers with larger asymmetric W/L ratios to make a larger built in offset voltage. The drains of the followers M204 and M206 are shorted to ground, which shorts their junction leakages also to ground. Donut shaped (in layout) M204 and M206 also help reduce the junction areas and their associated leakages. In this manner the VPTAT generation function (i.e., the built in offset of the differential source followers) is separated from the function of current mirror or loop amplifier. As such, a current mirror or current loop amplifier can be constructed with complete symmetry (i.e., equal W/L ratios). Therefore, the bias current's high temperature regulation span is widened via minimizing current leakage in key signal paths because asymmetries in the current mirror or loop amplifiers associated with prior art implementations can be eliminated or reduced, and more of the drain or source junctions areas and their associated leakage currents are shorted to power supplies. As noted earlier, most prior art implementations, employ asymmetries by scaling-in offsets in current mirrors, loop amplifiers, and or self-cascade cells for VT generation. As such, high temperature operation is in part hindered due to imbalances in asymmetric junction diode areas in drain or source terminals (which are hard to match and cancel out) and whose leakage currents pile on and double every 10 C—in a thin ice circuit environment so to speak—where each transistor is already operating in ultra low currents (five to tens of nano amperes).


For some of prior art implementations, it could be that in order for current mirror's, or loop amplifier's, or self-cascode's leakages to be contained (and ultimately its hot temperature performance less hindered), the MI (or area) of pertinent MOSFETs had to be somewhat restricted, which limits the allowed amplitude of VPTAT that can be generated (e.g., approximately 50 mV versus 150 mV). Note again that Voltage Proportional to Absolute Temperature (VPTAT) is generally generated via the difference in VGS of two MOSFETs that operate in subthreshold, but whose W/L and or quiescent currents are scaled differently. A circuit topology for reliable manufacturing would benefit from a VPTAT whose amount is set by W/L ratios and VT (which are accurately controlled) as opposed to being dominated from example by VTH mismatch between the two pair of MOSFETS. The prior art is restricted to smaller amount of VPTAT (e.g., 50 mV) which is a disadvantage because it would increase the impact of normal process fabrication mismatches and offsets on controlling the value of IBIAS to specifications in manufacturing, and ultimately the yield of IBIAS to the target specifications. For example, a contribution of 5 mV of VOFS (mismatch between two MOSFETs) to a 50 mV of VPTAT is 10% offset error contribution to VPTAT which is the case with some of the prior art. However, 5 mV of VOFS over 150 mV VPTAT is 3% offset error contribution to VPTAT which can be the case with this embodiment's topology. In the embodiment of FIG. 4, by having the option of using source followers to generate the PTAT terms, the drain junction and their associated leakage are shorted to the negative supply which helps higher temperature span. An additional benefit of this embodiment besides the (some relief) greater freedom from derailment of hot performance due to drain or source junction current leakages, the differential source follower in FIG. 4 can be constructed for higher value VPTAT (e.g., M204 and M206 aspect ratios >approximately 16× vs. prior art equivalent PTAT generator aspect ratio ˜4-6×). As such, VTH mismatch (of the loop amplifier or current mirror) within the current loop equation becomes a smaller percent contributor to IBIAS overall (in)accuracy. This in turn allows for using smaller transistors that would leak less and hence help extend the temperature span.


Note also that in the general cases of prior art (where a self-cascode structure is employed to generate the PTAT term) the positive TC of VT.ln(b×d) and negative TC of VGS (or VTH) can push the self-cascode stack off to the edge of triode-saturation region and derail accuracy of current reference at min-max temperatures. Also, in the FIG. 4 embodiment, employing source follower (that also function as voltage buffers) to drive the input terminals of the loop amplifier, A200, would help loop stability and enhance AC and transient response of this current source topology. This topology places the RBIAS in the input-output feedback loop of the current mirror amplification function, which helps its DC and AC performance (e.g., the impact of the ultra high resistance value of RBIAS, needed for ultra low current operation, can be attenuated by the gain of the current mirror loop amplifier). Another benefit of the FIG. 4 embodiment is that by establishing the IBIAS via RBIAS in the gate of current mirror loop (via amplifier A200), it provides more flexibility for scaling (via scale factor c) M210 and M212 to set the value VDSM202 and hence the value of IBIAS. Moreover, this move also helps with balancing VDSM202 across PMOSFETs non-cascade current source M210, M212, M214, and M216 pairs, which eliminates the need to use cascoded current mirrors (otherwise needed to avoid MOSFET's early voltage induced current mismatch). Moreover, another advantage of FIG. 4 embodiment is that, in part, due to balanced VDS across M210, M212, M214, and M216, the VC, PSRR, and TC performance is not compromised despite smaller but equal sized W/L transistors (e.g., L=1 micron for all NMOS and PMOS). Additionally, another advantage of the embodiment of FIG. 4 is that the prior art's use of cascoded current mirrors with unequal source-drain junction areas (and their respective junction leakages which double with every 10 C increase in temperature) are avoided, which in turn helps with higher temperature span of this embodiment. Retaining the benefits of the class of bias current sources to which it belong, an advantage of the embodiment of FIG. 4 is it allows operation of MOS transistors in subthreshold, which enables low power supply and ultra low power consumption. Also, as noted earlier, the embodiment of FIG. 4 is substantially independent of VTH and mostly depended on μ, which is better controlled in process fabrication, hence the overall power consumption of the bias current source is more tightly controlled over process variations. Having the flexibility of using NMOS or PMOS SC (self cascade) with respect to either of positive or negative power suppliers, another benefit of the embodiment of FIG. 4 is using such flexibility for the bias current source to operate with sub 1V power supply (i.e., minimum VDD is limited to only subthreshold VGS 2VDS). Another benefit of the FIG. 4 embodiment is that VSS (negative power supply) and the ground connection (GND) may be the same of separated, depending on system requirements, which allows IBIAS to be set in value independent of the ground potential.


Description of the FIG. 5 Embodiment in a ‘Current Reference’

Employing the functional block diagram of FIG. 2 (which is a variation of that of FIG. 1) is utilized in the embodiment of a current reference that is depicted in FIG. 5. The embodiment of FIG. 5 includes current generator ITCa, current generator ITCb, and current scalar and subtractor which outputs the ‘current reference’, IREF. One of the goals of utilizing the embodiment of FIG. 2 in the embodiment of FIG. 5 is to make current reference that is ultra low power, resistor free, whose operating condition are mostly independent of VTH, based in CMOS process fabrication, where there is greater level of flexibility in programming or predetermining MOSFET's W/L sizes or ratios, to make a high performance IREF with positive, negative, or stable TC.


The following is a description of the embodiment of FIG. 5. Typical reference topologies add two currents with opposing temperature coefficient (TC) polarities to generate a stable TC current, whereas this reference generates two currents (ITCa and ITCb) with same polarity TCs that are scaled with differing slopes, and subsequently scaled and subtracted from each other to form a positive or negative TC as well as a stable TC IREF. Here is how: in FIG. 5, the two currents, ITCa and ITCb are generated across two PMOSFETs, M402, and M402b, as part of a pair of self-cascodes, SC400a and SC400b Loop amplifiers A400a and A400b operating in conjunction with the SCs force VDSM402a and VDSM402b to equal VT.ln(c×d) and VT.ln(f×g), respectively, which are the built-in offset voltages of A400a and A400b, respectively. Note here that the VPTAT signal is not generated via the source followers or DC level shifters (which was the case with the functional block diagram of FIG. 1 when utilized in the embodiment of FIG. 4). Instead, the VPTAT signal is initiated via a built in offset voltages that is generated by scaling (and or operating their quiescent current) differently the amplifier's input MOSFETs, which operate in the subthreshold region. The TC and magnitude of ITCa=VDSM402a/RM402a and ITCb=VDSM402b/RM402b can be sloped differently via (mostly by) adjustments in setting the ratio of W/Ls of M400a-M402a (i.e., mostly set by ‘a’) different from M400b-M402b (i.e., mostly set by ‘b’) while adhering to matching considerations by using the same narrow W and long L (i.e., Y) for M400a-M402a and M400b-M402b. Here the TCa of R402a in the denominator of ITCa (with equally sized M400a-M402a in SC400a) is sloped differently from TCb of R402b in the denominator of ITCb (with differently sized M400b-M402b in SC400b) by sizing b>a. Hence, apples-to-apples, there is less RM402a contraction in resistance via increasing VGSM400a at higher temperatures, since VGSM402a−VGSM400a=VDSM402a=VT.ln(c×d).


As noted earlier, the proposed topology allows for magnitude and TC of ITCa and ITCb be set with some independence from one another using device aspect ratios, while it employs substantially identical topology mechanisms to generate ITCa and ITCb—which improves performance over power supply, temperature, and fabrication process variations. Concurrently, ITCa and ITCb (whose TCs and amplitudes are set partially independently from one another by adjustments to their MOSFET's aspect ratios) are fed into a current scalar and subtraction circuit, which scales (K400a.ITCa) to S400. (K400a.ITCa) whose value changes by the same amount as K400b.ITCb over an objective temperature span. This resultant current or S400.(K400a.ITCa) and K400b.ITCb are subtracted from each other to yield an IREF. All generated currents are mostly independent of VTH and primarily a function of MOSFET's μ and VT, thus helping stable specifications of IREF over fabrication process variations. Note that IREF can also be programmed to have a negative or positive TC via wider flexibility in choosing different MOSFET's W/L ratios in the generation of ITCa, ITCb, and the scalar factor (e.g., S400, K400a and K400b, which is a formulaic representation of MOSFET W/L ratios as well as MOSFET's device parameter constants) in the current scalar subtraction circuit.


This second utilization of the embodiment of FIG. 2 in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 5 includes elements such as amplifiers. The amplifier could be a voltage output or current output or have voltage output combined with voltage controlled current source or VCCS. Such amplifier, could also contain differential buffers (e.g., differential source followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators in series with its differential inputs). Other elements contained here could be voltage followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators, current mirrors, voltage controlled current source (VCCS), bias current or current generator circuits with differing TC, self-cascodes, current scale and subtractor circuit, and MOS transistors (e.g., MOS transistors can be configured to function as a VCCS, current mirror, current sources or active resistors or can be paired in the input of an amplifier or buffer or DC level shifter—with differing scale factors—to generate offset voltage).


As noted earlier, the same principles of this embodiments of the functional block diagram of FIG. 1 or its variation FIG. 2 can be utilized in the embodiment of FIG. 5. Here two independent bias current generators are utilized. For each of bias current generator, the RBIASa,b (RM402a,b) remains in the feedback loop of the current loop amplifier, and it is connected to the gate and not the source of the loop amplifier (VBIAS which is the VPTAT signal is not applied in series with the source terminal of the current mirror loop or loop amplifier). Note that other variations where a bias current generator (of FIG. 1 or FIG. 2) with RBIASa is connected to the gate, and can be combined with a bias current generators where RBIASb is connected to the source, which can offer a different cost performance characteristic. Another variation can be to have RBIASa be based on an NMOS active resistor (as in FIG. 1), and the other RBIASb be based on a PMOS active resistor (as in FIG. 2), where the process variations and relations between NMOS and PMOS can offer other cost performance traits. The embodiments shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 provide the flexibility to generate currents of ITCa and ITCb with two different TCs before they are scaled and subtracted from one another to generate the IREF of interest. Also, note that all transistors used in this embodiment of FIG. 5 circuitry operate in the subthreshold region, but this topology is not limited to subthreshold operation.


Firstly, here are more details describing how current generator ITCa yields a current with TCa. The signal loop that generates ITCa includes M402a, which makes the active CMOS resistor, RM402a (i.e. RBIASa). The active transistor M402a, operating in deep triode, makes the small size but high value resistor, RM402a, which helps in keeping the die size small while current at ultra low levels. The signal loop is also composed of amplifier A400a (consisting of M404b-M416a) with a built in offset determined by W/L ratios of M404a to M406a and M410a to M408a, which are c and d, respectively. Input stage of A400a helps generate the PTAT term of about VT.ln(c×d). The amplifier A400a, substantially equalizes the VDS of M402a to the PTAT term of about VT.ln(c×d). This is accomplished in part via forcing the gate voltages of transistors M418a, which operate as a voltage controlled current source (VCCS) to bias M402a and M400a which set RM402a and whose operating current scales in proportion with ITCa. The value of RM402a or RBIAS-400a is set in part by the SC400a composed of M400a and M402a scale factors and MOSFET's mobility which helps generate the CTAT term. The ITCa is made of VT.ln(c×d) divided by RM402a. Note that in FIG. 5, the scale factors ‘a’ through ‘j’ are the ratios of transistor's width over length (W/L or scale factors or aspect ratios) that may be set depending on such considerations as die size and various operating specifications, including but not limited to current consumption, temperature coefficients, and power supply range objectives. The scale factors ‘a’ through ‘j’ shown in FIG. 5 can be between approximately 0.1 and 50.


Secondly, and similar to the above description to ITCb generation, applying the same principle to the embodiment of FIG. 5, this is how current generator ITCb outputs a current with TCb. The signal loop that generates ITCb includes M402b, which makes the active CMOS resistor, RM402b (i.e., RBIASb). The active transistor M402b, operating in deep triode, makes the small size but high value resistor, RM402b, which helps in keeping the die size small while current at ultra low levels. The signal loop is also composed of amplifier A400b (consisting of M404b-M416b) with a built in offset determined by W/L ratios of M404b to M406b and M410b to M408b, which are f and g, respectively. Input stage of A400b helps generate the PTAT term of about VT.ln(f×g). The amplifier A400b, substantially equalizes the VDS of M402b to the PTAT term of about VT.ln(f×g). This is accomplished in part via forcing the gate voltages of transistors M418b, which operates a voltage controlled current source (VCCS) to bias M402b and M400b which set RM402b and whose operating current scales in proportion with ITCb. The value of RM402b or RBIAS-400b is set in part by the SC400b composed of M400b and M402b scale factors and MOSFET's mobility which helps generate the CTAT term. The ITCb is made of VT.ln(f×g) divided by RM402b.


Thirdly and lastly, the current ITCb is scaled and mirrored via M418b and M420b (by 1/h.X) and fed into M422b which is scaled (by j.X) and mirrored onto M422a. Concurrently, the current ITCa is scaled and mirrored via M418a and M420a (by 1/e.X) and fed into drain of M422a. Here the final IREF is generated which is a function of K400b. ITCb−S400. (K400a. ITCa), where K400a, K400b, S400 are formulaic representations and approximately a function of MOSFET's W/L ratios and MOSFET's (device) fabrication process constants. Also note that other variations of this circuit topology knowable by those skilled in the art can include, but not limited to, for example generating ITCb using the prior art circuits such as the ones shown in FIG. 11 and FIG. 12, which is then scaled and subtracted from ITCa generated by this invention topologies (e.g., FIG. 1, or 2, or 3) to yield an IREF.


The connections of the elements in FIG. 5 are described as follows. As noted earlier, node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Similarly, node 2 is the negative supply voltage terminal or VSS (which can also be set as the zero voltage terminal or ground). The source and body terminals of M414a, M416a, M418a, M420b, and M414b, M416b, M418b, M420b are connected to node 1, which is the positive power supply terminal. Note that M414a and M414b sets the bias voltage for the MOSFETs and M416a, M418a, M420b, and M416b, M418b, M420b, respectively. Here, M414a, M416a, M418a, and M420b are current mirrors, as well as M414b, M416b, M418b, and M420b all of which also function as current sources to set bias currents for ITCa and ITCb circuitries. The source and body terminals of M408a, M410a, M412a, M422a, and M408b, M410b, M412b, M422b are connected to node 2, which is the negative or ground power supply terminal. Gates and drains of M400a and M400b (both of which is part of the self cascade circuits together with M402a and M402b) are shorted to each other and connected to the node 2. Source and body of M400b are connected to drain of M402b and connected to node 402b, which is also connected to gate of M406b. Source and body of M402b are connected to drain of M418b and gate of M404b and connected to node 400b. Source and body of M404b, and source and body of M406b and drain of M416b are connected to node 406b. Drain of M404b and drain of M408b and gate of M412b are connected to node 408b. Gate and drain of M410b and drain of M406b are connected to node 410b. Drain of M412b and gate and drain of M414b are connected to node 404b. Gate terminals of M416b, M418b, and M420b are connected to node 404b. Drain of M420b and gate and drain terminals of M422b are connected to node 412b. Note that M404b, M406b, M408b, M410b, M412b, and M414b form an amplifier (A400b) with M404b and M406b gates at nodes 400b and 402b as A400b's input terminal and gate and drain of M414b as its output terminal. Also, as is the case with the FIG. 5 embodiment, note that offset voltage generation and amplifier function can be accomplished in one shot by scaling differing the sizes of M404b, M406b and scaling differing currents through them via scaling differing the sizes M408b and M410b.


Source and body of M400a are connected to drain of M402a and connected to node 402a, which is also connected to gate of M406a. Source and body of M402a are connected to drain of M418a and gate of M404a and connected to node 400a. Source and body of M404a, and source and body of M406a and drain of M416a are connected to node 406a. Drain of M404a and drain of M408a and gate of M412a are connected to node 408a. gate and drain of M410a and drain of M406a are connected to node 410a. Drain of M412a and gate and drain of M414a are connected to node 404a. Gate terminals of M416a, M418a, and M420a are connected to node 404a. Drain of M420a and gate and drain terminals of M422a are connected to node 412a, which is the IREF terminal. Note that M404a, M406a, M408a, M410a, M412a, and M414a form an amplifier (A400a) with M404a and M406a gates at nodes 400a and 402a as A400a's input terminal and gate and drain of M414a as its output terminal. Also, as is the case with the FIG. 5 embodiment, note that offset voltage generation and amplifier function can be accomplished in the amplifiers A400a (and A400b) by scaling differing the sizes of M404a, M406a and scaling differing currents through them via scaling differing the sizes M408a and M410a (as well as M404b, M406b and scaling differing currents through them via scaling differing the sizes M408b and M410b). Note also that transistor pairs M402b-M400b and M402b-M400b form the self cascades, SC400a and SC400b, respectively where RM402b (or RBIAS-400b) and RM402a (or RBIAS-400a), play into the equation that sets the value of ITCb and ITCa currents.


Drain of M420a is connected to gate and drain of M422b as well as gate of M422a at node 412b. Drain of M422a and drain of M420a are connected to node 412a, as well as the IREF output terminal. Note that M420a, M422a, and M420b, M422b constitute one of many possible embodiments (a simple one used here for descriptive simplicity and clarity) for the current scalar and subtractor function, but there are other higher performance variations of current scalar and subtractor function available and covered in prior art (e.g., Ledesma, F. et al, “Comparison of new and conventional low voltage current mirrors,” Circuits and Systems, 2002. MWSCAS-2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).


In summary, current generator ITCa includes M400a-M418a, and current generator ITCb includes M400b-M418b, where ITCa and ITCb have differing TCs which are set by the circuit's MOSFET's scale factors (as well as a factor of MOSFET device parameter constants) so to generate an IREF with positive TC, or negative TC, or a near zero TC, which will be explained below.


Here is a more detailed explanation of the embodiment of FIG. 5. The circuit is composed of two current generator making ITCa and ITCb whose respective magnitude and TC can be set partially independently from one another so to be scaled and subtracted from each other to generate an IREF with near zero TC. Each current generator is composed of a CMOS amplifier (A400a and A400b) and self-cascode (SC400a and SC400b). Amplifier A400a's input includes M404a, M406a, M408a, and M410a and has a built-in offset voltage roughly equal to VT.ln(c×d) which is forced across M402a of SC400a (with its diode connected counterpart M400a) so to generate a current ITCa via M418a that has a temperature coefficient of TCa:

ITCa=IDSM418a=IDSM402a=IDSM400a=VDSM402a/RM402a;
VGSM406a−VGSM404a≈VT.ln(c×d)=VDSM402a;
RM402a≈[μ.COX.(W/L)M402a(VGSM402a−VTHp−VDSM402a/2)]−1;
VGSM402a≈[2ITCa/μ.COX.(W/L)M400a]1/2+VTHp;
μ.COX.(W/L)M402a×[ITCa/μ.COX.(W/L)M400a]1/2≈ITCa.[VT.ln(d×c)]−1.
ITCa≈f(K400a,μ,VT);

Where K400a is set approximately by MOSFET's device parameter constants and the W/L sizes of MOSFETs in the ITCa's current generator circuitry.


Similar operations hold for the A400b and SC400b loops that generate the ITCb. Amplifier A400b's input includes M404b, M408b, M408b, M410b that has a built-in offset voltage roughly equal to VT.ln(f×g) which is forced across M402b of SC400b (with its diode connected counterpart M400b) so to generate a current ITCa via M418a that has a temperature coefficient of TCb:

ITCb=IDSM418b=IDSM402b=IDSM400b=VDSM402b/RM402b;
VGSM406b−VGSM404b≈VT.ln(g×f)=VDSM402b;
RM402b≈[μ.COX.(W/L)M402b(VGSM402b−VTHp−VDSM402b/2)]−1;
VGSM402b≈[2ITCb/μ.COX.(W/L)M400b]1/2+VTHp;
μ.COX.(W/L)M402b×[ITCb/μ.COX.(W/L)M400b]1/2≈ITCb.[VT.ln(g×f)]−1;
ITCb≈f(K400b,μ,VT),

where K400b is set approximately by the W/L sizes of MOSFETs in the ITCb's current generator circuitry;


In the current scalar and subtractor circuit there is: IREF=K400b. ITCb−S400. (K400a ITCa). As noted earlier, If a near zero TC current reference (IREF), then magnitude of ITCa can be scaled with MOSFET's W/L ratios such that a current S400. (K400a. ITCa) whose value changes near equally to that of K400b ITCb over an objective temperature range.


In the embodiment of FIG. 5, similar to the embodiment of FIG. 4, it can be noticed in the ITCa and ITCb equations that VTH term is canceled out in both the first loop (M404a, M406a as well as M404b, M406b) and the second loop (M400a, M402a as well as M400b, M402b) which desensitizes ITCa and ITcb value from VTH variations in process fabrication. As it is the case with this class of current sources, ITCa and ITCb, and thereby IREF which is a byproduct of them to be primarily a function of COX, VT, and μ. Here COX is a function of gate oxide thickness which has a very low TC, VT has a positive TC (PTAT like) and u has a negative TC (CTAT like). Therefore, the TC of ITCA and ITCB (and hence TC of IREF which is a function ITCA and ITCB) can be positive or negative or approximately flat depending on S400, K400a, and K400b which are predetermined or programmed (depending on circuit need) by the MOSFET device constants, and W/L sizes by setting scale factors ‘a’ through ‘j’, in FIG. 5. Note also that other variations of the proposed topology could include, but not be limited to, operating MOSFETs in SC400a and SC400b at different scaled currents (instead of PMOS), utilizing NMOS self-cascode or conventional current mirrors (triode MOS plus saturation diode connected MOS), or using source followers or diode level shifters or NMOS input (instead of PMOS) A400a and A400b with built-in offset voltages in order to achieve different specifications trades-offs (e.g., sub-1V operations).


In this section some of the benefits of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 5 are described: as noted earlier, typical reference topologies add two currents with opposing TC polarities to generate a stable TC current reference, whereas this reference generates two currents (ITCa and ITCb) with same polarity TCs that are scaled with differing slopes, and subsequently scaled and subtracted from each other to form a very stable TC IREF which provides a the benefit of more flexibility in generating IREF with different amplitude and TC. One of these flexibilities includes, but not limited to, programming an IREF with wider range of positive, negative, or very stable TC.


Also, while adhering to matching considerations by using the same exact narrow W and long L in the two independent self cascades (SC400a and SC400b), the TC and magnitude of ITCa and ITCb can be programmed differently via (mostly by) setting the ratio of W/Ls of MOSFETs aspect ratios, which can be made accurate with respect to topology targets because they are most independent of fabrication process variation.


In effect, the embodiment of FIG. 5 uses substantially similar functional blocks of the embodiment of FIG. 2 two times. Using different MOSFET aspect ratios (which are tightly controllable in process), the first instance of bias current generation (i.e., ITCa) produces certain amplitude and TC that is different from that of the one produced in the second instance of bias current generation (i.e., ITCb), while both ITCa and ITCb are subject to the same process fabrication, power supply, and temperature variations. As such, an advantage of the embodiment of FIG. 5 is to generate ITCa and ITCb by using the same configuration and same CMOS W/Ls in amplifiers (A400a and A400b), same CMOS W/Ls in self cascades (SC400, and SC400b), and same CMOS W/Ls in current mirrors (VCCS400a and VCCS400b). And because of this, the second order errors due to process, temperature, and power supply variations track each other and some of them are cancelled out, which helps both DC and AC performance of the current reference.


Similar to the embodiment of FIG. 4, for this embodiment of FIG. 5, the VPTAT is sensed and current is forced across an active resistor, RM4002a and RM402b, at the gate terminal instead of the prior art that does it at the source terminal of the current mirror loop amplifier. However, the embodiment of FIG. 4 used an NMOS resistor, an independent PMOS source follower (i.e., unity gain buffer with a built in offset voltage as a function of pseudo VT) function for built offset voltage (or VPTAT) generation, and a separate loop amplifier function for amplification. Instead, here in FIG. 5, the function of built in offset voltage (or VPTAT) generation and amplification are both preformed in MOS amplifiers which save some area and current, where additionally both active MOSFET resistors and MOSFET amplifier inputs are of the same type (i.e., PMOS) enabling better fabrication process tracking and lower noise (since PMOS has lower noise than NMOS).


As just noted for the embodiment of FIG. 5, the sensing and forcing of signal takes place at the gate terminal instead of the prior art that does it at the source terminal. As a result, another benefit of this embodiment is that one input of the loop amplifier is biased via an MOS that is diode connected (gate and source shorted) in SC and the other input of the loop amplifier is biased via the other MOS in SC that (is the resistor and sets the operating current) is in the feedback loop of the amplifier. As a consequence, the active MOS impedance (e.g., RBIASa,b) is lowered by the gain of the current mirror loop or current loop amplifier. Also, beside improvements in AC performance due to lower impendence here, the junction leakage asymmetries associated with generation of VT (in prior art implementations) are also separated from the SC operation, which helps wider temperature span (e.g., improving 0-70 C temperature span to 0-100 C) of this embodiment.


Moreover, embodiment of FIG. 5 is benefited for less dependence on process parameter variation because it eliminates some of the second order device's second order effects, including but not limited to, for example the elimination of NMOS body effect in M200 that was present in the embodiment of FIG. 4. Also, keeping the benefits of the category of circuits to which it belongs, the embodiment of FIG. 5 is substantially independent of VTH and mostly depended on μ, which is better controlled in process fabrication, hence the overall power consumption of the current reference is more tightly controlled over process variations. Also, the embodiment of FIG. 5 can operate MOSFET in the subthreshold region, which enables low power supply and ultra low power consumption. Another benefit of the FIG. 5 embodiment is that VSS (negative power supply) and the ground potential (GND) may be the same of separated, providing flexibility to system topology, which allows ITCa, ITCb and IREF to be set in value independent of the ground potential.


Description of the FIG. 6 Embodiment in a ‘Voltage Reference’

The embodiment shown in FIG. 5 is utilized in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 6, which is a ‘voltage reference’ that can also generate a pseudo bandgap reference voltage. This third embodiment in FIG. 6 includes elements such as amplifiers. The amplifier is defined here broadly, which could be a voltage output or current output, or have voltage output combined with voltage controlled current source or VCCS. Such an amplifier, could also contain differential buffers (e.g., differential source followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators in series with its differential inputs). Other elements contained here could be a voltage buffer or followers or DC level shifters, voltage offset generators, current mirrors, voltage controlled current source (VCCS), self-cascodes, and MOSFETs (e.g., MOS transistors can be configured to function as a VCCS, current mirror, current sources or an active resistors or MOSFETs that can be paired in the input of an amplifier or buffer or DC level shifter—with differing scale factors—to generate offset voltage).


The embodiment in FIG. 6 is a voltage reference, which includes current bias generator section or IBIAS section, MOS self cascode (SC) series section (that sums a number VPTATs to establish the PTAT term of the voltage reference), and VBE generator (that establishes the CTAT term) combined with an output voltage amplifier section, yielding the voltage reference output, VREF. The embodiment of FIG. 6 may be used to make a low cost (small die size), ultra low power, resistor free, CMOS pseudo bandgap voltage reference, where by programming or predetermining MOSFET's W/L sizes or ratios, an VREF equal to bandgap voltage (about 1.2V) of VBG with a stable TC may be realized. Different adjustments in MOSFET aspect ratios in this topology also allows for the option of generating a VREF that exhibits positive or negative TC.


Here is a description of the embodiment of FIG. 6 and some of its benefits. The proposed circuit belongs to a class of resistor free bandgap voltage references (VREF or VBG) whose CTAT voltage (VCTAT) is generated by VEB of a parasitic BJT available in standard CMOS fabrication process. This reference's PTAT voltage VPTAT is generated via summation, where the PTAT term is generated by adding K of the VT.ln (g) terms that are generated via K plurality of scaled MOS self-cascodes (SC) whose each of resistive MOFET's source-drain terminals are in series with one another while they all operate in subthreshold. All the SCs are concurrently biased by the bias current circuit of that is the embodiment of functional block diagram depicted in FIG. 2. Here K is the number of SC put in series with one another in the PTAT segment of the circuit. The embodiment of FIG. 6 shows K=4, but K can be a number as low as 2 or as high as 20. This circuit's contributions may include the following. The topology employs SCs in a manner to generate both the bandgap's IBIAS and VPTAT segments of the circuitry so that their operating conditions track over power supply, temperature, and supply variations, thereby aiding VREF's specifications. AC, transient performances are benefited because VPTAT and VCTAT signal paths are made in independent signal paths from one another, avoiding the simultaneous positive and negative VPTAT loops inherent in conventional bandgaps. Also, the die yield, attributed to impact of random non-ideal terms in the VPTAT's signal path, is comparatively attenuated since VPTAT is generated via summation instead of the multiplication that is operant in conventional bandgaps.


Operating in subthreshold, the MOS bias current generator segment includes the SC's M602 and M600. In the bias current generator segment of FIG. 6, by utilizing the built in offset voltage of VPTAT˜VT.ln(b×c) that is set by scaling M604-M606 and M608-M610 within the bias amplifier A602 (composed of M604, M606, M608, M610, M612, M614, and M616), a VPTAT is forced across VDSM602. Note that IBIAS flowing through the bias current generator's SC (M600-M602) is also fed into the SC series of the PTAT segment of the VREF circuit (Mi-Mit where ‘i’ is even numbers 624 to 630, such as M626-M626t or M624-M624t). It is of note that IBIAS can be configured such that its operating currents can be set to have a positive, negative, or near zero TC, depending on VREF circuit performance requirements and process parameters. Similar to IBIAS generation of FIG. 4 and that of FIG. 5, here in embodiment of FIG. 6 the IBIAS value over fabrication process variations is primarily a function of VT and μ (mobility of MOSFETs) and not VTH. Here the TC of IBIAS operating conditions which employs SC, mimics a similar mechanisms in the chain of SCs (Mi-Mit SCs) used in the PTAT section. The W/L of MOSFETs in the chain of SCs of the VPTAT section and in the SC of the IBIAS section may be made identical. Since IBIAS that is fed to SCs of the VPTAT section (M624, M626, M628, and M630) is mirrored from the IBIAS that resulted from forcing a PTAT voltage or ˜VT.ln(b×c) across SC in the bias circuit (VDS of M602), therefore a (multiple or fraction of) PTAT voltage can be developed across the drain to source terminals of each of the resistive MOSFETs M624, M626, M628, and M630 of SCs of the cumulative VPTAT section. A voltage reference output or VREF, with respect to VDD is hence generated via the summation (series combination or accumulation) of each of such PTAT voltages developed across drain to source terminals of each of the resistive MOSFETs of series of SCs, whose cumulative voltage (e.g., K×VPTAT) is subsequently added to a VCTAT, generated via the BJT Q622, which is configured in unity gain with a DC shift of VBE.


Note that in FIG. 6, the scale factors ‘a’ through ‘h’ are the ratios of transistor's width over length (W/L or scale factors or aspect ratios) that may be set depending on such considerations as die size and various operating specifications, including but not limited to current consumption, temperature coefficients, and power supply range objectives. The scale factors ‘a’ through ‘h’ can be in the range of approximately 0.1 to approximately 50.


The connections of the elements in FIG. 6 are described as follows. Similar to the bias current generators utilized in FIGS. 5 and 6, the embodiment in FIG. 6 also employs a bias current generator. Node 1 is the positive power supply, VDD, which is connected to the following terminals: source and body of M618, source and body of M616, source and body of M614, source and body of M630, and source and body of M620. Node 2 is the negative power supply, VSS, which can also be the ground potential depending on system requirements. Node 2 is connected to the following terminals: gate of M602, gate and drain of M600, body and source of M610, body and source of M608, body and source of M612, body and source of M630i, body and source of M628i, body and source of M626i, body and source of M624i, and collector of Q622.


In the current bias generator section, which biases up the voltage reference, the source and body of M600 are connected to drain of M602 and connected to node 602, which is also connected to gate of M604. Source and body of M602 are connected to drain of M618 and gate of M606 and connected to node 600. Source and body of M604, and source and body of M606 and drain of M616 are connected to node 606. Drain of M606 and drain of M610 and gate of M612 are connected to node 608. Gate and drain of M608 and drain of M604 are connected to node 610. Drain of M612 and gate and drain of M614 are connected to node 604. Gate terminals of M616, M618, and M620 are connected to node 604. Note that M604, M606, M608, M610, M612, and M614 form a voltage amplifier (A602) with M604 and M606 gates at nodes 600 and 602 as A602's input terminal, and gate and drain of M614 as the amplifier output terminal. Also, similar to the embodiment of FIG. 5, in the embodiment of FIG. 6 note that offset voltage generation and amplifier function can be accomplished in one shot by scaling differing the sizes of M604 M606 and scaling differing currents through them via scaling differing the sizes M608 and M610. MOSFETs M614, M616, M618, and M620 form current mirrors whose value is scaled via ‘d’ with respect to the bias level established by M614, and here also M618 functions as the VCCS600 that feeds the bias current for the self cascode (SC600) composed of M602 and M600.


The PTAT signal (with respect to VDD) is generated via a series of MOS SCs, whose node's connectivity is as follows: node 628 is connected to drain of M630 and to the body and source of M630t and to the source and body of M628. Node 624 is connected to drain of M628 and to the body and source of M628t and to the source and body of M626. Node 620 is connected to drain of M626 and to the body and source of M626t and to the source and body of M624. Node 616 is connected to drain of M624 and to the body and source of M624t and to the positive input terminal of output amplifier, A600. Node 630 is connected to gate of M630 and gate plus drain of M630t and drain of M630i. Node 626 is connected to gate of M628 and gate plus drain of M628t and drain of M628i. Node 622 is connected to gate of M626 and gate plus drain of M626t and drain of M626i. Node 618 is connected to gate of M624 and gate plus drain of M624t and drain of M624i. Gates of M630i, M628i, M626i, and M624i are connected to gate of M612 at note 608. In FIG. 602, the MOSFET pairs whose W/L's are scaled by the ratio ‘g’ are M624-M624t, M626-M626t, M628-M628t, and M630-M630t make the self cascode SC600, SC602, SC604, and SC606, respectively. M630i, M628i, M626i, and M624i provide the bias current for the SCs whose currents are mirrors of one another and are scaled by ‘d’ biased via M612 (from the bias generation section). Note that for ease and clarity of describing the embodiment of FIG. 6, only four SCs are shown. But the SC series could contain different number of SCs and bias currents (e.g., between 2 to 12) depending on fabrication process and VREF's specification requirements. Moreover and also for demonstrative clarity a simple current bias and mirror circuitry is shown in FIG. 6. But bias current circuits could be looped differently and or cascoded (e.g., desensitize the impact of MOS's VA) to improve bandgap's specifications, including but not limited to its' VC. The CTAT signal generation in FIG. 6 containing the VEB DC level shift and output amplifier section has the following nodes: node 612 is connected to the negative terminal of A600 which is also connected to emitter of Q622 and drain of M620. Output of A600 is connected to node 614 which is also connected to the base of Q622.


The following is a more detailed description of FIG. 6. VBG is composed on VPTAT with a positive TC and VCTAT with a negative TC whose addition generates a near zero TC output voltage of VBG. The VPTAT generator is made by K series of SC PMOSFETs, Mi-Mit (also operating in the subthreshold region) sized with ‘1/g’ ratio. The SC's PMOSFETs generate K×[VT.ln(g)+Ve]. Here Ve is approximated as the average DC equivalent of error terms (i.e., offset, drift, noise, etc) in the VPTAT signal path. The random contribution of Ve to die yield should be roughly the square root of sum of Ve2 or about K1/2.Ve versus for conventional bandgaps where Ve equivalent term (dominated by the PTAT loop amplifier) is multiplied by PTAT loop gain or about K. Ve. The bandgap's CTAT is generated by VEB of parasitic vPNP with Q622 that DC shifts the output of the unity gain amplifier. The bandgap voltage VBG accounting for random impact of Ve to yield, is about: VBG˜VEB+K.[VT.ln(g)(K1/2+1)×1)×Ve].


As noted earlier in this section, the embodiment in FIG. 6 employs SCs in a manner to generate both the bandgap's IBIAS and VPTAT circuitry so that their operating conditions track over power supply, temperature, and supply variations, thereby aiding bandgap's specifications. Hence similar to the embodiments in FIGS. 4 and 5, here in FIG. 6 there is the first voltage loop consisting of M602, M604, A602, and M606 produce a PTAT signal as a function of VT which is forced upon the VDS of M602 by the operation of the loop. There is also a second voltage loop consisting of M600 and M602 where M600 operates in saturation and M602 operates in the triode region (i.e., that is acting as an active resistor of RM602=RBIAS for this current source). This active resistor, while functioning as the current source's resistor, contributes to a CTAT signal into the IBIAS being mostly a function of μ. In the bias section, the application of PTAT signal via VT while interacting with CTAT signal via μ enables setting the objective TC (positive, negative, or neutral, or in between them) for IBIAS. This same IBIAS is applied to the SC series. Note that for demonstrative clarity of the proceeding formulations, second order effects—including but not limited to—early voltage, body effect, subthreshold slope factor TC are ignored:

VGSM602−VGSM600=VDSM602:
RBIAS=RM602≈[μ.COX.(W/L)M602(VGSM602−VTHp−VDSM602/2)]−1;
VGSM602≈[2IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M600]1/2+VTHp;
VGSM604−VGSM606=[VT.ln(c×b)]=VDSM602; and
μ.COX.(W/L)M602×[IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M600]1/2≈IBIAS.[VT.ln(c×b)]−1;
IBIAS≈f(S600,μ,VT).


As just noted above, this same IBIAS is applied to the SC series, where:

VDSM630=VGSM630−VGSM630t;
VDSM628=VGSM628−VGSM628t;
VDSM626=VGSM626−VGSM626t; and
VDSM624=VGSM24−VGSM624t.


Given that the bias circuit employs a similar mechanism (i.e., VGSM602−VGSM600=VDSM602) to generate both the bandgap's IBIAS and VPTAT sections, hence their operating conditions track over power supply, temperature, and supply variations, thereby aiding bandgap's specifications.


Before turning to more details about the benefits of the FIG. 6 embodiment, it can be noticed that VTH term is canceled out in both the first loop (M604, A602, M606) and the second loop (M600, M602) as well as in the SC series (M630-M630t, M628-M628t, M626t, and M624-M624t) which desensitizes IBIAS and the VPTAT terms (as well as the VREF or VBG) from VTH variations in process fabrication.


Some of the benefits of the embodiment of FIG. 6 are summarized here. First, low cost due to small die size with no passive resistor in standard digital CMOS fabrication with ease of process node portability besides smaller die size keeping the cost low. Moreover, in order to serve some of the medical applications of this topology, a very small die size is necessary for small incisions (e.g., or inside a crown). Second, ultra low power consumption over temperature span. Ultra low current consumption is key in some applications for example because replacement of micro-batteries or use of noisy magnetic micro-harvesters for power transfers may be impractical or unsafe. Third, superior VC, PSRR, and transient performance. For example, there could be mission critical biomedical batteryless systems may require uninterrupted monitoring and measurements while the IC's power supply is being charged via multiple micro-harvesters or being subjected to disorderly patterns. Fourth, avoiding big decoupling capacitors may be key for voltage references in some applications. For example, a large decoupling capacitor (typically isolated from power storage supercapacitor with a Schottky diode) can burden the scarce power of micro-energy harvester reserves, especially during power up and power down transients. As such, a voltage references such as the embodiment in FIG. 6 with superior VC, PSRR, and AC performance (or requiring much smaller decoupling capacitors) can be significantly more critical for micro-energy harvesting ICs. Fifth, another benefit of the FIG. 602 embodiment is that VSS (negative power supply) and the ground potential (GND) may be the same of separated, providing some flexibility to system topology. Sixth, also note that a challenge with ultra low current and MOSFETs is high noise. Apples-to-apples the embodiment of FIG. 6 is architecturally equipped to enhance noise performance compared to prior art because: (a) as noted above, the contribution of noise within the VPTAT generation circuit is (noise)×K1/2 because of the operation of summation instead of multiplication in the conventional bandgap of FIG. 2 where operation of multiplication or K (noise)×K gains up the loop amplifier A1's noise; (b) PMOSFET SCs may be used to build up to the VPTAT along the SC string, PMOSFETs may be used in the SC and the amplifier of the bias current generation circuit, as well as in the output amplifier differential input pairs, which should reduce the contribution of 1/f noise to the VBG output; and (c) bandgap reference's noise can be materially band pass filtered out by placing a capacitor at the end of the SC string or the high impedance node of output amplifier but in accordance with consideration for power up and down settling time requirements.


In addition to the synthesis of the aforementioned contributions of the embodiment of FIG. 6, as noted earlier, aims to improve upon the broader benefits attributable to the category of bandgap references to which it belongs. Some of such benefits are: (1) the PTAT and CTAT signal paths are independent, and hence the positive and negative feedback loops inherent in conventional bandgap PTAT loops are avoided, thus helping transient and power-up and down responses of the bandgap; (2) the non-idealities attributed to random DC offsets and noise that impact VBG are attenuated, due to operations of summation compared to multiplication for conventional bandgaps; and (3) tight performance tolerance over standard CMOS manufacturing process variations. Bandgap's IBIAS is made independent of CMOS VTH and instead primarily depends on VT and μ, which is more tightly controllable in manufacturing.


Description of the FIG. 9 Embodiment in a Bandgap Voltage Reference Along with FIGS. 3, 7, and 8

This fourth embodiment shown in FIG. 7, along with FIGS. 3, 8, and 9, includes elements such as amplifiers. The amplifier is defined here broadly, which could be a voltage output or current output, or have voltage output combined with voltage controlled current source or VCCS. Such an amplifier, could also contain differential buffers (e.g., differential source followers, DC level shifters, voltage offset generators in series with its differential inputs). Other elements contained here could be voltage buffer or followers or DC level shifters, voltage offset generators, current sources, current mirrors, voltage controlled current sources (VCCS), self-cascodes, bipolar transistors or BJTs (including parasitic vertical BJT) and MOSFETs (e.g., MOS transistors can be configured to function as an active resistor, or a VCCS, current mirror, current sources or MOSFETs that can be paired in the input of an amplifier or buffer or DC level shifter—with differing scale factors—to generate offset voltage).


The embodiment in FIG. 7 is a voltage reference, which consists of current bias generator IBIAS, MOS active resistors (that establishes the PTAT signal in the bandgap), and VEB generator (that establishes the CTAT signal in the bandgap) plus output amplifier delivering the voltage reference output, VREF or VBG.


The goal here is for the functional block shown in FIG. 3 to be used in an embodiment of a bandgap voltage reference depicted in FIG. 7 so as to make an ultra low power, resistor free, CMOS bandgap voltage reference. By setting MOSFET's W/L ratios in FIG. 7, a VREF equal to bandgap voltage (about 1.2V) or VBG with a stable TC may be realized, although a VREF with positive, or negative TC is possible with the topology.


Here is a summary description and some of the benefits of the embodiment of FIG. 7. The proposed circuit belongs to a conventional class of bandgap voltage references that adds a PTAT and a CTAT signal to yield a near zero TC, as depicted in prior art FIG. 10. In FIG. 10, a VPTAT (as a multiple of VT) signal is placed across R800 (or RBG). As a consequence, the current through RBG flows through R802 (p.RBG), which amplifies the VPTAT such that the sum of VEBQ802 (which is the CTAT signal) and [p+1]×VPTAT yields the VREF or VBG with a stable TC. Conventional bandgap voltage reference, such as the one shown in FIG. 10, can be attractive because for high volume markets, bandgap voltage references may be viewed in a more favorable light in manufacturing due to the predictable VBE and VT terms that constitute the VBG.


However, prior arts bandgaps of this category require passive resistors (e.g., R800 and R802), which makes their implementation in small form factor, low-cost, and ultra low power applications, such as energy harvesting impossible or impractical. Therefore, a resistorless CMOS bandgap embodied of FIG. 7 employs the bias current generator (functional block shown in FIG. 3) that is utilized in FIG. 8.


A new composite active MOS resistor is proposed, depicted in FIG. 9, which has a small size and high resistance. A network of active resistors using this composite active resistor cell (FIG. 9) replace the function of RGB for R800 plus ‘p’ times of RGB for R802. The composite active resistor of FIG. 9, working in concert with the bias current circuit of FIG. 804, is embodied in the bandgap circuit (FIG. 7).


The bias circuit of FIG. 8, makes possible the creation of the active resistor (FIG. 9), which enables keeping both the reliability benefits of conventional bandgap topology as well as eliminating the bandgap's need for passive resistors, which consequently enables making an ultra low power bandgap of FIG. 7 possible in standard digital CMOS. In the IBIAS generator of FIG. 8, a VPTAT (in the M804-A800-M806 loop making VT.ln [b×c]) is forced upon the active resistors RM802. Similarly, in the bandgap voltage reference circuit of FIG. 7, a VPTAT (in the Q804-A800-Q806 loop making VT.ln [g×i])]) is forced upon the active resistors RM826r. The IBIAS generator circuit of FIG. 8 and the bandgap loop circuitries of FIG. 7 independently apply PTAT voltages across functionally similar composite MOS resistors, namely RM802 and RM826r to generate their respective operating currents IDM802 and IDM826r.


Note also that in the SC loop in the IBIAS generator circuit of FIG. 8, VGSM800−VGSM802=VDSM802, where M802 is the MOS resistor of IBIAS circuit. Similarly, note that in the active MOS resistor of FIG. 9, ignoring the VOFFSET of amplifier A824 for now, VGSM824b−VGSM824r=VDSM824r, where M824r is the MOS resistor of active resistor circuit. This topology uses substantially similar functional conditions between the operations of M802-M800 loop in the IBIAS generator circuit of FIG. 8, and that of each of the MOS resistors of FIG. 9 that is utilized in the bandgap circuit of FIG. 7 (i.e., M826b-A826-M826r loop, M828b-A828-M828r loop, M830b-A830-M830r loop, M834b-A834-M836r loop). Therefore, the operating conditions of the IBIAS generator of FIG. 8, the active MOS resistor of FIG. 9, and bandgap circuit of FIG. 7 substantially track each other over fabrication process and temperature and power supply variations, and able to approximate a PTAT like behavior over temperature.


The combination of the IBIAS generator of FIG. 8, the active MOS resistor of FIG. 9, and bandgap circuit of FIG. 7 enable the bandgap's power consumption to be mostly independent of MOSFET's VTH and chiefly a function of mobility, μ, that benefits manufacturability and yield because μ, is more tightly controllable (compared to poly resistance or VTH, for example). Such trait not only yields a more stable bandgap voltage reference, but also one that delivers ultra low power which has a narrower range of variation over temperature and fabrication process corners.


Another advantage of combining IBIAS generator of FIG. 8, the active MOS resistor of FIG. 9, and bandgap circuit of FIG. 7, is that the bandgap circuit can be more stable in AC and transient response. For example, wireless and batteryless electronic systems, in general, may be subject to less orderly power supply patterns. To guard band against disorderly power supply and start-up patterns, especially for instance in mission critical bioelectronics applications, the positive feedback loop associated with prior art FIG. 10 which uses a conventional bandgap's PTAT amplifier (that is vulnerable to transients) is eliminated in bandgap circuit of FIG. 7. This is done without denting bandgap's accuracy since the overall bandgap's operating current is compensated by topology with IDM802 and IDM824 tracking each other (also because of combining IBIAS generator of FIG. 8, the active MOS resistor of FIG. 9, and bandgap circuit of FIG. 7). Although other variations are possible depending on different performance trade-offs, note that for the embodiment of FIG. 7, PMOS transistors are used in all of bandgap's key signal paths (i.e., amplifiers, composite MOS resistor, etc.) which should enhance the topology for manufacturability, provide some immunity against SOC's substrate (digital) jitters, and be less (1/f) noisy. Note that in FIGS. 3, 7, 8, and 9 the scale factors ‘a’ through are the ratios of transistor's width over length (W/L or scale factors or aspect ratios) that may be set depending on such considerations as die size and various operating specifications, including but not limited to current consumption, temperature coefficients, and power supply range objectives. As such, for FIGS. 3, 7, 8, and 9 the scale factors ‘a’ through can be predetermined or programmed to be between approximately 0.1 to approximately 50. Similar to the bias current generators utilized in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, the embodiment in FIG. 7 also employs a bias current generator, which is depicted in FIG. 3.


The connections of the elements in the embodiment of FIG. 8 are described as follows: node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Node 2 is the negative supply voltage terminal or VSS (which can also be set as the zero voltage terminal or ground). Source and body of M802, M822, and M820 are connected to node 1. Source and body of M810, M812, M814, M816, and M818 are connected to node 2. Transistors M800 and M802 form the self cascode, where the diode connected M800 is cascoded with M802. Node 800 is connected to gate and drain f M800, gate of M802, and drain of M810. Node 802 is connected to source and body of M800, drain of M802, drain of M812, drain of M822, and source and body of M804. Note that the body terminal of M800 can be connected to either its source at node 802 or to node 1, depending on performance objectives and the process fabrication. Moreover, here the PTAT Voltage is generated by using two DC level shifters (diode connected VGS followers) with a build in offset voltage, which is formed by diode connected MOSFETs M804 and M806 combined with current sources supplied by M822, M814 and M216. Node 804 is connected to gate and drain of M804, drain of M814, and inverting input of amplifier A800. Node 806 is connected to the non-inverting input of A800, drain of M816, and gate and drain of M806. Node 808 is connected to the gates of M810, M812, M814, M816, and M818. Node 810 is connected to the drain of M818, and gate and drain of M820. Note that M820 and M822, and M810, M812, M814, M816 and M818 function as current mirrors, as well as VCCS whose gate voltage varies by the output of A800. The drain current or ID of M810 or that of M818 constitutes the bias current of the circuit or reference current, IBIAS.


The connections of the elements in FIG. 9 are described as follows: node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Node 2 is the negative supply voltage terminal or VSS (which can also be set as the zero voltage terminal or ground). Source and body of M824i are connected to node 1. Drain of M824b is connected to node 2. Node 826 is connected to drain of M824i, body and source of M824b, and the inverting input of A824. M824i functions as the current source whose current is mirrored from (VBISA) node 810 to establish the operating current for M824b. Node 824 is connected to gate of M824b and the output of A824. Node 822 is connected to non-inverting node of A824 and drain of M824r. Node 820 is connected to source ad body of M824r. Single, series or parallel combinations of M824r can be as the resistor cell that is used in the bandgap (e.g., R800 and R802 of FIG. 10).


The connections of the elements in FIG. 7 are described as follows: node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Node 2 is the negative supply voltage terminal or VSS (which can also be set as the zero voltage terminal or ground). Source and body of M836i, M834i, M832i, M830i, M828i, and M826i are connected to node 1. Node 2 is connected to drains of M834b, M832b, M830b, M828b, and M826b as well as collectors of Q806 and Q804. Node 3 is VMID, which can also be connected to the ground or zero potential, and is connected to the base of Q804 and Q806. Node 828 is connected to emitter of Q804, positive input of A836, and drain of M836. Node 830 is connected to emitter of Q806, positive input of A826, and drain of M826r. Node 832 is connected to gates of M826r and M826b and output of A826. Node 834 is connected to source and body of M826b, drain of M826i, and negative input of A826. Node 836 is connected to the source and body of M826r, positive input of A828, drain of M828r, and negative input of A836. Node 838 is connected to gates of M828r and M828b and output of A828. Node 840 is connected to source and body of M828b, drain of M828i, and negative input of A828. Node 842 is connected to the source and body of M828r, positive input of A830, drain of M830r. Node 844 is connected to gates of M830r and M830b and output of A830. Node 846 is connected to source and body of M830b, drain of M830i, and negative input of A830. Node 848 is connected to the source and body of M830r, positive input of A832, drain of M832r. Node 850 is connected to gates of M832r and M832b and output of A832. Node 852 is connected to source and body of M832b, drain of M832i, and negative input of A832. Node 854 is connected to the source and body of M832r, positive input of A834, drain of M834r. Node 856 is connected to gates of M834r and M834b and output of A834. Node 858 is connected to source and body of M834b, drain of M834b and negative input of A834. Node 860 is the VREF of VBG connected to body and source of M834r, and output of A836.


The connections of the elements in the prior art FIG. 10 are described as follows: node 1 is the positive supply voltage terminal or VDD. Node 0 is the ground or zero voltage terminal. Node 1 is connected to body and source of M800a and M802a as well as output of A802. Node 0 or ground is connected to base and collector of Q800 and Q802. Node 804a is connected to emitter of Q802 and one side of R800. Node 802a is connected to the other side of R800 and one side of R802 and the positive input of A802. Node 808a is the VREF or VBG output that is connected to the other side of R802 and the drain of M820a. Node 806a is connected to the gates of M802a and M800a and the output of A802. Node 800a is connected to emitter of Q800, drain of M800a, and negative input of A802.


As noted earlier, the proposed circuit belongs to the general category of bandgap voltage references in standard digital CMOS that operate in subthreshold (see FIG. 7). One part of the proposed bandgap is the IBIAS generation circuit that is shown in simplified FIG. 8 (which is the embodiment of the functional block diagram of bias current generation shown in FIG. 3, which is also a variation of the functional block diagrams of the bias current generation embodiments shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2).


In FIG. 8 there is the first voltage loop consisting of M802, M804, A800, and M806 produce a PTAT signal as a function of VT, which is forced upon the VDS of M802 by the operation of the loop. There is also a second voltage loop consisting of M800 and M802 where M800 operates in saturation and M802 operates in the triode region (i.e., that is acting as an active resistor of RM802=RBIAS for this current source). The active resistor, while functioning as the current source's resistor, contributes to a CTAT signal being mostly a function of μ. Application of PTAT signal via VT while interacting with CTAT signal via μ whose combination (using different MOSFET aspect ratios) can facilitate making a positive TC, or negative TC, as well as a stable one for some temperature compensation for the IBIAS. Note that for demonstrative clarity of the proceeding formulations, second order effects—including but not limited to—early voltage, body effect, subthreshold slope factor TC are ignored:

VGSM802−VGSM800=VDSM802;
RBIAS=RM802≈[μ.COX.(W/L)M802(VGSM802−VTH−VDSM802/2)]−1;
VGSM802≈[2IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M800]1/2+VTH;
VGSM806−VGSM804=[VT.ln(d×b)]=VDSM802;
VDSM802≈IBIAS(e+1)×RM802[VT.ln(c×b)];
μ.COX.(W/L)M202×[IBIAS/μ.COX.(W/L)M200]1/2≈IBIAS(e+1)×[VT.ln(c×b)]−1;
IBIAS≈f(S800,VT).


This IBIAS, mostly a function of S800 (which is formulaic representation consisting of MOSFET W/L ratios and MOSFET's device constants) as well as μ, and VT.


The composite active MOS resistor of FIG. 9 is formed via the loop composed of A824, M824b (saturation mode), and M824r (in linear mode). In FIG. 9, M824r replaces and performs the role of bandgap resistor, RBG in FIG. 10.


The equivalent of RBG of FIG. 10 is the composite active MOS resistor RM826r, which is utilized in the PTAT loop composed of Q806, Q804, and A836 shown in the bandgap circuit of FIG. 7. Ignoring non-idealities (e.g., VOFS) for now, the concurrent operation of the active MOS resistor composed of A826-M826r-M826b voltage loop (depicted in FIG. 7) which is utilized in the bandgap in combination with the Q806-Q804-A836 voltage loop roughly yields:

VDSM826r˜VT.ln(n1×g);
VGS826b−VGS826r˜VDS826r˜VT.ln(n1×g);
IDSM826r˜VT.ln(n1×g)/RM826r;
IDSM826i˜IDSM826b˜f(S.μ,VT).


As such, IDSM826r (and the composite MOS's resistance) is mostly a function of VT and μ and is independent of MOSFET's VTH. Here, the dependence of RBA's network (of active resistance and its operating current) on μ and VT and their approximate independence from VTH can help enhance manufacturability and enable performance optimization, including efficient trimming to attain higher accuracy in this bandgap. To simplify description of this circuit's operations and it benefits, the composite active MOS resistors are approximated as: RBG as a lump sum ‘resistor’ in series with a lump sum ‘voltage source’ (which encapsulates the offset mismatch due to VGS terms of MOSFETs as well as the amplifier in the composite active resistor circuit of FIG. 9). In such a model the ‘voltage source’ is an offset voltage (VOFSR) between the composite active MOS resistors in the bandgap PTAT loop. Note that the VOFSR the systematic offsets are cancelled out: R802/R800˜(RM828r+RM830r+RM832r+RM834r)/RM826r.


ΔVOFSR is configured as the random mismatch between VOFSM828r, VOFSM830r, VOFSM832r, VOFSM834r, VOFSM826r of each of the composite MOS resistors. Here ΔVOFSR should induce an additional offset error term (statistical contribution) to VBG output of roughly (G+1)1/2×ΔVOFSR where ‘G’ is set by the (number active MOS resistor in series in the feedback loop of the bandgap circuit) ratio of string of composite active MOS resistors in the PTAT loop to satisfy the functional equivalent R802/R800 ratio (in FIG. 10) requirement for a near zero TC VBG. Given that MOSFETs operate in subthreshold, VTH mismatches dominate the differential pairs (i.e., input amplifiers, etc.) offset terms, and ΔVOFSR˜f(VT) that tracks the PTAT term in VBG and can be roughly trimmed out for more precision.


To guard band for start-up and transient response A836's output does not drive both the operating currents that feed Q804 and Q806 in order to eliminate the positive feedback in the PTAT loop. But accuracy of the VBG is not compromise. This is because the proposed embodiment of FIG. 7 enables IBIAS, which feeds Q804 and the strings of composite MOS resistors with the bandgap's PTAT loop that operate in a substantially (formulaically) similar manner, tracking each other over fabrication process, and temperature variations. Moreover, the same single pole CMOS amplifier is utilized throughout the bandgap which offers better transient, AC, and PSRR performance. Excluding the impact of random mismatch between amplifier offsets, the systematic higher VOFSA, which is the offset voltage associated with single pole amplifiers (A836), is roughly canceled out, and hence approximately:

VBG˜VEB+(G+1)[VT.ln(n1×g)+VOFSA]+(G+1)1/2.ΔVOFSR.


Although other variations of this topology are possible, the embodiment in FIG. 7 utilizes (but for substrate vertical PNPs in the PTAT section of the bandgap) PMOSFETs in the key signal paths (i.e., MOS resistors, bandgap amplifier, composite resistor amplifier, bias circuit MOS resistors and amplifier) that dictate bandgaps DC, AC, and transient performance. This use should further enhance manufacturability since most of the bandgap's performance would depend on fewer device parameters. This move should also improve the AC response of the bandgap, better 1/f noise performance, as well as provide some immunity against transient substrate noise when the bandgap is in a noisy SOC.


In summary the benefits of the embodiment in FIG. 7 are as follows. First, this is a voltage reference is based in standard digital CMOS fabrication. References are considered a key and critical electronics functions needed around actuators, sensors, and other access points circuits (for energy harvesting and wireless and batteryless Internet of things applications) must be small, low cost, and manufacturable to make it to high volume. As such, main stream digital CMOS processes can produce the smallest and be the lowest cost manufacturing platforms, assuming that circuit solutions here neither require any additional steps (i.e., no separate n-wells and p-wells or depletion mode MOSFETs) nor impose any non-standard device configuration (i.e., no lateral PNP, DMOST, or MOS body). Second, this is an ultra low power bandgap reference that could only require for example under approximately 250 nano ampere of current. Energy harvesting, wearable and next generation implantable bio-medical electronics are but a few examples of emerging wire-less-battery-less (WLBL) Internet of Things (IoT) applications with large total available market (TAM) potentials that require such ultra-low power and very small form-factor solutions. A voltage or current reference is a fundamental building block in systems, including in WLBL electronics that for example have to monitor, measure report on referenced levels of carbon monoxide, toxicity, acidity, sugar or salt levels, blood pressure, temperature, or a heart pulse, just to name a few.


As noted above, for WLBL electronics market potential to materialize, it is imperative that circuits ought to operate with ultra low currents. Hence the use of passive resistors are nonviable for several reasons: higher resistance obviously means prohibitively large die area (e.g., VPTAT of 700 mV at 10 nA requires 70MΩ poly resistor). Mainstream digital CMOS foundries generally do not guarantee resistance specifications, including for higher Ω/square poly resistors. Compared to lower Ω/square layer 1 poly resistors, the layer 2 higher Ω/square ones typically exhibit higher mismatch, worst non-linearity, and inferior TCs, in part because of less fabrication process control for the less critical process layers (i.e., ploy 2 and higher layers, especially highly doped ones). High Ω/square diffusion resistors are also impractical here due to unfavorable leakage, VC, and TC characteristics. Therefore, predominant research on ultra low power configurations, based on digital standard CMOS, has produced (non-conventional) non-bandgap topologies to generate voltage references, that are generally not as rugged as bandgaps.


In order to guard band for long-term production continuity, utilizing the kind of circuit topologies that can be ported to multiple process nodes with minimal challenge are obviously favored. In this regards, conventional bandgap topologies could generally be viewed on a more positive light because of manufacturing's familiarity and experience with the more predictable and controllable BJT parameters such as VBE and VT that constitute VBG. This embodiment retains the benefit of the class of bandgap voltage references to which it belongs.


This embodiment provides a composite active CMOS resistor (FIG. 9) that is small in size, consumes ultra low power (eliminates the need for passive resistors), and works in combination with the IBIAS generator (FIG. 8 which is the embodiment of the functional block diagram of FIG. 3), and in combination with bandgap circuit (FIG. 7) in such a way that the active MOS resistors' and IBIAS generator's and bandgap's circuits operating conditions track each other. As such more stable and reliable performance is achievable over process, temperature, and power supply variations. Given that the circuit current consumption is approximately in depended of MOSFET's VTH, mainly a function of VT and μ, which are more tightly controllable, hence manufacturability and performance specification can be improved. Combination of the features of IBIAS circuit and active MOS circuit enables, segregating the positive and negative feedback loops of the bandgap circuit, without materially denting its DC performance. Instead, the AC and transient performance of this circuit is improved. For example, batteryless energy harvesting or IoT applications could receive their power from single type (e.g., single or series of solar diodes) or multiple energy harvester types (e.g., solar diodes in the light, and magnetic harvesters in the dark in conjunction with super capacitors to store voltage). The VDD power-on and power-off patterns may be jittery and not follow a predictable or orderly pattern, and hence the AC and transient response of the references are as critical as their DC accuracy. Feeding the output of PTAT loop amplifier via MOSFETs back to its positive and negative inputs are avoided in this topology because they can pose start-up and transient risks (inherent in typical bandgap reference topologies). Another benefit of the FIG. 7 embodiment is that VSS (negative power supply) and the ground potential (GND) may be the same of separated, providing flexibility to system embodiments. Also note that a challenge with ultra low current and MOSFETs is high noise. In FIG. 7, the bandgap reference's noise can be materially band pass filtered out by placing a capacitor in the end amplifier (A834 that is used to form the composite active resistor) high impedance node of output amplifier but in accordance with consideration for power up and down settling time requirements. Additionally, PMOSFETs are used in the composite active resistors as well as in the output amplifier which should reduce the contribution of 1/f noise to the VBG output.


In summary, disclosed above are bias current topologies with embodiments in current source, current reference, (pseudo bandgap) voltage reference, and bandgap voltage reference that operate at ultra low currents and low power supply voltages which may use main stream standard digital Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) processes. The bias current topology uses chiefly a self cascode (SC) and PTAT offset generation with loop signal amplification to produce a bias current. The bias current circuit, senses and forces the PTAT signal (mostly as a function thermal voltage VT) at the gates of its loop amplification circuit, which in combination with a CTAT signal (mostly as a function of mobility of MOSFETS, μ) provides the flexibility of setting a negative, positive, or stable temperature coefficient (TC) bias current generator circuit, depending on an application's need. This circuit retains the benefits of the class of bias current circuits, whose current variations are approximately independent of threshold voltage (VTH) and mostly a function μ. Hence die yields and performance over process and temperature spans are improved. Embodiments of the bias current topology (FIG. 1) in a current source (FIG. 4) is provided which offers wider temperature span, in part, due to lower leakage associated with the bias current topology. Also bias current topology (FIG. 1) is utilized in the embodiment of a current references (FIG. 5) that combines multiple bias current source, with the capability of setting the current's TC and amplitude approximately independently from one another. This trait enables greater flexibility and making a higher performance and more stable current reference over process, temperature, and power supply variations. Moreover, the bias current topology when combined with series of SCs (FIG. 6) that make a summation of pseudo VT's that can be added to a VBE of a parasitic BJT available in digital CMOS, to generate a pseudo bandgap voltage. Lastly, the bias current topology when combined with a composite active MOS resistor enables making a conventional bandgap reference. A PTAT voltage is applied across the active MOS resistor, which is gained up using the strong of the same active MOS resistor to generate the required VPTAT that is added to VBE of parasitic BJT in digital CMOS to generate the VBG. The bias generation, active MOS resistor, and bandgap circuits use substantially similar functionality, which enables their operating conditions to track and hence enhancing their performance of the bandgap over process, temperature, and power supply variations. Moreover, the topology not only delivers ultra low power but also one whose current consumption is approximately independent of VTH, which can improve performance and die yield. All such embodiments enable making ultra low power, low cost (base on standard digital CMOS fabrication that are portable across multiple fabrications), with optimized yields (due in part to independence from VTH).


A number of embodiments are described in the present application, and are presented for illustrative purposes only. The described embodiments are not, and are not intended to be, limiting in any sense. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the disclosed embodiment(s) may be practiced with various modifications and alterations, such as structural, logical, software, and electrical modifications. Although particular features of the disclosed invention(s) may be described with reference to one or more particular embodiments and/or drawings, it should be understood that such features are not limited to usage in the one or more particular embodiments or drawings with reference to which they are described, unless expressly specified otherwise.


Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. Therefore, any given numerical range shall include whole and fractions of numbers within the range. For example, the range “1 to 10” shall be interpreted to specifically include whole numbers between 1 and (e.g., 1, 2, 3, . . . 9) and non-whole numbers (e.g., 1.1, 1.2, . . . 1.9).


The present disclosure is not a literal description of all embodiments of the invention(s). Also, the present disclosure is not a listing of features of the invention(s) which must be present in all embodiments. A description of an embodiment with several components or features does not imply that all or even any of such components/features are required. On the contrary, a variety of optional components are described to illustrate the wide variety of possible embodiments of the present invention(s).


Although process (or method) steps may be described or claimed in a particular sequential order, such processes may be configured to work in different orders. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be explicitly described or claimed does not necessarily indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order. The steps of processes described herein may be performed in any order possible. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously despite being described or implied as occurring non-simultaneously (e.g., because one step is described after the other step). Moreover, the illustration of a process by its depiction in a drawing does not imply that the illustrated process is exclusive of other variations and modifications thereto, does not imply that the illustrated process or any of its steps are necessary to the invention(s), and does not imply that the illustrated process is preferred. Although a process may be described as including a plurality of steps, that does not imply that all or any of the steps are preferred, essential or required. Various other embodiments within the scope of the described invention(s) include other processes that omit some or all of the described steps.


Although a product or system may be described as including a plurality of components, aspects, steps, qualities, characteristics and/or features, that does not indicate that any or all of the plurality are preferred, essential or required. Various other embodiments within the scope of the described invention(s) include other products that omit some or all of the described plurality.

Claims
  • 1. A method of generating a reference current comprising: a first p-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (PMOSFET), operating in the triode region, to make a first PMOSFET resistor;a second PMOSFET, operating in the triode region, to make a second PMOSFET resistor;the first PMOSFET resistor utilized to generate a first bias current;the second PMOSFET utilized to generate a second bias current;wherein the first bias current and the second bias current have the same polarity of temperature coefficient (TC) and different TC slopes; andwherein the first and second bias currents are scaled and subtracted from one another to yield stable TC reference current over an objective temperature range.
  • 2. A method of generating a reference current comprising: a first N-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (NMOSFET), operating in the triode region, to make a first NMOSFET resistor;a second NMOSFET, operating in the triode region, to make a second NMOSFET resistor;the first NMOSFET resistor utilized to generate first bias current;the second NMOSFET utilized to generate second bias current;wherein first bias current and second bias current have the same polarity of temperature coefficient (TC) and different TC slopes; andwherein the first and second bias currents are scaled and subtracted from one another to yield stable TC reference current over an objective temperature range.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/795,862, filed on Jul. 9, 2015; which claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/022,820, filed Jul. 10, 2014 and entitled “An Ultra Low Power CMOS Current Source”; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/060,193 filed Oct. 6, 2014 and entitled “A Very Low Power Resistorless CMOS Bandgap Voltage Reference”; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/126,588 filed Feb. 28, 2015 and entitled “A Very Low Power and Stable Current Reference”; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/129,002 filed Mar. 5, 2015 and entitled “A CMOS Bandgap Reference With Improved PSRR and Voltage Coefficient”. Each of the above applications are herein specifically incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (41)
Number Name Date Kind
4677369 Bowers et al. Jun 1987 A
5283579 Tasdighi et al. Feb 1994 A
5294927 Levinson et al. Mar 1994 A
5640084 Tero et al. Jun 1997 A
5668710 Caliboso et al. Sep 1997 A
5734260 Tasdighi et al. Mar 1998 A
5734292 Tasdighi et al. Mar 1998 A
5814995 Tasdighi Sep 1998 A
5923208 Tasdighi et al. Jul 1999 A
6005374 Tasdighi Dec 1999 A
6054823 Collings et al. Apr 2000 A
6122284 Tasdighi et al. Sep 2000 A
6281743 Doyle Aug 2001 B1
6366071 Yu Apr 2002 B1
6489831 Matranga Dec 2002 B1
6657480 Ochi Dec 2003 B2
6885178 Marinca Apr 2005 B2
7211993 Marinca May 2007 B2
7612606 Marinca Nov 2009 B2
7994848 Kothandaraman Aug 2011 B2
9519304 Far Dec 2016 B1
20020093325 Ju Jul 2002 A1
20040124822 Marinca Jul 2004 A1
20050264345 Ker Dec 2005 A1
20050285666 Garlapati Dec 2005 A1
20070052473 McLeod Mar 2007 A1
20070076483 Colman Apr 2007 A1
20070132506 Fujisawa Jun 2007 A1
20080018316 Chang Jan 2008 A1
20080224682 Haiplik Sep 2008 A1
20080278137 Harvey Nov 2008 A1
20090243711 Marinca Oct 2009 A1
20100164467 Jo Jul 2010 A1
20100225384 Hirose Sep 2010 A1
20100237926 Kikuta Sep 2010 A1
20110025666 Baek Feb 2011 A1
20110068767 Carper Mar 2011 A1
20110102049 Conte May 2011 A1
20120176186 Chen Jul 2012 A1
20120323508 Vilas Boas Dec 2012 A1
20150160680 Marinca Jun 2015 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (31)
Entry
Sansen, Wily M., “A CMOS Temperature-Compensated Current Reference”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jun. 1988, p. 821, vol. 23.
De LaPlaza,Alejandro, “NanoampereSupplyIndependentLow VoltageCurrentReference”,FaibleTensionFaibleCommunication (FTFC), 2011.
Fayomi, Christian, “Sub 1 V CMOS bandgap reference design techniques: a survey”, Analog Integr Circ Sig Process, 2010.
Vittoz,Eric,“A Low-Voltage CMOS Bandgap Reference”,IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,Jun. 1979,vol. SC-14,No. 3.
Galeano,Edgar,“A Very Low Power Area Efficient CMOS Only Bandgap Reference”.Integrated Circuits and System Design (SBCCI), 2012.
Osaki,Yujietal.,“A 95-nA,523 pp,/C,0.6-uW CMOS Current Refence Circuit with Subthreshold MOS Resistor Ladder”, ASPDAC 1,2011,p. 113.
Ueno,Kenetal.,“A1-uW600-ppm/C Current Reference Circuit Consisting of Subthreshold CMOS Circuits”,IEEETransaction On Circuits, 2010.
De Vita,A109NW, 44ppm/C CMOS Current Reference with Low Sensitivity to Process Variations. Circuits and Systems, 2007, p. 3804.
Ledesma,Francisco,Comparison of New and Conventional Low Voltage Current Mirrors, Circuits and Systems, 2002, p. 49-52, vol. 2.
Hirose,Tetsuya et al.,“A Nano-Ampere Current Reference Circuit and its Temperature Dependence . . . ”, Proceedings of the ESSCIRC, 2010, pp. 114.
Camacho-Galeano,Edgar etal.,“A2-nW1.1-VSelf-Biased Current Reference in CMOSTechnology”,Feb. 2005, IEEE Transactions On Circuits and Sys, vol. 52, p. 61.
Camacho-Galeano,Edgaretal.,“Temperature Performance of Sub-1V Ultra-Low Power Current Sources”, 2008, Circuits and Systems, p. 2230.
Osaki etal.,“Nano-Ampere CMOS Current Reference with Little Temperature Dependence Using Small Offset Voltage”.Proceedings of 53rd IEEE Intl MWSCAS, 2010, p. 668.
Gallegos,Samuel,“A 128.7nW Neural Amplifier and Gm-C Filter fo EEG, Using gm/ID Methodology . . . ”, Circiuts and Systems, 2014,p. 876.
Cordova, David, “A Low-Voltage Current Reference with High ImmunitytoEMI”.Intregrated Circuits and Systems Design,Sep. 2014,p. 1-6.
Annema,Anne-Johan,“Low-Power Bandgap References Featuring DTMOST's”,IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,Jul. 1999,p. 949.
Buck,Arneetal.,“ACMOS Bandgap Reference without Resistors”. Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2000, p. 442-443.
Chouhan,Shailesh,“A Modified CMOS Nano-Power Resistorless Current Reference Circuit”. Microelectronics and Electronics,Jun. 2014.
Guiges, Fabrice, “Sub-1V Oguey's Current Reference Without Resistance”.Circuits and Systems, 2006,p. 288-291.
Giustolis, G., “A Low-Power Voltage Reference Based on Subthreshold MOSFETs”,IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,2003,p. 151.
Hirose, Tetsuya et al.,“ACMOS Bandgap and Sub-Bandgap Voltage Reference Circuits for Nanowatt Power LSIs”,IEEE Asian Solid-State 2010.
Kussener,F.“50nA,1V Nanowatt Resistor-Free Compact CMOS Current References”, Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2010, pp. 1212-1215.
Oguey, Henri, “CMOS Current References Without Resistance”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jul. 1997, p. 1132, vol. 32.
Serra-Graells, Francisco, “Sub-1-V CMOS Proportional-to-Absolute Temperature References”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2003, p. 84.
Ueno, Ken et al., “A 300nW. 15 ppm/C, 20 ppm/V CMOS Voltage Reference Circuit Consisting of Subthreshold MOSFETs”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, p. 2047.
VanPetegham, Peter, “On a New CMOS Resistor Implementation for Linear Analog IC Signal Processing Applications”, IEEE, 1998.
Vittoz, Eric et al., “CMOS Analog Integrated Circuits Based on Weak Inversion Operation”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1977, p. 224.
Wilson, G., Novel Voltage-Controlled Grounded Resistor. Electronic Letters, 1989, pp. 1725-1726.
Huang, Zhangcai et al., “A CMOS Sub-1-V NanoPower Current and Voltage Reference with Leakage Compensation”. Circuits and Systems, 2010.
Colombo, Dalton, “A CMOS 25.3 ppm/C Bandgap Voltage Reference using Self-Cascode Composite Transistor”. Circuits and Systems, 2012, p. 1.
Colombo, Dalton. “A CMOS 25.3 ppm/C Bandgap Voltage Reference Using Self-Cascade Composite Transistor”, Circuits and Systems, 2012.
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
62022820 Jul 2014 US
62060193 Oct 2014 US
62129002 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14795862 Jul 2015 US
Child 15375170 US